Ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide / TiO2 nanocomposite for conversion of CO2 to CH4
09545625 ยท 2017-01-17
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J31/0295
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02P20/584
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B01J31/0284
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J21/063
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2235/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/33
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02P20/52
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B01J35/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2235/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J38/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C07C2521/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J35/399
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J31/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J35/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J21/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
An ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide (IL-RGO)/TiO.sub.2 nanocomposite was synthesized and used to reduce CO.sub.2 to a hydrocarbon in the presence of H.sub.2O vapor.
Claims
1. A photocatalytic nanocomposite comprising: a reduced graphite oxide; a photocatalytic metal oxide in nanoparticle form; and an ionic moiety attached to the reduced graphite oxide; wherein the photocatalytic metal oxide in nanoparticle form is dispersed in the reduced graphite oxide.
2. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 1, wherein the ionic moiety comprises R.sub.1R.sub.2R.sub.3 and wherein R.sub.1 is NH, R.sub.2 is alkylene, and R.sub.3 is a cationic group.
3. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 2, wherein R.sub.2 is C.sub.1 to C.sub.5 alkylene, and R.sub.3 is an imidazole ring protonated or substituted at a nitrogen atom.
4. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 3, wherein R.sub.2 is propylene, and R.sub.3 is an alkyl-substituted imidazole ring.
5. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 1, wherein the reduced graphite oxide is an ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide formed by attaching a NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid to the reduced graphite oxide.
6. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 1, wherein the photocatalytic metal oxide is TiO.sub.2.
7. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 6, wherein the TiO.sub.2 is in the form of rutile and anatase.
8. The photocatalytic nanocomposite of claim 1, wherein the reduced graphite oxide is a powder.
9. A method of making a photocatalytic nanocomposite comprising: oxidizing graphite to form a reduced graphite oxide; attaching an ionic moiety to the reduced graphite oxide; and mixing the reduced graphite oxide with a photocatalytic metal oxide in nanoparticle form to form the photocatalytic nanocomposite.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of functionalizing the reduced graphite oxide with a NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid to form an ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide before the step of mixing.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid is an imidazole.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid is a 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquid.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein the NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid is a 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride.
14. A method of CO.sub.2 photoreduction comprising: contacting reactants of CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O over a photocatalytic nanocomposite according to claim 1; reacting the CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O over the photocatalytic nanocomposite to produce products including CH.sub.4.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the products are substantially free of CO gas.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein the CH.sub.4 has a production rate in excess of 10 mol/g catalyst-hr.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein the CH.sub.4 has a production rate in excess of 250 mol/g catalyst-hr.
18. The method of claim 9, wherein the photocatalytic metal oxide is TiO.sub.2.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(11) Carbonaceous nanomaterials have unique properties and the potential to control the structural and electrical properties of photocatalysts. The presence of a carbon material such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) or graphene might potentially reduce electron and hole recombination in the photocatalyst via transport of the electrons to the conductive carbon material. By improving the separation of the charges, recombination may be avoided thereby enhancing the photoconversion efficiency of TiO.sub.2. Indeed, to date some nanocarbon (for example, CNTs or graphene)/TiO.sub.2 composites have shown improved photocatalytic activity over TiO.sub.2 in various applications (for example, the photooxidation of environmental pollutants).
(12) As compared to cylindrical CNTs, planar graphene may have a smaller electron transfer barrier. As a result, the electron-hole recombination may be less. Graphene is an atomic sheet of sp.sup.2-bonded carbon atoms that are arranged into a honeycomb structure. The high surface area of graphene may increase the adsorption of reactants and provide more active sites. Nearly 90% enhancement in photocurrent was seen for reduced graphene oxide described below, which serves as an electron collector and transporter in the graphene-TiO.sub.2 composite. A significant enhancement in the reaction rate for the degradation of methylene blue was observed using a P25 (Degussa)-graphene composite material in contrast with a bare P25 (Degussa) or a P25 (Degussa)-CNT material with the same carbon content. In addition, a decrease in charge transfer resistance of graphene/P25 (Degussa) sample was observed versus P25 (Degussa) alone.
(13) Presently, there are only a few examples regarding the use of TiO.sub.2 nanocarbon materials for the conversion of carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) and H.sub.2O vapor to fuels. Xia et al. synthesized multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) supported TIO.sub.2 and investigated its photocatalytic activity in the reduction of CO.sub.2 with H.sub.2O (Xia, X. H.; Jia, Z. H.; Yu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ma, L. L., Preparation of multi-walled carbon nanotube supported TiO.sub.2 and its photocatalytic activity in the reduction of CO.sub.2 with H.sub.2O. Carbon 2007, 45, 717-721.). Sol-gel and hydrothermal methods were used to synthesize the MWCNT/TiO.sub.2 composite. Both syntheses methods led to the formation of C.sub.2H.sub.5OH, HCOOH and CH.sub.4. The total carbonaceous yields of the products were higher than the reported yields in the literature, which focused on using other materials to modify TiO.sub.2 rather than carbon (i.e., Cu doping, CuFe co-doping TiO.sub.2/porous silica, TiO.sub.2 nanotube). This result suggests that carbon-containing TiO.sub.2 materials may be better than other materials in terms of enhancing CO.sub.2 photoconversion efficiency.
(14) It appears there has been only one instance in which an externally mixed graphene/TiO.sub.2 material was applied to CO.sub.2 photoreduction. Liang, Y. T.; Vijayan, B. K.; Gray, K. A.; Hersam, M. C., Minimizing Graphene Defects Enhances Titania Nanocomposite-Based Photocatalytic Reduction of CO.sub.2 for Improved Solar Fuel Production. Nano Letters 2011, 11, 2865-2870. A solvent exfoliated graphene/P25 thin film and a thermally reduced graphite oxide/P25 thin film were used as the photocatalysts, and CH.sub.4 was the major product identified. The CH.sub.4 production rates of exfoliated graphene/P25 thin film and a thermally reduced graphite oxide/P25 thin film were 8.1 mol/m.sup.2-hr and 1.8 mol/m.sup.2-hr, respectively. The results indicate that TiO.sub.2/graphene may be selective towards CH.sub.4 production but provided low reaction rates.
(15) In this disclosure, a novel synthesis method was used to create an improved graphene type carbon/TiO.sub.2 composite material for CO.sub.2 photoreduction, and the product of the CO.sub.2 photocatalytic reaction in the presence of water vapor was studied. Instead of adding TiO.sub.2 and the graphene type material separately, a nanocomposite material was formed. Graphene is a single atomic layer of sp.sup.2 carbon structure. In the disclosed method and resulting structure, carbon layers were separated by oxidizing natural graphite to form graphite oxide and subsequently functionalizing graphite oxide with a NH.sub.2-terminated ionic liquid. At the same time graphite oxide was reacted to form reduced graphite oxide (RGO) in a basic reaction environment. The high solubility of the ionic liquid in water makes it possible for an ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide (IL-RGO) to mix well with TiO.sub.2 nanoparticles in water. Moreover, the ionic liquid, which is functionalized to the RGO surface, may introduce surface charge to the RGO. The charge repulsion may help to further separate the graphite layers. The high surface area of the layer-separated graphite material may enhance the adsorption of the reactants, i.e. CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O vapor, thus creating more reactive sites.
(16) In addition, NH.sub.2-ionic liquid cations may significantly enhance the ability to attract CO.sub.2 via amine group-CO.sub.2 interactions. Therefore, the amine-functionalized ionic liquid may also enhance the adsorption of CO.sub.2. Previous experimental results indicate that the C.sub.4mimCl ionic liquid does not interact with alkanes. CH.sub.4 is a potential product of CO.sub.2 photoreduction using TiO.sub.2 or modified TiO.sub.2 catalyst. Therefore, the ionic liquid may be able to selectively adsorb the reactant, CO.sub.2, but quickly dissociate the potential product, CH.sub.4, thus promoting the photoreduction of CO.sub.2.
(17) The IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 nanocomposite was applied to reduce CO.sub.2 in the presence of H.sub.2O vapor. The products of CO.sub.2 photoreduction over the IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 was compared with the product formation data that were reported in the literature using pristine TiO.sub.2 (P25) and other modified TiO.sub.2 in order to provide an initial examination of the selectivity towards different products.
(18) In the examples provided below, the new method was used to synthesize a carbon/semiconductor composite material via attaching ionic liquid to graphite oxide surface to obtain the ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphite oxide (IL-RGO), and mixing it with TiO.sub.2 nanoparticles in solution. The successful synthesis of this material was confirmed by Raman spectra, XRD, XPS and SEM. Comparing RGO without functionalized ionic liquid, the IL-RGO layers were separated and IL-RGO flakes can be clearly seen in the SEM images. In addition, the SEM images showed that TiO.sub.2 nanoparticles are dispersed with IL-RGO flakes. The photoreduction of CO.sub.2 over IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 in the presence of H.sub.2O vapor was investigated using Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS). CH.sub.4 was formed after just 40 seconds of UV-Vis irradiation over the catalyst of IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2. The IR features of CH.sub.4 increased as the irradiation time increased. However, no product was found for the photoreduction of commercial P25 under the same experimental conditions. Therefore, the presence of IL-RGO significantly enhances the photocatalytic activity of P25 due to the enhanced electron-hole separation. In addition, CH.sub.4 was found to be the only product for IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2.
(19) The regeneration and reuse of IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 catalyst for CO.sub.2 photoreduction was also investigated. The regenerated catalyst can produce almost identical amount of CH.sub.4 at the same irradiation times. A CH.sub.4 production rate of 279 mol/g catalyst-hr over a 55 minute period was calculated.
(20) The following examples are presented for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.
EXAMPLES
Synthesis of the 1 L-RGO/TiO2 Composite
(21) Synthesis of the ionic liquid reduced graphite oxide/TiO.sub.2 (IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2) composite involved three basic steps: synthesis of graphite oxide, functionalization and reduction of the graphite oxide in order to make the material more conductive, and addition of the TiO.sub.2 to allow for photoactivity.
Synthesis of Graphite Oxide
(22) Graphite Oxide (GO) was synthesized from natural graphite powder (325 mesh, Alfa Aesar) by the method of Hummers and Offeman (Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E., Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1958, 80, 1339-1339). Prior to synthesis using Hummers and Offeman's method, the graphite powder was pre-oxidized. Otherwise, incompletely oxidized graphene-core/GO-shell particles were observed in the final product. The pre-oxidation procedure followed the method of Kovtyukhova et al. (Kovtyukhova, N. I.; Ollivier, P. J.; Martin, B. R.; Mallouk, T. E.; Chizhik, S. A.; Buzaneva, E. V.; Gorchinskiy, A. D., Layer-by-layer assembly of ultrathin composite films from micron-sized graphite oxide sheets and polycations. Chemistry of Materials 1999, 11, 771-778.) Briefly, the pre-oxidation process used concentrated H.sub.2SO.sub.4, K.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.8 and P.sub.2O.sub.5 to oxidize the graphite powder. The resultant product was subsequently thermally isolated and allowed to cool to room temperature. After cooling, the product was diluted and washed with distilled water until the water's pH became neutral. The product was dried in air at ambient temperature overnight and subjected to oxidation by Hummers and Offeman's method. The pre-oxidized graphite powder was further oxidized using 0 C. concentrated H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and KMnO.sub.4. The reaction was terminated by the addition of a large amount of distilled water and 30% H.sub.2O.sub.2 solution. The mixture was centrifuged with 1:10 HCl solution to remove metal ions. Also, additional distilled water washing was done to the mixture until a neutral pH was achieved. The mixture was dark brown in color. The GO was added to distilled water and sonicated for 15 minutes to separate the GO layers. Finally, the GO sample was obtained by centrifugation of the GO solution at 5000 rpm for 30 minutes.
(23) It is observed that this oxidation step may help to prevent the graphite from aggregating during mixing, as might occur when using natural graphite flakes. This is evidenced by SEM images in the results below in which the flakes remain separated.
Ionic Liquid Functionalized Reduced Graphite Oxide (IL-RGO)
(24) The overall reaction for the synthesis of IL-RGO is presented in
(25) First, 3-chloropropylamine hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich, 98%) and 1-methylimidazole (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) were added to ethanol (Sigma Aldrich, 99.5%). The mixture was then refluxed under nitrogen for 24 hours. The resulting turbid mixture was purified by re-crystallization from ethanol and ethyl acetate as anti-solvent. Finally, the resulting ionic liquid was dried under N.sub.2 at 60 C. overnight.
(26) The C.sub.4mimCl functionalized RGO synthesis is based on an epoxide ring-opening reaction between GO and NH.sub.2C.sub.4mimCl. NH.sub.2C.sub.4mimCl was added into a GO dispersed solution. The salt effect of the GO sheet occurred due to the presence of the ionic liquid. The epoxide ring-opening reaction can be catalyzed by a base. Therefore, KOH was added into the turbid mixture solution. The solution was subjected to ultrasonication for 30 minutes. Lastly, the homogeneous solution was vigorously stirred at 80 C. for 24 hours. The resulting solution was washed using ethanol and distilled water several times until the pH was neutral. The resulting solution was subjected to the IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 nanocomposite material synthesis process. The IL-RGO solution was dried at room temperature for IL-RGO material characterization. For comparison, RGO was synthesized using the same procedure, but without adding the NH.sub.2C.sub.4mimCl.
IL-RGO/TiO2 Nanocomposite Synthesis
(27) TiO.sub.2 nanoparticles (Evonik P25) were mixed with distilled water and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (C.sub.4mimBF.sub.4, Sigma Aldrich, 98%) (H.sub.2O:C.sub.4mimBF.sub.4=9:1 by volume) to make a TiO.sub.2 suspension. Before making the IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 composite, the IL-RGO solution was ultrasonicated for 30 minutes and stirred for 1 hour. Later, the IL-RGO solution was added to the TiO.sub.2 suspension and vigorously stirred for one hour. The mass percentage of IL-RGO was 3.5% of the composite material. The IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 mixture was washed until the pH became neutral. Then the mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 minutes and dried at 80 C. overnight. Eventually, the sample was ground to powder for use in the CO.sub.2 conversion experiments. For comparison, the RGO/TiO.sub.2 was synthesized using the same procedure.
Material Characterization
(28) Raman spectra of GO and IL-RGO were collected using a custom built Raman spectrometer in a 180 geometry. The sample was excited using a 100 mW compass 532 nm laser. The data were collected using an Acton 300i spectrograph and a back thinned Princeton Instruments liquid nitrogen cooled CCD detector. The spectral resolution was 3.5 cm.sup.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) data were collected with a high resolution X-ray diffractometer (PANALYTICAL X'PERT PRO) using Cu-K radiations and an X'celerator detector. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using an XL30 ESEM-FEG. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a VG ESCALAB 220i-XL aluminum-K (1486.6 eV) X-ray source.
(29) The Raman spectra of GO and IL-RGO are shown in
(30) X-ray spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the chemical composition of the material. The XPS spectra are presented in
(31) The atomic concentration ratio of carbon to oxygen (C/O) determined using the XPS data of GO was 0.8, while the C/O ratio for IL-RGO determined using the XPS data was 1.4. The atomic concentration of the CN peak shown in
(32) High resolution XPS spectra of C1s in GO and IL-RGO are shown in
(33) Turning now to
(34) The scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 and RGO/TiO.sub.2 are shown in
Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 Over IL-RGO/TiO2 and Bare P25 with H2O Vapor
(35) The experiments on the photoreduction of CO.sub.2 were carried out using a Nicolet 6700 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer equipped with a Praying Mantis diffuse reflectance accessory (Harrick Sci. Corp., Model DRP-M-07) and a 316 stainless steel high temperature reaction chamber (Harrick Sci. Corp., Model HVC-DRP-4), a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector and a KBr beam splitter. The chamber dome has two KBr windows and a quartz window. The quartz window was used for visual observation while the KBr windows were used to permit entry and exit of the infrared beam.
(36) The IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 or pristine Degussa P25 powders were placed in the sample compartment of the reaction chamber, and the dome was mounted and sealed with an O-ring. The reaction chamber has an inlet for introducing gas to the sample and an outlet for gas exhaust. The chamber was purged with N.sub.2 before introducing the CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O vapor reactant gases. The H.sub.2O vapor was obtained by flowing N.sub.2 through an impinger containing distilled water. CO.sub.2 mixed with humidified N.sub.2 was introduced to the reaction chamber. Mass flow controllers (Omega Engineering, Inc.) were used to control the flow of CO.sub.2 and N.sub.2. The inlet mixing ratio of CO.sub.2 is 10% by volume. An IR spectrum was obtained after the CO.sub.2/humidified N.sub.2 mixture flowed over the photocatalyst, in order to check that CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O vapor were absorbed to the surface of the catalyst. The inlet and outlet of the chamber were sealed, and subsequent spectra were taken in a batch mode of operation.
(37) A series of background experiments were conducted in order to characterize the system and to ensure the absence of product formation, even in the presence of the catalytic surface. The sample with CO.sub.2 and humidified N.sub.2 was kept in the dark for 30 minutes. IR spectra were obtained during the 30 minutes dark period to examine whether products formed in the absence of light. In addition, a background experiment with the catalyst and humidified N.sub.2 but without CO.sub.2 was performed under UV-Visible light irradiation in order to determine whether there was product formation in the absence of CO.sub.2. After performing the background experiments, the catalyst (IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 or P25) was placed in the chamber with CO.sub.2 and humidified N.sub.2. UV-Visible light, produced from a deuterium-halogen light source (Ocean Optics DH-2000-BAL, wavelength=210-1500 nm), was used to activate the catalyst. An optical fiber cable was used to introduce the light to the sample surface through the quartz window of the chamber. Several IR spectra at different irradiation times were acquired over a total irradiation time of 60 minutes. Each spectrum was acquired using 4 cm.sup.1 resolution and 32 scans.
(38) To attempt to quantify the amount of product formed, standard samples of product (diluted by N.sub.2) were admitted to the DRIFTS reaction cell to generate a calibration curve. The gas was allowed to equilibrate with the surface, a spectrum was obtained, and the surface was subsequently purged with N.sub.2 in between each admission of product. Spectra were acquired during the N.sub.2 purge to ensure that the product was completely desorbed from the surface and removed from the chamber. A surface adsorbed product calibration curve was generated and used to attempt to quantify the amount of product formed during the CO.sub.2 photoreduction experiment over IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2.
(39) The CO.sub.2 photoreduction using IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 catalyst in the presence of H.sub.2O vapor was performed twice using fresh and regenerated catalyst samples. Initially, fresh IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 was used for CO.sub.2 photoreduction. After 30 minute UV-Visible irradiation, the sample was regenerated by cleaning the catalyst surface using pure N.sub.2. IR spectra of the catalytic surface were obtained to ensure that the reactants (CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O vapor), and the CH.sub.4 product formed in the previous run were completely dissociated from the catalyst surface and removed from the reaction chamber. Then, the reactants with the same concentrations were admitted to the reaction chamber and the photoreduction experiment was performed again.
(40) In the background experiments, no new peaks were observed in the IR spectra of IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 with CO.sub.2 and humidified N.sub.2 in the dark over 30 minutes. When IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 and humidified N.sub.2 (in the absence of CO.sub.2) were irradiated for 30 minutes using UV-Vis light, no new peaks were detected in the IR spectra. Experiments were also performed for bare P25 with CO.sub.2 and humidified N.sub.2. Even after 60 minutes of UV-Vis irradiation, no new peak formation was detected in the IR spectra.
(41) The IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 composite material was applied to the photoreduction of CO.sub.2 in the presence of H.sub.2O vapor. IR spectra of the IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 surface before and after UV-Visible irradiation were obtained and are shown in
(42) The major challenge in CO.sub.2 photoreduction is that the recombination of electron and hole generated from TiO.sub.2 is very fast. Thus, there is a significant decrease in the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO.sub.2. P25, which is the mixed phases of TiO.sub.2 with approximately 75% anatase and approximately 25% rutile, is expected to have better electron and hole separation than a single phase of TiO.sub.2 due to the different positions of the conduction and valence bands of the anatase and rutile phases such as is illustrated in
(43) Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies by Gray and co-workers indicated that photogenerated electrons actually migrated from rutile to lower energy anatase trapping sites, consequently enhancing electron-hole separation. See, for example: Hurum, D. C.; Agrios, A. G.; Gray, K. A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M. C., Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO.sub.2 using EPR. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2003, 107, 4545-4549; Hurum, D. C.; Gray, K. A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M. C., Recombination pathways in the Degussa P25 formulation of TiO.sub.2: Surface versus lattice mechanisms. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2005, 109, 977-980; and Hurum, D. C.; Agrios, A. G.; Crist, S. E.; Gray, K. A.; Rajh, T.; Thurnauer, M. C., Probing reaction mechanisms in mixed phase TiO.sub.2 by EPR. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 2006, 150, 155-163.
(44) However, when P25 was used in the CO.sub.2 photoreduction experiments, no product was observed under the DRIFTS experimental conditions. Therefore, the commercial P25 was still not effective enough for the photoreduction of CO.sub.2 with H.sub.2O vapor. Nevertheless, it was found that the presence of IL-RGO significantly enhances the photoactivity of P25 which is likely due to the improved electron-hole separation via electron transport from the TiO.sub.2 to the IL-RGO.
(45) The production of CO is frequently reported in the literature as the major product for CO.sub.2 photoreduction studies using TiO.sub.2-based nanoparticles. The IR feature of CO is expected to appear in the 2000-2270 cm.sup.1 frequency range. Notably, the lack of CO features in
(46) Additionally, in the literature, there are different proposed mechanisms for CH.sub.4 formation in CO.sub.2 photoreduction using TiO.sub.2-based photocatalysts. The selectivity of the products, for example CO or CH.sub.4, may be due to differences in the numbers of electrons that are produced by the catalyst and separated from the holes. As reported for photochemical reduction of CO.sub.2, the reaction mechanism for CO production requires four electrons, while eight electrons are needed for CH.sub.4 production. The selective formation of CH.sub.4 that is reported herein suggests that more electrons are available from the IL-RGO/TiO.sub.2 material as compared to the catalysts used in published studies that have CO as the major product of CO.sub.2 photoreduction. This further confirms that the presence of IL-RGO helps to separate electron and hole pairs. The selective production of CH.sub.4 is very valuable in the application of the catalyst in CO.sub.2 photoreduction because CO, as a synthesis gas, cannot be used as a fuel directly whereas CH.sub.4 is an energy-rich fuel.
(47) In
(48) Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to certain embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which have been presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation. Therefore, the scope of the invention should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein. For example, it is contemplated that another application for this material or other materials made by similar processes may exist in Field Effect Transistors.