PLASMA-FREE ETCHED B-GA2O3-NIO MERGED PIN SCHOTTKY DIODE WITH HIGH-VOLTAGE STRESS RELIABILITY

Abstract

A (Ga.sub.2O.sub.3)-nickel oxide (NiO) heterojunction device and method of making the same are presented. In implementations, the method includes: providing a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base including a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate with an n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer thereon; forming NiO-filled internal trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench in the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer using a plasma-free etching process; forming at least one junction termination extension (JTE) structure about the periphery of the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer; depositing an anode over the NiO filled interior trenches, over portions of the NiO-filled peripheral trench, and over portions of the JTE structure; and depositing a cathode over a bottom surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate, thereby forming the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device is formed without the use of plasma-etching and is free of plasma-etching damage.

Claims

1. A method of making a gallium oxide (Ga.sub.2O.sub.3)-nickel oxide (NiO) heterojunction device comprising: providing a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base including a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate with an n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer thereon; forming NiO-filled internal trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench in the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer using a plasma-free etching process; forming at least one junction termination extension (JTE) structure about the periphery of the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer; depositing an anode over the NiO filled interior trenches, over portions of the NiO-filled peripheral trench, and over portions of the JTE structure; and depositing a cathode over a bottom surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate, thereby forming the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device is formed without the use of plasma-etching and is free of plasma-etching damage.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the NiO-filled internal trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench includes: forming internal trenches in the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer via the plasma-free etching process; forming a peripheral trench extending about the periphery of the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer via the plasma-free etching process; depositing p-type NiO into the internal trenches and the peripheral trench, thereby forming the NiO-filled internal trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the JTE structure comprises: depositing the at least one JTE structure over portions of the NiO filled peripheral trench and surface portions of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device comprises a merged PiN Schottky (MPS) diode having a specific contact resistance between the anode and the NiO of less than 0.0005 Ohm*cm.sup.2.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the JTE structure comprises a bi-layer JTE structure including first and second layers of NiO.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein depositing the JTE structure comprises: depositing a first layer of NiO via sputtering in a pure argon atmosphere over portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench and over portions of a surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer; and depositing a first stage of a second layer of NiO in 20:1 argon:oxygen atmosphere over the first layer and portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench; and depositing a second stage of the second layer of NiO in a 2:1 argon:oxygen atmosphere over the first stage of the second layer of NiO and portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the JTE structure comprises a layer of NiO.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein forming the NiO-filled internal trenches and the NiO-filled peripheral trench in the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer using a plasma-free etching process comprises patterning using photolithography and gallium flux etching.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising annealing the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the anode and cathode comprise platinum oxide and gold.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer is doped with silicon (Si).

12. A gallium oxide (Ga.sub.2O.sub.3)-nickel oxide (NiO) heterojunction device comprising: a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base comprised of a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate with an n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer thereon, the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer including a plurality of NiO-filled internal trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench; a junction termination extension (JTE) structure formed about the periphery of the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer; an anode formed over the NiO filled interior trenches, over portions of the NiO-filled peripheral trench, and over portions of the JTE structure; and a cathode formed over a bottom surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device is formed without the use of plasma-etching and is free of plasma-etching damage.

13. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the JTE structure is a NiO bi-layer JTE structure.

14. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 13, wherein the first layer of the NiO bi-layer JTE structure extends beyond opposing edges of the anode.

15. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the JTE structure comprises a layer of NiO.

16. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the anode and cathode comprise platinum oxide and gold.

17. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the JTE structure is formed over portions of the NiO filled peripheral trench and surface portions of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer.

18. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device comprises a merged PiN Schottky (MPS) diode having a specific contact resistance between the anode and the NiO of less than 0.0005 Ohm*cm.sup.2.

19. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer is doped with silicon (Si).

20. The Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of claim 12, wherein the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer has a thickness of at least 5 microns.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] Aspects of the present invention are described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

[0012] FIG. 1 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for making a semiconductor device in accordance with aspects of the present invention.

[0013] FIG. 2A depicts a stage of a device of the present invention including a SiO.sub.2-patterned mask with interior trenches and a peripheral trench formed therein.

[0014] FIG. 2B depicts a stage of a device of the present invention after Ga flux etching.

[0015] FIG. 2C depicts a stage of a device of the present invention after the residual portions of the SiO.sub.2 mask are removed.

[0016] FIG. 2D depicts a stage of a device of the present invention with NiO-filled interior trenches and an NiO-filled peripheral trench.

[0017] FIG. 2E depicts a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of the present invention with opposing NiO JTEs portions and an anode and cathode.

[0018] FIG. 2F is a close-up partial view of FIG. 2F, showing the two stages of the second bi-layer of the NiO JTE structure.

[0019] FIG. 2G depicts another Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device of the present invention with opposing NiO JTE portions and an anode and cathode.

[0020] FIG. 2H is a top view of the embodiment 200G of FIG. 2G.

[0021] FIG. 3A is a chart depicting C-V measurements of a PtOx and Ni SBD in accordance with embodiments of the invention

[0022] FIG. 3B is a chart depicting C-V measurements of a PtOx JBS diode in accordance with embodiments of the invention, showing a dual sweep at 300 kHz measured from accumulation to depletion (dashed line) and back to accumulation (solid line).

[0023] FIG. 3C is a chart depicting linear transmission line measurements of Ni and PtOx Ohmic contacts to NiO. Control films of NiO were isolated via lift-off on sapphire substrates, as indicated in FIG. 3C.

[0024] FIG. 4A is a chart depicting C-V measurements for a PtOx MPS and Ni JBS diodes in accordance with embodiments of the invention.

[0025] FIG. 4B is a chart depicting C-V measurements Ni/Au and PtOx/Au SBDs in accordance with embodiments of the invention, showing a dual sweep at 300 kHz measured from accumulation to depletion and back to accumulation.

[0026] FIG. 5 illustrates a testing waveform for high voltage reliability measurements in accordance with embodiments of the invention.

[0027] FIG. 6 is a chart depicting specific on-resistance and reverse leakage current as a function of stress time measured at 600, 700 and 800 V.

[0028] FIG. 7 is a chart depicting forward J-V measurements (25 curves) taken during the reliability measurements of the MPS diode at 700V.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0029] Aspects of the present invention relate generally to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to a plasma-free etching method of making a gallium oxide (Ga.sub.2O.sub.3)-nickel oxide (NiO) heterojunction device. In embodiments, a method of fabricating a beta-gallium oxide (-Ga.sub.2O.sub.3)NiO merged PiN Schottky (MPS) diode is provided, which uses a gallium (Ga) flux plasma-free etch process and platinum oxide (PtOx) contacts. In general, an MPS diode is a hybrid device that combines a Schottky diode and a P-N diode in parallel.

[0030] Dry etching or plasma etching is a process of removing material, typically a masked pattern of semiconductor material, by exposing the material to a bombardment of ions (e.g., a plasma of nitrogen, chlorine, and boron trichloride), that dislodge particles of the material from the exposed surface. One drawback of plasma etching is the problem of surface damage that may result from the etching process, which can hinder device performance by increasing the level of leakage current (i.e., the amount of current that flows when it should not). For example, a high power (typically 600-1000 W) boron trichloride (BCl.sub.3) reactive-ion etching (RIE) or inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) etching has long been known to negatively impact Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 surfaces and requires mitigation with high temperature or aggressive chemical treatments. While instances of plasma damage to Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 surfaces and Schottky contact formations are readily found within the literature, the impacts on a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO etched heterojunction remain a void.

[0031] Advantageously, the use of a plasma-free etch process in implementations of the invention avoids the problem of Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 surface damage that would be caused by a high-power plasma etch process. By removing the need for RIE plasma etching and post etch chemical treatments, embodiments of the invention provide a high quality and damage free surface for heterojunction formation.

[0032] In embodiments, PtO.sub.x acts as both a Schottky contact to n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 as well as an Ohmic contact to p-type NiO. Compared to Ni contacts to NiO (Ni/NiO contacts) used in Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 junction barrier Schottky (JBS) diodes and PN diodes, the PtO.sub.x/NiO contact in accordance with embodiments of the invention exhibits a lower contact resistance as shown by linear transmission line measurements. This improved contact resistance enables an apparent second turn-on, potentially due to minority carrier injection, and a further decrease in differential on-resistance under forward diode operation, confirming the formation of a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 MPS diode.

[0033] MPS diodes fabricated in accordance with embodiments of the invention were subjected to high reverse bias reliability testing. At 800 volts (V), MPS diodes were stressed for a cumulative time of 2000 seconds(s) while periodically switching the device on. No variation or degradation of the on-state performance was observed as the Schottky regime (<3 V) of the MPS diode was turned on. This signifies an improved Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO heterojunction with minimal side-wall trapping as a result of the plasma-etch-free process.

Exemplary Method

[0034] FIG. 1 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for making a semiconductor device in accordance with aspects of the present invention. The method references semiconductor device elements depicted in FIGS. 2A-2F.

[0035] At 101, a gallium oxide (Ga.sub.2O.sub.3) base 202 is provided or fabricated, wherein the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 is comprised of an n.sup.+ beta ()-phase Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate 203 with an n Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204 grown thereon. See FIG. 2A described below. In embodiments, the substrate 203 is a tin (Sn)-doped -Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 (-Ga.sub.2O.sub.3:Sn) substrate with a halide vapor phase epitaxial (HVPE) layer 204 thereon. In implementations, the -Ga.sub.2O.sub.3:Sn substrate has a thickness of 5 micrometers (m), and includes unintentional silicon (Si) doping.

[0036] At 102, multiple internal trenches (e.g., 210A, 210B, 210C) and at least one peripheral trench 215 (hereafter the peripheral trench) are formed in the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204 via a plasma-free anisotropic dry etching method. In embodiments, the trenches are formed using photolithographic gallium flux etching. In implementations, the peripheral trench 215 extends about the periphery of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204. Opposing portions 215A and 215B of a single peripheral trench 215 are depicted in FIG. 2D discussed below, for example.

[0037] In one exemplary embodiment, a silicon oxide (SiO.sub.2) mask layer 206 is deposited onto a surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204 using plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Existing PECVD methods may be utilized to deposit the SiO.sub.2 mask layer 206. The SiO.sub.2 mask layer 206 is then patterned using a buffered oxide etchant (BOE), thereby generating a SiO.sub.2-patterned surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204. Existing patterning methods may be utilized to implement step 103. In embodiments, the patterning results in interior trenches 208A-208C formed in the SiO.sub.2 mask, as well as the peripheral trench 215. See FIG. 2A discussed below. The SiO.sub.2-patterned surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 is heat-cleaned. In implementations, the heat cleaning is performed for ten (10) minutes at 800 degrees Celsius ( C.). Existing heat cleaning methods may be utilized. See FIG. 2A discussed below.

[0038] FIG. 2A is a cross-sectional side view of a stage 200A of a device of the present invention including a SiO.sub.2-patterned mask 206, with the interior trenches 208A-208C and a peripheral trench 209 formed therein. Opposing portions of the peripheral trench 209 are shown at 209A and 209B. The device stage 200A includes the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 comprised of the n+ beta ()-phase Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate 203 with the n.sup. Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204 grown thereon. While three interior trenches 208A-208C are depicted, it should be understood that more or less interior trenches may be formed in accordance with embodiments of the invention.

[0039] As part of the exemplary photolithography process of step 102, Ga flux etching of the SiO.sub.2-patterned surface 206 of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base is performed, resulting in an etched n Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204, included interior trenches 210A-210C, and a peripheral trench 211 (opposing sides of which are shown at 211A and 211B). See FIG. 2B discussed below. In general, Ga flux etching is a technique that uses Ga to etch the surface of Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 and other materials. Ga flux etching uses molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and other processes known to those skilled in the art. In implementations, the Ga flux etching is performed for 159 minutes (min) using 1.2410.sup.7 Torr of Ga flux at 725 C. thermocouple temperature in an MBE reactor maintained at 110.sup.9 Torr during the etching.

[0040] FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional side view of a stage 200B of a device of the present invention after the Ga flux etching. Ga flux etching results in the interior trenches 210A-210C and the peripheral trench 211 (with opposing sides indicated at 211A and 211B) formed in the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202. While three interior trenches 211A-211C are depicted, it should be understood that more or less interior trenches may be formed in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Ga flux etching may result in residual droplets of Ga on surfaces of the device, as represented at 212.

[0041] As part of the exemplary photolithography process of step 102, portions of the SiO.sub.2 mask 206 that remain after the Ga flux etching step are removed using BOE, resulting in a patterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 with trenches 210A-210C, and 211 formed therein. See FIG. 2C discussed below.

[0042] FIG. 2C is a cross-sectional side view of a stage 200C of a device of the present invention after the residual portions of SiO.sub.2 mask 206 are removed.

[0043] As part of the exemplary photolithography process of step 102, the patterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 is soaked in hydrogen chloride (HCl) diluted in water (H.sub.2O), to remove any remaining Ga droplets from surfaces of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202. In implementations, the dilution ratio of H.sub.2O to HCl utilized is 10:1. The patterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 is re-patterned with another photoresist, resulting in a repatterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 including trenches 210A-210C, 211A and 211B formed therein.

[0044] At 103, nickel oxide (NiO) (a p-type material) is deposited into trenches 210A-210B and 211 of the repatterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202, thereby creating NiO trench regions 214A-214C, 215A and 215B within the repatterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202. See FIG. 2D discussed below. In implementations, the NiO is deposited via sputtering from an NiO target, with a hole concentration (N.sub.A) of N.sub.A>10.sup.18 cm.sup.3. The photoresist may then be removed using existing photolithographic techniques.

[0045] FIG. 2D is a cross-sectional side view of a stage 200D of a device of the present invention with NiO-filled interior trenches 214A-214C and an NiO-filled peripheral trench 215 (opposing portions of which are shown at 215A and 215B). As noted above, the number of interior trenches is not meant to be limited to the examples herein.

[0046] With reference back to FIG. 1, at 104, at least one junction termination extension (JTE) structure 217 is deposited about the periphery of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202. In general, a JTE is a technique that improves the control of electric fields in p-n junctions. JTEs can be employed to reduce field crowding at a junction periphery where the charge in the JTE is designed to sink the critical electric field lines at breakdown.

[0047] FIG. 2E is a cross-sectional side view of a stage of a device of the present invention including a JTE 217 extending about the periphery of the device. In the embodiments of FIG. 2E, a first layer 216 of a bi-layer NiO JTE structure 217 is deposited on the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 over portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench 215 (e.g., portions of 215A and 215B) and portions of a surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204. In implementations, the first layer 216 comprises 700 nanometers (nm) of NiO sputtered in a pure argon (Ar) atmosphere, resulting in a N.sub.A of about 310.sup.17 cm.sup.3. In embodiments, the first layer 216 is configured to extend beyond (e.g., 40 micrometers beyond) a respective edge of an anode contact 220. See FIG. 2E discussed below, for example.

[0048] In this first embodiment, a second layer 218 of the bi-layer NiO JTE structure 217 is then deposited over the first layer 216 and portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench 215 (see portions of 215A, 215B covered by the bi-layer NiO JTE structure 217. In implementations, the second layer 218 is deposited in two stages.

[0049] FIG. 2F is a close-up partial view of FIG. 2F, including the two stages of the second bi-layer of the NiO JTE structure. Stage one is depicted in FIG. 2F at 219A and stage two is depicted in FIG. 2F at 219B, for example. In embodiments, the first stage comprises 250 nm of NiO in a 20:1 argon:oxygen (Ar:O.sub.2) atmosphere followed by a second stage comprising 100 nm of NiO in a 2:1 Ar:O.sub.2 atmosphere, resulting in an N.sub.A>10.sup.19 cm.sup.3.

[0050] FIG. 2G is a cross-sectional side view of an alternative embodiment 200G of a device of the present invention including a single layer JTE 217. In implementations, the JTE structure 217 comprises NiO deposited about the periphery of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202. Opposing side portions 217A and 217B of the JTE 217 are visible in FIG. 2G. More specifically, the JTE structure 217 is deposited about the periphery of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base 202 over portions of the peripheral NiO-filled trench 215 and portions of a surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 epitaxial layer 204.

[0051] FIG. 2H is a top view of the embodiments 200G of FIG. 2G. Note the JTE structure 217 extends about the periphery of the semiconductor base 202.

[0052] With reference back to FIG. 1, at 105, an anode 220 (e.g., a platinum oxide (PtO.sub.x) and gold (Au) anode) is deposited over the interior NiO-filled trenches 214A-214C, over portions of the NiO-filled peripheral trench 215, and over portions of the JTE (e.g., over at least a portion of the second layer 218 of the NiO JTE 217), via reactive ion sputtering. See FIGS. 2E and 2F. Sec also the embodiment of FIG. 2G, wherein an anode 220 is deposited over the interior NiO-filled trenches 214A-214C, over portions of the NiO-filled peripheral trench 215, and over portions of the JTE 217. In implementations, the sputtering occurs from a platinum target at 3 mTorr, 50 W in a 10:4 Ar:O.sub.2 atmosphere.

[0053] Returning to FIG. 1, at 106, a backside ohmic contact 222 (e.g., a nickel (Ni) and gold (Au) contact) is deposited onto a surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate 203 via reactive ion sputtering, resulting in a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device 200E. In implementations, the sputtering occurs from a platinum target at 3 mTorr, 50W in a 10:4 Ar:O2 atmosphere. See FIGS. 2E, 2F and 2G discussed below.

[0054] At 107, the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3NiO heterojunction device (e.g., 200E or 200G) is annealed. In implementations, the annealing is performed at 275 C. in nitrogen gas (N.sub.2) for 15 minutes.

Experimental Results

[0055] Fabrication of a PtO.sub.x-anode MPS device including Ni-anode JBS and reference PtOx and Ni anode SBDs was carried out on a Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base comprised of a (001) oriented Sn-doped Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 substrate with a 5 m thick halide vapor phase epitaxial (HVPE) epilayer with an unintentional Si doping concentration of 510.sup.16 moles per cubic centimeter (cm.sup.3). The fabrication process began with a 100 nm PECVD SiO.sub.2 mask deposited onto the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base and patterned using buffered oxide etchant (BOE). Atomic Ga flux etching was performed for 159 minutes (min) in a molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) reactor using a Ga flux at a pressure of 1.2410.sup.7 Torr and at thermocouple temperature of 725 degrees Celsius ( C.). Prior to Ga-flux etching, the SiO.sub.2 patterned Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 surface was heat cleaned for 10 min at 800 C. The MBE reactor pressure was maintained at 110.sup.9 Torr during the etching. BOE was used to remove the SiO.sub.2 mask that remained after etching, followed by a 2 min soak in dilute 10:1 H2O:HCl to remove remaining Ga droplets from the surface of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 base. Profilometry using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) yielded an etch depth of 240 nm for an etch rate of 1.51 nm/min. After re-patterning for NiO liftoff, 240 nm of NiO with a hole concentration N.sub.A>10.sup.18 cm.sup.3 was sputtered from a NiO target into the etched trenches. The room temperature sputtering conditions were 20:1 Ar:O.sub.2, at 100 W power, and at a 3 mTorr pressure. Subsequently, a bi-layer NiO junction termination extension (JTE) was sputtered around the devices extending to 40 m beyond the edge of an anode contact position.

[0056] The first JTE layer consisted of 700 nm of NiO sputtered in a pure Ar atmosphere, resulting in hole concentration N.sub.A of about 310.sup.17 cm.sup.3. The second JTE layer was sputtered in two parts consisting of 250 nm of 20:1 Ar:O.sub.2 NiO followed by 100 nm of 2:1 Ar:O.sub.2 NiO with N.sub.A>10.sup.19 cm.sup.3. All sputtering conditions, including the sputtered PtO.sub.x anode layer are listed in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sputtering Conditions Thickness Pressure Ar/O.sub.2 (nm) (mTorr) Power (W) N.sub.A (cm.sup.3) JBS NiO 20:1 240 3 100 >10.sup.18 JTE 1 60:0 700 3 100 ~3 10.sup.17 JTE2 20:1 350 3 100 >10.sup.18 2:1 110 3 100 >10.sup.19 PtO.sub.x 10:4 20 3 50

[0057] A schematic of the bi-layer JTE and the etched trench geometry is shown in FIG. 2E. The Ni/Au and PtO.sub.x/Au anodes were deposited via electron beam evaporation and reactive ion sputtering, respectively. Platinum oxide was sputtered from a platinum target (3 mTorr, 50 W) in a 10:4 Ar:O.sub.2 atmosphere. Backside Ohmic contacts of Ti/Au (20/200 nm) were deposited using electron beam evaporation. The anode area was roughly 100100 m with rounded corners of radius 10 m. A backside Ohmic contact anneal was not performed. Lastly, an anneal of the as-fabricated device structures was performed at 275 C. in N.sub.2 for 15 min.

[0058] FIG. 3A is a chart 300A depicting C-V measurements of a PtO.sub.x and Ni SBD in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements were taken at 1 MHz frequency on the reference SBDs of both Ni and PtO.sub.x anodes to extract the .sub.B,CV as shown in FIG. 3A. The built-in potential (V.sub.bi) for the Ni and PtO.sub.x anode metals was 1.17 eV and 1.87 eV, respectively. Using the extracted V.sub.bi and the additional E.sub.C-E.sub.F, the .sub.B,CV was calculated to be 1.22 eV (Ni) and 1.92 cV (PtO.sub.x).

[0059] FIG. 3B is a chart 300B depicting C-V measurements of a PtO.sub.x JBS diode in accordance with embodiments of the invention, showing a dual sweep at 300 kHz measured from accumulation to depletion (dashed line) and back to accumulation (solid line). The absence of hysteresis shows that charge trapping along the etched sidewalls is minimal for the plasma-free etched Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO heterojunction. As the JBS and MPS diodes were fabricated using identical mask designs, the differentiation between the two diode architectures stems from the Ohmic contact formation to the p+ NiO regions. The forward bias operation of a JBS diodes is determined mainly by majority carrier injection from the Schottky anode into the n-drift region. Since minority carrier injection from the p-region is not required, the anode does not need to form an Ohmic contact to the p-type NiO in a JBS diode. An improved Ohmic contact to the p-type region is necessary for the formation of a MPS diode where a second turn-on and increase in current density due to minority carrier injection occurs as the PN diode portion of the device turns on. In this work, the Ni and PtO.sub.x Ohmic contacts to p-NiO were evaluated using linear transmission line measurements (LTLM).

[0060] FIG. 3C is a chart 300C depicting linear transmission line measurements of Ni and PtO.sub.x Ohmic contacts to NiO. Control films of NiO were isolated via lift-off on sapphire substrates, as indicated in FIG. 3C. A specific contact resistance (R.sub.c,sp) of 1.0710.sup.2 *cm.sup.2 was extracted from the Ni/NiO LTLMs. The PtO.sub.x/NiO LTLMs resulted in a R.sub.c,sp of 1.8710.sup.4 *cm.sup.2, a reduction of nearly two orders of magnitude. Similar sheet resistance values of 1.3810.sup.6 /sq (Ni) and 1.4610.sup.6 /sq (PtO.sub.x) where extracted as evidenced by the nearly linear slope of the LTLM data in FIG. 3C.

[0061] FIG. 4A is a chart 400A depicting C-V measurements for a PtO.sub.x MPS and Ni JBS diodes in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The forward current density voltage (J-V) characteristics were recorded using a Keithley 4200SCS source measurement unit. The JBS and MPS diodes can be analyzed by splitting the J-V characteristics into two regimes, a Schottky barrier regime (V.sub.F<3V) and a PN diode regime (V.sub.F>3V). The V.sub.F value of 3 V is chosen due to the band-alignment of the Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO heterojunction. The turn-on voltage (V.sub.on) of the Ni/Au JBS diode was 1.13 V as shown in FIG. 4A. The minimum differential specific on-resistance (R.sub.on,sp) of 3.12 m.Math.cm.sup.2 occurred at V.sub.F of 1.84 V. The differential R.sub.on,sp showed a gradual increase as the JBS diode entered the PN regime where a minimum R.sub.on,sp of 3.15 m.Math.cm.sup.2 occurred at V.sub.F of 5.18 V. The PtO.sub.x/Au MPS diode exhibits differing J-V/R.sub.on,sp characteristics as shown in FIG. 4A. As a result of the increased PB of the PtO.sub.x anode compared to Ni, the PtO.sub.x MPS diode shows an increased V.sub.on of 1.74 V. As the MPS diode turns on in the Schottky regime, the differential R.sub.on,sp continuously decreases unlike the Ni JBS diode. A more drastic decrease of the R.sub.on,sp is observed within the PN regime, where minimum value of 1.97 m.Math.cm.sup.2 was observed at 3.7 V. It is at this point the improved Ohmic contact to PtO.sub.x/NiO results in a second turn-on and a higher current density compared to the Ni JBS diode. Increased forward current under surge conditions is a fundamental characteristic of a MPS diode due to minority carrier injection in these devices. Such behavior has not been reported for Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 devices before.

[0062] FIG. 4B is a chart 400B depicting C-V measurements Ni/Au and PtO.sub.x/Au SBDs in accordance with embodiments of the invention, showing a dual sweep at 300 kHz measured from accumulation to depletion and back to accumulation. Ni/Au and PtO.sub.x/Au SBDs were measured for comparison and exhibit a V.sub.on of 0.97 V and 1.62 V, respectively, as depicted in FIG. 4B. The minimum differential R.sub.on,sp of the Ni/Au SBD is 1.54 m.Math.cm.sup.2 and increases beyond this point, similar to Schottky regime of the Ni/Au JBS diode. The PtO.sub.x/Au SBD has minimum differential R.sub.on,sp of 1.67 m.Math.cm.sup.2 with a less gradual increase beyond this point.

[0063] FIG. 5 illustrates a testing waveform 500 for high voltage reliability measurements in accordance with embodiments of the invention. Reverse I-V characteristics were measured in Fluorinert (FC70) using a Keithly 2657 as shown in FIG. 5. The PtO.sub.x MPS diode achieved a breakdown voltage (V.sub.BR) of 1 kV while exhibiting a reduction in leakage current as a result of the increased PtO.sub.x .sub.B compared to Ni/Au JBS devices. A significant increase in leakage current was observed for the Ni/Au JBS devices, particularly at lower voltages, while achieving a V.sub.BR of 900 V. The leakage current of the PtO.sub.x/Au SBD was comparable or slightly lower than the Ni/Au JBS devices up to 600 V. Current compliance of 100 A was reached at 800 V for the PtO.sub.x SBD. The geometry or cell pitch, along with the abrupt junction doping concentrations of a JBS and MPS diode heavily influence the leakage current. The 6 m pitch (4 m Schottky and 2 m Ohmic) of the JBS and MPS diodes is not ideal for this NiO Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 junction doping of N.sub.A=10.sup.18 cm.sup.3 and N.sub.D=510.sup.18 cm.sup.3, respectively. Further optimization of the cell pitch and geometry, as well as an increase in the abrupt junction doping profile could improve the leakage current without impacting the forward characteristics of the device.

[0064] A key advantage provided by the MPS (and JBS) diode structure, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, is the reduction of leakage current at the Schottky metal-semiconductor interface, a weak point of the device. Silvaco TCAD simulations for the PtO.sub.x MPS diode and SBDs were performed at an 800 V reverse bias. The peak electric field (E.sub.C) 100 nm below the semiconductor interface showed a value of 3.22 MV/cm and 3.63 MV/cm for the MPS and SBDs, respectively. While only 0.4 MV/cm, the simulated reduction in peak E.sub.C from the drift layer depletion was validated by the improved V.sub.BR and leakage current from the experimental reverse I-V data.

[0065] Lastly, high bias reliability and stress testing were performed on the PtO.sub.x MPS diodes in accordance with embodiments of the invention, using a Keysight B1505. High bias reliability testing of Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 devices has not been reported in the literature to date and is a crucial test for evaluating the ruggedness and switching capabilities of Ga.sub.2O.sub.3. The testing waveform of the MPS diode according to embodiments of the invention is shown in FIG. 5. Device forward characteristics were initially measured before applying a maximum 800 V reverse bias for a cumulative stress time of 2000 s. Throughout the duration of the test, devices were periodically switched on a total of 25 times.

[0066] FIG. 6 is a chart 600 depicting specific on-resistance and reverse leakage current as a function of stress time measured at 600, 700 and 800 V. During the test, each time the MPS diode was periodically switched on, the minimum differential R.sub.on,sp was recorded within the Schottky and PN regime. Analysis of the R.sub.on,sp values shows minimal variation (0.1 m.Math.cm.sup.2), remaining nearly constant throughout the duration of each 2000 s measurement.

[0067] FIG. 7 is a chart 700 depicting forward J-V measurements (25 curves) taken during the reliability measurements of the MPS diode at 700V. The vertical dashed line separates the Schottky and PN regimes of the MPS diode. The forward J-V characteristics are plotted for each device turn-on that occurred during the 700 V reliability test, as depicted in FIG. 7. The nearly identical V.sub.on and R.sub.on,sp within the Schottky regime of the MPS diode further supports a lack of charge trapping at the plasma-etch-free interface contributing to excellent diode stability.

[0068] In conclusion, fabrication of Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO heterojunction devices using a plasma-etch-free Ga flux etch method was demonstrated. MPS and JBS diodes were fabricated utilizing PtO.sub.x and Ni contacts, respectively. An increased metal work function provides a larger Schottky barrier height to the n-type Ga.sub.2O.sub.3 for improved leakage current while simultaneously improving the Ohmic contact to p-type NiO. Analysis of the NiO Ohmic contacts shows that PtO.sub.x has a lower R.sub.c,sp compared to Ni. The improved contact resistance results in a significant reduction of the R.sub.on,sp and an increase of the current density as the PN diode portion of the MPS diode of the present invention is switched on, a trait not exhibited by the Ni JBS diodes.

[0069] The PtO.sub.x MPS diodes fabricated in accordance with embodiments of the invention achieved a V.sub.BR of 1 kV while also withstanding 800 V reliability testing for a cumulative time of 2000 s. The quality of the etched surface and lack of charge trapping at the heterojunction is supported by the nearly constant turn-on characteristics of the MPS diodes.

[0070] The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.