Apparatus and method for the detection of dementia and retinal conditions
11666213 · 2023-06-06
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61B5/4088
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/6803
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/7282
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B3/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B3/14
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61B3/12
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B3/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B3/14
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
An apparatus and method for aiding in the detection of dementia, concussion, other neurologic conditions, retinal, and optic nerve conditions. The apparatus enables the diffusion coefficient of the tissue to be ascertained and studied by directing the light from a laser or other coherent light source at the patient's retina, optic nerve or choroid and measuring the fluctuations in the intensity of the back-scattered light caused by the movement of light scatterers in the tissue. By comparing the measurements to a normal database, or to the subject's previous measurement, in combination with an eye examination and OCT image/measurement the changes caused by the disease and the effectiveness of therapy can be ascertained. The disclosed apparatus allows the incident and detection optics to be attached to ophthalmic devices typically used in ophthalmologic care. Also, where both the incident laser fiber optic and the detection fiber optic are directly connected to goggles, one or more or all of the above-described mirrors may not be necessary, as both fiber optics are preferably directly directed into the eye.
Claims
1. An optical apparatus adapted for use with a fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device, comprising: a body member adapted for positioning adjacent to a fundus camera, OCT machine or a similar ophthalmic device; a detection optical fiber secured to or within the body member; an incident optical fiber secured to or within the body member; a laser light source that passes light through the incident optical fiber; a linear positioner secured to the body member for varying a measurement spot on a subject's or patient's retina; a plurality of folding mirrors secured to the body member; a beam splitter mirror positioned adjacent to the subject's or patient's face during use; wherein the plurality of folding mirrors and beam splitter mirror place an incident beam into a frame of an image of the subject's or patient's retina created by the fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device; wherein the detection optical fiber is attached to the linear positioner such that incident light and detection light are simultaneously varied by a same amount when the linear positioner is used to vary the measurement spot.
2. The optical apparatus of claim 1 wherein the body member defining a termination and the optical is mounted within the termination.
3. The optical apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a plate member adapted to be rotatable with respect to the fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device for changing a beam scan angle.
4. The optical apparatus of claim 3 wherein the body member is secured to the plate member.
5. The optical apparatus of claim 3 further comprising a beam splitter holder secured to the plate member and adapted for holding the beam splitter mirror.
6. An optical apparatus adapted for use with a fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device, comprising: a body member adapted for positioning a fundus camera, OCT machine or a similar ophthalmic device; a detection optical fiber secured to or within the body member; an incident optical fiber secured to or within the body member; a laser light source that passes light through the incident optical fiber; a linear positioner secured to the body member for varying a measurement spot on a subject's or patient's retina; a plurality of folding mirrors secured to the body member; a beam splitter mirror positioned adjacent to the subject's or patient's face during use; wherein the plurality of folding mirrors and beam splitter mirror place an incident beam into a frame of an image of the subject's or patient's retina created by the fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device; further comprising a single photon counting module for detecting a light output from the detection optical fiber.
7. The optical apparatus of claim 6 wherein the body member defining a termination and the optical is mounted within the termination.
8. The optical apparatus of claim 6 further comprising a plate member adapted to be rotatable with respect to the fundus camera, OCT machine or similar ophthalmic device for changing a beam scan angle.
9. The optical apparatus of claim 8 wherein the body member is secured to the plate member.
10. The optical apparatus of claim 8 further comprising a beam splitter holder secured to the plate member and adapted for holding the beam splitter mirror.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(15) In
(16) In
(17) The detection optical fiber 255 attached to the linear positioner 230 on the non-limiting example fundus camera so both the incident light and detection light is simultaneously varied by the same amount. The light output of detection fiber 255 is detected by single photon counting module 260 and processed by the correlator software on a personal computer. The laser preferably goes through the incident fiber and the backscattered light from the retina and/or optic nerve is detected by the detection fiber.
(18) Optics may be incorporated to vary the diameter of the beam on the retina or choroid thus allowing a greater or smaller area to be sampled or measured. Modifications may also be made to the detection fiberoptic such that a smaller or larger measurement area may be made.
(19) The optical arrangement is attached to a frame that is easily connected to a commercially available instruments, such as an OCT, fundus camera, laser treatment device, or other devices. These devices are typically used in ophthalmological studies and treatments of the eye. Ophthalmologic devices suitable for modification are manufactured by multiple companies and the conventional operation and use of those devices is performed by ophthalmologists and others engaged in the examination of human eyes. The attachment of the disclosed device can be sized to fit the chosen ophthalmic device. Alternatively, the incident and detection fiber optic may be directly attached to the front surface of a Virtual Reality headset, Augmented Reality headset, a headset, goggles, or eyeglasses, so that the patient may visualize the incident light and the detection fiber may detect the backscattered light from the retina and/or optic nerve.
(20) Also, the laser diodes utilized within the OCT device may also be used to perform the DLS measurement. If infrared diodes are utilized, then pharmacologic dilation of the pupil may not be necessary to perform the DLS measurement. A device to maintain fixation and/or focusing of the incident light in the presence of eye movements may be utilized.
(21) A fundus camera consists of a light source, a viewing microscope and a mechanical supporting arrangement that allows precise positioning of the light source and microscope relative to the patient to enable focusing and visualization of the light on selected portions of the patient's eye in order to perform photography. One non-limiting fundus camera that can be used with the present invention is manufactured by Topcon Inc. of Japan.
(22) In
(23) In still another embodiment, the described device may be incorporated with another device used in ophthalmology, such as, but not limited to, an Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT) machine, that can provide the incident light and focusing on the eye necessary to the performance of the method.
(24) In another embodiment the operation of the device or devices may be automated, such that an operator is not required to make the measurements.
(25) Correlator 265 counts for a predetermined time interval and performs a well-known mathematical operation to obtain the correlation function. A suitable time interval can be approximately five seconds, though another measurement duration may be selected by experimentation. The sample time may be chosen to further characterize the population of light scatters. Measurements taken at shorter sample times, i.e., at 1.5 microseconds, appear to be more characteristic of smaller and/or faster scattering elements whereas measurements made at longer sample times, i.e., 200 microseconds, appear more characteristic of larger and/or slower scattering elements. Multiple measurements may be taken and the results averaged to minimize artifacts. The correlator utilizes the received counts to solve the following equation for the autocorrelation function Cm(t):
i=n
C.sub.m(t)=ΣPi Pi+m
i=1
where:
t=the length of the predetermined time interval
i=an index number whose range is one to the total number of intervals
p.sub.i=the number of pulses occurring during the ith time interval
n=the total number of intervals
m=an integer whose range is the number of correlator channels
(26) In accordance with the above equation correlator 265 produces solutions or points (one for each value of m) in a time sequence, each measurement separated by the value of t. These measurements may be plotted against time to produce a curve that may then be displayed for examination on a personal computer monitor.
(27) More specifically, the program calculates the first and second cumulants (and their respective statistical uncertainties) of the decay rate distribution from a weighted least squares fit of the measured autocorrelation function. Calculations are performed using the results of the cumulants analysis to yield the average translational diffusion coefficient, effective diameter and in certain instances, the average molecular weight.
(28) For the simplest case of monodisperse particles, the field correlation is a single decaying exponential. If the polydispersity is not too great, the field autocorrelation function is nearly exponential. Two parameters that are frequently used to characterize particle distribution are the average decay rate and the polydispersity parameter.
(29) The diffusion coefficient (D) is also related to the correlation function Cm(t) determined by the correlator by the following equation: Cm(t)=A+B e.sup.−2DK2m(t) where:
(30) A, B=constants dependent on the physical details of the measurement
(31) K=the scattering constant for the eye which is 4 π/λ (sin θ/2) where λ is the wavelength and θ is the the scattering angle.
(32) t=the length of the predetermined time interval
(33) m=an integer whose range is the number of correlator channels
(34) Therefore, the values of the diffusion coefficient D and the constants A and B in the above equation can be determined, with the aid of computer, from the autocorrelation curve produced by the correlator 265 by using standard curve fitting and analysis techniques. The calculated diffusion coefficient, the average decay rate, the polydispersity parameters, the statistical uncertainties of each of these parameters and other calculated mathematical terms including the effective diameter and molecular weight, can be stored in the computer along with other patient data.
(35) The apparatus shown in
(36) The illumination light of the fundus camera is used to focus the laser beam on the desired spot on the retina. The illumination beam is turned off when the measurement is made.
(37) An infrared system may be used to aid in the maintenance of the light beam at the measurement site during the time the fundus camera illumination light is off.
(38) In order to accurately compare measurements made from an individual with measurements made from the same individual at a later time or with measurements from a different individual, the compared measurements could be made from approximately the same position in the retina. Measurements obtained from other positions in the retina may give somewhat different results, which can provide additional information concerning the health of the patient.
(39) Patients with dementia can demonstrate a slowing of the Brownian movement of the retinal proteins as compared to a patient without dementia.
(40) At the present time, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are injected into the vitreous cavity of patient's eyes to treat neovascular or “wet” age-related macular degeneration. Using the above system, preliminary results have demonstrated that the average decay constant, or Gamma, decreases immediately following injection. It appears that successful treatment resulting in the resolution of subretinal fluid and a decrease in leakage results in an increase in Gamma, and unsuccessful treatment does not, and that eyes receiving multiple injections of some of these types of drugs may exhibit lower measurements than the fellow, untreated eye which may have future negative consequences on the health of the eye.
(41) Patients undergoing retinal or optic nerve stem cell surgery have been tested using this system. A measurement is made from the posterior pole of the retina the day before surgery, and the patient is re-measured at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Preliminary data indicates that though there may not be any visible changes by fundus photography or OCT in those patients with improved vision after the stem cell surgery, the postoperative diffusion coefficient is greater than the preoperative measurement. Those patients whom did not experience an improvement in vision after the stem cell surgery did not demonstrate a change in the diffusion coefficient postoperatively.
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49) Also disclosed is a novel method for using the DLS device to assess the efficacy of therapeutic agents and for the development of new therapeutic agents in a relatively shorter amount of time. In order to determine the efficacy of a new therapeutic agent, a baseline DLS measurement can be made from a patient diagnosed with early dementia. The therapeutic agent would then be started or otherwise provided to or for the patient, and longitudinal DLS measurements made over time to determine whether the DLS measurement worsened over time (i.e. as compared to the baseline DLS measurement), which is defined as a slowing of the retinal proteins. A worsening of the DLS measurement is expected in an untreated dementia patient over time. Stability or improvement in the DLS measurement, (the proteins would not slow down, or the Brownian movement would not change, or even increase) would demonstrate drug efficacy.
(50) With the novel method, drug efficacy can be determined much earlier than the present method of waiting for the patient to decline cognitively over time, which can take years. The determination of efficacy can be shortened from on average 5 years, to about 6 months. Since drug studies would be shorter, they would be much less expensive to conduct leading to the development and testing of more new therapeutic agents.
(51) All locations, sizes, shapes, measurements, amounts, angles, voltages, frequencies, component or part locations, configurations, temperatures, weights, dimensions, values, time periods, percentages, materials, orientations, etc. discussed above or shown in the drawings are merely by way of example and are not considered limiting and other locations, sizes, shapes, measurements, amounts, angles, voltages, frequencies, component or part locations, configurations, temperatures, weights, dimensions, values, time periods, percentages, materials, orientations etc. can be chosen and used and all are considered within the scope of the invention.
(52) Dimensions of certain parts as shown in the drawings may have been modified and/or exaggerated for the purpose of clarity of illustration and are not considered limiting.
(53) Changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in ophthalmology. It is expected that advancements in electronics will simplify the design of this system. The diffusion coefficient can be replaced by another measure such as the decay constant. The essential point is that variations in the intensity of the back-scattered light are the basis of the measurement. That measurement may then be utilized to obtain derivatives. The form in which those variations are presented is mainly a matter of individual preference. Such obvious modifications and changes are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
(54) Unless feature(s), part(s), component(s), characteristic(s) or function(s) described in the specification or shown in the drawings for a claim element, claim step or claim term specifically appear in the claim with the claim element, claim step or claim term, then the inventor does not considered such feature(s), part(s), component(s), characteristic(s) or function(s) to be included for the claim element, claim step or claim term in the claim for examination purposes and when and if the claim element, claim step or claim term is interpreted or construed. Similarly, with respect to any “means for” elements in the claims, the inventor considers such language to require only the minimal amount of features, components, steps, or parts from the specification to achieve the function of the “means for” language and not all of the features, components, steps or parts describe in the specification that are related to the function of the “means for” language.
(55) While the invention has been described and disclosed in certain terms and has disclosed certain embodiments or modifications, persons skilled in the art who have acquainted themselves with the invention, will appreciate that it is not necessarily limited by such terms, nor to the specific embodiments and modification disclosed herein. Thus, a wide variety of alternatives, suggested by the teachings herein, can be practiced without departing from the spirit of the invention, and rights to such alternatives are particularly reserved and considered within the scope of the invention.