Colloidal-copper based water oxidation electrocatalyst

Abstract

A noble metal-free water oxidation electrocatalyst can be stable and obtained from earth-abundant materials, e.g., using copper-colloidal nanoparticles. The catalyst may contain nanobead and nanorod morphological features with narrow size distribution. The onset for oxygen evolution reaction can occur at a potential of 1.45 V.sub.RHE (η=220 mV). Such catalysts may be stable during long-term water electrolysis and/or exhibit a high electroactive area, e.g., with a Tafel slope of 52 mV/dec, TOF of 0.81 s.sup.−1, and/or mass activity of 87 mA/mg. The copper may also perform CO.sub.2 reduction at the cathode side. The Cu-based electrocatalytic system may provide a flexible catalyst for electrooxidation of water and for chemical energy conversion, without requiring Pt, Ir, or Ru.

Claims

1. An oxygen evolution reaction catalyst, comprising: a substrate; and a porous nanoparticle film, comprising copper oxide and carbon, disposed on the substrate, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises, based upon energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, 10 to 20 atom % of carbon, 35 to 60 atom % of copper, and 25 to 50 atom % of oxygen.

2. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises a Cu.sub.8O phase.

3. The catalyst of claim 2, wherein the CuO phase is crystalline.

4. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises a CuO phase.

5. The catalyst of claim 4, wherein the CuO phase is crystalline.

6. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises a Cu.sub.2O phase.

7. The catalyst of claim 6, wherein the Cu.sub.2O phase is amorphous.

8. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises a Cu.sub.8O phase, a CuO phase, and a Cu.sub.2O phase.

9. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein an atomic ratio of the copper to the oxygen in the porous nanoparticle film is in a range of from 1.175 to 1.6:1, measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.

10. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein an atomic ratio of the copper to carbon in the porous nanoparticle film is in a range of from 2.25:1 to 5:1, measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.

11. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises at least 50 wt. % of a transparent conductive oxide, relative to a total substrate weight.

12. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the substrate comprises at least 75 wt. % indium tin oxide, relative to a total substrate weight.

13. The catalyst of claim 1, which has an oxygen evolution reaction onset potential in 0.1 M KOH solution of 1.40 to 1.70 V relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode.

14. The catalyst of claim 1, which has a current density of 9.5 to 15 mA/cm.sup.2 at a potential in 0.1 M KOH solution of 1.59 V relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode.

15. The catalyst of claim 1, which has a Tafel plot of over potential versus logarithm of current density that is linear with a slope of in a range of from 0.45 to 0.6.

16. An electrochemical cell, comprising: the catalyst of claim 1; and a basic electrolyte.

17. A method for making the catalyst of claim 1, the method comprising: spray and/or drop coating a nanoparticle dispersion comprising copper ions and carbonaceous anions onto the substrate to obtain a coated substrate; and annealing the coated substrate at a temperature in a range of from 450 to 550° C. to form the catalyst.

18. A method of conducting an oxygen evolution reaction, the method comprising: contacting the catalyst of claim 1 with an aqueous electrolyte solution having a pH of 8 to 14; and applying a potential of 1.40 to 1.70 V to the electrocatalyst and a counter electrode immersed in the aqueous electrolyte solution.

19. A method of making an oxygen evolution reaction catalyst, the method comprising: spray or drop coating a nanoparticle dispersion comprising at least 50 wt. %, as a percentage of non-solvent weight, of copper and carbonaceous anions onto a substrate, outside of solution, to obtain a coated substrate; and annealing the coated substrate at a temperature in a range of from 450 to 550° C. to form the catalyst.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the nanoparticle dispersion is made by a process comprising: combining copper ions and bicarbonate or carbonate ions in an aqueous solution to form a precursor solution; aging the precursor solution at a temperature in a range of from 5 to 45° C. to form a copper particle suspension; and microfiltering the copper particle suspension to obtain the nanoparticle dispersion.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 shows an illustration of the synthesis process of colloidal copper nanoparticles and a fabrication process for the electrode/electrocatalyst material useful as a water oxidation electrocatalyst within the scope of the invention;

(3) FIG. 2A shows a chart of the particle size distribution for the colloidal copper particles useful within the scope of the invention;

(4) FIG. 2B shows a plot indicating the zeta potential of colloidal copper particles useful within the scope of the invention;

(5) FIG. 2C shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of colloidal copper particles useful within the scope of the invention;

(6) FIG. 2D shows an x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for Cu-based colloidal nanoparticles developed in carbonate/bicarbonate based anionic electrolytes at a pH of 8.5;

(7) FIG. 3A shows an SEM image for a Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 sample at 500 nm;

(8) FIG. 3B shows an SEM image for a Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 sample at 500 nm;

(9) FIG. 3C shows forward potential sweeps for Cu-CNP/FTO, Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250, and Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 at 2 mV/s;

(10) FIG. 3D shows short-term, time versus current density curves for bare FTO, Cu-CNP/FTO at 1.77 V.sub.RHE, Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 at 1.67 V.sub.RHE, and for Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 at 1.56 V.sub.RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution;

(11) FIG. 4A shows an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst;

(12) FIG. 4B shows an XPS spectrum for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst with an enlarged view for the Cu 2p region;

(13) FIG. 4C shows an XPS spectrum for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst with an enlarged view for the C 1s region;

(14) FIG. 4D shows an XPS spectrum for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst with an enlarged view for the O 1s region;

(15) FIG. 5A shows a cyclic voltammetry (CV) profile for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution at a pH of approx. 13 at a scan rate of 2 mV/s;

(16) FIG. 5B shows an enlarged view from 1.0 to 1.54 V.sub.RHE of CV profile for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution at a pH of approx. 13 at the scan rate of 2 mV/s;

(17) FIG. 5C shows a Tafel plot of overpotential versus the logarithm of the current density curve for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst calculated from a polarization curve;

(18) FIG. 5D shows a plot comparing 1 to 500 consecutive CV sweeps for the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution at a pH of approx. 13 at a scan rate of 10 mV/s;

(19) FIG. 5E shows a multistep controlled current electrolysis (CCE) plot showing potential profiles for consecutive current density increments from 2 to 20 mA/cm.sup.2;

(20) FIG. 6 shows a plot of extended time electrocatalytic oxygen evolution during controlled potential water electrolysis using a Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample at 1.56 V.sub.RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte;

(21) FIG. 7A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 sample on 1 μm scale;

(22) FIG. 7B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 sample on 200 nm scale;

(23) FIG. 8A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 2 μm scale;

(24) FIG. 8B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 100 nm scale;

(25) FIG. 9 shows Nyquist plots at 1.63 V.sub.RHE for exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO, Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250, and Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts derived from Cu-colloids immobilized on FTO substrates, with an inset zoom of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample plot, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) being conducted in 0.1 M KOH solution at a pH of approx. 13 in the frequency range of 100K to 0.1 Hz;

(26) FIG. 10A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 1 μm scale;

(27) FIG. 10B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 200 nm scale, with an inset showing a view of the nanosized bead-type structure;

(28) FIG. 10C shows an SEM image of a blank fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) slide;

(29) FIG. 10D shows an energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS, EDX, EDXS, or XEDS) spectrum for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample;

(30) FIG. 11 shows an x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample indicating a Cu.sub.8O phase with an “@” and a CuO phase with a “#”;

(31) FIG. 12A shows a Raman spectrum overview for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample;

(32) FIG. 12B shows a Raman spectrum selection from 280 to 340 cm.sup.−1 for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample;

(33) FIG. 12C shows a Raman spectrum selection from 439 to 442 cm.sup.−1 for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample;

(34) FIG. 12D shows a Raman spectrum selection from 610 to 630 cm.sup.−1 for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample;

(35) FIG. 13A shows CV profiles for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst generated with different catalyst loadings on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO);

(36) FIG. 13B shows an overview image of a CV curve for exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst generated with a 60 μL aliquot of copper colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) on FTO in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution at the scan rate of 2 mV/s;

(37) FIG. 14A shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer at a pH of approx. 6.3;

(38) FIG. 14B shows a plot of the results of a controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 16A;

(39) FIG. 14C shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M aq. bicarbonate electrolyte solution a pH of approx. 8.3;

(40) FIG. 14D shows a plot of the results of a CPE experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 16C;

(41) FIG. 14E shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M aq. carbonate electrolyte solution a pH of approx. 11;

(42) FIG. 14F shows a plot of the results of a CPE experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 16E;

(43) FIG. 15 shows a Tafel plot of overpotential versus the logarithm of the current density curve for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst calculated from static chronoamperometry technique;

(44) FIG. 16 shows the area under reduction peak for Cu.sup.2+ to/from Cu.sup.3+ redox reaction on an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 material under potential range from 1.43 to 0.94 V.sub.RHE based on a CV scan rate of 20 mV/s;

(45) FIG. 17 shows a plot of the turn-over frequency (TOF) calculated at various applied potential for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst in 0.1 M KOH for which the surface concentration was determined from the redox peak current; and

(46) FIG. 18 shows a chart of the mass activity (MA) values for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 material at various applied potential calculated from OER current obtained by CV curve.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(47) Aspects of the invention provide oxygen evolution reaction catalysts, comprising: a substrate, preferably a non-elemental metal, e.g., no more than 75, 62.5, 50, 40, 33, 25, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.5, or 0.1 wt. % elemental metal and/or at least 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 92.5, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. % metal oxide, relative to the total substrate weight, such as one or more transparent conducting oxides; and a porous nanoparticle film, comprising copper oxide and carbon, e.g., at least 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 92.5, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. % of the total film weight, disposed on the substrate, generally without any intervening films, coatings, and/or surface treatments, wherein the porous nanoparticle film comprises, based upon energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, 10 to 20 atom. % (e.g., at least 10, 10.5, 11, 11.5, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, or 15 atom. % and/or up to 20, 19.5, 19, 18.5, 18, 17.5, 17, 16.5, 16, 15.5, 15, 14.5, or 14 atom. %) of carbon, 35 to 60 atom. % (e.g., at least 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 atom. % and/or up to 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, or 45 atom. %) of copper, and 25 to 50 atom. % (e.g., at least 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 30.5, 31, 31.5, 32, 32.5, 33, 33.5, 34, 34.5, or 35 atom. % and/or up to 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39.5, 39, 38.5, 38, 37.5, 37, 36.5, 36, 35.5, 35, 34.5, 34, 33.5, 33, 32.5, 32, 31.5, 31, 30.5, or 30 atom. %) of oxygen. The catalyst layer may consist essentially of copper, copper oxide(s), carbonate, bicarbonate, and/or carbon, or may comprise at least 75, 80, 85, 90, 92.5, 95, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. % of the catalytic layer. The substrate need not contribute any more than 10, 8, 7.5, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01, or 0.001% of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalytic effect. Moreover, any components additional to the aforementioned components will generally not materially affect the basic and novel onset potential by more than 5, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1, or 0.5% under conditions excluding such additional components.

(48) The substrate/support may be a non-elemental metal for relevant applications, such as a transparent metal oxide, a metal oxide, a glass (or metalloid oxide), a ceramic, a plastic (particularly fluorinated plastics and/or outer coatings on plastics, ceramics, or metal oxides, e.g., PTFE, PVDF, PHFP, PFCA, PPVE, and/or PMVE, as well as polystyrenes, polyolefins (PE, PP, XPE, etc.), polyimides, polyethersulfones, polyamides, and the like.

(49) The porous nanoparticle film may comprise an optionally crystalline Cu.sub.8O phase, an optionally crystalline CuO phase, and/or an optionally amorphous Cu.sub.2O phase. In the catalytic layer, the CuO phase may make out the largest component phase, either by volume, weight, or mol. %, e.g., at least 15, 20, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37.5, 40, 42.5, 45, 47.5, 50, 52.5, 55, 57.5, 60, 62.5, 65, 67.5, or 70%. The CuO phase and/or the Cu.sub.2O phase may constitute 40, 33, 25, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0.5% of the copper oxide phases or remainder of the catalytic layer, disregarding the carbon content.

(50) The atomic ratio of the copper to the oxygen in the porous nanoparticle film may be in a range of from 1.175 to 1.6:1, measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. The atomic ratio of the copper to carbon in the porous nanoparticle film may be in a range of from 2.25:1 to 5:1, measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. The atomic ratio of copper to oxygen in inventive catalysts may be, e.g., at least 1.175, 1.2, 1.2125, 1.225, 1.2375, 1.25, 1.2625, 1.275, 1.2875, 1.3, 1.3125, 1.325, 1.3375, 1.35, 1.3625, or 1.375 to 1 and/or up to 1.6, 1.575, 1.55, 1.525, 1.5125, 1.5, 1.4875, 1.475, 1.4625, 1.45, 1.4375, 1.425, 1.4125, 1.4, 1.3875, or 1.375 to 1. The atomic ratio of copper to carbon in inventive catalysts may be, e.g., at least 2.25, 2.375, 2.5, 2.625, 2.75, 2.875, 3, 3.125, or 3.25 to 1 and/or up to 5, 4.75, 4.5, 4.25, 4.125, 4, 3.875, 3.75, 3.625, 3.5, 3.375, or 3.3 to 1. The atomic ratio of oxygen to carbon in inventive catalysts may be, e.g., at least 1.75, 1.875, 2, 2.05, 2.1, 2.125, 2.15, 2.175, 2.2, 2.25, 2.3, 2.35, 2.375, or 2.4 to 1 and/or up to 3.25, 3.125, 3, 2.95, 2.9, 2.85, 2.8, 2.75, 2.7, 2.67, 2.65, 2.6, 2.55, 2.5, 2.45, 2.4, or 2.375 to 1. The carbon content of inventive catalysts may be, e.g., at least 11.25, 11.5, 11.75, 12, 12.25, 12.5, 12.75, 13, 13.25, 13.5, 13.75, or 14 atom. % and/or no more than 20, 19.5, 19, 18.5, 18, 17.75, 17.5, 17.25, 17, 16.75, 16.5, 16.25, 16, 15.75, 15.5, 15.25, 15, 14.75, 14.5, 14.25, or 14 atom. %, relative to all atoms, or all atoms of mass greater than 4 or 10 a.u. (e.g., measured by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy), in the catalyst.

(51) The substrate may comprise at least 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 92.5, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. % of a transparent conductive oxide, relative to a total substrate weight. Inventive catalysts need not be upon a metal substrate, such as Cu or Ni, and may exhibit sufficient or better performance upon glass, ceramic, or non-conducting substrate, and/or may include no more than 50, 33, 25, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, 5, 2.5, 2, 1, or 0.1 wt. %, relative to the total substrate weight, of one or more elemental metals (i.e., in uncharged, non-oxidized form), such as Ni and/or Cu, individually or in combination. The support/substrate may include, e.g., indium tin oxide (ITO), aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO), indium zinc oxide (IZO), indium-doped cadmium oxide, barium stannate, strontium vanadate, calcium vanadate, or combinations of two or more of any of these. The substrate may have a resistivity, ρ, at 20° C. of at least 2.66×10.sup.−8, 2.75×10.sup.−8, 3×10.sup.−8, 3.5×10.sup.−8, 5×10.sup.−8, 7.5×10.sup.−8, 1×10.sup.−7, 5×10.sup.−7, 1×10.sup.−6, 1×10.sup.−5, 1×10.sup.−4, or 1×10.sup.−3 Ω.Math.m and or up to 100, 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 1×10.sup.−3, or 1×10.sup.−4 Ω.Math.m. The substrate may have a conductivity, a, at 20° C. of no more than 1×10.sup.7, 0.75×10.sup.7, 0.5×10.sup.7, 0.25×10.sup.7, 1×10.sup.6, 1×10.sup.5, or 1×10.sup.6 S/m. The substrate may comprise at least 75, 80, 85, 90, 92.5, 95, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. % (or any aforementioned percentage) indium tin oxide, relative to a total substrate weight Inventive catalysts may have an oxygen evolution reaction onset potential in 0.1 M KOH (and/or LiOH, NaOH, CsOH, and/or NH.sub.4OH) solution of 1.40 to 1.70 V, e.g., at least 1.4, 1.41, 1.42, 1.43, 1.44, 1.45, 1.46, 1.47, 1.48, 1.49, or 1.5 V and/or up to 1.7, 1.68, 1.66, 1.65, 1.64, 1.63, 1.62, 1.61, 1.6, 1.59, 1.58, 1.57, 1.56, or 1.55 V, relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode. Inventive catalysts may have a current density of 9.5 to 15 mA/cm.sup.2, e.g., at least 9.5, 9.75, 10, 10.25, 10.5, 10.75, 11, 11.25, 11.5, 11.75, 12, 12.25, or 12.5 mA/cm.sup.2 and/or up to 15, 14.75, 14.5, 14.25, 14, 13.75, 13.5, 13.25, 13, 12.75, 12.5, 12.25, or 12 mA/cm.sup.2, at a potential in 0.1 M KOH (and/or LiOH, NaOH, CsOH, and/or NH.sub.4OH) solution of 1.59 V relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode.

(52) Inventive catalysts may have a Tafel plot of over potential versus logarithm of current density that is linear with a slope of in a range of from 0.45 to 0.6, e.g., at least 0.45, 0.46, 0.47, 0.48, 0.49, 0.5, 0.505, 0.51, 0.515, or 0.52 and/or up to 0.6, 0.59, 0.58, 0.57, 0.56, 0.55, 0.54, 0.535, 0.53, 0.525, 0.52, 0.515, 0.51, 0.505, or 0.5.

(53) Aspects of the invention provide electrochemical cells comprising any permutation of the inventive catalyst described herein and a basic electrolyte, e.g., 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45, 0.5 and/or 2, 1.75, 1.5, 1.25, 1, 0.9, 0.8, 0.75, 0.7, 0.6, or 0.5 M hydroxide, such as KOH, LiOH, NaOH, CsOH, and/or NH.sub.4OH, or a carbonate, propionate, formate, acetate, bicarbonate, aq. pyridine, aq. triethylamine, etc.

(54) Aspects of the invention provide methods for making any permutation of the inventive catalyst described herein, which methods may comprise: spray and/or drop coating a nanoparticle dispersion (i.e., rather than electroplating, sputtering, or electrolytically depositing/electrodeposition, coating instead with a stream of fluidized) comprising copper ions and/or copper oxide(s), and carbonaceous anions, such as carbonate, bicarbonate, formate, acetate, propionate, oxalate, and/or citrate, onto the substrate, such a FTO or any of the substrates described herein, to obtain a coated substrate; and annealing the coated substrate at a temperature in a range of from 450 to 550° C., e.g., at least 450, 455, 460, 465, 470, 475, 480, 485, 490, 495, or 500° C. and/or up to 550, 545, 540, 535, 530, 525, 520, 515, 510, 505, or 500° C., to form the catalyst in the form of a carbon-containing copper oxide layer upon a preferably non-reactive substrate. The annealing may be performed directly after the coating or directly after air-drying the dispersion, which dispersion directly contacts the substrate, without intervening electrochemical or reactive process.

(55) Aspects of the invention provide methods of conducting an oxygen evolution reaction, which method may comprise: contacting any permutation of the inventive catalyst described herein with an aqueous electrolyte solution, such as any electrolyte solution described herein or otherwise commercially available or known, having a pH of 8 to 14, e.g., at least 8, 8.25, 8.3, 8.33, 8.35, 8.4, 8.45, 8.5, 8.6, 8.67, 8.7, 8.75, 8.8, 8.9, 9, 9.25, 9.5, 9.75, or 10 and/or up to 14, 13.75, 13.5, 13.25, 13, 12.9, 12.8, 12.7, 12.6, 12.5, 12.4, 12.3, 12.2, 12.1, 12, 11.9, 11.8, 11.7, 11.6, 11.5, 11.4, 11.3, 11.2, 11.1, or 11; and applying a potential of 1.40 to 1.70 V, e.g., at least 1.4, 1.425, 1.433, 1.4375, 1.45, 1.4625, 1.475, 1.4875, 1.5, 1.5125, 1.525 V and/or up to 1.7, 1.69, 1.675, 1.667, 1.65, 1.6375, 1.633, 1.625, 1.6125, 1.6, 1.5875, 1.575, 1.5625, 1.55, 1.5375, 1.525, 1.5125, or 1.5 V (or any potential described above), to the electrocatalyst and a counter electrode immersed in the aqueous electrolyte solution.

(56) Aspects of the invention provide methods of making an oxygen evolution reaction catalyst, particularly performing the electrolysis of water and/or the half-reaction for reducing protons to H.sub.2 gas, which methods may comprise: spray or drop coating a nanoparticle dispersion comprising at least 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 92.5, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 97.5, 98, 99, 99.1, 99.5, or 99.9 wt. %, as a percentage of non-solvent weight, of copper (for example, including copper oxide, copper ions, and counterions) and carbonaceous anions (for example, including carbonate, bicarbonate, and counterions) onto a substrate, outside of solution, to obtain a coated substrate; and annealing the coated substrate at a temperature in a range of from 350 to 650° C., e.g., at least 350, 375, 385, 390, 395, 400, 415, 425, 430, 440, 450, 452.5, 457.5, 462.5, 467.5, 472.5, 477.5, 482.5, 487.5, 492.5, 497.5, or 500° C. and/or up to 650, 633, 625, 615, 605, 600, 585, 575, 567, 560, 555, 552.5, 547.5, 542.5, 537.5, 532.5, 527.5, 522.5, 517.5, 512.5, 507.5, 502.5, or 500° C. (or any range or endpoint above), to form the catalyst.

(57) The nanoparticle dispersion may be made by processes comprising: combining copper ions and bicarbonate or carbonate ions in an aqueous solution to form a precursor solution; optionally aging—e.g., for at least 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, or 20 minutes and/or up to 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 days—the precursor solution at a temperature in a range of from 5 to 45° C., typically ambient or, e.g., at least 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, or 25° C. and/or up to 45, 42.5, 40, 37.5, 35, 32.5, 30, 27.5, 25, 22.5, 20° C., to form a copper particle suspension; and optionally filtering or microfiltering the copper particle suspension to obtain the nanoparticle dispersion. The copper ions may be in the form of a nitrate, fluoride, chloride, perchlorate, bromide, bromate, iodide, iodate, chromate, fluorosilicate, selenate, selenite, sulfate, sulfite, pyrophosphate, tetrafluoroborate, formate, tartrate, citrate, and/or gluconate. Alternatively or additionally, the copper may be present as an oxide and/or partial oxide and/or organocopper complex. The bicarbonate and/or carbonate ions may be, for example, in the form of a Li.sup.+, Na.sup.+, K.sup.+, Cs.sup.+, Rb.sup.+, Mg.sup.2+, Ba.sup.2+, Sr.sup.2+, Ca.sup.2+, NH.sub.4.sup.+, NMeBu.sub.4.sup.+, N(CH.sub.3).sub.4.sup.+, NEt.sub.4.sup.+, Ag.sup.+, Cu.sup.2+, pyridinium, and/or guanidinium, salt. The filtering/microfiltering may allow particles in an average particle size range of from 0.01 to 500 μm, e.g., at least at least 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, or 25 μm and/or up to 500, 450, 400, 350, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 90, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 8, 6, or 5 μm.

(58) Inventive catalyst layer may have a volume porosity, i.e., non-filled space versus space occupied by copper oxide and/or carbonaceous matter, of at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37.5, 40, 42.5, 45, 47.5, 50, 52.5, 55, 57.5, or 60% and/or up to 75, 70, 67, 65, 60, 55, 50, 47.5, 45, 42.5, 40, 37.5, 35, 32.5, 30, 27.5, or 25%. The aggregation of the nanoparticles (i.e., spheroid copper oxide particles) in the catalytic layer may take the form of a diffusion limited cluster aggregation (DLCA) or a reaction limited cluster aggregation (RLCA), but generally manifests a structure akin to a compact RLCA aggregation. The copper oxide particles in the catalytic layer upon the substrate/support may have an average sphericity of at least 0.91, 0.915, 0.92, 0.925, 0.93, 0.935, 0.94, 0.945, 0.95, 0.955, 0.96, 0.965, 0.97, 0.975, 0.98, 0.985, or 0.99.

(59) Inventive catalysts may exclude Mn, Ir, Rh, Ru, Re, Os, Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, and/or Ni, or may contain no more than 5, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, or 0.00001 wt., relative to total catalyst weight, and/or no more than 75, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 2.5, or 1 atom. %, relative to copper, of such metal(s), individually or in combination. In addition or separately, inventive catalysts may exclude Mn, Zn, Sc, Co, Fe, Ta, Sn, Nb, W, Ti, Va, Cr, Ni, Mo, Y, La, Nd, Er, Gd, Yb, and/or Ce, or may contain no more than 5, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, or 0.00001 wt. %, relative to total catalyst weight, and/or no more than 75, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 2.5, or 1 atom. %, relative to copper, of such metal(s), individually or in combination. In addition or separately, inventive catalysts may exclude F, Cl, Br, I, S, Se, Te, N, P, As, Sb, Bi, and/or Al, or may contain no more than 20, 17.5, 15, 12.5, 10, 7.5, 5, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, or 0.00001 wt. %, relative to total catalyst weight, of such element(s), individually or in combination.

(60) The onset potential of inventive electrocatalysts may be under or no more than 1.48, 1.475, 1.47, 1.465, 1.46, 1.455, or 1.45 V vs RHE in 1 M KOH, and/or the Tafel slope of inventive electrocatalysts may be under or no more than 59, 58, 57, 56.5, 56, 55.5, 55, 54.5, 54, 53.5, 53, 52.5, or 52 mV/dec.

(61) Aspects of the invention provide colloidal, copper-based electrocatalytic systems suitable for water oxidation, optionally nanotextured and/or obtainable from facile Cu-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) preparative methods. Aspects of the invention include adding solutions comprising copper ions into a buffer comprising carbonate and/or bicarbonate, typically leading directly to a colloid formation as seen in FIG. 1. Aspects of the invention comprise surface deposited thin films of the inventive copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) generally having activity and stability during long-term water electrolysis experiments. Aspects of the invention provide, relative to other and/or non-noble metal water oxidation catalysts, copper-colloidal nanoparticle (Cu-CNP)-based electrocatalysts displaying initiation of the oxygen evolution reaction at an overpotential, η, of no more than 220 mV, for example, no more than 300, 275, 267, 260, 255, 250, 245, 240, 235, 232.5, 230, 227.5, 225, 222.5, 220, 217.5, or 215 mV.

(62) Aspects of the invention comprise capture and/or transformation of solar energy into useful gaseous and/or liquid fuels, e.g., to meet expanding global energy demands while preferably allaying environmental apprehensions caused by combustion carbon-based fossil fuels. Aspects of the invention include the production of chemical fuels and/or useful organic, organometallic, and/or inorganic compounds with renewable energy, including sunlight, wind, nuclear fusion, hydroelectric, and/or hydrogen, and inexpensive feedstocks, particularly drawing on abundant supplies of protons and electrons to form the reduced products. Aspects of the invention provides employing water as a source of required protons and electrons, particularly making hydrogen from water splitting, to make clean and renewable fuel. Aspects of the invention comprise robust and sustained electrocatalytic water oxidation systems based on non-noble metal(s), particularly copper-centered catalytic assemblages. Aspects of the invention provide nanostructured electrocatalytic materials exhibiting high stability at low overpotential for water oxidation catalysis under generally benign conditions, preferably obtained by exploiting easily accessible, time effective and cost-effective Cu-colloids synthesis that can be easily scaled up. Aspects of the invention comprise photoelectrochemical and/or electrochemical water splitting, as well as energy conversion devices using such methods and catalysts.

EXAMPLES

(63) Materials and Methods: Copper nitrate, Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.3H.sub.2O, 99.99%; sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO.sub.3, 95.5%; and potassium hydroxide, KOH, 99.99%, were obtained from Aldrich. Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass slides with a resistivity less that 7 to 10 ohms/sq were obtained from Aldrich. All the solutions were made using ultrapure water with a Milli-Q resistivity of 18.2 MΩ/cm, with 2 to 4 ppb total organic contents.

(64) Analytical Instrumentation: To confirm the formation of colloidal nanoparticles of the M(OH).sub.x type, X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) analysis using Rigaku-Dmax 3C diffractometer from the Rigaku Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα at λ.sub.max of 1.54056 Å radiation was conducted. The homogeneity and stability of the copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) were evaluated via zeta potential analysis and particle size distribution analysis conducted on Anton Paar's PSA analyzer. The nano-pattern electrocatalytic films obtained as described herein from the inventive copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) were characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a NOVA FEI SEM-450 instrument equipped with an energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS, EDX, EDXS, or XEDS) detector. The surface composition of inventive films was investigated via energy dispersive X-ray compositional analysis using a NOVA FEI SEM-450 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microscope equipped with EDX detector and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on a PHI 5000Versa.probe 111 (ULVAC-PHI) x-ray photoelectron spectrophotometer. The crystallinity and phase of inventive thin film electrocatalysts were investigated via x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern using a Rigaku-Dmax 3C diffractometer from the Rigaku Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα (λ.sub.max at 1.54056 Å) radiation. The catalytic phase of the exemplary catalysts was further scrutinized by RAMAN spectroscopy on an iRaman SN.17003 532 nm Raman spectrometer.

(65) Preparation of Cu(OH).sub.2 and Cu(OH).sub.2/HCO.sub.3.sup.− type colloids: Colloidal nanoparticles comprising Cu(OH).sub.x and HCO.sub.3.sup.− are preferably generated via a bicarbonate and/or carbonate buffer solution. To a 1.0 mL clear solution of 0.1 M Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.3H.sub.2O (0.1 mmol) in water were added 0.02 mL (2 μmol) of 0.1 MHCO.sub.3.sup.− buffer solution. The mixture was stirred at low speed for a while (e.g., about 100 rpm for 10-15 minutes) and allowed to stand for few minutes to obtain a cloudy/opaque dispersion of copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs). The generalized reaction is shown below in Equation 1. Thereafter, the cloudy/opaque dispersion obtained is filtered using micro filter syringes to attain homogeneous copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs). The homogeneity and average size of Cu-CNPs were investigated via particle size analyzer, as described below and shown, inter alia, in FIG. 2.
Cu.sup.2++OH.sup.−+H.sup.++HCO.sub.3.sup.−.fwdarw.Cu(OH).sub.2/HCO.sub.3.sup.− (Eq. 1)

(66) Fabrication and characterization of nanoscale copper colloids-based water oxidation electrocatalyst: A thin film electrode or anode material suitable for water catalysis was generated via simple drop casting approach by placing Cu(OH).sub.xHCO.sub.3.sup.− colloids (nanotextured) onto a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) surface, air dried, then inserted into an electrochemical cell as the working electrode for water oxidation catalysis testing. To explore the structural and morphological modifications in the electrocatalytic films, the FTO slides coated with copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) were annealed at about 250 and 500° C. inside a furnace for about 1 hour.

(67) Electrochemical measurements: The electrochemical investigations, including cyclic voltammetry, impedance, controlled potential water electrolysis (chronoamperometry), and controlled-current water electrolysis (chronopotentiometry) were carried out employing a standard three electrode system on a Autolab PG-Stat 10 computer-controlled potentiostat. Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass slides with an exposed surface area, A, of 1 cm.sup.2, coated with a thin film water oxidation electrocatalyst served directly as the working electrode. Prior to use, the FTO slides were carefully cleaned by sonicating the slides in methanol, ethanol, ultrapure water, and acetone as described in Chemistry Select 2018, 3, 11357-11366, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

(68) A spiral-shaped platinum wire with a thickness of 1 mm was used as a counter electrode after cleaning by immersion in a 20 wt. % solution of nitric acid for few minutes before placing into the electrochemical system. A saturated silver/silver chloride, also designated “(sat.) Ag/AgCl.” and a saturated calomel electrode, also designated “Hg/HgO,” were used as reference electrodes in mildly alkaline electrolyte solutions. All the electrochemical measurements were performed in deoxygenated aqueous electrolyte solutions at room temperature. Glassware and electrochemical cell were cleaned as described in J. Raman Spectros. 2013, 44, 1195-1199, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

(69) The thin film electrocatalysts coated on the FTO slides were directly placed in the electrochemical cell as an anode. The cyclic voltammograms were conducted in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution having pH≈13 by cycling the potential between −0.8 to +1.0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) or +0.166 to +1.966 V (vs. RHE). The cyclic voltammograms were recorded at scan rates of 20, 10, and 2 mV/s.

(70) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was undertaken to measure solution resistance (R.sub.s) and charge transfer resistance (R.sub.ct) of the electrode-electrolyte interphase. The solution resistance (R.sub.s) and charge transfer resistance (R.sub.ct) were obtained by fitting a simplest Randles circuit using NOVA 1.10 software on a Metrohm Autolab computer controlled potentiostat.

(71) Calculations of electrochemical constraints: All the voltage potentials given here were converted into reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the Nernst equation, given below in Equation 2.
E.sub.RHE=E.sub.REF+E.sup.0.sub.REF+0.059 (pH) (Eq. 2)
wherein E.sup.0.sub.REF for the Ag/AgCl reference is 0.197 V and for the saturated calomel electrode (SCE) is 0.2416 V.

(72) The true polarization potential, E.sub.P, was calculated from applied potential, E.sub.A, measured current, I, in Ampere, and uncompensated resistance, R.sub.u, as set forth in Equation 3.
E.sub.P=E.sub.A−IR.sub.u (Eq. 3)
wherein the uncompensated resistance, R.sub.u, is referred to as solution resistance calculated from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).

(73) The overpotential, η, was calculated according to Equation 4, below.
Overpotential[η]=E.sub.RHE−1.23 V (Eq. 4)

(74) Tafel slope calculation from cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve: The Tafel slope was calculated from cyclic voltammetry (CV) data, taking into account current density and overpotential, η, using the following Tafel equation set forth below in Equation 5, wherein b is the Tafel slope.
η=b log J+a (Eq. 5)

(75) Tafel slope calculation from static chronoamperometry: The Tafel slopes obtained from polarization curves, such as cyclic voltammograms and linear sweep voltammetry, usually recorded at lower scan rate, such as 5, 1, and 0.1 mV/s, are actually not in steady state as current and overpotential are changing continuously with increasing time. Moreover, the capacitance of the interphase can significantly contribute to the total gas evolution current. Because of these deficiencies, it is believe to be more advantageous to derive Tafel plots from static electroanalytical techniques, such as chronoamperometry and chronopotentiometry, wherein the catalytic interphase is given sufficient time to attain a steady state and Tafel curves are plotted considering overpotential and current densities. The Tafel plots obtained by static chronoamperometry can more accurately reflect the intrinsic activity of the catalysts than those derived from voltammogram.

(76) Current-potential data was collected by performing controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) experiments at a variety of applied potentials. Typically, the current values are read after 8 to 10 minutes. Prior to data collection, the solution resistance was measured using a blank FTO electrode. The solution resistance of approx. 30Ω was used to correct the Tafel plot for IR (ohmic) drop.

(77) Determination of electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) from charge passed under reduction peak: The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) for exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 was determined by measuring the charge, Q.sub.Cu, O, from the oxide reduction peak of its cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve, assuming that each surface Cu atom corresponds to one chemisorbed oxygen atom. The charge, Q.sub.Cu, S, associated with a smooth Cu surface as reported in J. Raman Spectros. 2013, 44, 1195-1199, was taken to be 350 μC/cm.sup.2. Based on these factors, the electrochemical surface area, ECSA, was calculated using Equation 6.

(78) $\begin{matrix} E C S A = \frac{Q_{Cu, 0}}{Q_{C u}, s} & (Eq . 6) \end{matrix}$

(79) A volume of 20 to 30 μL of the inventive copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) was used for electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) measurements. The area under the reduction peak considering the redox couple of Cu.sup.+3 to Cu.sup.+2 measured directly from cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves was found to be 5.30×10.sup.−5 VA.

(80) Hence, the charge can be calculated as follows:
5.30×10.sup.−5 VA/0.02 Vs.sup.−1=0.00265 As or 0.00265 Coulomb,
and the electrochemically active surface area is calculated to be 7.5 cm.sup.2.

(81) Determination of surface Cu concentration from cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves: The charge passed, calculated by integrating the area under reduction peak from potential vs. current curve, is 0.00265 Coulomb. Therefore, the number of electrons, n.sub.e, can be calculated based on Equation 7.
n.sub.e=(0.00265 C)/(1.602×10.sup.−19 C)=0.0016583×10.sup.19 electrons (Eq. 7)

(82) The surface concentration of the Cu atom on the electrode can be estimated by dividing by the number of electrons, n.sub.e, involved in the copper redox reaction, which is 1 for Cu.sup.+2 to/from Cu.sup.+3. Therefore, the surface concentration of Cu atoms, conc.sub.se, can be considered to be
conc.sub.se=0.0016583×10.sup.19/1=0.0016583×10.sup.19.

(83) Determination of turn-over frequency (TOF) from integrated oxygen evolution reaction (OER) cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve: The turn-over frequency (TOF) can be calculated at 1.58 V.sub.RHE with an onset overpotential, η, of 0.35 V, as specific potential value. The turn-over frequency (TOF) can be calculated at varied potential values based on Equation 8.

(84) $\begin{matrix} T O F = \frac{I \times NA}{A \times n \times F \times r} & (Eq . 8) \end{matrix}$
wherein I is the current value at a specified potential in ampere, N.sub.A is Avogadro's constant (6.022×10.sup.23); A is the geometrical area of the working electrode (1 cm.sup.2); N is the number of electrons; F is Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol); and r is the surface concentration of atoms on the electrode surface.
TOF@1.58 V=[0.0087×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.81 s.sup.−1

(85) Further details for the TOF calculation at different potentials is given in the paragraphs before Table 2.

(86) Mass activity determination: The loading normalized current density or mass activity (MA) can be calculated according to Equation 9.

(87) $\begin{matrix} MA = \frac{J @ specific η}{Active mass of catalyst} & (Eq . 9) \end{matrix}$

(88) Here, J is current density in mA at specific potential value. We choose 1.58 V.sub.RHE as the specific potential value. A corresponding mass activity of 87 mA/mg was obtained at 0.35 V. The mass activity was calculated at various applied potential and the resulting mass activity values are presented in FIG. 19 and Table 2.

(89) Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views.

(90) FIG. 1 shows a pictorial representation of a method of preparing a suitable colloid within the scope of the invention, including adding solutions comprising copper ions into a buffer comprising carbonate and/or bicarbonate, typically leading directly to a colloid. FIG. 1 depicts copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) and fabrication process for the electrode and electrocatalyst material employed as an inventive water oxidation electrocatalyst.

(91) The synthesis of colloidal-copper nanoparticles and fabrication of thin-film electrode/electrocatalyst system for water oxidation is outlines in FIG. 1. Copper colloid-based nanoparticles, Cu(OH).sub.x/CuO.sub.x, were prepared by mixing Cu.sup.2+ ions solution and carbonate/bicarbonate anionic electrolytes at a pH of 8.5. Once formed, the Cu-colloidal nanoparticles were coated on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates by simple drop casting to obtain a thin-film electrode coated with copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs). The exemplary inventive films were then annealed at either 250 or 500° C. for one hour, annealing is preferably at a temperature of 250-500 in ambient air for about 1 hour to be tested for water oxidation catalysis.

(92) FIG. 2A shows a chart of the particle size distribution of the copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs), indicating a substantially symmetric distribution about roughly 120 nm average particle size, e.g., 120±1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, or 25 nm. FIG. 2B shows a zeta potential determination for an exemplary inventive catalytic material, i.e., approximately 33 mV, which may be a range of, e.g., at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 22.5, 25, 27.5, 30, 32.5, 33, 34, or 35 mV and/or up to 100, 85, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 42.5, 40, 37.5, 35, 34, 33, or 32.5 mV. FIG. 2C shows a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) image on 100 nm scale showing the agglomeration of nanoparticles in the surface morphology of inventive electrocatalyst layers. FIG. 2C shows a x-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum for Cu-based colloidal nanoparticles developed in carbonate/bicarbonate based anionic electrolytes at a pH of 8.5.

(93) The average particle size of the exemplary copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) was in the range of 100 nm to 140 nm showing good homogeneity, as seen in the chart in FIG. 2A. Copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) indicated a zeta potential of 33 mV showing good stability of the colloidal system in the carbonate buffer system, as seen in FIG. 2B. The stability of the exemplary colloids was observed to depend on the electrostatic interaction between the negatively capped nanoparticles. Therefore, the stability of the exemplary colloids can be controlled by carefully directing the concentration, pH, and volume of the electrolyte solution.

(94) Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imaging of the exemplary copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) demonstrates the size of nanoparticles to be in the range of 50 to 150 nm, but may be, for example, at least 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or 100 nm and/or up to 500, 375, 250, 225, 200, 185, 175, 165, 155, 150, 145, 140, 135, 130, 125, 120, 115, 110, 105, or 100 nm. The exemplary nanoparticles were spherical or pseudo-spherical in shape and agglomerated with each other in form of clumps. The individual particles and agglomerations can be seen in the SEM image in FIG. 2C.

(95) FIG. 2D shows an x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for Cu-based colloidal nanoparticles developed in carbonate/bicarbonate based anionic electrolytes at a pH of 8.5. The phase of the Cu-based colloidal nanoparticles was analyzed by x-ray diffraction pattern (XRD). The XRD spectrum for Cu based CNPs in the FIG. 2D signifies that the position and relative intensity of the 2θ peaks represented at 16.43°, 23°, 33.20°, 35.80°, and 37.80° match well with standard XRD data of Cu(OH).sub.x as reported in Adv. Mater. Lett. 2015, 6, 51-54, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The data, including that shown in FIG. 2D, indicate that copper-based colloidal nanoparticles CNPs are stable and mainly comprises of Cu-hydroxide type materials.

(96) FIG. 3A shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image for a Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 sample, i.e., annealed for roughly 1 hour at 250° C., on 500 nm scale. The Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 sample shows a jagged, discontinuous “mountain-ridge and valley” structure, with pseudo-geometric, directly abutting/agglomerated (without voids) prism form, somewhat in less symmetric form of a 30-60° rhombille pattern, but not completely amorphous. The longest average dimension of the pattern in FIG. 3A may be, e.g., at least 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 325, 350, 375, 400, 425, or 450 nm and/or up to 600, 575, 550, 525, 500, 475, 450, 425, or 400 nm, and an average shortest (coplanar) dimension of, e.g., at least 25, 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 115, or 125 nm and/or up to 400, 375, 350, 325, 300, 275, 250, 225, 200, 175, 150, 125, or 100 nm.

(97) The annealing of copper-colloidal nanoparticle (Cu-CNP) thin films at 250° C., herein referred to as Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250, and 500° C., herein referred to as Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500, also generate an agglomerated nanoparticulate type morphology as seen in FIGS. 3A and 3B. However, Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 film exhibits more of a spongy nanoparticulate type texture, representing enhanced surface area of the thin film, which is seen in FIGS. 7A, 7B, 8A, and 8B. FIG. 7A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 sample on 1 μm scale. FIG. 7B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 sample on 200 nm scale. FIG. 8A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 2 μm scale. FIG. 8B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 100 nm scale.

(98) For water oxidation studies, the cyclic voltammetry experiments were conducted in 0.1 M KOH solutions. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) profile of simple Cu-CNPs/FTO shows the appearance of oxidative current at about 1.1 V.sub.RHE. The onset of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) originates at about 1.62 V.sub.RHE and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) onset overpotential, η, of 390 mV, as seen in FIG. 3C. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve for Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 indicates pre-oxidative pre-features of copper at about 1.0 V.sub.RHE that are followed by a large catalytic peak at 1.57 V.sub.RHE, along with the onset of oxygen evolution, as seen in FIG. 3D. A current density of greater than 10 mA/cm.sup.2 is achieved just under the potential of 1.83 V.sub.RHE. The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) onset overpotential, η, was determined to be 340 mV. For the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample, the water oxidation reaction was observed to initiate at a potential of 1.45 V.sub.RHE, with an overpotential of 220 mV, in a 0.1 M aq. KOH system.

(99) FIG. 3B shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 sample, i.e., annealed for roughly 1 hour at 500° C., on 500 nm scale. The Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 sample shows particulate (10 to 200 nm diameter) features agglomerated into structures of, e.g., at least 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, or 600 nm and/or up to 1000, 900, 850, 800, 750, 700, 650, or 600 nm largest span, with roughly equivalent, e.g., at least 25, 30, 35, 40, or 50% and/or up to 60, 55, 50, or 45% (v/v), void volumes seen orthogonally to the two dimensional coating plane. The morphology also shows rod-shaped features in up to 20, 17.5, 15, 12.5, 10, 7.5, 5, or 2.5% (v/v) of the total surface volume, which rod-shaped features have a longest dimension of, e.g., at least 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, or 650 nm and/or up to 10000, 7500, 5000, 3500, 2500, 2000, 1500, 1000, 900, 800, 750, 700, 650, or 600 nm, and/or an aspect ratio (length:width) of, e.g., at least 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, or 5:1 and/or up to 25, 20, 15, 12.5, 10, 9, 8, 7, or 6:1. By volume, the particulate morphological features versus the rod-like morphological features in the catalyst layer may be, for example, at least 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 25, 30, 33, 35, 37.5, 40, 45, or 50% and/or up to 85, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25%.

(100) FIG. 3C shows forward potential sweeps for Cu-CNP/FTO, i.e., not annealed, Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250, i.e., annealed for roughly 1 hour at 250° C., and Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500, i.e., annealed for roughly 1 hour at 500° C., at 2 mV/s. FIG. 3D shows short-term, time versus current density curves for bare FTO, Cu-CNP/FTO at 1.77 V.sub.RHE, Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 at 1.67 V.sub.RHE, and for Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 at 1.56 V.sub.RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution.

(101) From a comparative cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis, it appears that the onset potential for water oxidation reaction shifts towards the more negative potential by applying the annealing and by increasing the annealing temperature up to 500° C. This can be observed in FIG. 3C. Without wishing to be bound to any particular theory, the more negative potential upon annealing may be due to the formation of more intense nanoscale catalytic structures by applying and increasing annealing temperature, which is evidenced by the SEM images in FIGS. 7 and 8. Annealing at 500° C. also produced a more porous catalytic film, thus presenting a comparatively larger number of active sites for efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER), relative to the samples annealed at 250° C. or prepared without annealing.

(102) Nanoscale porous materials are generally considered more efficient catalysts based upon their high surface areas which typically facilitate catalytic performance. Furthermore, adjacent nanoparticles on catalyst surface can favor O—O bond formation and evolution of molecular oxygen at a lower energy cost.

(103) FIG. 9 shows Nyquist plots at 1.63 V.sub.RHE for exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO, Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250, and Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts derived from Cu-colloids immobilized on FTO substrates, with an inset zoom of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample plot, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) being conducted in 0.1 M KOH solution at a pH of approx. 13 in the frequency range of 100K to 0.1 Hz. Additional evidence potentially explaining the high efficiency of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample can be taken from a study of the charge transfer resistance at the electrode-electrolyte interface double layer via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The impedance data shows a lower charge transfer resistance for the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample facilitating electron transfer at the interface, which facilitated electron transfer may also be attributed to the fine nanoscale surface structure of the copper-derived electrocatalyst, as seen in FIG. 9. Further annealing the samples did not appear to produce a profound reduction in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) onset potential, and a 500° C. treatment is considered a preferred heating temperature for thin-film copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) sufficient to make efficient water oxidation electrocatalysts.

(104) FIG. 3D shows short-term, time versus current density curves for bare FTO, Cu-CNP/FTO at 1.77 V.sub.RHE, Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.250 at 1.67 V.sub.RHE, and for Cu-CNP/FTO.sub.500 at 1.56 V.sub.RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution. From short-term chronoamperometry analysis, the exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO electrocatalysts, i.e., derived from copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) deposited on FTO without applying post-annealing operations, were indicated to be insufficiently stable for robust usage desired, as seen in FIG. 3D. The non-annealed catalyst samples were observed to undergo 40% degradation under the harsh oxidative environment for water electrooxidation. Although the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.250 sample catalyst, i.e., catalytic film coated on conductor surface followed by annealing at 250° C., showed comparatively higher stability of the electrocatalyst (relative to non-annealed analogs) for the oxygen evolution reaction with 20% degradation over time, as seen in FIG. 3D. The degradation of the exemplary inventive catalyst may be attributed to the crumbling of catalytic materials from the FTO surface, possibly due to the vigorous oxygen evolution. The disintegration of the catalyst and/or detachment the catalyst from the FTO surface during a short-term controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) experiment was also observed by the naked eye during the course of analysis. However, the time versus current density plot for the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample electrocatalyst presented remarkable stability with no observable degradation, as seen in FIG. 3D. The high stability of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample catalyst may be attributed to the formation of finer, nanosized particulate-type CuO.sub.x structures on the FTO surface by annealing at 500° C., as indicated by SEM microscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies discussed below.

(105) FIG. 10A shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 1 μm scale, and FIG. 10B shows an SEM image of an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample on 200 nm scale with an inset showing a view of the nanosized bead-type structure. FIG. 10C shows an SEM image of a blank fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) slide. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) images for Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 samples revealed well pronounced nano-rods type morphological features, as seen in FIGS. 10A and 10B. The enlarged view of nanobead-type structures grown on FTO surface (FIG. 10B) indicates a narrow size distribution of nanoparticulate features, whereas such structural morphology was not observed for the plain FTO substrate (uncoated) seen in FIG. 10C.

(106) FIG. 10D shows an energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS, EDX, EDXS, or XEDS) spectrum for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample. The bulk compositional analysis as carried out via energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS, EDX, EDXS, or XEDS), FIG. 10D, indicated the presence of 14 atom. % C, 33.66 atom. % O, and 46 atom. % Cu in the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalytic film. Without wishing to be bound to any particular theory, the carbon assimilation in the metal oxide is believed to increase the electroactive sites of electrocatalyst while facilitating the good electron transfer and enhance stability.

(107) FIG. 4A shows an x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst, FIG. 4B shows an enlarged view of the XPS spectrum for the Cu 2p region, FIG. 4C shows an enlarged view of the XPS spectrum for the C 1s region, and FIG. 4D shows an enlarged view of the XPS spectrum for the O 1s region. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis in the form of the survey data in FIG. 4A reveals that the exemplary inventive catalytic materials contain Cu, O, and C as the main constituent elements in the deposit. In the survey spectrum of the CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the binding energies between 930 eV and 960 eV indicate the response from Cu 2p.sub.3/2, centered at 934.5 eV, and Cu 2p.sub.1/2, centered at 954.2 eV, while the peak at 530 eV is associated with O 1s and the peak at 283 eV is associated with C 1s as seen in FIGS. 4C and 4D.

(108) The magnified view of C 1s in FIG. 4C indicates a well-pronounced peak at about 283.6 eV which is attributed to the sp.sup.2 carbon (C—C bond), while a small peak at 286.1 eV may be assigned to O—C—O and C—OH groups. The high-resolution XPS spectrum for Cu 2p in FIG. 4B shows a pronounced spin-orbit splitting into Cu 2p.sub.3/2 and Cu 2p.sub.1/2, with an energy difference of about 20 eV, which is characteristics of CuO type materials as previously reported. In between the Cu 2.sub.3/2 and Cu 2p.sub.1/2 peaks, next to the Cu 2.sub.3/2 XPS signals, there is a satellite peak, positioned at about 941.1 eV which is the characteristics of Cu.sup.2+ materials with d9 configuration in the ground state as discussed in ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1768-1771, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The shake-up satellite peak is characteristic of CuO based materials. The Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample shows a peak for oxygen at about 530.9 eV, seen in FIG. 4D, which is ascribed to the surface-bound oxide in the catalytic layer. Consequently, the surface and bulk elemental analysis indicate an active CuO-based electrocatalyst useful for water oxidation catalysis.

(109) FIG. 11 shows an x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample. The x-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum for phase analysis of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst reveals the presence of CuO and Cu.sub.8O type phases in the catalytic layer, as seen in FIG. 11. The CuO remains the dominating phase in the inventive catalytic films. However, the pattern in FIG. 11 includes some signals representing the contribution of metallic copper in the catalytic layer that might have formed from the reduction of copper oxide. Thus, the x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern in FIG. 11 reveals intense diffraction peaks for the Cu.sub.8O phase, indicated by “#” signs, and for the CuO phase, indicated by “@” signs.

(110) FIG. 12A shows a Raman spectrum overview for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample, while FIG. 12B shows a selection from 280 to 340 cm.sup.−1, FIG. 12C shows a selection from 439 to 442 cm.sup.−1, and FIG. 12D shows a selection from 610 to 630 cm.sup.−1. Raman spectroscopy was also undertaken on the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst sample to investigate the structure of the nanoscale copper oxide-based material, as presented in FIG. 12A to 12D. The Raman peaks at 295, 332, and 614 cm.sup.−1 indicate the presence of a CuO phase in the catalytic layer, particularly visible in the enlarged view shown in FIGS. 12B and 12D. However, a peak at 440 cm.sup.−1, seen in FIG. 12C, indicates the presence of a Cu.sub.2O phase in the catalytic film. Thus, the analytical results indicate that the exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts, derived from the Cu(OH).sub.x/CuO.sub.x/HCO.sub.3.sup.− formulation-based colloidal nanoparticles (CNPs), relatively easily made as described above, is a mixture of various phases of copper oxides with CuO as the dominating phase. The Raman data correspond with XPS and XRD data for the chemistry of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst.

(111) Detailed electrochemical characterization of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 system was conducted via cyclic voltammetry (CV) in FIGS. 5A and 5B, Tafel measurements in FIG. 5C, consecutive cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements in FIG. 5D, and incremental multistep controlled current electrolysis (CCE), as shown in FIG. 5E. FIGS. 5A and 5B show a cyclic voltammetry (CV) profile for an inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution at a pH of approx. 13 at a scan rate of 2 mV/s. FIG. 5C shows a Tafel plot of overpotential versus the logarithm of a current density curve for an exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst calculated from the polarization curve. FIG. 5D shows a plot comparing 1 to 500 consecutive CV sweeps for the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte solution at a pH of approx. 13 at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. FIG. 5E shows a multistep controlled current electrolysis (CCE) plot showing potential profiles for consecutive current density increments from 2 to 20 mA/cm.sup.2.

(112) The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) onset potential, E/V, was determined to be 1.45.sub.RHE, with an onset overpotential, η, was determined to be 220 mV, as seen in FIG. 5A, with an enlarged view shown in FIG. 5B. The onset potential achieved by the inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 system is the lowest on the list in Table 1, and better than other Cu-based heterogeneous catalysts reported to date.

(113) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 A comparative analysis of different Cu-based electrocatalytic systems for water oxidation reaction and that of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 type electrocatalyst. Onset potential Tafel slope Catalyst/System.sup.[a] Electrolyte [V.sub.RHE] [mV/dec] Cu—Bi 0.2M Borate buffer 1.73 V 89 (pH ≈ 9) Cu-NWs.sup.[b] 0.2M Borate buffer 1.84 V — Cu.sub.c—Ni.sub.s NWs.sup.[c] (pH ≈ 9.2) 1.69 V CuO 0.1M K—Bi 1.64 V 54.5 (pH ≈ 9.2) Cu-NLs.sup.[d] 0.2M carbonate 1.55 V — (pH ≈ 11) Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 0.1M KOH 1.45 V 52 (pH ≈ 13) .sup.[a]the Cu catalysts are prepared by different methods and are deposited on various conducting substrates; .sup.[b]Cu-NWs = Copper nanowires; .sup.[c]Cu—Ni NWs = electroplated nickel onto copper nanowires; .sup.[d]Cu-NLs = Copper-oxide nanoleaves.

(114) The oxidative prefectures at about 1.0 V.sub.RHE seen in FIG. 5B may be ascribed to the surface oxidation of copper to higher oxidation state upon the applied anodic potential. A current density of less than 15 mA/cm.sup.2 was achieved under 1.63 V.sub.RHE, and a current density of 10 mA/cm.sup.2 could be achieved just under the potential, E.sub.J=10 mA/cm.sub.2, of 1.59 V.sub.RHE, with an onset overpotential, η, of 360 mV. This data indicates a substantial electrocatalytic activity of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample for the water oxidation reaction. A large reduction current is also observed that might be originated from the Cu site reduction along with some O.sub.2 reduction in this potential region. During the catalytic reaction, copper is thought to undergo from +2 to +3 oxidation state through OH.sup.− adsorption and desorption. Such behavior is consistent with other 3d metal oxides as well.
Cu.sup.+2O+OH.sup.−.fwdarw.Cu.sup.+3(O)—OH+e−
Cu.sup.+3(O)—OH+OH.sup.−.fwdarw.Cu.sup.+2O+O.sub.2+2e.sup.−+2H.sup.+

(115) The exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 water oxidation electrocatalyst described herein can exhibit an oxygen evolution reaction (OER) onset potential, E/V, of 1.45.sub.RHE, and an onset-overpotential, η, of 220 mV, which is unexpectedly superior relative to known materials, as seen in Table 1. Copper is not generally considered to be a good electrocatalytic material because the M-OH bond formation is either too strong or too weak, thereby hindering copper's intrinsic catalytic activity. However, the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 materials described herein show much-improved performance for driving otherwise kinetically sluggish oxygen evolution reaction (OER).

(116) The unexpectedly superior performance of the inventive catalysts is believed to be attributable to the nanoscale, rough, highly porous surface structure, particularly of the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 samples, enabling a rapid charge transfer as evident by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in FIG. 9. The inventive catalysts also appear to possess unexpectedly enhanced stability, possibly due to the insertion of carbon content in the catalytic layer, e.g., from a carbonate electrolyte, as evidence by EDS and XPS analysis.

(117) Carbon assimilation in the catalytic system can be facilitated, as described herein, by employing a relatively simple colloidal route and inexpensive carbonate electrolyte systems. Accordingly, it is possible that that nanostructure, porous spongy morphological attributes of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 further reduce kinetic barriers and support O—O bond formation from individual OH entities adsorbed on catalyst surface, allowing the inventive system to operate at a much lower energy cost. Porous, nanoscale, particulate-type catalytic films, such as the inventive materials, can also provide more active sites, thereby facilitating adsorption/stabilization of reaction intermediates and their conversion for high rates of 0-0 bond formation and subsequent rapid oxygen gas evolution.

(118) FIG. 13A shows CV profiles for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst generated with different catalyst loadings on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO). FIG. 13B shows an overview image of a CV curve for exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst generated with a 60 μL aliquot of copper colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) on FTO in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution at the scan rate of 2 mV/s. The effects of different catalyst loadings on the FTO surface were studied by preparing Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 anodes obtainable by depositing 10 to 60 μL, the mass loading of Cu-CNPs catalyst in the volume range 10-60 μL is as follows: 10 μL (0.1 mg); 20 μL (0.2 mg); 30 μL (0.3 mg); 40 μL (0.4 mg); 50 μL (0.5 mg); 60 μL (0.6 mg) of copper-colloidal nanoparticles (Cu-CNPs) on FTO substrates. Varying the copper-colloidal nanoparticle (Cu-CNP) loading in the range of 10 to 30 μL was observed to produce similar catalytic signatures and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance during cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments as shown in FIG. 13A. However, at a 60 μL loading, the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst sample shows a broad metal redox peak just prior to water oxidation catalytic wave with a relatively high current density as expected for high catalyst loadings, as indicated in FIG. 13B.

(119) FIG. 14A shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer at a pH of approx. 6.3. FIG. 14B shows a plot of the results of a controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 14A. FIG. 14C shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M aq. bicarbonate electrolyte solution a pH of approx. 8.3. FIG. 14D shows a plot of the results of a CPE experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 14C. FIG. 14E shows a CV profile for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst in a 0.1 M aq. carbonate electrolyte solution a pH of approx. 11. FIG. 14F shows a plot of the results of a CPE experiment conducted for more than three hours at applied potential of 1.6.sub.RHE and 1.55 V.sub.RHE for the system in FIG. 14E.

(120) The catalytic performance of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 was investigated in various electrolyte solutions at varied pH values, from neutral to basic pH values. The results show that the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst sample can perform the water oxidation reaction under a wide range of pH conditions and in a variety of electrolyte solutions, such as in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PBS) (pH≈6.3) as illustrated in FIG. 14A, in 0.1 M aq. bicarbonate electrolyte solution (pH≈8.3) as illustrated in FIG. 14C, and 0.1 M aq. carbonate electrolyte solution (pH≈11) as illustrated in FIG. 14E. Furthermore, the Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst sample shows good activity and stability for the water oxidation reaction in all aforementioned electrolyte solutions during controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) experiments conducted at constant potential, as respectively seen in FIGS. 14B, 14D, and 14F. These results demonstrate substantial catalytic activity of the exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalyst for water oxidation reaction under wide pH range. However, the catalytic performance in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution indicates that basic conditions can be desirable.

(121) FIG. 15 shows a Tafel plot of overpotential versus the logarithm of the current density curve for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst calculated from static chronoamperometry technique. The current versus overpotential measurements for the exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) calculated from the polarization curve reveals a Tafel slope of 63 mV/dec as illustrated in FIG. 5C. Furthermore, to get a steady state polarization curve and to avoid the current contribution from the capacitance of the interphase, the Tafel curve is plotted by considering a static electroanalytical technique, such as chronoamperometry as described above. The resulting Tafel slope of 52 mV/dec corresponds to a three electron transfer during the catalytic process, and represents the actual intrinsic catalytic activity of the material as seen in FIGS. 5C and 15. The elementary step in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode surface involves a two to three electron transfer reaction including the oxidation of water and/or hydroxide to oxyhydroxide.

(122) Accelerated degradation experiments are performed in 0.1 M KOH to assess the durability of the inventive catalysts. The successive multi-scan cyclic voltammetry (MSCV) measurements for the exemplary Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalyst exhibited excellent stability and high activity, generating similar catalytic signatures after 500 cyclic voltammetry (CV) cycles as after 1 cycle for water oxidation catalysis, as seen in FIG. 5C. In addition, the catalytic performance of the electrocatalyst was investigated by a series of multistep controlled current electrolysis (CCE) experiments. In the pursuit of the multistep CCE experiments, current was held constant for a minimum of 300 seconds and the resulting potential-time curves are presented in FIG. 5E. Upon increasing the current density, the potential of electrode upsurges, but can be quickly stabilized due to the mechanical sturdiness of the system. This feature proves the stability of the system under anodic environment.

(123) FIG. 16 shows the area under reduction peak for Cu.sup.2+ to/from Cu.sup.3+ redox reaction on an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 material under potential range from 1.43 to 0.94 V.sub.RHE based on a CV scan rate of 20 mV/s. The electrochemically active surface area calculated from the charge under the active reduction peak from the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) polarization curve by assuming that each surface Cu atom corresponds to one chemisorbed oxygen atom is found to be 7.5 cm.sup.2, e.g., 7.5±0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.33, 0.4, 0.45, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 0.67, 0.75, 0.85, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, or 2.5 cm.sup.2 (or any range including any combination of such endpoints), presenting enhanced electrocatalytic physiognomies of the system as seen in FIG. 16. This method is based on the assumption that all the atoms in electrocatalyst are 100% electrochemically active, based on the following calculations and Table 2, below.
TOF@1.45V=[0.0009×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.084 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.48V=[0.00152×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.14 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.51V=[0.0034×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.32 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.54V=[0.0051×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.48 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.57V=[0.0084×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=0.79 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.60V=[0.0118×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=1.1 s.sup.−1
TOF@1.63V=[0.017×(6.022×10.sup.23)]/[1×4×96485×(0.0016583×10.sup.19)]=1.6 s.sup.−1

(124) FIG. 20 shows a plot of the turn-over frequency (TOF) calculated at various applied potential for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst in 0.1 M KOH for which the surface concentration was determined from the redox peak current. FIG. 21 shows a chart of the mass activity (MA) values for an exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 material at various applied potential calculated from OER current obtained by CV curve. The turn-over frequency (TOF) and mass activity values were calculated at various applied potential values from 1.45 V.sub.RHE to 1.63 V.sub.RHE as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, as well as Table 2, below.

(125) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Shows the mass activity and TOF values of Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 type electrocatalytic calculated at various applied potential. Applied potential Current Value Mass Activity TOF (V.sub.RHE) (mA) (mA/mg) (s.sup.−1) 1.45 0.9 9 0.08 1.48 1.52 15.2 0.14 1.51 3.41 34.1 0.32 1.54 5.19 51.9 0.48 1.57 8.4 84 0.79 1.58 8.7 87 0.81 1.60 11.8 118 1.11 1.63 17.24 172.4 1.62

(126) The inventive catalysts can achieve turn-over frequencies of 0.8 s.sup.−1, e.g., at least 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.33, 0.35, 0.375, 0.4, 0.4125, 0.425, 0.4375, 0.45, 0.475, 0.5, 0.525, 0.55, 0.575, 0.6, or 0.65 s.sup.−1 and/or up to 25, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, 5, 2.5, 2.25, 2, 1.75, 1.5, 1.25, 1.2, 1.15, 1.1, 1.05, 1, 0.95, 0.9, 0.875, 0.85, 0.8375, 0.825, 0.8125, 0.8, 0.7875, 0.775, 0.7625, or 0.75 s.sup.−1, and mass activity of 87 mA/mg, e.g., at least 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 82.5 85, 86.25, 87.5, 88.75, 89, or 90 mA/mg and/or up to 150, 140, 130, 125, 120, 115, 110, 105, 102.5, 100, 98.75, 97.5, 96.25, 95, 93.75, 92.5, 91.25, 90, or 87.5 mA/mg, at just 0.35 V. The choice of an onset overpotential, η, of 0.35 V, depends on an well-described device model, indicating that 10% efficient solar water splitting device should operate at 10 mA/cm.sup.2 with a maximum overpotential of 0.35 V for oxygen evolution reaction as reported in Chemistry Select 2018, 3, 11357-11366. The overall electrocatalytic activity indicates that comparatively easily-made, inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts are promising, robust, cheap, and efficient electrocatalytic candidates for facilitating the water oxidation reaction.

(127) The remarkably lower energy input, i.e., cost, for initiating water oxidation catalysis at just 220 mV using inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 electrocatalysts compelled an evaluation of the long-term stability of the inventive catalytic material for water oxidation catalysis under electrochemical conditions. The stability of exemplary inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 catalysts were tested under harsh oxidative environment via long-term controlled potential water electrolysis experiments.

(128) FIG. 6 shows a plot of extended time electrocatalytic oxygen evolution during controlled potential water electrolysis using a Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 sample at 1.56 V.sub.RHE in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte. Chronoamperometry experiments conducted for inventive Cu-CNPs/FTO.sub.500 samples presented respectable results, achieving a current density of less than 6 mA/cm.sup.2 at an operating potential of 1.56 V.sub.RHE at an onset overpotential, r, of 0.33 V. The current density in the catalyst samples remained constant during an unremitting 10 hours of electrolysis, and the catalyst samples showed no observable degradation as indicated in FIG. 6. Furthermore, a rich stream of oxygen bubbles could be seen coming out of electrode surface during the constant potential electrolysis (CPE) experiments, owing to the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The value of much higher current density and outstanding stability can be attributed to the excellent catalytic activity of the inventive catalysts, particularly under the employed conditions. Electrochemical investigations including cyclic voltammetry, Tafel slope analysis, and controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) indicate that inventive electrocatalysts, prepared as described above, despite using simple precursors and following low-cost, time effective and straightforward synthetic methods, proved efficient, e.g., in electrochemical cells, for catalyzing the water oxidation reaction. The electrochemical activity of inventive catalysts can unexpectedly be even better than activities observed for known Cu electrocatalysts.

(129) Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Colloidal-copper based water oxidation electrocatalyst

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

Classification Explorer

C25B11/091

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C25B3/26

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

B01J35/023

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J21/18

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J37/08

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J37/0215

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

Y02E60/36

GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS

Classification Explorer

B01J2219/00747

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

C01B13/0237

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C25B3/03

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C01B13/0207

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

B01J23/72

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

C25B1/04

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C25B11/069

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C25B3/07

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

C25B11/075

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

B01J35/10

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

C25B11/054

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

International classification

Classification Explorer

B01J23/72

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J37/02

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J21/18

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J35/10

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

C01B13/02

CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

Classification Explorer

B01J35/02

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING

Classification Explorer

B01J37/08

PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING