Method to make scalable ultrathin hexagonally faceted metal-organic framework (MOF) and method of using same for detecting explosives and other nitro-aromatic compounds

Abstract

A method to make metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in which a first aqueous solution of a transition metal salt is mixed with a second aqueous solution of an imidazole or alkyl-substituted imidazole to yield a product solution containing MOF crystals. The MOF crystals are used to fabricate electrodes for electrochemical detection of nitro-aromatic compounds.

Claims

1. A method of detecting nitro-aromatic compounds, the method comprising: (a) contacting a solution or a gas suspected of containing a nitro-aromatic compound with an electrode of an electrochemical cell, wherein the electrode comprises a metal-organic framework disposed on a surface of the electrode; (b) applying a first electric potential to the electrode within the electrochemical cell and measuring current generated in the electrochemical cell in response to the applied potential; and (c) comparing the current generated in step (b) with a standard curve of current data generated using the electrochemical cell of step (a) and standard solutions or gases containing known concentrations of at least one nitro-aromatic compound; wherein the metal-organic framework is made by mixing a first aqueous solution comprising a transition metal salt with a second aqueous solution comprising imidazole or alkyl-substituted imidazole for a time and at a temperature to yield a product solution containing metal-organic framework crystals; and wherein the first aqueous solution comprises from about 0.01 M to about 0.5 M of the transition metal salt and the second aqueous solution comprises about 1 mM to about 100 mM of the imidazole or alkyl-substituted imidazole.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the metal-organic framework is zeolitic imidazole framework-8 (ZIF-8).

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the transition metal salt in the first aqueous solution comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of scandium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc, and an anion selected from the group consisting of nitrate, sulfate, acetate, and halide.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising mixing the first aqueous solution and the second aqueous solution for a time of about 1 minute to about 10 minutes.

5. The method of claim 1, comprising mixing the first aqueous solution and the second aqueous solution at a temperature of about 20±5°.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D. Characterization of ZIF-8 made according to the disclosed method. FIG. 1A is an X-ray powder diffractogram of the ZIF-8. FIG. 1B depicts nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms; Inset: BJH pore size curves. FIG. 1C is the FTIR spectrum of the ZIF-8. FIG. 1D shows the thermogram of the ZIF-8 and the corresponding derivative curve.

(2) FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D. Morphology of ZIF-8 made according to the disclosed method. FIGS. 2A and 2B are high-resolution transmission electron microscopic (HRTEM) images of the ZIF-8. FIG. 2C is a tapping mode atomic force microscopic (AFM) topographic image. FIG. 2D is a height profile corresponding to the AFM image shown in FIG. 2C.

(3) FIG. 3A is a real-time AFM 2D image and FIG. 3B is a representative AFM 3-D image of growing ZIF-8 crystal taken 1 minute after first observing surface nuclei. FIG. 3C is a real-time AFM 2D image taken 2 minutes after first observing surface nuclei.

(4) FIGS. 4A through 4E are X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra for ZIF-8 made according to the present method. FIG. 4A is a high-resolution XPS spectrum for the ZIF-8. FIG. 4B is the XPS spectrum for N 1s. FIG. 4C is the XPS spectrum for Zn 2p. FIG. 4D is the XPS spectrum for O 1s. FIG. 4E is the XPS spectrum for C 1s.

(5) FIG. 5A depicts pulsed amperometric response (n=3) of the ZIF-8-modified electrode to different concentrations of TNT (E1=0 V for 5 s; E2=−0.8 V for 5 s and E3=0 V, for 5 s). FIG. 5B depicts pulsed amperometric response (n=50) of the ZIF-8-modified electrode to 50 nM of TNT. The inset shows an enlarged view. FIG. 5C depicts zeta potential measurements of ZIF-8 aqueous solution, TNT solution (50 nM), H.sub.2O, and ZIF-8 aqueous solution with 50 nM TNT. FIG. 5D is Bode plot for the electrode recorded in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 10 kHz, using a sinusoidal potential perturbation with an amplitude of 5 mV in 0.5 M KCl solution in the absence and presence of 80 nM TNT. FIG. 5E depicts a continuous amperometric response at ZIF-8-modified electrode to different interfering species each spiked at 500 μM and TNT at 50 nM concentration.

(6) FIG. 6 shows the results of differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) with varying concentrations of TNT at the ZIF-8-modified electrode. The inset displays the calibration curve. DPV parameters: peak width=0.2 s; pulse period=0.5 s; increment=10 mV.

(7) FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the charge-transfer complex interactions between ZIF-8 and the TNT molecule.

(8) FIGS. 8A through 8D show DPV plots of nitrobenzene (NB) (FIG. 8A), 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT) (FIG. 8B), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) (FIG. 8C), and trinitrotoluene (TNT) (FIG. 8D) at the ZIF-8-modified electrode. DPV parameters: peak width=0.2 s; Pulse period=0.5 s; increment=10 mV.

(9) FIG. 9A shows the gas-phase detection of TNT using a ZIF-8-functionalized screen-printed electrode. FIG. 9B shows the electrode housed in a measurement chamber containing TNT vapors. FIG. 9C shows impedance (Z) versus time before exposure to TNT vapors and after exposure to TNT vapors for up to 420 seconds. FIG. 9D shows impedance (Z) versus time before exposure to TNT vapors and after exposure to TNT vapors for one hour.

(10) FIG. 10A shows cyclic voltammetry (CV) plots of TNT (50 μM) at various scan rates (10-600 mVs.sup.−1) using the ZIF-8-modified electrode disclosed herein. FIG. 10B is plot of peak currents vs. the square root of the scans.

(11) FIG. 11 presents current-time curves for the ZIF-8-modified electrode upon ten (10) successive additions of TNT (200 nM) with different applied potentials ranging from 0 to −0.85 V.

(12) FIG. 12 is a graph showing the stability (i.e., relative response over time) for the ZIF-8-modified electrode to 100 nM TNT over the course of 15 days.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(13) Abbreviations and Definitions:

(14) AFM=atomic force microscopy. BET=Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area calculated according to ISO 9277 “Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption—BET method.” CV=cyclic voltammetry. DNB=dinitrobenzene. DNT=dinitrotoluene. 2,4-DNT=2,4-dinitrotoluene. 2,6-DNT=2,6-dinitrotoluene. DPV=differential pulse voltammetry. DMF=dimethyl formamide. HRTEM=high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. MOF=metal-organic framework. NB=nitrobenzene. PVP=polyvinylpyrrodlidone. RDX=1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane. SPE=screen printed electrode. TNT=trinitrotoluene. TEM=transmission electron microscopy. XPS=X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. XRD=X-ray diffraction spectroscopy. ZIF=zeolitic imidazole framework.

(15) The word “solution” as used herein is given a broader definition to include true solutions in which a solute is solvated by a solvent, as well as suspensions, dispersions, colloids, aerosols, and the like.

(16) “Transition metal” means any element in the d-block of the periodic table, that is, any element within Groups 3 to 12 on the periodic table. The term explicitly includes, but is not limited to scandium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, technetium, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, cadmium, hafnium, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, osmium, iridium, platinum, and gold.

(17) Numerical ranges as used herein are intended to include every number and subset of numbers contained within that range, whether specifically disclosed or not. Further, these numerical ranges should be construed as providing support for a claim directed to any number or subset of numbers in that range. For example, a disclosure of from 1 to 10 should be construed as supporting a range of from 2 to 8, from 3 to 7, from 1 to 9, from 3.6 to 4.6, from 3.5 to 9.9, and so forth.

(18) All references to singular characteristics or limitations of the present invention shall include the corresponding plural characteristic or limitation, and vice-versa, unless otherwise specified or clearly implied to the contrary by the context in which the reference is made. The indefinite articles “a” and “an” mean “one or more,” unless explicitly defined to the contrary.

(19) All combinations of method or process steps as used herein can be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified or clearly implied to the contrary by the context in which the referenced combination is made.

(20) The methods disclosed herein can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the essential elements and limitations of the method described, as well as any additional or optional ingredients, components, or limitations described herein or otherwise useful in synthetic organic chemistry and/or electrochemical detection.

(21) Materials:

(22) All chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purification. 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, 2,6-dinitrotoluene, and nitrobenzene, ZnNO.sub.3.6H.sub.2O, 2-methylimidazole, toluene, 4-nitrophenol, Pb.sup.2+, potassium chloride, Nafion®-brand resin (registered trademark of E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.), and urea were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.) and Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, Pa.). Deionized water generated by a Millipore Milli-Q system (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, Mass.; resistivity 18.2 MΩ-cm) was used in the electrochemical studies.

(23) Material Characterizations:

(24) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was investigated with a PANalytical X'PERT PRO X-ray diffractometer using CuKα radiations λ=0.1542 nm, 40 kV, 20 mA (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a JEOL JEM-2100F electron microscope (JEOL, Akishima, Japan). N.sub.2 adsorption studies were performed on an Autosorb®-brand instrument at 77 K (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, Fla.). All the samples were degassed at 423 K under vacuum before analysis. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were taken in tapping mode using an Asylum Research, Cypher S-brand instrument. (Asylum Research, a wholly owned subsidiary of Oxford Instruments, Santa Barbara, Calif.). Zeta potential measurements were carried out using a NanoBrook® 90Plus-brand particle analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments Corp., Holtsville, N.Y.).

(25) Preparation of Solutions: All solutions were made with analytical grade chemicals in ultra-purified water from a Milli-Q system (Millipore). In all the experiments, the supporting electrolyte was 0.5 M potassium chloride solution. Stock solutions of nitroaromatic explosives were prepared carefully in a ventilating hood and were successively diluted to obtain the desired concentration range.
Synthesis of ZIF-8:

(26) A novel one-step method was developed to prepare ZIF-8 crystals. In a typical synthesis, 20 mg of zinc nitrate hexahydrate dispersed in 1 mL Millipore water (˜0.067 M Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2) was added to a solution of 2-methylimidazole (2.3 g, ˜28 mM) in 9 g Millipore water under stirring. The mixture turns turbid immediately; after 2 min of stirring, the nanocrystals were separated from the milky dispersion by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 30 min and dried overnight at 333 K.

(27) TNT Vapor Generation:

(28) A known amount of TNT was placed in 5 mL borosilicate glass under a heating mantle set at 80° C. The top of the borosilicate glass was covered by an aluminum foil and then capped. The disposable screen-printed electrode (described below) was fitted to the top of the glass vessel.

(29) Electrochemical Measurements:

(30) Electrochemical experiments were performed using CHI-660D electrochemical workstation (CHI Instruments Inc., Austin, Tex.) using a disposable screen-printed electrode (SPE). The electrode pattern comprised a 3-mm diameter carbon working electrode, a carbon counter electrode, and a silver/silver chloride reference electrode.

(31) Electrode Fabrication:

(32) Catalyst ink was prepared by mixing 5.0 mg of the prepared ZIF-8 catalyst with a mixture of 100 μl Nafion®-brand resin (0.5 wt %) and 0.9 mL of water, thereafter dispersed by sonication for 1 hour to obtain a well-dispersed suspension. 2 μL of the catalyst ink was drop-cast onto the SPE surface. The electrode was then dried in air leaving the material mounted onto the SPE surface.

(33) Characterization of the ZIF and Method to Detect Nitro-Aromatic Explosives:

(34) Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been exploited to confirm the crystal structure and to investigate the phase of the prepared material. See FIG. 1A, which is the full X-ray diffractogram for a specimen of the ZIF-8 made as described herein. The XRD peaks of ZIF-8 as shown in FIG. 1A match to a sodalite topology.[21-23] A very sharp peak at 7.2° on the XRD diffractogram of FIG. 1A indicates that ZIF-8 is highly crystalline. Furthermore, the XRD patterns of the ZIF-8 exhibited a better crystallinity as compared to that of silica-based materials such as SBA-15. The nitrogen isotherm of ZIF-8, shown in FIG. 1B displayed a type-1 isotherm typical for microporous materials. The capillary step in the p/p.sub.0 (<0.1) suggests a microporous structure according to IUPAC classification.[23,24] The BET-specific surface area of 1398.7 m.sup.2/g and cumulative pore volume of 0.62 cm.sup.3/g were obtained for ZIF-8 when made as described herein. The pore-size distribution was determined using the Barrette Joynere Halenda method, showing a mean pore size distributed between 0.4 nm and 1.8 nm which implies that the material is microporous (<2 nm), see FIG. 1B.[23,24] The nitrogen adsorption/desorption parameters of the ZIF-8 are summarized in Table 1.

(35) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Surface properties of synthesized material. Total External Micropore surface area surface area Micropore area volume Sample (m.sup.2 g.sup.−1) (m.sup.2g.sup.−1) (m.sup.2g.sup.−1) (cm.sup.3g.sup.−1) ZIF-8 1398.75 94.57 1304.17 0.6236

(36) The chemical state of the synthesized material was further investigated by FT-IR. FT-IR spectra of ZIF-8 showed a characteristic peak in the frequency region from 900-1350 cm.sup.−1 which can be attributed to in-plane bending of the imidazole ring. See FIG. 1C. The bands between 800 to 400 cm.sup.−1 are associated with the out-of-plane bending of the ring. The band at 1582 cm.sup.−1 is due to the C≡N stretching mode. The signal at 417 cm.sup.−1 is ascribed to the stretching vibrations of Zn—N. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) profile of ZIF-8 showed weight loss below 200° C. which is attributed to the removal of adsorbed water molecules from the cavities. See FIG. 1D. The second loss observed above 200° C. corresponds to the carbonization of unreacted 2-methylimidazole. A sharp weight loss step at about 490° C. corresponds to the decomposition of the ZIF-8 nanocrystal.

(37) The morphologies of the as-prepared ZIF-8 have been examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). See FIGS. 2A and 2B, which are panoramic images of a representative ZIF-8 sample. FIGS. 2A and 2B reveal a highly ordered hexagonal symmetry. The ZIF-8 crystallites are in the size range of ˜380 nm on average. As shown in FIG. 2C, a two-dimensional atomic force microscopy (AFM) topographic image clearly reveals the hexagonal edges of a single crystal. The AFM image in FIG. 2C is confirms the accuracy of the SEM and TEM images. The topographic profile indicates a high aspect ratio of the crystals, with a height of about ˜60 nm, as shown in FIG. 2D.

(38) The AFM images of ZIF-8 at different reaction times are shown in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C. The crystal surface at 1 minute, shown 2-dimensionally in FIG. 3A and 3-dimensionally shows the beginning of the formation of a highly ordered hexagonal symmetry. The atomic force microscopy image taken at 2 minutes, shown in FIG. 3C, confirms the ordered hexagonal symmetry.

(39) XPS studies have been further performed to characterize the chemical composition of the ZIF-8 manufactured as described herein. See FIGS. 4A-4E. The wide scan spectra from ZIF-8, shown in FIG. 4A, shows multiple regions of Zn 2p, O 1s, N and 1s, respectively. Individual spectra for each element (N 1s, Zn 2p, O 1s, and C 1s) were collected over the appropriate energy range. See FIGS. 4B-4E. The high-resolution N1s spectra of ZIF-8, FIG. 4B, exhibited peaks of 399.5 and 407.1 eV, which corresponded to pyridinic nitrogen C—N═, and C—NH— graphitic-nitrogen, respectively.[25] The high-resolution Zn 2p XPS scan shows Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2 subpeaks of the Zn 2p doublet, which were located at 1022.24 and 1045.34 eV, confirmed the position of the metallic Zn 2p peaks.[25] See FIG. 4C. The O 1s spectra is shown in FIG. 4D. The peaks with binding energy of 531.4 is assigned to the O in the forms of Zn—OH (FIG. 4D). The peaks in the C1s area, see FIG. 4E, are very likely from imidazole-derived carbon. Overall, the XPS analysis, together with the FTIR and XRD data, confirmed the formation of ZIF-8.

(40) The growth of ZIF-8 nanocrystals was monitored by tracking the change in solution pH with reaction time. The initial pH of aqueous H.sub.2O was 7.4, which increased to 11.4 when 2-methylimidazole (Hmim) precursor was added; however, upon further addition of Zn.sup.2+ solution, the pH decreased to 10.8 in 60 s and to 10.42 in 120 s. The pH remained constant thereafter confirming that the formation of ZIF-8 crystal is complete. The initial drop in pH of the synthesis solution can be assigned to the acidity introduced by the zinc solution and the ligand deprotonation during the reaction. When Zn.sup.2+ is added, coordination of Zn.sup.2+ to the ligand occurs at the nitrogen atoms at positions 1 and 3 in imidazole. Here Hmim act as a linker unit in its deprotonated form. The drop in the pH shows nucleation as well as a fast crystallization rate which is reflected by the change in turbidity of the solution after 60 s. The product formed is rhombic dodecahedron in morphology and its crystalline shape is determined by the discrepancies in the growth rates. The growth rate is associated with the degree of nucleation as well as the fast crystallization rate.

(41) The utility of the ZIF-8-modified electrode for nitro-aromatic explosive detection was then explored. The electrochemical behavior of TNT was first investigated by cyclic voltammetry. As seen in FIG. 10A, the reduction peak current of TNT increases with an increase in scan rate. The reduction peak current was in linear relation with the square root of scan rate from 40 to 400 mV s.sup.−1, as shown in FIG. 10B. The non-zero intercept (FIG. 10B) suggested that TNT is initially adsorbed at the surface-active sites. The effect of applied potential on the reduction peak current (i-t curve) for 200 nM aqueous TNT solution was investigated. The amperometric response of ZIF-8 modified electrode (0 mV to −850 mV range) was recorded upon 10 successive additions of TNT solution. The results are shown in FIG. 11. The results showed applied potentials ranging from −0.40 to −0.85 V accelerated the reduction current providing the best values of TNT reduction. The maximum response current with a good signal/noise ratio was achieved at 0.8 V. Thus, a constant potential of −0.8 V was chosen for further amperometric investigations.

(42) The electrochemical behavior of TNT with respect to the ZIF-8-modified electrode described herein was first investigated by pulse amperometry. FIG. 5A illustrates the three-step potential pulse amperometric response obtained for ten injections of a standard solution of TNT (ranging from 0 nM TNT to 175 nM TNT) at a fixed potential (−0.8 V). As clearly shown in FIG. 5A, the ZIF-8 modified electrode exhibited reduction peak current densities that are proportional to the TNT concentration. The precision of the sensor was then investigated by pulse amperometric response at a fixed potential (−0.8 V) in response to adding TNT (50 nM) (See FIG. 5B). The test revealed that the 50 cycles showed no current drop. The inset of FIG. 5B shows an enlarged view. Surface zeta potential measurements were then used as a means to investigate the electrostatic interactions between ZIF-8 nanoparticles with TNT.[26] The zeta potential value of water was measured to be 0 mV at pH=7. See FIG. 5C. In the presence of TNT, a zeta potential value of −28.8 mV was seen, implying a negative surface charge. ZIF-8 dispersed in water has a zeta potential value of −9.9 mV. Adding TNT to ZIF-8 induces a lower value of zeta potential (−16.8 mV), thus clearly indicate the electrostatic interaction (adsorption) between TNT and ZIF-8. See FIG. 5D5E.

(43) To understand the interface reactions further, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed. Bode module plots at open circuit in the presence and absence of TNT can be considered to have two regions, one at high frequency corresponding to the depletion layer, and another at low frequency relating to the Helmholtz layer (See FIG. 5D). The increase in phase angle after adding 80 nM of TNT (−42°) in the low-frequency region consisted predominately of capacitive reactance but was far less than −90°, which is associated with the interaction between TNT and the ZIF-8-modified electrode.

(44) Contacting the ZIF-8-modified electrode with various concentrations of TNT and then performing differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) shows that the resulting curves are concentration-dependent. See FIG. 6. The clearly demonstrates that the electrode as described herein can be used to detect TNT. Here, the concentration of the TNT solution was serially diluted from 0 nM to 460 nM. The inset of FIG. 6 displays the calibration curve. The DPV test parameters were as follows: peak width=0.2 s; Pulse period=0.5 s; increment=10 mV. More specifically, a linear range over a TNT concentration from 1 nM to 460 nM with a detection limit of 346 pM was obtained (level of detection=3σ/S, where (σ) the standard deviation of the three-parallel analysis of the blank, and (S) the slope of the calibration line).[27] Again, see FIG. 6. The linear regression equation was I(μA)=−0.0174-0.6249 C.sub.TNT (nM), (R.sup.2=0.9981). The analytical parameters of the ZIF-8-modified electrode was compared with different methods previously reported for DNB, DNT, and TNT detection in the literature.[28-50] The results are presented in Table 2. The sensor described herein has a demonstrated level of detection and a rational linear range suitable for the detection of TNT as compared to known assay methods (as shown in Table 2).

(45) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Analytical performance comparison of ZIF-8 modified electrode with sensors reported for detection of DNT, DNB, and TNT. Linear Range Detection Procedure Technique Analyte (nM) Limit (nM) References NH.sub.3-plasma-treated SWV DNT  8.9 × 10.sup.2-5.34 × 10.sup.3 0.6394 .sup.28 MWCNT/GCE Reduced graphene/GCE LSV DNT 5.49 × 10.sup.4-11.0 × 10.sup.4 42 .sup.29 Poly[meso-tetrakis(2- DPV DNT —   8 ppb .sup.30 thienyl)porphyrin]/GCE NH.sub.3-plasma-treated SWASV DNT 1.0 × 10.sup.2-1.0 × 10.sup.3 0.12 .sup.31 MWCNTs Polyaniline DPV DNB    .sup.  22-3.08 × 10.sup.3 7.33 .sup.32 Nanofibers/GCE Porphyrin/CNTs/GCE DPV DNB    .sup.  9-5.0 × 10.sup.4 2 .sup.33 Two-dimensional DPV TNT      40-3.2 × 10.sup.3 13 .sup.34 MIM/Au nanoparticles/GCE Acrylic polymer (MIP) DPV TNT 5.0 × 10.sup.2-2.0 × 10.sup.4 500 .sup.35 electrode MIP/MWCNTs/GCE SWV DNB      45-8.5 × 10.sup.3 25.15 .sup.36 Ordered mesoporous ASV DNT — 5.5 .sup.37 carbon Nitrogen-doped LSV TNT   .sup.  528-8.8 × 10.sup.3 130 .sup.38 graphene/GCE Nano-MIP/Fe.sub.3O.sub.4NPs SWV TNT  1.00-130.00 — .sup.39 based MCPE Gr-PANI-MIP film DPV TNT    730.00-3.15 × 10.sup.3 — .sup.40 Anion exchanger resin UV-vis TNT 1.76 × 10.sup.3-5.10 × 10.sup.5   127 × 10.sup.3 .sup.41 DLLME GC-MS TNT  12.76-127.68 2.17 .sup.42 Metalloporphyrin- SAW TNT    140.44-3.06 × 10.sup.3 12.76 .sup.43 functionalised diamond NPs AuNPs based SERS TNT  0.10-100.00 0.10 .sup.44 CL-ELISA Luminor TNT — 5.11 .sup.45 CL-labeled CL TNT    (2.55-63.84) × 10.sup.3  2.55 × 10.sup.3 .sup.46 immunosensor Enzyme Immunosensor ECL TNT — 1.40 .sup.47 Graphene CV TNT 12.76 × 10.sup.3-24.25 × 10.sup.5 12.76 × 10.sup.3 .sup.48 FRET Fluorescence TNT  3.19-191.52 0.29 .sup.49 AuNPs nanoplasmonic PRET TNT     2.55-2.55 × 10.sup.3 2.55 .sup.50 probe ZIF-8 DPV TNT  1-460 346 pM This work Abbreviations: Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), Squarewave voltammetry (SWV), Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), Adsorptive stripping voltammetry (ASV), Square-Wave Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (SWASV), glassy carbon electrode (GCE), Dinitrobenzene (DNB), Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT), Molecular Imprinting (MIM), Molecular imprinting polymer (MIP), Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), Chemiluminescence enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CL-ELISA), Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET).

(46) While not being bound to any underlying mechanism or phenomenon, it is believed that the TNT molecule interacts with the ZIF-8 as shown schematically in FIG. 7. As shown in FIG. 7, it is believed that the lone pair electrons on the nitrogen atoms of the imidazole rings of the ZIF-8 coordinate with the delocalized aromatic electrons of the toluene ring of TNT, thus binding TNT molecules with the ZIF-8. This is further bolstered by FT-IR studies, which confirmed the presence of an aromatic ring in ZIF-8. TNT is an electron-deficient molecule because of three electron-withdrawing nitro groups and the electron-rich ZIF-8 (lone pair electrons on the nitrogen atoms) which favors the formation of donor-acceptor electron-transfer mechanism.

(47) The specificity of different substances as potential interfering compound for the determination of TNT was studied under the optimum conditions. It was found that the ZIF-8-modified electrode displayed excellent anti-interference properties towards possible co-existing organic molecules and inorganic cations in water and soil. The results also showed that 500 μM concentrations of toluene, urea, 4-nitrophenol, and Pb.sup.2+ did not interfere with the detection of TNT (see FIG. 5E).

(48) The electrochemical responses of the ZIF-8-modified electrode to a series of nitroaromatic compounds, including nitrobenzene (NB), 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT), and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) were investigated. The results are shown in FIGS. 8A (NB), 8B (2,6-DNT), 8C (TNT), and 8D (2,4-DNT). It was observed that the position of cathodic peaks is strongly dependent on the number of nitro groups contained in nitroaromatic compounds. Nitrobenzene (FIG. 8A) exhibits only one reduction peaked at −0.83 V. In contrast, 2,4-DNT (FIG. 8D) and 2,6-DNT (FIG. 8B) exhibit two reduction peaks, showing that the sensor can detect the other nitroaromatic explosive with high sensitivity. FIG. 8C shows the corresponding curve for TNT for sake of comparison.

(49) The storage stability of the ZIF-8 modified electrode was studied by measuring the sensor response to TNT over time. The results are shown in FIG. 12. There was no obvious decrease in the normalized signal to 100 nM TNT for a period of 15 days. Over that time period, the sensor retained 89.7% of its initial signal, indicating the acceptable stability. In addition, it was found that the standard deviation of current responses obtained at two different electrodes prepared by the same method for 100 nM did not exceed 6.2%.

(50) The structural change induced by the TNT reduction reaction at a ZIF-8-modified screen-printed electrode surface was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bare SPE surface is not covered by carbon particles; however, after modification ZIF-8 nanoparticles are seen distributed throughout the SPE surface. (Data not shown). The ZIF-8 nanoparticles octahedral in shape.

(51) The method to detect nitro-aromatic explosives using the ZIF-8-modified electrode thus has high sensitivity and good selectivity for the detection of TNT and other nitro-aromatic vapors. TNT has an extremely low volatility (vapor pressure 4.8×10.sup.−6 Torr) at 20° C. Therefore, TNT residues are expected to persist and evaporate over time.[51] Thus, the resistance response sensitivities for the ZIF-8 sensor upon exposure to TNT vapors as a function of exposure time was evaluated. The ZIF-8-modified electrode is shown in FIG. 9A. A sealed vial (5 mL) was filled with a known amount of solid explosive and the electrode inserted, as shown in FIG. 9B. Exposure of TNT vapors was achieved by placing the ZIF-8-modified electrode into the sealed vial at a chosen temperature (about 80° C. in this experiment). After exposing the electrode for a given period of time, the resistance values of the electrode were measured. The results for exposure times up to 420 seconds are shown in FIG. 9C. The results for an exposure time of 1 hour are shown in FIG. 9D. The response of the sensor to the presence of TNT vapors was instantaneous with an increase in resistance values upon time. The current intensity of the ZIF-8 sensor was also recorded after exposure to the saturated vapours of TNT at room temperature for 1 h (FIG. 9D). The resistance gradually increased. These results show that the electrode described herein is a sensitive electrochemical sensor for detecting TNT vapors.

(52) In closing, disclosed herein is an easy approach to synthesize high-quality ZIF-8. The method enables rapid, large-scale, low-cost preparation of ZIF-8. The electrode described herein is useful for detecting nitro-aromatic explosives. The linear range of detection is from about 1 nM to about 460 nM, and the limit of detection is 346 pM. Zeta potential studies and electrochemical studies further prove that TNT molecule adsorbs onto the ZIF-8 hexagonal nanosheet. The practical utility of the sensor was also demonstrated in the gas phase.

REFERENCES

(53) The following documents are incorporated herein by reference.

(54) (1) Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2010, 9 (6149), 1230444.

(55) (2) Rosi, N. L.; Eckert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D. T.; Kim, J.; O'Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Hydrogen Storage in Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2003, 300 (5622), 1127-1129.

(56) (3) Li, J.-R.; Kuppler, R. J.; Zhou, H.-C. Selective Gas Adsorption and Separation in Metal-organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (5), 1477.

(57) (4) Lee, J.; Farha, O. K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (5), 1450-1459.

(58) (5) Bétard, A.; Fischer, R. A. Metal-Organic Framework Thin Films: From Fundamentals to Applications. Chemical Reviews. 2012, pp 1055-1083.

(59) (6) Chaikittisilp, W.; Hu, M.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.-S.; Fujita, T.; Wu, K. C.-W.; Chen, L.-C.; Yamauchi, Y.; Ariga, K. Nanoporous Carbons through Direct Carbonization of a Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework for Supercapacitor Electrodes. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48 (58), 7259.

(60) (7) Yaghi, O. M.; Davis, C. E.; Li, G.; Li, H. Selective Guest Binding by Tailored Channels in a 3-D Porous zinc(II)-Benzenetricarboxylate Network. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (12), 2861-2868.

(61) (8) Gross, A. F.; Sherman, E.; Vajo, J. J. Aqueous Room Temperature Synthesis of Cobalt and Zinc Sodalite Zeolitic Imidizolate Frameworks. Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41 (18), 5458.

(62) (9) Zhang, H. X.; Cao, A. M.; Hu, J. S.; Wan, L. J.; Lee, S. T. Electrochemical Sensor for Detecting Ultratrace Nitroaromatic Compounds Using Mesoporous SiO2-Modified Electrode. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78 (6), 1967-1971.

(63) (10) Zang, J.; Guo, C. X.; Hu, F.; Yu, L.; Li, C. M. Electrochemical Detection of Ultratrace Nitroaromatic Explosives Using Ordered Mesoporous Carbon. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 683 (2), 187-191.

(64) (11) Yan, F.; He, Y.; Ding, L.; Su, B. Highly Ordered Binary Assembly of Silica Mesochannels and Surfactant Micelles for Extraction and Electrochemical Analysis of Trace Nitroaromatic Explosives and Pesticides. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87 (8), 4436-4441.

(65) (12) Stringer, R. C.; Gangopadhyay, S.; Grant, S. A. Detection of Nitroaromatic Explosives Using a Fluorescent-Labeled Imprinted Polymer. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82 (10), 4015-4019.

(66) (13) Salinas, Y.; Agostini, A.; Pérez-Esteve, É.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Sancenón, F.; Dolores Marcos, M.; Soto, J.; Costero, A. M.; Gil, S.; Parra, M.; Amorós, P. Fluorogenic Detection of Tetryl and TNT Explosives Using Nanoscopic-Capped Mesoporous Hybrid Materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (11), 3561.

(67) (14) Anu Prathap, M. U.; Wei, C.; Sun, S.; Xu, Z. J. A New Insight into Electrochemical Detection of Eugenol by Hierarchical Sheaf-like Mesoporous NiCo2O4. Nano Res. 2015, 8 (8), 2636-2645.

(68) (15) Prathap, M. U. A.; Sun, S.; Wei, C.; Xu, Z. J. A Novel Non-Enzymatic Lindane Sensor Based on CuO—MnO2 Hierarchical Nano-Microstructures for Enhanced Sensitivity. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4376-4379.

(69) (16) Anu Prathap, M. U.; Srivastava, R. Synthesis of NiCo2O4 and Its Application in the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol. Nano Energy 2013, 2 (5), 1046-1053.

(70) (17) Anu Prathap, M. U.; Chaurasia, A. K.; Sawant, S. N.; Apte, S. K. Polyaniline-Based Highly Sensitive Microbial Biosensor for Selective Detection of Lindane. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (15), 6672-6678.

(71) (18) Seenivasan, R.; Chang, W. -J.; Gunasekaran, S. Highly Sensitive Detection and Removal of Lead Ions in Water Using Cysteine-Functionalized Graphene Oxide/Polypyrrole Nanocomposite Film Electrode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7 (29), 15935-15943.

(72) (19) Seenivasan, R.; Maddodi, N.; Setaluri, V.; Gunasekaran, S. An Electrochemical Immunosensing Method for Detecting Melanoma Cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 68, 508-515.

(73) (20) Seenivasan, R.; Singh, C. K.; Warrick, J. W.; Ahmad, N.; Gunasekaran, S. Microfluidic-Integrated Patterned ITO Immunosensor for Rapid Detection of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Biomarker in Prostate Cancer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 95, 160-167.

(74) (21) He, M.; Yao, J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, K.; Chen, F.; Wang, H. Facile Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 from a Concentrated Aqueous Solution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 184, 55-60.

(75) (22) Tu, M.; Wiktor, C.; Rösler, C.; Fischer, R. A. Rapid Room Temperature Syntheses of Zeolitic-Imidazolate Framework (ZIF) Nanocrystals. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (87), 13258-13260.

(76) (23) Ren, H.; Zhang, L.; An, J.; Wang, T.; Li, L.; Si, X.; He, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, C.; Su, Z. Polyacrylic Acid@zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 Nanoparticles with Ultrahigh Drug Loading Capability for pH-Sensitive Drug Release. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (8), 1000-1002.

(77) (24) Rouquerol, J.; Rouquerol, F.; Llewellyn, P.; Maurin, G.; Sing, K. S. W. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications: Second Edition; 2013.

(78) (25) Gao, M.; Zeng, L.; Nie, J.; Ma, G. Polymer-metal-organic Framework Core-shell Framework Nanofibers via Electrospinning and Their Gas Adsorption Activities. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (9), 7078-7085.

(79) (26) Arjmandi, N.; Van Roy, W.; Lagae, L.; Borghs, G. Measuring the Electric Charge and Zeta Potential of Nanometer-Sized Objects Using Pyramidal-Shaped Nanopores. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (20), 8490-8496.

(80) (27) Anu Prathap, M. U.; Srivastava, R.; Satpati, B. Simultaneous Detection of Guanine, Adenine, Thymine, and Cytosine at polyaniline/MnO2 Modified Electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 114, 285-295.

(81) (28) Chen, T. W.; Xu, J. Y.; Sheng, Z. H.; Wang, K.; Wang, F. Bin; Liang, T. M.; Xia, X. H. Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for the Reduction of Nitro Explosives. Electrochem. commun. 2012, 16 (1), 30-33.

(82) (29) Chen, T. W.; Sheng, Z. H.; Wang, K.; Wang, F. Bin; Xia, X. H. Determination of Explosives Using Electrochemically Reduced Graphene. Chem.—An Asian J. 2011, 6 (5), 1210-1216.

(83) (30) Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Brückner, C.; Li, C. M.; Lei, Y. Poly[meso-tetrakis(2-Thienyl)porphyrin] for the Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Explosives. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2010, 147 (1), 191-197.

(84) (31) Fierke, M. A.; Olson, E. J.; B??hlmann, P.; Stein, A. Receptor-Based Detection of 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Using Modified Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Carbon Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4 (9), 4731-4739.

(85) (32) Liang, Y.; Gu, L.; Liu, X.; Yang, Q.; Kajiura, H.; Li, Y.; Zhou, T.; Shi, G. Composites of Polyaniline Nanofibers and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Recognition of Nitroaromatic Compounds. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2011, 17 (21), 5989-5997.

(86) (33) Lu, X.; Quan, Y.; Xue, Z.; Wu, B.; Qi, H.; Liu, D. Determination of Explosives Based on Novel Type of Sensor Using Porphyrin Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2011, 88 (1), 396-401.

(87) (34) Nie, D.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, D.; Liang, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zhou, T.; Jin, L.; Shi, G. Two-Dimensional Molecular Imprinting Approach for the Electrochemical Detection of Trinitrotoluene. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2011, 156 (1), 43-49.

(88) (35) Pesavento, M.; D'Agostino, G.; Alberti, G.; Biesuz, R.; Merli, D. Voltammetric Platform for Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene Based on a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405 (11), 3559-3570.

(89) (36) Qu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Shi, G.; Jin, L. Electrochemical Sensor Prepared from Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Recognition of 1,3-Dinitrobenzene (DNB). Chinese J. Chem. 2009, 27 (10), 2043-2048.

(90) (37) Shi, G.; Qu, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Yang, J.; Jin, L. {MSU/PDDA}n LBL Assembled Modified Sensor for Electrochemical Detection of Ultratrace Explosive Nitroaromatic Compounds. Electrochem. commun. 2007, 9 (7), 1719-1724.

(91) (38) Yang, R.; Wei, Y.; Yu, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, J. H.; Huang, X. J. Make It Different: The Plasma Treated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Improve Electrochemical Performances toward Nitroaromatic Compounds. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 76, 354-362.

(92) (39) Alizadeh, T. Preparation of Magnetic TNT-Imprinted Polymer Nanoparticles and Their Accumulation onto Magnetic Carbon Paste Electrode for TNT Determination. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 61, 532-540.

(93) (40) Shi, L.; Hou, A. G.; Chen, L. Y.; Wang, Z. F. Electrochemical Sensor Prepared from Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Recognition of TNT. Polym. Compos. 2015, 36 (7), 1280-1285.

(94) (41) Üzer, A.; Erça{hacek over (g)}, E.; Apak, R. Selective Colorimetric Determination of TNT Partitioned between an Alkaline Solution and a Strongly Basic Dowex 1-X8 Anion Exchanger. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 174 (2-3), 239-243.

(95) (42) Cortada, C.; Vidal, L.; Canals, A. Determination of Nitroaromatic Explosives in Water Samples by Direct Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Talanta 2011, 85 (5), 2546-2552.

(96) (43) Chevallier, E.; Scorsone, E.; Girard, H. A.; Pichot, V.; Spitzer, D.; Bergonzo, P. Metalloporphyrin-Functionalised Diamond Nano-Particles as Sensitive Layer for Nitroaromatic Vapours Detection at Room-Temperature. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2010, 151 (1), 191-197.

(97) (44) Jamil, A. K. M.; Izake, E. L.; Sivanesan, A.; Fredericks, P. M. Rapid Detection of TNT in Aqueous Media by Selective Label Free Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Talanta 2015, 134, 732-738.

(98) (45) Romolo, F. S.; Ferri, E.; Mirasoli, M.; D'Elia, M.; Ripani, L.; Peluso, G.; Risoluti, R.; Maiolini, E.; Girotti, S. Field Detection Capability of Immunochemical Assays during Criminal Investigations Involving the Use of TNT. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015, 246, 25-30.

(99) (46) Mirasoli, M.; Buragina, A.; Dolci, L. S.; Guardigli, M.; Simoni, P.; Montoya, A.; Maiolini, E.; Girotti, S.; Roda, A. Development of a Chemiluminescence-Based Quantitative Lateral Flow Immunoassay for on-Field Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 721, 167-172.

(100) (47) Wilson, R.; Clavering, C.; Hutchinson, A. Electrochemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassays for TNT and Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75 (16), 4244-4249.

(101) (48) Goh, M. S.; Pumera, M. Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) in Seawater: The Comparison of Single-, Few-, and Multilayer Graphene Nanoribbons and Graphite Microparticles. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 399 (1), 127-131.

(102) (49) Xia, Y.; Song, L.; Zhu, C. Turn-on and near-Infrared Fluorescent Sensing for 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene Based on Hybrid (Gold Nanorod)-(Quantum Dots) Assembly. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83 (4), 1401-1407.

(103) (50) Qu, W.-G.; Deng, B.; Zhong, S.-L.; Shi, H.-Y.; Wang, S.-S.; Xu, A.-W. Plasmonic Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Nanospectroscopy for Sensitive and Selective Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT). Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (4), 1237-1239.

(104) (51) Senesac, L.; Thundat, T. G. Nanosensors for Trace Explosive Detection. Materials Today. 2008, pp 28-36.