PROCESS FOR REFORMING HYDROCARBONS
20170002281 ยท 2017-01-05
Inventors
- Kim Aasberg-Petersen (Allerod, DK)
- Peter Seier Christensen (Virum, DK)
- Thomas Sandahl CHRISTENSEN (Kgs. Lyngby, DK)
Cpc classification
B01D53/72
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01B2203/0244
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/143
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B3/36
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/0233
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C1/0485
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/0255
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/0261
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/062
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B3/34
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B3/382
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/148
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/142
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C01B3/36
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A process for the production of synthesis gas by the use of autothermal reforming in which tail gas from downstream Fischer-Tropsh synthesis is hydrogenated and then added to the autothermal reforming stage.
Claims
1. Process for the production of liquid hydrocarbons from a hydrocarbon feedstock comprising: a) passing said hydrocarbon feedstock through an ATR, CPO or POx, and withdrawing a stream of hot effluent synthesis gas from the ATR, CPO or PDX, b) converting the synthesis gas into liquid hydrocarbons via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, c) passing tail gas from the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis stage through a hydrogenation stage to produce a hydrogenated tail gas containing less than 1 mol olefins, and d) adding the hydrogenated tail gas directly to said ATR, CPO or Pox; e) optionally recovering the liquid hydrocarbons produced.
2. Process according to claim 1, wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is a gas that has passed through at least one adiabatic pre-reforming stage.
3. Process according to claim 1, wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is a gas that has passed through at least one steam reforming stage.
4. Process according to claim 1, wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is a gas mixture resulting from dividing a raw hydrocarbon feed gas into two streams, passing the first stream through at least one steam reforming stage to form a primary reformed gas, using the second stream as a by-pass stream to said steam reforming stage, and subsequently combining said primary reformed gas with the by-pass stream to form said hydrocarbon feedstock.
5. Process according to claim 1, comprising dividing a raw hydrocarbon feed gas into two streams, by which one of the streams becomes said hydrocarbon feedstock, and passing the other stream through at least one steam reforming stage to form a reformed gas.
6. Process according to claim 3, wherein the steam reforming stage is heat exchange reforming, and where at least a portion of the hot effluent synthesis gas from the ATR, CPO, or POx is used as heating medium in said heat exchange reforming.
7. Process according to claim 5, wherein said hot effluent synthesis gas is combined with said reformed gas before, during or after said hot effluent synthesis gas has delivered heat to the heat exchange reforming.
8. Process according to claim 6, comprising adding a stream comprising steam to said hot effluent synthesis gas, said reformed gas, or the combined stream of hot effluent synthesis gas and reformed gas.
9. Process according to claim 4, wherein the, at least one adiabatic pre-reforming stage is conducted prior to dividing said raw hydrocarbon feed.
10. Process according to claim 1, comprising mixing the hydrogenated tail gas with the hydrocarbon feedstock prior to conducting reforming in the ATR, CPO or POx.
11. Process according to claim 1, comprising adding the hydrogenated tail gas to the ATR, CPO or POx as a separate stream.
12. Process according to claim 4, comprising mixing the hydrogenated tail gas with said by-pass stream prior to conducting reforming in the ATR, CPO or POx.
13. Process according to claim 4, comprising mixing the hydrogenated tail gas with said primary reformed gas.
14. Process according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogenated tail gas of step c) contains below 0.5 mol %.
15. Process according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogenated tail gas of step c) contains less than 0.2 mole %.
16. Process according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogenated tail gas of step c) contains less than 0.1 mole %.
16. Process according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogenated tail gas of step c) contains less than 0.1 mole %.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0056] The invention is further illustrated by reference to the accompanying figures.
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0060] The accompanying
[0061] In
[0062] In
EXAMPLE
[0063] Two tests were made in the same experimental setup: An 800 mm long sample of Inconel 690 was placed in a reactor. The reactor was placed in an oven with three heating zones. The temperature of the Inconel 690 sample varied with the position in the oven. The sample temperatures were 200 to 640 C. The sample was exposed to a continuous flow of gas with the composition given in Table 1 as Test 1. The flow rate was 100 Nl/h. The pressure was 29 barg. The conditions were kept for 626 hours. The sample was examined after the test using stereo microscope and scanning electron microscope. The sample was attacked by metal dusting corrosion.
[0064] The second test was made analogous to the first test, with the exceptions that the gas composition used was as given in Table 1 as Test 2 and the conditions were kept for 672 hours. Examination of the sample after the test showed that the sample was not attacked by metal dusting corrosion.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Gas compositions (mole %) Component Test 1 Test 2 Hydrogen 12.1 12.1 Water 22.6 22.6 Carbon 6.9 6.9 monoxide Carbon 7.8 7.8 dioxide Ethylene 0.14 0 Ethane 0 0.14 Methane 49.8 49.8 Propane 0.45 0.45 1-Butene 0.21 0 Butane 0 0.21
[0065] The two gas compositions in the two tests are identical with the exception that the gas in test 1 contains the olefins (alkenes), whereas the gas in test 2 contains the corresponding alkanes. Metal dusting attack occurs in Test 1 but not in Test 2, which is of longer duration.
[0066] The presence of alkenes makes a gas more aggressive with respect to metal dusting corrosion. Thus, the use of a hydrogenated tail gas conveys the reduction or elimination of metal dusting compared to a situation where tail gas is used without being hydrogenated.