Techniques for magnetic particle imaging
11054392 · 2021-07-06
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01R33/10
PHYSICS
A61B5/05
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01R33/0213
PHYSICS
G01R33/00
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R33/00
PHYSICS
A61B5/05
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B5/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01R33/10
PHYSICS
G01R33/12
PHYSICS
Abstract
A magnetic particle imaging apparatus includes magnets [106,107] that produce a gradient magnetic field having a field free region (FFR), excitation field electromagnets [102,114] that produce a radiofrequency magnetic field within the field free region, high-Q receiving coils [112] that detect a response of magnetic particles in the field free region to the excitation field. Field translation electromagnets create a homogeneous magnetic field displacing the field-free region through the field of view (FOV) allowing the imaging region to be scamled to optimize scan time, scanning power, amplifier heating, SAR, dB/dt, and/or slew rate. Efficient multi-resolution scanning techniques are also provided. Intermodulated low and radio-frequency excitation signals are processed to produce an image of a distribution of the magnetic nanoparticles within the imaging region. A single composite image is computed using deconvolution of multiple signals at different harmonics.
Claims
1. A magnetic particle imaging device, comprising: a pair of magnets arranged proximate an imaging region of the magnetic particle imaging device, the pair of magnets being configured to produce a gradient magnetic field within the imaging region of the magnetic particle imaging device such that the gradient magnetic field will have a field-free line (FFL); an excitation magnet configured to produce an excitation magnetic field that induces a signal from an object under observation that contains magnetic tracer, a receiver arranged proximate the imaging region, the receiver being configured to receive the signal from the magnetic tracer in the imaging region; and a signal processor configured to be in communication with the receiver, the signal processor being configured to convert the signal into an image of the magnetic tracer, wherein the pair of magnets is constructed such that each magnet has a longer dimension substantially parallel to the FFL and a shorter dimension substantially perpendicular to the FFL.
2. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the pair of magnets is a pair of permanent magnets.
3. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the pair of magnets is a pair of electromagnets.
4. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the pair of magnets comprises a permanent magnet and an electromagnet.
5. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the magnets of the pair of magnets is a pair of superconducting magnets.
6. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the magnets of the pair of magnets are placed symmetrically about the imaging region and along an axis wherein the FFL is generated.
7. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein the pair of magnets has an axis along which one magnet of the pair of magnets is aligned parallel and the other magnet is aligned anti-parallel, and wherein the FFL is perpendicular to this axis.
8. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, further comprising a translating magnet configured to produce a translating magnetic field that translates the position of the FFL.
9. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 8, wherein the translating magnetic field displaces the FFL in a direction perpendicular to the FFL.
10. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, wherein movement of the FFL is implemented by mechanical movement of the object under observation relative to the pair of magnets.
11. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 8, wherein movement of the FFL is implemented by a combination of dynamic scanning using the translating magnetic field and mechanical movement of the object under observation relative to the pair of magnets.
12. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, further comprising a rotation mechanism configured to mechanically rotate the FFL with respect to the object under observation using mechanical movement.
13. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 1, further comprising: a translating magnet configured to produce a translating magnetic field that translates the position of the FFL along a predetermined trajectory covering a plane perpendicular to the FFL; and a rotation mechanism configured to mechanically rotate the FFL with respect to the object under observation to change an angle of the FFL with respect to the object under observation.
14. The magnetic particle imaging device according to claim 13, wherein the receiver is configured to receive a signal from the magnetic tracer in the object under observation at each position of the FFL as the FFL is being displaced, at a plurality of angles of the FFL with respect to the object under observation; and wherein the signal processor is configured to convert the signals into a 3D image using computed tomographic techniques.
15. A method of magnetic particle imaging, comprising: placing magnetic particles into an imaging region; using a pair of magnets to generate within the imaging region an inhomogeneous magnetic field having a spatial gradient and having a field-free line (FFL) within the imaging region; generating an excitation magnetic field that excites the magnetic particles; detecting signals produced by the magnetic particles in the imaging region, wherein the signals detected at a given time are produced by magnetic particles located coincident or near to a position of the FFL at the given time; and producing from the detected signals an image of the magnetic particles in the imaging region, wherein the pair of magnets is constructed such that each magnet has a longer dimension substantially parallel to the FFL and a shorter dimension substantially perpendicular to the FFL.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein placing the magnetic particles into the imaging region comprises placing an object into the imaging region, wherein the object contains the magnetic particles.
17. The method of claim 15, further comprising mechanically rotating the pair of magnets with respect to the magnetic particles in the imaging region.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the generating the excitation magnetic field comprises generating a radio-frequency excitation magnetic field in superposition with the inhomogeneous magnetic field generated by the pair of magnets.
19. The method of claim 15, further comprising generating within the imaging region a scanning magnetic field that displaces the position of the FFL.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising rotating, with respect to the magnetic particles in the imaging region, the pair of magnets and magnets used to generate the scanning magnetic field.
21. The method of claim 19, further comprising displacing the FFL in a direction perpendicular to the FFL using the scanning magnetic field.
22. The method of claim 15, further comprising displacing the FFL by mechanically moving the magnetic particles in the imaging region relative to the pair of magnets.
23. The method of claim 15, further comprising displacing the FFL using a scanning magnetic field in combination with mechanical movement of the magnetic particles in the imaging region relative to the pair of magnets.
24. The method of claim 21, further comprising detecting a first plurality of signals as the FFL is displaced in the direction perpendicular to the FFL; mechanically rotating the pair of magnets with respect to the magnetic particles placed into the imaging region to change an angle of the FFL with respect to the magnetic particles placed into the imaging region; and detecting a second plurality of signals as the FFL is displaced in the direction perpendicular to the FFL.
25. The method of claim 15, comprising: detecting a plurality of signals at each of a plurality of angles of the pair of magnets with respect to the magnetic particles in the imaging region; and reconstructing from the plurality of detected signals a 3D image using computed tomographic techniques.
26. The method of claim 16, wherein the object is at least a portion of an organism.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(20) An MPI apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in
(21)
(22) Circuitry
(23)
(24) The receive circuitry 450 shown in
(25) Interfacing electronics are designed to prevent intermodulation in the RF and LF amplifier output stages (
(26)
(27) The battery-powered preamplifier uses low-noise op-amps in stages 456, 460, 464 matched to a high-Q coil 452 of Z.sub.coil=2 kΩ at resonance. The preamplifier is noise matched to the receive coil using a 4:1 balanced-to-unbalanced impedance transformer (balun) 454.
(28) Some embodiments may include feedback circuitry to prevent phase and magnitude drift in the RF transmit power and excitation field strength caused by loading of the transmit coil and heating. The feedback can be implemented in various ways such as cartesian feedback or current feedback. The current or field can be measured in various ways such as using a pickup coil (preferably untuned so that loading is not an issue) or a current sensor or a shunt resistor. The objective of the feedback is to regulate the field that the sample experiences, and is effectively defining the current through the transmit coil. Also, because the RF signal is in the kHz to low MHz range, simple feedback may also be practical.
(29) In some embodiments, feedback damping is used to widen the bandwidth of the receive coils. Feedback damping is performed by feeding back the received signal out of phase to the receive coil. This can be seen in
(30) In some embodiments, a rotating (quadrature) excitation field is used to increase the detectable signal.
(31) Signal Harmonics and Sideband Tones
(32)
(33)
(34) Theory—Intermodulation
(35) When magnetic field strengths used in MPI are less that 1 Tesla, tissue is unaffected by the magnetic field, but an SPIO particle undergoes a nonlinear change in magnetization described by the Langevin theory of paramagnetism. Specifically, the magnetization M is given by
(36)
where L is the Langevin function, m is the magnetic moment of the particle, H is the applied magnetic field, k.sub.B is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the absolute temperature.
(37) To excite the particles, in some embodiments a single oscillating magnetic field of magnitude H.sub.0 and frequency f.sub.0 is generated within the region where the particles are located. In the case of a sinusoidal excitation waveform, the oscillating field is given by
H(t).Math.H.sub.0 sin(2πf.sub.0t).
(38) The field H(t) excites the particles and induces a corresponding time-varying magnetization at harmonics of f.sub.0
(39)
where A.sub.m are the amplitudes of the various harmonics and the index m ranges over the detected harmonics. See
(40) In some embodiments using intermodulation, a second oscillating magnetic field of magnitude H.sub.1 and frequency f.sub.1 is also generated within the region where the particles are located. Thus, in the case of a sinusoidal excitation waveform aligned in parallel with the first excitation field, the net oscillating field is given by
H(t)=H.sub.0 sin(2πf.sub.0t)+H.sub.1 sin(2πf.sub.1t).
(41) This intermodulation field H(t) excites the particles the nonlinear Langevin function acts as a nonlinear mixer, inducing a corresponding time-varying magnetization
(42)
where A.sub.m,n are the amplitudes of the separate intermodulation tones. In addition to the harmonics, there are sideband tones corresponding to sum and difference frequencies. See
(43) The frequencies f.sub.0 and f.sub.1 and the field strengths H.sub.0 and H.sub.1 can all be selected independently of each other. There are, however, trade-offs that guide their selection. Specific absorption rate (SAR) and received signal strength are dominated by f.sub.0 and H.sub.0 since f.sub.0>>f.sub.1 and SAR grows as H.sup.2f.sup.2. Imaging speed and detection bandwidth are limited by f.sub.1 to allow detection at each field-free point of intermodulation sidebands surrounding harmonics mf.sub.0. Thus, the scanning speed is preferably restricted so that the sidebands can be detected at each point without aliasing. Although increasing f.sub.1 can allow an increase in imaging speed, higher values for f.sub.1 has other drawbacks because the received signal bandwidth must be less than the bandwidth of the receiver coil. SNR and the spatial extent of the point spread function (PSF) depend on the total magnitude of the excitation fields H.sub.tot=H.sub.0+H.sub.1. Increasing H.sub.tot increases the total signal received at the expense of widening the PSF. Increasing H.sub.1 increases the received signal while affecting SAR negligibly. This allows trading increased signal for reduced resolution.
(44) LF Intermodulation
(45) In various embodiments, the LF (low frequency) intermodulation is preferably done by a frequency between 100 Hz and 5 kHz using water-cooled electromagnets. MRI gradient amplifiers may be used to drive the magnets, and the power requirements are reasonable. The LF intermodulation provides a large shift in magnetization of the particles with very little addition of SAR. It also allows large amounts of magnetic energy to be put into the sample which is then up-mixed with the RF frequency. An RF eddy current shield is used prevent interaction between the LF circuits and the RF transmit coil. In addition, a set of filters, such as common mode and differential low-pass filters, may also be positioned between the power amplifier and coil to reduce interaction. The gradient amplifiers are current controlled and eddy current compensated.
(46) The LF excitation field may be implemented in x, y, z directions or any subset thereof. Changing the direction the LF excitation source changes the shape of the shape and magnitude of the point spread function.
(47) The LF intermodulation fields and field-free point displacement fields may both be generated by the same electromagnets. However, because the power requirements for these fields differ, in other embodiments separate electromagnets are used to generate these two fields.
(48) The transmit coils may be configured in various orientations and spatial arrangements. In one embodiment, the transmit coil is configured to create a transverse field along the length of the bore. Coils to create transverse excitation would require specialized and precise winding using known techniques.
(49) The receive coil is a gradiometer constructed with litz wire and an overall Q.sub.coil=167. The coil has a diameter of 3.175 cm and the outer coil has a diameter of 4.5 cm. The receiver is a phase coherent control console and detector. The coherent detector directly samples at 65 MSPS and digitally down converts the RF signal to baseband. The down-sampled signal has a bandwidth of 31.25 kSPS centered at 2f.sub.0=300 kHz with over 90 dB of dynamic range. An object containing a distribution of magnetic particles may be translated through the bore using a linear translator controlled by the control console. The detected signal is continuously acquired during translation of the stage in the readout direction, e.g., along the axis of the bore. The signal received by the pickup coil is fed to the preamplifier and then into the console. The digitized is quadrature demodulated at multiples of the intermodulation frequency (i.e., ±f.sub.1, ±2f.sub.1, ±3f.sub.1, ±4f.sub.1, . . . ) and brick-wall filtered at 20 Hz. In practice, the intermodulation products around the fundamental are more difficult to receive than those around the harmonics due to eddy-current coupling from the excitation frequency into the receive coil. The intermodulation products around the fundamental may be detected by subtracting the fundamental using a low phase noise PLL or crystal filter. However, this would increase the complexity of the preamplifier.
(50) The received signal contains most of the power in the lower harmonics and lower intermodulation peaks while most of the high frequency spatial content is in the higher harmonics and higher intermodulation peaks (where “higher” harmonics means m is greater than 4 and “lower” harmonics means m is 4 or less and, likewise, “higher” intermodulation peaks means n is greater than 4 and “lower” intermodulation peaks means n is 4 or less). The magnitude of the harmonics is strongly dependent on the size of the magnetic particles, and larger particles increase higher order harmonics. Intermodulation dramatically increases the spectral content of the received signal. The total normalized signal also is larger with intermodulation than without. The intermodulated point-spread function (PSF) is well-behaved around 2f.sub.0 and is similar to the PSF without intermodulation. As the absolute value of n or m increases, the magnitude of the PSF decreases and its resolution increases.
(51) While in some embodiments the intermodulation products around a single harmonic (e.g., 2f.sub.0±nf.sub.1) may be received, in other embodiments the RF coils may be tuned to multiple frequencies to receive signals around multiple harmonics (e.g., 2f.sub.0±nf.sub.1, 3f.sub.0±nf.sub.1, 4f.sub.0±nf.sub.1, 5f.sub.0±nf.sub.1). For example, one or more dual-tuned coils may be used, each to receive signals around two harmonics. Alternatively, multiple RF coils may be separately tuned to receive the signals around each harmonic.
(52) As f.sub.0 increases, the frequency separation of its harmonics increases and simplifies coil-to-coil isolation, high-Q coil construction, and noiseless rejection of the fundamental. As f.sub.0 increases, the SAR limit is rapidly approached. For example, with f.sub.0=1 MHz and detection at 2f.sub.0=2 MHz, a SAR of 4 W/kg is reached at 3 mTpp is a small animal.
(53) The high-Q receive coil dramatically simplifies construction and optimal noise matching of the signal detection system. The bandwidth requirements are low because of the low intermodulation frequency (e.g., f.sub.1=200 Hz). With intermodulation, the receive bandwidth requirements are decreased compared to conventional MPI designs. More specifically, detecting N harmonics with conventional MPI would require bandwidth of BW=Nf.sub.0. Thus, detecting N=8 harmonics using an excitation frequency f.sub.0=150 kHz would require a bandwidth of 1.2 MHz, resulting in sub-optimal matching to the preamplifier. With intermodulation, on the other hand, the bandwidth depends on f.sub.1=200 Hz instead of f.sub.0=150 kHz, and is thus very narrow in comparison.
(54) The specific system parameters above are provided for illustrative purposes and may be set to various other values or even varied dynamically during operation. The values of H.sub.0 H.sub.1 may be selected independently and each ranges from 0.01 to 100 mT, more practically ranges from 1 mT to 30 mT, and more preferably ranges from 10 mT to 20 mT. The gradient of the inhomogeneous field ranges from 0.5 T/m to 10 T/m, more practically ranges from 1 T/m to 7 T/m, and more preferably ranges from 2.5 T/m to 7 T/m. The value of f.sub.0 ranges from 10 kHz to 10 MHz, more practically ranges from 20 kHz to 1 MHz, and more preferably ranges from 10 kHz to 1 MHz. The value of f.sub.1 ranges from 1 Hz to 20 kHz, more practically ranges from 1 Hz to 5 kHz, and more preferably ranges from 1 Hz to 5 kHz. The value for f.sub.0 is larger than that of f.sub.1, more practically f.sub.0 is 5 to 1,000,000 times f.sub.1, and more preferably f.sub.0 is 100 to 5,000 times f.sub.1.
(55) Receiver Circuit
(56) The receiver pickup coils convert the magnetic signal from the sample into an electrical signal. In a preferred embodiment, separate x, y, z coils are used to measure signals in orthogonal x, y, z directions, as illustrated in
(57)
(58) The preamplifier uses operational amplifiers and high-Q tuned traps. The output may use an RC filter or bandpass filter to reduce high frequency noise.
(59) Optimal matching between the receive coil and preamplifier occurs when the coil resistance at the receive frequency is equal to the ratio of the preamplifier noise voltage to the preamplifier noise current. The matching may be effected using baluns and matching capacitors and inductors in low-pass, high-pass, and band-pass configurations.
(60)
(61) Theory—SNR and Noise Matching
(62) When the receive coil and preamplifier dominate the noise in a receiver, it is important to noise match the receiver to the pickup coil to improve SNR. Optimal matching occurs when the coil impedance is matched to the voltage and current noise of the preamplifier. Because the coil contains reactive impedance, it is not possible to achieve a high-bandwidth match. Assuming optimal matching, the dominant noise source is the coil. A high-Q receiver coil and bandwidth narrowing will increase preamplifier SNR for a given f.sub.0 by reducing the preamplifier noise figure, the coil noise for a given volume, and the detection bandwidth. Additionally, because these factors are independent of f.sub.0, the detection frequency can be increased to reach body noise dominance without increasing receiver bandwidth. Moreover, the imaging region can be increased by increasing H.sub.tot=H.sub.0+H.sub.1. Embodiments of the present invention thus provide narrowband MPI which increases SNR for a fixed SAR.
(63) The signal from the MPI receive coil is amplified prior to digitization. The amplifier noise is minimized when the receiver coil is noise matched to the preamplifier. Specifically, noise matching is optimized by minimizing the ratio of output noise to input noise, i.e., the noise gain ratio. This ratio is minimized when the real coil resistance at resonance is R.sub.coil=e.sub.n/i.sub.n, where e.sub.n and i.sub.n are, respectively, the voltage and current noise amplitude per unit bandwidth of the preamplifier.
(64) Operation
(65) In medical imaging applications, magnetic nanoparticles may be components of a contrast agent that may be distributed in any object, e.g., by injection into an organism or labeled into or onto cells. The object, which may be animate or inanimate, human, animal, or other organism or portion thereof, is then positioned into the apparatus for imaging. To detect the concentration of magnetic particles in different regions, the field-free point is moved relative to the object by physical motion of the organism relative to the apparatus and/or displacement of the field-free point by dynamically changing the magnetic field. For example, movement of the field-free point can be produced by a combination of physical translation in the axial direction with dynamic scanning in the transverse plane. The scanning can also be produced by physical translation alone or dynamic scanning alone.
(66) At each field-free point, one or more oscillating magnetic fields may be used to excite the magnetic particles situated at the field-free point. These oscillating fields typically have amplitudes in the range of 0.1 mT to 20 mT. These fields cause the magnetization of the particles to saturate, generating harmonics that can be isolated from the fundamental using frequency domain techniques. The harmonic response at each field-free point is detected using one or more receive coils, and the detected signals are recorded at each point to create a complete scan of the distribution of particles in the imaging region.
(67) Imaging
(68) The complex interplay between a magnetic particle and the field-free point corresponds to a point-spread function that depends on various factors such as the particle size, magnetic field gradient, and intermodulation product. The measured PSF has higher SNR in sidebands closer to the harmonic (e.g., 2f.sub.0 and 2f.sub.0±f.sub.1), but contains more high frequency spectral content in the sidebands further from the harmonic (e.g., 2f.sub.0±2f.sub.1, 2f.sub.0±3f.sub.1, 2f.sub.0±4f.sub.1, . . . ).
(69) In some embodiments, the high SNR of the lower sidebands may be combined with the higher resolution of the upper sidebands to form a reconstructed image. In the reconstructed image, if the upper sidebands become unavailable as SNR drops, then the image resolution decreases.
(70) Dynamic Gradient Reduction
(71) Dynamic gradient reduction—Dynamically reducing the gradient during imaging enables increase of the imaging area. This increases SNR at the expense of the point spread function (resolution). We can then dynamically change this over time so we can choose the desired resolution/SNR tradeoff. This is implemented using a second strong gradient.
(72) Excitation Waveforms
(73) The RF excitation signal is a periodic oscillating field, such as a sinusoidal waveform. However, the waveform of the RF excitation is not necessarily sinusoidal. Similarly, the LF intermodulation excitation signal is a periodic oscillating field, and it may be a sinusoidal waveform or non-sinusoidal waveform. In fact, non-sinusoidal waveforms are preferable in some embodiments, as they can provide more harmonic content, improving SNR and resolution. For example, embodiments of the invention may use a triangle waveform. The waveform may also be dynamically changed during operation to provide different imaging properties.
(74) In some embodiments, intermodulation may be applied separately and sequentially to the excitation field in the x, y, and z directions. For example, intermodulation may be applied in the x direction alone, while no intermodulation is used in either the y or z directions. Then intermodulation may be applied to just the y direction, and then just to the z direction. The intermodulation may also be applied in a combination of directions at once, e.g., a rotating x-y field created by phase-shifted x and y intermodulation waveforms.
(75) Receiver Signal Processing
(76) We use a dual-lock in amplifier system to receive the signal. The signal is downmixed centered at two and three times the high-frequency RF excitation. The downmixed signal is then downmixed again at the LF*(0, +/−1, +/−2, +/−3, . . . ).
(77) The signal from the receive coil and preamplifier chain is fed into a digital down-converter circuit block that down-converts the signal to baseband with channelization. The circuit block independently down-samples each intermodulation signal so that each subband tone is channelized. For example, intermodulation products 210, 212, 214 shown in
(78)
(79) Field Free Point Translation Magnets
(80) Field-free point translation electromagnets may be used to translate the position of the field-free-point in real time to provide scanning. In one embodiment, a pair of coils is used to provide independent translation in each of three orthogonal directions. Due to the strong field gradient, the electromagnets are required to generate strong fields to provide significant displacement. For example, 5 kW magnets provide a 4.5 cm translation. The magnets preferably have a 1% homogeneity. To provide cooling, the coils may be made of hollow copper tubing through which water may be circulated at 6 gpm and 30 psi providing 34 kW cooling capacity. The RF shield absorbs significant power and may also be actively cooled using circulating water.
(81) Scanning
(82) Movement of the field-free point relative to the sample may, in general, be performed in one, two, or three dimensions, and may be implemented by mechanical movement of the sample relative to the magnets and/or by electronically modifying the inhomogeneous gradient field using electromagnets that generate a homogeneous field. These field displacement electromagnets can be implemented in x, y, and z directions, or a subset of these directions. In a combination system, for example, electromagnets provide scanning of the field-free point within a plane while mechanical movement provides translation along an axial direction perpendicular to the plane. The electronic displacement of the field-free point is preferably performed using a homogeneous field created by electromagnets, e.g. using Helmholtz coils. The homogeneous field 800 superimposed on the inhomogeneous gradient field 802 has the effect of shifting the position of the field-free point 804 by a distance D, as illustrated in
(83) Due to the large field gradients, strong homogeneous fields are required to shift the field-free point a significant distance to provide electronic scanning of the sample. Consequently, scanning a large field of view can require enormous amounts of power and large amplifiers. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide methods to scan that reduce heat loading of the power amplifiers, allowing the use of smaller and less expensive power electronics. For example,
(84) Other scanning trajectories are also possible, of course, and may be used depending on the specific application or scanning requirements. For example, to reduce transition time from scan line to scan line in the above example, instead of going to the next scan line diagonally, it is possible to change only the y-displacement when going to the next scan. The amplifiers have slew rate limits, and this would reduce the slew rate requirements in the x-direction. For example, if heating is not a significant issue then a more time-efficient scan may be used, such as a serpentine scan of horizontal lines sequentially progressing from a largest upward displacement in the y-direction to a largest downward displacement in the y-direction. Alternatively, a time-efficient spiral scan may be performed, starting from the center and spiraling outward. The spiral scan has the advantage that more of the scanned region is likely to overlap with the sample than a rectangular scan.
(85) Adaptive Scanning
(86) Embodiments of the invention provide techniques for adaptive scanning to improve efficiency. According to one method of adaptive scanning, an initial scout scan is performed at lower resolution. The low resolution scan may be performed quickly by optimizing signal acquisition to just the first and/or second and/or third harmonics, which would require less time to acquire than a high resolution scan. The low resolution scan can sample points in the imaging region at a lower spatial density. For example,
(87) The high-resolution scan can involve using a dynamic gradient reduction technique which involves dynamically changing the gradient strength. It can also include modifying the waveform and amplitude of the intermodulation field, and careful choice of the acquisition trajectory. Most of the reduction in acquisition time will be through choosing a mathematically optimal acquisition trajectory that will change on the fly, i.e., as more data is acquired, the system determines where to look for more signal and where to refine.
(88) As an alternative to the two-step adaptive scanning technique described above, the acquisition of low and high resolution signals may be performed on a point-by-point basis during one scan. Specifically, the imaging region may be scanned as follows. At each coarse low-resolution sample point a signal is acquired, as described above in relation to
(89) Image Reconstruction
(90) In embodiments of the invention, detected signals from different harmonics and/or intermodulation sidebands are separately down-converted and stored to form a set of N distinct images h.sub.1(x,y,z), . . . , h.sub.N(x,y,z), each corresponding to a different frequency. Each of these images is a convolution of the unknown magnetization. An image may be reconstructed by a method of parallel deconvolution of these images to form a single composite image. According to one such method, a Fourier transform is applied to each of the detected signals s.sub.n(x,y,z) to obtain a frequency-domain representation, Y.sub.n(k)=F[s.sub.n(x,y,z)], where k is a vector indexing the frequency domain and F is the Fourier transform. Now let H.sub.n(k) represent the n-th harmonic point spread function of a point source (which can be determined by calibration using a magnetic particle smaller than the system's resolvable limit), and let M(k) be the unknown magnetization distribution in the frequency domain (i.e., the Fourier transform of the unknown magnetization distribution in the spatial domain). Then we have Y.sub.n(k)=H.sub.n(k) M(k)+N.sub.n(k), where N.sub.n(k) is the Fourier transform of the unknown n-th harmonic noise image. Hence, finding the desired M(k) is equivalent to finding the slope of a complex line given the regression data {Y.sub.n(k), H.sub.n(k)}. There are many ways of finding the slope, e.g., using a least-squares fit. The reconstructed composite image in the frequency domain is then given by M(k)=H.sup.T*(k).Math.Y(k)/(H.sup.T*(k) H(k)), where H(k) and Y(k) are N-dimensional column vectors whose components are H.sub.n(k) and Y.sub.n(k), respectively. The reconstructed composite image is then m(x,y,z)=F[M(k)]. This method solves for each frequency-domain point separately. Because the least-squares problem grows linearly with the number of points, it is not the computationally limiting factor, as the fast Fourier transform (FFT) used to prepare the data scales with O(N.Math.log N).
(91) The reconstruction method just described above will amplify noise at higher-frequency points in the frequency domain where SNR in the reference images are low. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention provide the following technique to address this issue. A simple non-linear processing step may be used to gracefully degrade reconstructed image resolution while improving the composite image. Specifically, points in the frequency domain with insufficient SNR may be set to zero:
(92)
where ε is an experimentally determined threshold that depends on the SNR. In an alternative thresholding technique, each element where |H.sub.n(k)|>ε is used and the others are removed. That is,
(93)
(94) The parallel deconvolution technique described here can theoretically increase the SNR of the composite image by √N, but will provide somewhat less gain at high spatial frequencies, where fewer harmonics are used in the image reconstruction. For regions of k-space where none of the N harmonics or intermodulation terms satisfy the condition |H.sub.n(k)|>ε, then this region of k-space M(k) is set to zero. Then m(x,y,z) is computed by an inverse FFT algorithm in a computer.
(95) Gradient Magnet Configurations
(96) Various designs and configurations of gradient magnets may be used in various embodiments of the invention. The gradient magnets may be permanent magnets, electromagnets, or a combination of both. The gradient magnets may also be superconducting magnets. Three examples of gradient magnets are illustrated in
(97)
(98) The field-free line (which need not be perfectly straight) allows magnetic particles in an entire one-dimensional region to be detected at once. Electromagnets or physical translation may be used to shift the field-free line relative to the sample, based on the same principle as shifting the field-free point in other embodiments. Moreover, rotation of the field-free line relative to the sample, e.g., by geometric rotation of the permanent magnets and field shifting magnets relative to the sample, allows computed tomography techniques to be used for image reconstruction. For example,