Reactor Assemblies and Methods of Performing Reactions
20220305453 · 2022-09-29
Inventors
- Richard F. Zheng (Lake Oswego, OR, US)
- Robert S. Wegeng (Richland, WA)
- Paul H. Humble (Kennewick, WA)
- Dustin D. Caldwell (Portland, CT, US)
- Richard B. Diver (Albuquerque, NM, US)
Cpc classification
Y02P20/133
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
B01J19/0093
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02E10/44
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C01B2203/0805
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F24S90/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F24S10/502
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01J2219/2479
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/00943
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J19/0013
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01B2203/0283
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J2219/2481
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F24S10/25
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01J19/248
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F24S10/50
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01J2219/00835
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01B2203/0233
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B2203/0833
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J2219/00783
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/2453
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2219/00788
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J19/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F24S20/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
Reactors are provided that can include a first set of fluid channels and a second set of fluid channels oriented in thermal contact with the first set of fluid channels. The reactor assemblies can also provide where the channels of either one or both of the first of the set of fluid channels are non-linear. Other implementations provide for at least one of the first set of fluid channels being in thermal contact with a plurality of other channels of the second set of fluid channels. Reactor assemblies are also provided that can include a first set of fluid channels defining at least one non-linear channel having a positive function, and a second set of fluid channels defining at least another non-linear channel having a negative function in relation to the positive function of the one non-linear channel of the first set of fluid channels. Processes for distributing energy across a reactor are provided. The processes can include transporting reactants via a first set of fluid channels to a second set of fluid channels, and thermally engaging at least one of the first set of fluid channels with at least two of the second set of fluid channels.
Claims
1-35. (canceled)
36. A process for distributing energy across a reactor, the process comprising: transporting reactants via a first set of fluid channels to a second set of fluid channels; and thermally engaging at least one of the first set of fluid channels with at least two of the second set of fluid channels.
37. The process of claim 36 further comprising performing an endothermic reaction within one of the sets of fluid channels.
38. The process of claim 37 further comprising facilitating the endothermic reaction with solar energy.
39. The process of claim 37 further comprising facilitating the endothermic reaction with a catalyst.
Description
DRAWINGS
[0012] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
[0013] Embodiments of the disclosure are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings.
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
DESCRIPTION
[0028] This disclosure is submitted in furtherance of the constitutional purposes of the U.S. Patent Laws “to promote the progress of science and useful arts” (Article 1, Section 8).
[0029] It has been recognized that for practical solar concentrators, there can be hot spots at the reactor surface due to imperfections in the solar concentrator optics. The hot spots, or local points of high solar flux, can limit the maximum total operating flux because of reactor metallurgy limits. Hot spots, or other thermal gradients, can also induce large thermal stresses in the reactor which can lead to reduced life time over thermal cycles due to low cycle fatigue. Thus, the differential temperatures associated with thermal gradients can lead to high operating and/or capital costs and failures, causing reduced lifetimes, for the reactor system.
[0030] The present disclosure will be described with reference to
[0031] Referring next to
[0032] Referring next to
[0033] Referring next to
[0034] Referring next to
[0035] The mathematical functions defining the channel shape and orientation can be expressed by the general equation θ=f(r) in reference to the polar coordinate system 110 with coordinates (r,θ) in
[0036] In accordance with example implementations, the non-linear mathematical functions of the shape of fluid channels 60 and 80 when taken as absolute values can be equal to one another, thereby having a mirror image of one another. In accordance with other implementations, the fluid channels may not be mirror images of each other but may still be configured as counter spirals. In accordance with example implementations, reactors can include a plurality of non-linear fluid channels having the same positive function as well as a plurality of non-linear channels having the same negative function. The reactor can include an entirety of one set of non-linear channels having a positive function and another set of non-linear channels having a negative function. In accordance with example implementations, and with reference to
[0037] In accordance with example implementations, catalyst supported on foam can be provided into one set of channels 212. In accordance with example implementations, and with reference to individual fluid channels of one set 212, an individual fluid channel of reactor 200 can be in thermal connection with as many as two if not as many as 14 individual channels of the other set 214, as shown as a plurality of contact at 206.
[0038] The process can provide transporting reactants via a first set of fluid channels and extracting products from a second set of fluid channels and thermally engaging at least one of the first set of fluid channels with at least two of the second set of fluid channels as shown, for example, in
[0039] While embodiments of the present disclosure can utilize most metals as the material of construction, metals comprising Ni, Cu, stainless steel alloys, Ti, Ti alloys, super alloys such as Inconel, Hastelloy and Haynes alloys, and combinations thereof can be utilized. Ceramics may also be useful.
[0040] The dividing member 216 between the sets of channels can have a flat, concave, or convex contour. The dividing member can be any thickness necessary to support the channel structure and to provide a heat conduction path. In accordance with example implementations, the dividing member may have a thickness between 0.1 and 3.2 mm. The dividing member can be an impermeable solid.
[0041] Heights of the individual channels within each set can be less than 100 microns (0.1 millimeters) or greater than 1 centimeter. However, in embodiments where a solid catalyst is used, the channel heights are preferably greater than 1 mm, and still more preferably greater than 5 mm, in order to provide sufficient catalyst material to support reactions.
[0042] Referring next to
[0043] In particular embodiments and with reference to
[0044] Near the reactor rim where the channels end, slot shaped openings connect the channels to a second set of channels that curve in the opposite direction of that of the first set of channels. The second set of channels 214 may be referred to as heat recuperation channels while the first set of channels can be referred to as reaction channels. The reaction channels and the heat recuperation channels are separated by a solid intermediate member 216 that allows heat transfer by conduction. The slot-shaped openings 230 penetrate the intermediate member to allow the reaction product streams from the reaction channels to enter the heat recuperation channels. The product streams are returned to the center through the heat recuperation channels and flow out of the reactor through the annular space 204 between the inlet and the outlet connection tubes. Similar to the reaction channels, the heat recuperation channels may also be bifurcated.
[0045] The spiral counter-cross flow pattern of this reactor is clearly shown in
[0052] Reactive flow under steam methane reforming conditions and non-uniform solar flux distribution of embodiments of the present reactor assembly and methods can be simulated to understand the effects of reactor geometry and channel configuration on temperature and thermomechanical stress distributions.
[0053] In one embodiment, the reactor provides thermal spreading over a large reactor area and multiple channels. The non-linear revolution can be one quarter or more of a full circle. In one embodiment incorporating counter-cross flow, the two sets of channels can cover a substantial area of the reactor, thus using the fluid to provide substantial thermal spreading from hot zones to colder zones.
[0054] Each feed stream flowing in channels 212 is in thermal contact through dividing member 216 with a plurality of product streams in the counter flow channels 214, the flow path of the latter group of streams cover approximately one-fifth of the entire area between the two sets of flow channels. Referring to
[0055] The counter-cross flow arrangement of reaction channels and recuperative channels can provide efficient thermal spreading of inhomogeneous solar irradiation to a substantially greater degree than could be provided by direct thermal conduction through metal layers. The reduction of hot spots leads to lower operating and capital costs through improvements to reactor's operability under high flux conditions and longer reactor life by reducing thermal stress, respectively.
[0056] The solar flux distribution on the reactor surface can be estimated from a moon flux distribution obtained in previous experiments through a mapping exercise where the parabolic dish was pointed at a full moon. The results are shown in
[0057] The reactor surface temperature distributions under a set of typical high solar flux conditions (9.6 kW total incident solar power, >80% methane conversion, 0.032 mol/s methane flow, steam to carbon ratio of 3) are shown in
[0058] The von Mises stress in psi units is given in
[0059] One embodiment of the present disclosure was tested in a solar thermochemical reaction system that consisted of a solar concentrator of the parabolic dish type, an on-sun reactor unit located at the focal point of the dish, and the balance of plant located on the ground. The configuration of the reaction system is given in
[0060] A non-linear reactor, designated TRL 6, was manufactured according the design described in previous sections. In this particular embodiment of the disclosure, the reactor was fabricated by machining individual plates and diffusion bonding the stack of the plates. The reactor was tested under medium to high solar flux conditions with pairing to an Infinia PowerDish III parabolic dish concentrator with nominal mirror area of 14.85 m.sup.2. A linear reactor of otherwise similar reactor and channel dimensions, designated TRL 5, was also fabricated and tested on-sun with a dish concentrator of the same specifications.
[0061] With reference to
[0062] System solar-to-chemical energy efficiency as high as upper 60% to 70% was achieved with the TRL 6 reactor system. This reactor system was able to consistently achieve the high efficiency over medium to very high flux conditions. The excellent thermal spreading capacity of the non-linear reactor design allowed the reaction channels to be at higher temperatures when the reactors were operated with the same surface temperature limit. The higher thermodynamic efficiency of the endothermic reaction at higher temperature is thought to be able to make up any additional radiative heat lost, thus the overall high solar-to-chemical conversion efficiency of TRL 6 reactor was able to extend to the high flux region.
[0063] As a comparison, due to the absence of enhanced thermal spreading, the TRL 5 reactor system was not operated at the same high solar flux as the non-linear reactor system due to the surface temperature exceeding design points. In low to medium solar flux range, the non-linear reactor system also outperformed the linear reactor in terms of solar-to-chemical energy efficiency.
[0064] The performance advantage of the non-linear reactor is even more evident when the energy efficiency of the reactor is examined. The reactor thermal-to-chemical efficiency is defined as the ratio of the higher heating value difference between the reactor product stream and the feed stream to the amount of concentrated solar thermal energy received by the reactor and therefor includes effects due to heat losses around the reactor-receiver and the degree of chemical conversion in the reactor. The reactor thermal-to-chemical efficiency data from the on-sun testing are given in
[0065] The TRL 5 reactor achieved 60%-70% thermal-to-chemical energy efficiency but was limited to low to medium flux operation due to the hot spot issues and reactor material temperature limit. With the TRL 6 reactor, thermal-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency as high as 85% was achieved in the high flux region. Some data points suggest even close to 90% level performance may be possible. The non-linear reactor's superior performance in energy efficiency is attributed to its ability of greater thermal spreading.
[0066] An exergy analysis was conducted based on TRL 6 reactor on-sun performance data. The objective was to evaluate the reactor and the heat exchanger's second law efficiencies and to identify the sources and magnitudes of exergy destruction. In the exergy analysis, the exergy destruction at the reactor front surface was estimated by approximating the surface temperature with an average value based on IR thermography measurements. The reference environment was chosen as 25° C. and 1 atm with chemical compositions as proposed by Szargut et al. The TRL 6 reactor's exergetic efficiency was determined to be greater than 90%. For example, when tested under conditions of 0.048 mol/s methane feed flow rate, steam to carbon ratio of 2.2, 10.88 kW concentrated solar power input, and an average reactor surface temperature of 820° C., the reactor rate of exergy destruction was estimated to be 5.34 kW, giving a reactor exergetic efficiency of 90.2%.
[0067] In compliance with the statute, embodiments of the invention have been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the entire invention is not limited to the specific features and/or embodiments shown and/or described, since the disclosed embodiments comprise forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.