LAMINATED PACKAGING MATERIAL COMPRISING A BARRIER LAYER AND PACKAGING CONTAINER MADE THEREFROM
20250388007 · 2025-12-25
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B32B2317/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2323/046
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B29/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2255/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/153
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B29/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B27/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/0053
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2310/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B27/327
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2367/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B7/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B32B27/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B29/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B29/06
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B37/15
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A laminated packaging material for packaging of liquid or semi-liquid food products comprises: a bulk layer comprising cellulose-based material, preferably paper or paperboard, a first outermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer, arranged on the outside of the bulk layer to constitute the outside of a package formed from the packaging material, a second innermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer arranged on the inside of the bulk layer to be in direct contact with the filled food product, and a barrier layer comprising a barrier substrate layer coated with a physical vapour deposited barrier coating comprising partially oxidised aluminium, the barrier coating having a thickness of 8 to 40 nm and a transmittance of 20 to 60%, the barrier layer being laminated between the bulk layer and the second, innermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer.
Claims
1. A laminated packaging material for packaging of liquid or semi-liquid food products, comprising: a bulk layer comprising cellulose-based material, preferably paper or paperboard, a first outermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer, arranged on the outside of the bulk layer to constitute the outside of a package formed from the packaging material, a second innermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer arranged on the inside of the bulk layer to be in direct contact with the filled food product, and a barrier layer comprising a barrier substrate layer coated with a physical vapour deposited (PVD) barrier coating comprising partially oxidised aluminium, the barrier coating having a thickness of 8 to 40 nm and a transmittance of 20 to 60%, as measured by a spectrophotometer at wavelengths over the visible spectrum and after stabilisation of the coating in air, the barrier layer being laminated between the bulk layer and the second, innermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer.
2. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the partially oxidised aluminium comprises a ceramic-metallic composite of aluminium particles and Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
3. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrier coating has a non-metallic appearance.
4. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrier substrate layer comprises a polymer film or a cellulose-based material.
5. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 4, wherein the polymer film is a polyolefin film or a polyester film.
6. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 5, wherein the polymer film is a pre-manufactured mono-axially or biaxially oriented film.
7. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 6, wherein the polymer film is a mono-axially orientated polyethylene terephthalate film or a biaxially orientated polyethylene terephthalate film.
8. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 4, wherein the barrier substrate layer is a paper layer.
9. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the surface of the barrier substrate layer to be PVD coated has been pre-treated by in-line plasma pre-treatment and/or corona, flame or atmospheric plasma during film manufacturing.
10. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrier coating has been post-treated by plasma treatment.
11. A laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, wherein the PVD barrier coating has been applied by plasma-assisted reactive evaporation.
12. A method of manufacturing the laminated packaging material as claimed in claim 1, comprising, in any order, laminating the barrier layer to the inner side of the bulk layer, applying the first outermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer onto the outer side of the bulk layer, and applying the second innermost liquid-tight, heat-sealable thermoplastic layer on the inner side of the barrier layer.
13. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the barrier layer is laminated to the bulk layer by melt (co-)extruding an interjacent laminating layer of a thermoplastic polymer between the bulk layer and the barrier layer, and subsequently applying pressure in a lamination roller nip.
14. A packaging container for liquid or semi-liquid food products comprising the laminated packaging material defined in claim 1.
15. A method of forming a packaging container as claimed in claim 14, comprising folding the laminated packaging material.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0084] In the following, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:
[0085]
[0086]
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090]
[0091]
[0092]
[0093]
[0094]
[0095]
[0096]
[0097] In
[0098] The bulk layer 11 is laminated to a barrier layer 14 (also referred to herein as a barrier film), formed from an oriented BOPET film barrier substrate layer 14b, coated with a PVD barrier coating 14a comprising partially oxidised aluminium. The coating 14a is applied by PVD with reactive evaporation to a thickness of about 15 nm. The form of the partially oxidised aluminium is discussed in more detail in the example below.
[0099]
[0100] A limited amount of oxygen is introduced into the chamber via injection nozzles. Reactive evaporation takes place between the aluminium and oxygen.
[0101] Before the PVD coating operation is initiated, the surface of the polymer film barrier substrate layer 14b is briefly pre-treated by a plasma to functionalise and clean the surface, in order to render the surface more susceptible to the coating and create better bonding between coating and substrate.
[0102]
[0103] Post-treatment is also used to remove aluminium hydroxides and to oxidise the surface of the coating 14a.
[0104] Returning to the structure shown in
[0105] In
[0106]
[0107]
[0108]
[0109]
[0110]
EXAMPLES
[0111] A series of barrier layers 14 were produced by vapour coating of barrier substrate layers 14b. The barrier layers were included in packaging laminates, which were then formed into packages, as described below.
[0112] The barrier substrate layers were polymer films of BOPET (Mitsubishi primed film, BOPET RNK12-2DF) and MOPET (developed internally).
[0113] A plasma pre-treatment was applied to the barrier substrate layers as described in connection with
[0114] Barrier coatings 14a of partially oxidised aluminium were applied by PVD with reactive evaporation between aluminium and oxygen, as described in connection with
[0115] The amounts of oxygen and aluminium were varied as shown in Table 1 (sccm=standard cubic centimeter of gas volume flow):
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Oxygen Particles Recipe Control or Sample flow Al rate Transmittance Thickness seen in Substrate Number test Number (sccm) (g/min) value (%) (nm) TEM? BOPET 1a Control 2014-09-11-A1 12500 1.67 85 12.5 0.4 BOPET 2a Test 2014-09-11-A2 10000 1.67 70 10.3 0.7 (comparative) BOPET 3a Test 2014-09-11-A3 7000 4.2 18 22.8 1.6 ++ BOPET 4a Test 2014-09-11-A4 12000 4.2 25 24.7 0.6 ++ MOPET 1b Control 2014-09-12-A1 12300 1.67 85 13.4 0.7 MOPET 2b Test 2014-09-12-A2 12000 4.2 25 23.8 0.5 ++ MOPET 3b Test 2014-09-12-A3 25000 4.2 32 28.9 1.1 +
[0116] The barrier layers were used to manufacture packaging laminates. The laminated structure was as shown in
[0117] /LDPE (12 g/m.sup.2) outermost/unbleached paperboard/LDPE optionally with adhesive (20 g/m.sup.2)/barrier coating/MOPET OR BOPET film substrate of 12 m thickness/[LDPE (12 g/m.sup.2)/m-LLDPE (13 g/m.sup.2) OR adhesive (6 g/m.sup.2)/m-LLDPE (19 g/m.sup.2)]/
[0118] The laminates were formed into cuboidal packages using a TETRA PAK A3 Flex/TBA1000 packaging apparatus with ultrasonic sealing.
[0119] The barrier layers, laminates and packages were evaluated.
TEM Images
[0120] TEM images were obtained of the barrier coatings. Dark particles were visible in some but not all coatings, as shown in Table 1. Particles were seen in coatings 3a (shown in
[0121] Without wishing to be bound by this theory, the inventors believe that the dark particles are particles of aluminium metal dispersed in aluminium oxide, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, so that the coating is of a ceramic-metallic (cer-met) composite. It is believed that where the amount of aluminium metal is small the particles may be present but be too small to be visible by TEM.
XPS Analysis
[0122] XPS analysis of the three MOPET-based samples 1b, 2b, 3b indicated that the surface composition of the barrier layer coatings was Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
Thickness
[0123] Thicknesses of the coatings were determined by TEM and are shown in Table 1. Coating thicknesses were in the range of 10.3-28.9 nm.
Transmittance Values of Coatings
[0124] Transmittance values for the coatings were measured online during coating formation and are shown in Table 1.
[0125] Transmittance values increased after coating and this was thought to be due to further oxidation and stabilisation of the coating during post-treatment and afterwards in air. Increases of 5 to 7 percentages points (or up 30-40% of initial value for low initial transmittance) were typical. The values provided in Table 1 thus increased to final, stabilised values being 5-7 percentage points higher, on each coating.
Oxygen Transmission Rates of Barrier Layers
[0126]
[0127] It can be seen that OTRs decrease as the coating is prepared with a lower oxygen ratio i.e. OTR for BOPET-based barrier layers is 1a (control, labelled BOPET AlOx (standard))>2a>>3a>4a and for MOPET-based barrier layers is 1b (control, labelled MOPET AlOx (standard))>2b>3b. Low OTRs are desirable.
[0128] Coatings 3a, 4a, 2b and 3b provided OTRs of less than 3 cm.sup.3/(m.sup.2.Math.24 h.Math.1 atm), which is desirable. For coatings 2b and 3b (on MOPET) OTRs were less than 2 cm.sup.3/(m.sup.2.Math.24 h.Math.1 atm), which is even more desirable.
[0129]
Crack Onset Strain
[0130]
[0131] Crack onset strain increases in the order 1a (control, labelled A1)<2a (A2)<3a (A3)<4a (A4) for BOPET-based barrier layers. For MOPET-based films, again films 2b (A2) and 3b (A3) performed better than the control (1b/A1).
Oxygen Transmission Rates of Laminates
[0132]
[0133] Again, it can be seen that OTR decreases as the coating is prepared with a lower oxygen ratio, with OTR for the control 1a (labelled BOPET AlOx (standard)) higher than for 4a.
[0134] It can also be seen that OTR for the 4a packaging material is similar to that for the barrier layer, indicating that the barrier layer maintains good properties even after extrusion lamination.
Oxygen Transmission Rates of Packages
[0135]
[0136] Again, it can be seen that OTR decreases as the coating is prepared with a lower oxygen ratio. For each of MOPET and BOPET, the standard AlOx coating gives higher OTR than the modified AlOx coating.
Appearance
[0137] The appearance of the test coatings was visually evaluated. The coatings were usually grey, brown, dark brown or bluish but in one case the coating was purple.
[0138] It was found that coatings with a final transmittance value of less than 20% had a metallic appearance. Coatings with a higher transmittance value than 20% did not have a metallic appearance after lamination, particularly when unbleached board was used.
[0139] Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that the appearance of the coatings is dependent on both the thickness of the coating and the size of the aluminium particles.
CONCLUSIONS OF EXAMPLE
[0140] The coatings of the examples had various advantages. [0141] The coatings were non-metallic in appearance, especially after lamination, and could thus be visually distinguished from metal and metallised films. This may be important in meeting market needs. For example, the Japanese market requires barrier layers which are non-metallic in appearance to enable package recycling. [0142] The coatings provided effective barrier properties as shown by OTRs. The good OTRs were maintained when the barrier layers were converted to form laminates (including extrusion coating) and when the laminates were formed into packages. The good OTRs were also maintained after a Gelbo flex test. Crack onset strain was high. Thus, the coatings showed better mechanical properties than conventional AlOx coatings, which tend to be brittle. Again without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that the cer-mat structure with its aluminium particles contributes to the good mechanical properties of the test coatings by reducing brittleness. The coatings are promising as a barrier layer for use in liquid packaging laminates (including those for long-term aseptic, ambient storage), where crack resistance is very important. The low thickness of the coatings contributes to the good mechanical properties: thicker coatings used in the prior art e.g. the coating of EP437946 (thickness around 5-7 times that of the example) would be likely to be more brittle. [0143] The coatings could be applied at a higher coating speed than PECVD coatings using standard PVD equipment. Again, low coating thickness allows for higher coating speed. These coatings thus offer a low-cost, scaleable option. [0144] The coatings use a low amount of metal compared with conventional aluminium foil, which also enables easier recycling of the laminated material, and generates less carbon dioxide in the manufacturing process. In addition, the PE used in the various layers may be bio-based. Therefore, the laminate of the examples has sustainability advantages. [0145] The coatings may be microwaveable.
[0146] As a final remark, the invention is not limited by the embodiments shown and described above, but may be varied within the scope of the claims.