COPPER ALUMINUM CATALYST USED FOR 1,4-BUTYNEDIOL PRODUCTION
20230311100 · 2023-10-05
Inventors
- Huan Wang (Shanghai, CN)
- Ai Ling LV (Shanghai, CN)
- Diana Carolina Galeano Nunez (Shanghai, CN)
- Mario Soorholtz (Shanghai, CN)
Cpc classification
Y02P20/52
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C07C29/42
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C29/42
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J23/002
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J23/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J37/03
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present invention is generally related to a novel catalytic composition and a method for the production of 1,4 -butynediol by catalytic ethynylation of formaldehyde, the said method is known as the Reppe reaction. The invented catalyst with lower copper content would provide an advantageous combination of improved utilization efficiency of copper, reduced copper leaching and enhanced filterability, and has minimal to no impact on catalytic activity.
Claims
1. A catalytic composition comprising from 5% to 35% by weight of Cu, calculated as CuO; from 0.1% to 7% by weight of Bi, calculated as Bi.sub.2O.sub.3; from 60% to 95% by weight of Al, calculated as Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
2. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the Cu to Bi molar ratio is 55-300:1.
3. The catalytic composition according to claim 2, wherein the Cu to Bi molar ratio is 80-200:1.
4. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic composition comprises from 10% to 30% by weight of Cu, calculated as CuO.
5. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic composition comprises from 0.2% to 4% by weight of Bi, calculated as Bi.sub.2O.sub.3.
6. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic composition comprises from 70% to 90% by weight of Al, calculated as Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
7. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 has a D.sub.50 of between 0.1 to 20 μm.
8. The catalytic composition according to claim 6, wherein the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 has a D.sub.50 of between 0.2 to 15 μm.
9. The catalytic composition according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic composition has a D.sub.50 of between 0.5 to 40 μm.
10. The catalytic composition according to claim 9, wherein the catalytic composition has a D.sub.50 of between 1 to 30 μm.
11. A process for producing a catalytic composition according to claim 1 comprising: 1) precipitation of an acidic copper-containing aqueous solution with precipitation agent, on a particulate carrier; 2) drying the treated particulate carrier and calcining at 300 to 800° C. to form the catalytic composition; wherein the particulate carrier comprises alumina.
12. A process for using the catalytic composition according to claim 1 for hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, or ethynylation.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] Before describing several exemplary embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the details of construction or process steps set forth in the following description. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways.
[0016] With respect to the terms used in this disclosure, the following definitions are provided.
[0017] Throughout the description, including the claims, the term “comprising one” or “comprising a” should be understood as being synonymous with the term “comprising at least one”, unless otherwise specified, and “between” or “to” should be understood as being inclusive of the limits.
[0018] The terms “a”, “an” and “the” are used to refer to one or to more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article.
[0019] The term “and/or” includes the meanings “and”, “or” and also all the other possible combinations of the elements connected to this term.
[0020] All percentages and ratios are mentioned by weight unless otherwise indicated.
[0021] Thus, according to one aspect of the invention, provided is a catalytic composition comprising from 5% to 35%, preferably from 10% to 30%, more preferably 15% to 30%, and the most preferably 20 to 30%, including 25 and 28%, by weight of Cu, calculated as CuO; from 0.1% to 7%, preferably from 0.2% to 4%, including 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5%, by weight of Bi, calculated as Bi.sub.2O.sub.3; from 60% to 95%, preferably from 70% to 90%, including 75, 80 and 85%, by weight of Al, calculated as Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
[0022] In one or more embodiments, the Cu to Bi molar ratio is 55-300:1, preferably 80-200:1.
[0023] In one or more embodiments, the Al.sub.2O.sub.3 has a D.sub.50 of between 0.1 to 20 μm, preferably 0.2 to 15 μm.
[0024] As used herein, “D.sub.50” has its usual meaning of median diameter referring to the point where the portions of particles with diameters smaller and larger than this value are 50%. The particle size distribution is measured by using laser diffraction particle size analyzer.
[0025] In one or more embodiments, the catalytic composition has a D.sub.50 of between 0.5 to 40 μm, preferably between 1 to 30 μm.
[0026] Another aspect includes methods for producing the catalytic composition described above, wherein the methods comprise steps of: [0027] 1) precipitation of an acidic copper-containing aqueous solution with precipitation agent, on a particulate carrier; [0028] 2) drying the treated particulate carrier and calcining at 300 to 800° C. to form the catalytic composition; wherein the particulate carrier comprises alumina.
[0029] A type of the alkaline aqueous solution used as the precipitation agent is not particularly limited, but inorganic alkalis such as aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, an aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide, and the mixture thereof are generally used.
[0030] As used herein, the term “mixture” or “combination” refers, but is not limited to, a combination in any physical or chemical form, e.g., blend, solution, suspension, alloy, composite, or the like.
[0031] With reference to a copper source, typical copper sources may include, but not limited to, copper acetate, copper chloride, copper phosphate, copper pyrophosphate, copper nitrate, copper ammonium sulfate, copper albuminate, copper sulfate, copper gluconate, copper lactate, copper saccharate, copper fructate, copper dextrate, and the mixture thereof.
[0032] With reference to a bismuth source, typical bismuth sources may include, but not limited to bismuth chloride, bismuth oxychloride, bismuth bromide, bismuth silicate, bismuth hydroxide, bismuth trioxide, bismuth nitrate, bismuth subnitrate, bismuth oxycarbonate, and the mixture thereof.
[0033] Typical alumina used herein could be α-alumina, β-alumina, γ-alumina, and the mixture thereof.
[0034] Other aspects include methods for using the catalytic composition described above for hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, or ethynylation.
[0035] Various embodiments are described hereinafter. It should be noted that the specific embodiments are not intended as an exhaustive description or as a limitation to the broader aspects discussed herein.
[0036] Preparation of the Catalyst
[0037] The particulate alumina carrier is first added to water in a precipitation vessel. An acidic solution is made up of a mixture of copper-containing and bismuth-containing salts in a separate vessel. A basic solution is made up of sodium hydroxide in a separate vessel. The temperature of the solution in the precipitation vessel is set at the precipitation temperature which is held constant throughout the precipitation process with a value anywhere from about 40° C. to about 90° C. The acid mixture and the sodium hydroxide solution are simultaneously added to the vessel containing water and the particulate carrier. The precipitation is carried out at a constant pH of about 7 to about 11. During precipitation, the flow of the acid solution is kept constant while the flow of the NaOH solution is adjusted to keep the precipitation pH constant. The time of precipitation may be anywhere from 15 mins to 120 mins. Usually the time is about 30 mins to about 60 mins. After the precipitation step, the precipitate may be aged for a short time, about 15 mins to about 120 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered, washed, and dried. The dried material is calcined in air. The calcination temperature may vary between about 300° C. to about 800° C., 400, 500, 600, and 700° C. included.
[0038] Catalytic Performance Testing of the Catalyst
[0039] By use of identical testing conditions according to U.S. Pat. No. 9,006,129B2, the active catalyst is preferably generated by means of the introduction of the acetylene into the formaldehyde-catalyst reaction medium. In the first reactor, the calcined catalyst is mixed with formaldehyde aqueous solution. The pH of the aqueous medium is adjusted to the range of 7.0 to 10.0, and preferably 8.0. The control of pH is to suppress the formation of formic acid, which will react with copper compound and raise loss of copper due to leaching into solution. Activation of the catalyst is conducted after acetylene stream is introduced and the reactor is heated from room temperature to about 80° C. The activation process generally requires 5 hours.
[0040] Afterwards, the slurry was removed, centrifuged, and decanted, leaving wet catalyst ready for activity testing. In the second reactor, a certain amount of wet catalyst is mixed with formaldehyde aqueous solution. Acetylene stream is then introduced with partial pressure generally from 0.5 to 1.9 atmospheres, preferably 1.0 atmosphere. catalyst will be present in amounts of about 1 to 20 weight parts per 100 weight parts of formaldehyde aqueous medium. The reactor is heated from room temperature to about 80° C. The reaction process generally requires 5 hours and the pH of aqueous medium after reaction is about 5.0. The product mixture is analyzed by gas chromatography in which butynediol (primary product) and propargyl alcohol (product intermediate) were quantified and the activity of catalyst is determined.
[0041] Filterability Testing of the Catalyst
[0042] For ethynylation process in plant, a filter is used for separation of spent catalysts and reaction products. In this way, spent catalysts are recycled, mixed with fresh catalyst and fed back into reactors. Therefore, the filtration speed of spent catalysts is critical to the recycling efficiency. The filtration rate is tested for the catalyst after attrition: about 4 g of fresh catalyst is added to 40 mL DI H.sub.2O and stirred at room temperature for a sufficiently long time. Afterwards, the slurry is filtered, and the time used for filtration is recorded to calculate the filtration rate accordingly.
[0043] The invention will be more specifically described and explained by means of the following examples, which are not to be considered as limiting but only illustrative of the invention. All parts and proportions therein as well as in the appended claims are by weight unless otherwise specified.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0044] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 5 μm is added into water to obtain a 37 wt % slurry. 117.3 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 95/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate is aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Example 2
[0045] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 5 μm is added into water to obtain a 37 wt % slurry. 117.3 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 190/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate is aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Example 3
[0046] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 5 μm is added into water to obtain a 37 wt % slurry. 55.4 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 190/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate is aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Example 4
[0047] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 5 μm is added into water to obtain a 37 wt % slurry. 55.4 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 48/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate is aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Example 5
[0048] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 14 μm is added into water to obtain a 37 wt % slurry. 117.3 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 190/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate is aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 1
[0049] α-alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 5 μm is added into water to obtain a 26 wt % slurry. 117.3 g of copper nitrate (contains 15.5 wt % Cu) and bismuth nitrate (Cu/Bi molar ratio as 48/1) solution are precipitated with 15 wt % sodium hydroxide solution onto the particulate carrier. After the precipitation step, the precipitate was aged at 35° C. for 10 mins. Afterwards, the precipitate was filtered and dried. The catalyst was obtained after calcination at 450° C. and its composition is shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 2
[0050] α-Alumina carrier with average particle size D.sub.50 of 15 μm is added into 200 mL of water to obtain a slurry and heat it up to 60° C. Prepare 500 mL of 1 mol/L copper nitrate solution containing 10 g/L bismuth nitrate. Add 50 mL of Cu/Bi nitrate solution into the carrier slurry by use of peristaltic pump and keep stirring for 10 mins. Then add 1 mol/L sodium carbonate solution into the slurry to adjust pH of slurry to 7.0. Afterwards, add another 50 mL of Cu/Bi nitrate solution into the carrier slurry and keep stirring for 10 mins, followed by adding 1 mol/L sodium carbonate solution into the slurry to adjust pH of slurry to 7.0 again. Repeat above procedure until all of 500 mL of Cu/Bi nitrate solution is added. Afterwards, the precipitate is filtered, washed and dried. The catalyst is obtained after calcination at 400° C. for 4h and its composition is shown in Table 1.
[0051] Table 1 shows catalyst component in terms of CuO, Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 as well as Cu/Bi molar ratio for Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative example 1 to 2.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Catalyst component data CuO Bi.sub.2O.sub.3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Cu/Bi molar (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) ratio Example 1 27.2 0.8 72.0 95 Example 2 27.3 0.4 72.3 190 Example 3 15.1 0.2 84.6 179 Example 4 15.0 0.9 84.0 48 Example 5 27.3 0.4 72.3 190 Comparative 1 37.8 2.3 59.9 48 Comparative 2 50.9 4.1 44.8 36
[0052] Catalytic test was carried out in two steps. First the catalyst was activated to form the active copper acetylide on the surface of catalyst. It was then transferred to the reaction vessel. Detailed procedure is shown as following. The activation was conducted in the reactor containing 100 mL formalin (37 wt % formaldehyde aqueous solution). 1.5M sodium hydroxide solution was added to formalin to adjust initial pH to about 7.5-9.0 and 15 g of catalyst was then added to formalin after the adjust of pH. Inertization of the reactor was conducted by purging nitrogen and then gas flow was exchanged to acetylene with 80 mL/min. Start stirring and on-line control pH at ca. 8.0 via NaOH solution, and start heating up to 80° C. The reaction was kept for 5 hours. Afterwards, the reactor was cooled down to room temperature under gas flow of acetylene. Nitrogen was purged into reactor for inertization and the slurry was discharged, centrifuged, and decanted, leaving wet catalyst ready for activity testing. 0.8 g (dry basis) of catalyst was added into reactor with formaldehyde aqueous solution. Similarly, the initial pH of formalin was adjusted to 8.0 by sodium hydroxide solution. The flow rate of acetylene was kept constant at 50 mL/min and the reaction temperature was 80° C. After 5 hours, the reactor was cooled down under gas flow of acetylene followed by purging of nitrogen for inertization. The slurry was discharged and centrifuged. The product mixture is analyzed by gas chromatography in which butynediol and propargyl alcohol were quantified. A sodium sulfite titration method is used to determine the amount of formaldehyde remaining in the product. Thereafter, the activity of catalyst is evaluated by the formation rate of butynediol, which is calculated on the basis of reaction time of 300 min and catalyst mass of 0.8 g. Similar catalytic test was conducted for Example 2, Example 3, Example 5 and Comparative 2 but with longer reaction time of 40 hours. Afterwards, copper content in product solution was measured and the result is shown in Table 2.
[0053] Filterability test was conducted by simulating catalyst attrition in solution. About 4 g of fresh catalyst was added to about 40 mL DI H.sub.2O. The stirring was started with a constant rate of 250 rpm and kept at room temperature for 24 hours, respectively. Afterwards, the slurry was filtered, and the time used for filtration was recorded to calculate the filtration rate accordingly with the unit of mL/min.
[0054] A comparison of catalytic activity per gram of catalyst and per gram of CuO for Examples and Comparative examples was provided in
[0055] Lower Cu content for invented catalysts would have less Cu leaching possibility. As shown in Table 2, leached Cu in product solution after reaction time of 40 hours is reduced for invented catalysts compared to the sample in the prior art.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparison of leached Cu in product solution after 40 hours reaction Cu content in product solution (ppm) Example 2 <10 Example 3 <10 Example 5 <10 Comparative 2 57
[0056] Comparison of filterability for Examples and Comparative Examples was provided in