ULTRASOUND-CONTROLLED TRAINING PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALIZED AND AUTOMATIC WEANING
20230063364 · 2023-03-02
Inventors
- Cornelis Petrus Hendriks (Eindhoven, NL)
- Roberto Buizza (Eindhoven, NL)
- Kiran Hamilton J. Dellimore (Eindhovven, NL)
- Michael Polkey (Monroeville, PA, US)
- Jaap Roger Haartsen (Eindhoven, NL)
- Joerg Sabczynski (Norderstedt, DE)
- Thomas Koehler (Hamburg, DE)
- Nataly Wieberneit (Hamburg, DE)
- Rafael Wiemker (Kisdorf, DE)
- Rita Priori (Utrecth, NL)
Cpc classification
A61M16/0003
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M16/024
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G16H50/70
PHYSICS
G16H20/40
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
A mechanical ventilation device comprises at least one electronic controller configured to: receive ultrasound data related to a thickness of a diaphragm of a patient during inspiration and expiration while the patient undergoes mechanical ventilation therapy with a mechanical ventilator; calculate a diaphragm thickness metric based on at least the ultrasound data; and when the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy an acceptance criterion, at least one of: output an alert indicative of the calculated diaphragm thickness metric failing to satisfy the acceptance criterion; and output a recommended adjustment to one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient.
Claims
1. A mechanical ventilation device comprising at least one electronic controller configured to: receive ultrasound data related to a thickness of a diaphragm of a patient during inspiration and expiration while the patient undergoes mechanical ventilation therapy with a mechanical ventilator; calculate a diaphragm thickness metric based on at least the ultrasound data; and when the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy an acceptance criterion, at least one of: output an alert indicative of the calculated diaphragm thickness metric failing to satisfy the acceptance criterion; and output a recommended adjustment to one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein the diaphragm thickness metric includes a diaphragm thickening ratio indicative of a diaphragm thickness during inspiration relative to a diaphragm thickness during expiration.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein the diaphragm thickness metric includes a mean diaphragm thickness over a respiratory cycle.
4. The device of claim 1, further comprising: a wearable ultrasound transducer from which the at least one electronic controller receives the ultrasound data.
5. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one electronic controller is configured to: control the mechanical ventilator to adjust one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient; and iteratively repeat the receive, calculate, and control operations to provide feedback control of the mechanical ventilator based at least on whether the calculated diaphragm thickness metric satisfies the acceptance criterion.
6. The device of claim 1, further comprising: an ultrasound imaging device configured to generate the ultrasound data; wherein the at least one electronic controller is implemented in the ultrasound imaging device.
7. The device claim 1, wherein the electronic controller is configured to: calculate the diaphragm thickness metric from the ultrasound data by: extracting one or more respiratory features of the patient; comparing the extracted features with a biomechanical model; and determining a respiratory muscle pressure from the comparing; and control the mechanical ventilator to adjust one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient based on the determined respiratory muscle pressure.
8. The device of claim 7, wherein the electronic controller is configured to generate the biomechanical model by: generating a patient geometry model of the patient from one or more images of the patient's exterior; and generating the biomechanical model from the patient geometry model and the ultrasound data.
9. The device of claim 1, further including: the mechanical ventilator; and a second electronic controller implemented in the mechanical ventilator.
10. The device of claim 9, wherein the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient comprises a mechanical ventilation training program, and the second electronic controller is configured to: detect when the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy the acceptance criterion; and adjust the mechanical ventilation training program until the calculated diaphragm thickness metric satisfies the acceptance criterion.
11. The device of claim 10, wherein the calculated diaphragm thickness metric comprises a respiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) calculated from the ultrasound data and a biomechanical model, and the second electronic controller is configured to adjust the mechanical ventilation training program until the calculated respiratory muscle pressure satisfies the acceptance criterion by: adjusting a level-of-support parameter of the mechanical ventilation training program.
12. The device of claim 11, wherein the second electronic controller is configured to: multiply the level-of-support parameter by the respiratory muscle pressure to determine an airway ventilation pressure value; and continuously perform the mechanical ventilation training program until the airway ventilation pressure value falls below a predetermined training program threshold.
13. The device of claim 9, wherein the second electronic controller is configured to: output an alert on a display device of the mechanical ventilator, the alert being indicative of the calculated diaphragm thickness metric failing to satisfy the acceptance criterion.
14. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one electronic controller configured to is configured to: control the mechanical ventilator to adjust one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient.
15. A mechanical ventilation method comprising, with at least one electronic controller: receiving ultrasound data related to a thickness of a diaphragm of patient during inspiration and expiration while the patient undergoes mechanical ventilation therapy with a mechanical ventilator; calculating a diaphragm thickness metric based on at least the ultrasound data; and when the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy an acceptance criterion, at least one of: outputting an alert indicative of the calculated diaphragm thickness metric failing to satisfy the acceptance criterion; and outputting a recommended adjustment to one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] The disclosure may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure.
[0025]
[0026]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0027] As used herein, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, statements that two or more parts or components are “coupled,” “connected,” or “engaged” shall mean that the parts are j oined, operate, or co-act together either directly or indirectly, i.e., through one or more intermediate parts or components, so long as a link occurs. Directional phrases used herein, such as, for example and without limitation, top, bottom, left, right, upper, lower, front, back, and derivatives thereof, relate to the orientation of the elements shown in the drawings and are not limiting upon the scope of the claimed invention unless expressly recited therein. The word “comprising” or “including” does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those described herein and/or listed in a claim. In a device comprised of several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware.
[0028] With reference to
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032] In a more particular example, the medical imaging device 18 includes an ultrasound transducer 20 that is wearable by the patient P (e.g., on the abdomen or chest of the patient P in position to image the diaphragm of the patient, as shown in
[0033] With reference to
[0034] At an operation 104, the electronic controller 22 is configured to calculate a diaphragm thickness metric based on (at least) the ultrasound data. In some embodiments, the diaphragm thickness metric includes a diaphragm thickening ratio (or fraction) TFdi indicative of a diaphragm thickness during inspiration relative to a diaphragm thickness during expiration. In a particular example, the diaphragm thickness metric includes a mean diaphragm thickness over a respiratory cycle. In another particular example, the diaphragm thickness metric includes a ratio of the maximum diaphragm thickness to the minimum diaphragm thickness over a breathing cycle. Optionally, the maximum diaphragm thickness used in calculating the ratio may be the average maximum diaphragm thickness over a sliding window spanning several breath cycles, and similarly for the minimum diaphragm thickness, in order to reduce noise. Typically, onset and/or progression of diaphragm atrophy is detected as a decrease in the diaphragm thickness over time.
[0035] At an operation 106, the electronic controller 22 is configured to determine whether the calculated diaphragm thickness metric satisfies a predetermined acceptance criterion. For example, if the medical imaging device 18 comprises a wearable US device 18 that acquires images of additional activities from respiratory muscles (i.e., an auxiliary muscle), the controller 13 can analyze the US images and the calculated diaphragm thickness metric to determine an effort by the patient P. If the electronic controller 22 determines that the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy the predetermined acceptance criterion, the method 100 proceeds in one or more different ways. In one example embodiment, at an operation 108, an alert 26 indicative of the calculated diaphragm thickness metric failing to satisfy the acceptance criterion is output. The acceptance criterion may be, for example, that the diaphragm thickness metric exceeds a threshold value, as dropping below that threshold is considered to be an indication of onset of diaphragm atrophy. This alert output can be done by displaying a message on the display device 14 of the mechanical ventilator, or on a display of an electronic processing device (shown schematically in
[0036] In another example embodiment, at an operation 110, a recommended adjustment to one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient P is output. Again, this can be done by displaying a message on the display device 14 of the mechanical ventilator, or on the display of an electronic processing device 10, thereby indicating to a medical professional that the calculated diaphragm thickness metric is not satisfactory.
[0037] In a further example embodiment, at an operation 112, the mechanical ventilator 2 is controlled to adjust one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient P. It will be appreciated that more than one of the operations 108, 110, and 112 can be performed (e.g., the alert 26 can be displayed and the settings of the mechanical ventilator 2 can be adjusted). In some embodiments, the operations 102-106 and at least one of operations 108-112 can be repeated iteratively to provide feedback control of the mechanical ventilator 2 based at least on whether the calculated diaphragm thickness metric satisfies the acceptance criterion.
[0038] In other embodiments, the electronic controller 13 of the mechanical ventilator 2 is configured to perform the method 100 (i.e., in lieu of the electronic controller 22 of the medical imaging device 18).
[0039] In such embodiments, the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient P comprises a mechanical ventilation training program. In such embodiments, when the calculated diaphragm thickness metric does not satisfy the acceptance criterion (i.e., the determination operation 106), the mechanical ventilation training program is adjusted until the calculated diaphragm thickness metric satisfies the acceptance criterion.
[0040] In some examples, the calculated diaphragm thickness metric comprises a respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus calculated from the ultrasound data and a biomechanical model 28 (stored in non-transitory computer readable medium 15 of the mechanical ventilator 2). In this case, diaphragm atrophy is indicated as an undesirably low value for the calculated respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus indicating the patient's diaphragm is unable to produce a satisfactory level of respiratory effort. The electronic controller 13 is configured to adjust the mechanical ventilation training program until the calculated respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus satisfies the acceptance criterion by adjusting a level-of-support parameter of the mechanical ventilation training program. For example, in proportional assist ventilation (PAV or PAV+), the degree of assistance is set by the percentage level-of-support parameter K which scales the airway pressure (P.sub.aw) delivered to the patient, i.e.:
P.sub.aw(at level-of-support)=K×P.sub.aw(full-support)
[0041] See e.g., Kondili, E., et al., 2006, “Respiratory load compensation during mechanical ventilation—proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors versus pressure support”, Intensive Care Med (2006) 32:692-699. To adjust the mechanical ventilation training program, the electronic controller 13 is configured to multiply the level-of-support parameter by the respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus to determine an airway ventilation pressure value, and continuously perform the mechanical ventilation training program until the airway ventilation pressure value falls below a predetermined training program threshold.
[0042] With continuing reference to
[0043] The training program can be started or initiated when atrophy is detected or predicted (i.e., when the diaphragm thickness metric TFdi is decreasing), for example with manual ultrasound and/or when the patient P fails a first spontaneous breathing test (SBT), indicating a difficult weaning patient. The medical professional (i.e., a respiratory technician (RT)) starts the training program by activating this functionality in a user interface of the display device 14 of the mechanical ventilator 2 (i.e., a start button). The manual or wearable ultrasound transducer 20 can also work in the background and alarm the RT that the level of ventilation support for that particular patient is inadequate, too high, or too low (i.e., the diaphragm thickness metric TFdi outside of the safe range (i.e., 15-30%)) at any time during the ventilation.
[0044] The diaphragm thickness TFdi during a SBT is taken as a reference to determine the muscle function at the start of the training program (i.e., this includes the mental state of the patient P and the level of sedation). A level of support K is adapted until the initial TFdi is in a safe range to start with, for example between TFdi=15-30%.
[0045] The level of support K can be adapted to do a training program a couple of times a day. For example, two or three times a day (i.e., every 8-12 hours), K can be decreased with X% depending on the results of the titration. Optionally the number and duration of the intervals can be increased manually or automatically on a day-to-day basis depending on the patient's response. For example, the electronic controller 13 detects a decrease in the diaphragm thickness TFdi or the mean thickness; hence, it suggests increasing the duration or the number of training intervals depending on the patient response.
[0046] The daily average TFdi or daily average mean thickness d can be determined to inform the RT if the training program works or does not work (i.e., a muscle response “yes/no”), for program adaptation based on the muscle response (i.e., slow-down, or ramp-up depending on fatigue or strengthening), and for safety (i.e., the muscle does not respond or responds negatively). Information on the patient health status can be combined with the status of the diaphragm function.
[0047] The weekly average diaphragm thickening TFdi can be determined to represent the training effect (e.g., the recovery from atrophy, or to mark the end of the training program, after which the patient can be successfully extubated). Some target options for the training algorithm can include for example, a pre-determined mean diaphragm muscle thickening TFdi (for example the thickening when the patient was still healthy or when they were first admitted to the ICU prior to intubation is such data are available); a thickening range representative for similar healthy patients; a patient remains stable while K<50%, after which a SBT can confirm weaning success; a thickness and contractile activity reach a plateau (i.e., no further improvement is observed); and so forth. In case such targets are not set by the RT at the beginning of the training, the electronic controller 13 informs the RT when at least one of the pre-set targets is reached. The RT terminates the training program when the target is reached.
[0048] A user interface (UI) can be displayed on the display device 14 to help visualize the patient's status to the RT or the clinical team can be added. The average diaphragm thickening TFdi, and the P. are displayed in the UI, and the training portion of these data can be shown in different colors or shades. This information will be valuable to the clinical team in understanding better the patient progression.
[0049] In other embodiments disclosed herein, the diaphragm thickness metric calculation operation 104 includes: extracting one or more respiratory features of the patient P (e.g., a diaphragm thickness measured from the US images), comparing the extracted features with the biomechanical model 28, determining a respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus from the comparing; and controlling the mechanical ventilator 2 to adjust one or more parameters of the mechanical ventilation therapy delivered to the patient P based on the determined respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus. In some embodiments, when the respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus falls below a predetermined respiratory muscle pressure threshold, the alert 26 can be output.
[0050] To generate the biomechanical model 28, the electronic controller 13 is configured to generate a patient geometry model 32 of the patient P from one or more images of the patient's exterior, and generating the biomechanical model 28 from the patient geometry model 32 and the ultrasound data.
[0051] With continuing reference to
[0052] Despite directly measuring the contractile activity of the diaphragm muscle, the thickening fraction TFdi is a surrogate measure for the pressure generated by the respiratory muscles Pmus. The respiratory muscle pressure P.sub.mus depends on the patient specific geometry and mechanical properties of the thorax structures. It can be difficult to estimate the diaphragm strength directly from ultrasound measurements. Therefore, an option is to apply a patient specific biomechanical model 28 to calculate Pmus. The patient specific geometry can be obtained from the CT images 34 obtained at ICU admission. The muscle deformation is obtained from the ultrasound measurements. An advantage of the biomechanical model 28 is that the patient specific variables are considered in the estimation of P.sub.mus. The generation of the biomechanical model 28 can be done off-line. The biomechanical model 28 simulates P.sub.mus as a function of diaphragm thickening fraction and excursion. The model output P.sub.mus is stored in a lookup table 36 in the non-transitory computer readable medium 15. The lookup table 36 is used in the closed loop system, as an intermediate step between the ultrasound image processing and the training program.
[0053] Safety is an important aspect of automated systems. A risk of proportional assist (PA) ventilation is that the system decreases the support if the diaphragm starts to weaken. In an extreme situation this means that both the respiratory effort and the support decrease to zero. Therefore, in some embodiments disclosed herein, a safety algorithm is needed to overwrite the electronic controller 13 if needed. The safety algorithm takes, as input, patient parameters such as SpO.sub.2, EtCO.sub.2, Ve (volume of gas exchange per minute), and/or the P.sub.mus trajectory. If the patient P starts to respond with a negative trend, or if the muscle does not respond, the safety algorithm stops the training program. This is communicated in the user interface (“training aborted”, plus the reason for stopping) on the display device 16. The communication can take the form of the alert 26 (i.e., an alarm or warning). In some examples, a camera (not shown) can be added to assist the safety logic and alarming algorithm. During the training program, the RT or a member of the clinical team can remotely monitor the patient's progression using the additional information from the camera.
[0054] In some embodiments, the electronic controller 13 can be used to measure arousals when the patient P sleeps (such as EEG, vital signs, respiratory variability, bioimpedance, and so forth). Arousal from sleep when the training program is activated can be an indication that the level of support is too low. Since the patient P is already hooked up to the mechanical ventilator 2, it might be useful to measure their sleep state using parameters measured by the ventilator itself as opposed to adding additional sensors.
[0055] In other embodiments, a respiratory effort can also be measured, such as with a belt worn around the thorax, with a microphone positioned on the suprasternal notch, with intra-costal surface electromyography (EMG), or with an accelerometer or other acceleration, displacement or movement sensor mounted on, or close to the thorax—e.g., on the bed, under the mattress, etc. (none of which are shown in the FIGURES).
[0056] The disclosure has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the exemplary embodiment be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.