CATALYSTS FOR CARGEN, METHODS OF PREPARING, AND USES OF SAME

Abstract

Disclosed is high conversion and high carbon yielding CARGEN catalyst and a method of preparing the same. The catalyst comprises transition metals that may be supported or unsupported. The preparation method involves mixing a metal material with or without a support in a standard ball milling apparatus to produce a fine and homogenous solid mixture of the transition metal oxide and support. The catalyst is used in the CARGEN system.

Claims

1. A method of preparing a catalyst for a Carbon Generator Reactor (CAREEN) process, the method comprising milling a precursor material, wherein the catalyst is supported or unsupported.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the precursor material comprises at least one of Fe, Ni, Co, Pt, Ru, Mo, or a lanthanide.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the precursor material comprises nickel oxide.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalyst is supported by a support material that comprises at least one of alumina, titania, silica, zeolites, carbon, SiO.sub.2, TiO.sub.2, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, MgO, ZrO.sub.2, CeO.sub.2, zeolites, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), inorganic clays, carbonates, or carbon nanotubes.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the catalyst comprises alumina oxide.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein an amount of the precursor material is about 20 wt % of the total amount of the precursor material and a support material.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the precursor material and a support material are milled in a ball milling apparatus.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the ball milling apparatus comprises stainless steel balls of about 5 mm diameter.

9. The method of claim 1 comprising milling the precursor material and a support material for about 1 hour.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising reducing the precursor material with a reduction gas.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the reduction gas comprises hydrogen.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein a ratio of the number of balls in the ball milling apparatus to the weight of the catalyst in grams is from about 1:1 to about 100:1.

13. A catalyst prepared by the method of claim 1 for use in a CARGEN reactor, wherein the catalyst comprising a nickel based material.

14. The catalyst of claim 13 comprising about 1 wt % to about 100 wt % nickel.

15. The catalyst of claim 13, wherein the nickel based material is supported by a support material comprising at least one of alumina, titania, silica, zeolites, or carbon.

16. The catalyst of claim 15, wherein the support material comprises at least one of activated carbon, carbon nanotube, or carbon nanofibers produced from a CARGEN process.

17. The catalyst of claim 16, wherein the support material is procured with a purity of at least 90%.

18. The catalyst of claim 13 having an egg-shell type of structure resembling weak support-metal-interaction (SMI).

19. The catalyst of claim 13, wherein the catalyst has a total surface area of greater than 10 m.sup.2/g.

20. The catalyst of claim 13, wherein the catalyst has a pore volume of at least 0.1 cm.sup.3/g.

21. A method of using a catalyst prepared by the method of claim 1 for a CARGEN process.

22. The method of claim 21 comprising producing MWCNT.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the MWCNT has a diameter of up to 100 nm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] Features and advantages of the inventions described herein may be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

[0034] FIG. 1 is a systematic overview of the CARGEN process.

[0035] FIG. 2 shows the weight gain profile in thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) experiment of the CARGEN catalyst.

[0036] FIG. 3 shows the N.sub.2 physisorption isotherm linear plot of the fresh catalyst sample prepared in the examples.

[0037] FIG. 4 shows the temperature programmed reduction (TPR) profile of the fresh catalyst sample prepared in the examples.

[0038] FIG. 5 shows the X-ray diffractometer (XRD) profile of the fresh and the reduced catalyst samples in the examples.

[0039] FIG. 6 are scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the spent CARGEN catalyst in the Examples.

[0040] FIG. 7 are transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the CARGEN catalyst in the examples.

SUMMARY

[0041] In a general embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method of preparing a catalyst for CARGEN process, the method comprising milling a transition metal oxide, wherein the catalyst is supported or unsupported.

[0042] In one embodiment, the transition metal oxide may comprise nickel oxide.

[0043] In one embodiment, the catalyst is supported by a support material that may comprise alumina.

[0044] In one embodiment, the catalyst may comprise alumina oxide.

[0045] In one embodiment, an amount of the transition metal oxide may be about 20 wt % of the total amount of the transition metal oxide and the support.

[0046] In one embodiment, the transition metal oxide and the support may be milled in a ball milling apparatus.

[0047] In one embodiment, the ball milling apparatus may comprise stainless steel balls of 5 mm diameter.

[0048] In one embodiment, the method may comprise milling the transition metal oxide and the support for about 1 hour.

[0049] In one embodiment, the method may comprise mixing the transition metal oxide with the support before the milling, and the milling producing a solid mixture of the transition metal oxide and the support.

[0050] In one embodiment, the method may comprise reducing the milled transition metal oxide with a reduction gas.

[0051] In one embodiment, the reduction gas may comprise hydrogen.

[0052] In one embodiment, a ratio of the number of balls in the ball milling apparatus to the weight of the catalyst in grams may be from about 1:1 to about 100:1.

[0053] In one embodiment, a ratio of the number of balls in the ball milling apparatus to the weight of the catalyst in grams may be from about 1:1 to about 10:1.

[0054] In one embodiment, a ratio of the number of balls in the ball milling apparatus to the weight of the catalyst in grams may be from about 10:1 to about 100:1.

[0055] In one embodiment, a ratio of the number of balls in the ball milling apparatus to the weight of the catalyst in grams may be about 10:1.

[0056] In one embodiment, the catalyst may have a total surface area of greater than 10 m.sup.2/g.

[0057] In one embodiment, the catalyst may have a pore volume of at least 10 cm.sup.3/g

[0058] Another embodiment provides a method of using the produced catalyst for CARGEN process.

[0059] A method of preparing a catalyst for a Carbon Generator Reactor (CARGEN) process is provided in an embodiment. The method includes milling a precursor material, wherein the catalyst is supported or unsupported. In an embodiment, the precursor material includes at least one of Fe, Ni, Co, Pt, Ru, Mo, a lanthanide or the like. The lanthanide can include, for example, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu or the like.

[0060] Additional features and advantages are described herein, and will be apparent from the following detailed description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0061] The present disclosure provides high conversion and high carbon yielding CARGEN catalysts, methods of preparing same, and uses of same for CARGEN. The disclosed catalyst is inexpensive, but highly effective and suitable for the CARGEN process disclosed in WO2018187213, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.

[0062] Specifically, a highly active reforming catalyst tailor-made for CARGEN process is presented. The catalyst is specifically designed to form multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) per the conditions prescribed in the inventors' previous patent application US2020/0109050, which is also entirely incorporated herein by reference, and WO2018187213. The catalyst is synthesized via ball milling technique in order to provide a unique active metal-support interaction that is favorable to form MWCNT in the CARGEN process. The catalyst is suitable for use in packed bed, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and fluidized bed mode of operation, while the main task of the catalyst is to convert natural gas and carbon dioxide into MWCNT along with syngas and water.

[0063] The CARGEN catalyst of the present invention is prepared using a unique catalyst synthesis technique that involves the use of traditional ball mills. Since the ball milling process is a unit operation that could be conducted using electricity, the generation of wastes from such a process is minimal.

[0064] CARGEN is the first reactor in a two-reactor system that provides enhanced carbon dioxide utilization for chemical and fuels processes, while ensuring fixation of CO.sub.2; the amount of CO.sub.2 utilized is less than that generated during the process. The first reactor converts CH.sub.4 and CO.sub.2 dinto solid carbon, while the second reactor converts CH.sub.4 and CO.sub.2 to syngas using a combined reforming reaction process. In view of the global concern of greenhouse gas emissions, such a two-reactor system enhances overall CO.sub.2 fixation, unlike conventional single reactor reformer systems. From a CO.sub.2 life cycle assessment (LCA) and a process integration point of view, this system facilitates CO.sub.2 utilization in methane reforming at fixation conditions while producing both solid carbon and syngas. The latter, syngas, is an important feedstock for production of a variety of value-added chemicals, as well as ultra-clean liquid fuels.

[0065] A combined reforming process is aimed at reacting methane (or any other volatile organic compound) with CO.sub.2, and optionally other oxidants such as O.sub.2, H.sub.2O, or both to produce syngas. Optimal operational conditions of temperature and pressure of the two reactors can be determined using a thermodynamics equilibrium analysis. Any reaction feasible thermodynamically indicates that the reaction can be carried out, given that the hurdles associated with the process are tackled via the development of an efficient catalyst and reactor orientation.

[0066] CARGEN aims to maximize CO.sub.2 fixation by optimization of the operating conditions, which could maximize carbon formation in the first reactor in the limited presence of oxygen to drive the reaction auto-thermally. As the partial combustion or partial oxidation reaction is an exothermic reaction, the CARGEN reactor hosts two main reactions concerning the CO.sub.2 fixation. The first reaction includes conversion of CO.sub.2 to carbon. The second reaction includes a partial oxidation reaction utilizing a portion of methane (or any other volatile organic compound) for partial combustion to produce energy, among other products. The energy provided through partial oxidation reaction is more efficient compared to any other form of heat transfer, as this energy is generated in-situ in the process itself.

[0067] The CARGEN reactor may be operated under low temperature and low/high pressure conditions, while the combined reformer (second reactor) may be operated at high temperature and low/high pressure conditions. By tapping the advantage of pressure and temperature swings between the two reactor units, improvements occur in both CO.sub.2 fixation, as well as reduction in overall energy requirements of the dual reactor setup. The CARGEN process utilizes work and energy extraction processes (like turbine, expanders etc.) associated with the change in pressure between the two reactors to overcome the pre-compression duty of the feed gas, at least partially. Thus, a unique synergism evident between the two reactors is beneficial for saving carbon credits, as well as improving sustainability of the overall process. In addition to the syngas generated from the second reactor (reformer reactor), the CARGEN process also produces solid carbon or carbonaceous material from the first reactor (CARGEN reactor). This carbonaceous product, which is produced as a part of the CO.sub.2 fixation process, is industrially valuable. In particular, the carbonaceous product may serve as a starting material to produce many value-added chemicals that can generate substantial revenue for the process plant. Non-limiting examples of the valuable chemicals include activated carbon, carbon black, carbon fiber, graphite of different grades, earthen materials, etc. This material can also be added to structural materials like cement and concrete and in road tar or in wax preparation as a part of the overall CO.sub.2 capture process.

[0068] The CARGEN process includes a dry reforming process for conversion of carbon dioxide to syngas and carbon. The CARGEN process enhances CO.sub.2 fixation using a two-reactor setup or system. The reaction scheme is divided into two processes in separate reactors in series. The first reaction is targeted to capture CO.sub.2 as solid carbon and the other to convert CO.sub.2 to syngas. The present subject flatter provides a systematic approach for CO.sub.2 fixation,

[0069] There can be significant conversions of CO.sub.2 to carbon at auto-thermal low temperature conditions (<773.15 K) in the first reactor of the two-reactor setup. The subsequent removal of solid carbon from the system (first reactor) enhances CO.sub.2 conversions to syngas in the second reactor by thermodynamically pushing the reaction forward, As such, the carbon from the system is removed, which is incredibly beneficial from the perspective of the CO.sub.2 life cycle assessment (LCA).

[0070] After the reaction in the first reactor, the solid carbon is filtered. The remaining product gases are fed to a higher temperature second reactor (a combined reformer) with the main focus of producing high quality syngas. Thermodynamic analysis of the results of operation of the second reactor shows that there is no carbon formation. This drives the reaction forward at much lesser energy requirements (approximately 50 kJ less) and at relatively lower temperatures in comparison to conventional reformer setups. A substantial increase in the syngas yield ratio is also seen, which is not only beneficial for syngas production for Fischer Tropsch synthesis (requiring approximately a 2:1 H.sub.2:CO ratio), but also for the hydrogen production (which requires high H.sub.2:CO ratios).

[0071] In addition to the advantage of getting a higher H.sub.2:CO ratio, a significant increase in the methane and carbon dioxide conversion is also seen at much lower operating temperatures. If a conventional reforming setup was used, such effects would be obtained only at higher temperatures (almost 250° C.). The advantage of removing carbon in the first reformer helps to bring down the operating temperature in the second reactor significantly. As such, the CARGEN process is much more energy efficient than the conventional single reactor setup operated at higher temperatures to get similar levels of methane and carbon dioxide conversions at zero carbon deposition.

[0072] In addition to the advantage of getting a higher H.sub.2:CO ratio, a significant increase in the methane and carbon dioxide conversion is also seen at much lower operating temperatures. If a conventional reforming setup was used, such effects would be obtained only at higher temperatures (almost 250° C.). The advantage of removing carbon in the first reformer helps to bring down the operating temperature in the second reactor significantly. As such, the present subject matter is much more energy efficient than the conventional single reactor setup operated at higher temperatures to get similar levels of methane and carbon dioxide conversions at zero carbon deposition.

[0073] In the present process, carbon dioxide is partially utilized in the first reactor by co-feeding methane and/or oxygen and/or steam together or separately to the first reactor in order to produce solid carbon as product only. The operational conditions of the CARGEN reactor are chosen so that it promotes solid carbon and does not promote syngas. Consequently, the objective of the second reactor, a modified reforming reactor, is to produce syngas from the raw gas (mainly unconverted methane, carbon dioxide, steam, etc.) exiting the CARGEN reactor.

[0074] From the perspective of energy utilization and efficiency, the CARGEN process produces an environment conducive to production of a single product in two separate reactors. Additionally, the present approach may utilize a relatively inexpensive catalyst (e.g., naturally occurring minerals such as calcite dolomite, coal, etc.) in the first reactor (CARGEN) to help in improving carbon formation. Due to significant reduction of carbon dioxide concentration from the first reactor, carbon formation tendency of the second reactor is almost eliminated. Therefore, an avenue is opened for the utilization of expensive, high stability, and high resistance catalyst for a longer operational time on stream.

[0075] Further, due to the unique method of segregation of operational conditions in the two different reactors, the CARGEN process provides a unique opportunity for handling of the two products separately. For instance, the second reactor (which is mainly carbon formation free) does not need to undergo maintenance when the first reactor (CARGEN) is under maintenance. During such a situation, more than one CARGEN reactor could be added in parallel to ensure continuous operation.

[0076] Additionally, the catalyst removal process in the first reactor and the second reactor would be different, as the second reactor may utilize a more expensive catalyst and would not require many maintenance cycles but could undergo regeneration more frequently. On the other hand, the first reactor may require many maintenance cycles and less frequent catalyst regeneration. The difference in the method of handling of catalysts and operational conditions for production of the two products separately makes the CARGEN process unique when compared to conventional systems and methods.

[0077] The remaining reactant gas mixture can be used for the reforming reaction in the separate second reactor for carrying out the dry reforming reaction, while discarding the sacrificial surface (catalyst) in the CARGEN.

[0078] The inexpensive or sacrificial catalyst material can be discarded in a batch- wise process while loading a new material. The CARGEN can be used for carbon capture while using the regenerated catalyst from a separate regenerator operated in parallel mode. The sacrificial surface (catalyst) can be treated separately to at least partially recover the catalyst while removing solids (including carbon and sacrificed material).

[0079] The CARGEN may, optionally, be operated under no additional steam basis, as addition of steam increases both the energy demands and compromises the formation of coke. However, steam may be added to the second reformer (also called operated as combined. Dry/Steam reforming) for increasing the conversion of the methane.

[0080] Addition of oxygen to both the CARGEN and/or to the combined reformer improves carbon capture performance, as it increases carbon formation in the CARGEN and also decreases the overall energy demands of the dual reactor setup.

[0081] Removal of the carbon (mechanically or with the spent catalyst) from the CARGEN pushes the reforming reaction forward in the second reactor (combined reformer) and thus subsequently increases the overall CO.sub.2 and methane conversions to syngas significantly.

[0082] Steam may be added to the second reactor to produce hydrogen rich syngas for hydrogen production. Using steam in the second reactor increases hydrogen in the system significantly.

[0083] The product gas mixture from the second reactor can at least be used as a feed stock for production of hydrogen, as a feed stock for Fischer Tropsch synthesis reaction, and as a teed stock for use as a source of energy in a hydrogen-based fuel cell. The reactant gas may be an output product of a furnace in a process plant and may be a combination of the flue gases and/or carbon dioxide and unreacted methane.

[0084] The CARGEN reactor may be operated under auto-thermal conditions by using oxygen as an additive for partial combustion (or oxidation) as the energy source. Auto-thermal low temperature (below 773 K) is associated with zero carbon credits, and thus has more impact in fixation of CO.sub.2 from the life cycle of the process plant. The CARGEN reactor can be operated under low temperature and low/high pressure conditions, while the second reactor can be operated at high temperature and low/high pressure conditions.

[0085] The first reactor (the CARGEN reactor) comprises a mechanical housing facility to receive methane, the carbon dioxide, and at least one more oxidant (oxygen etc). The first reactor may also comprise a housing/mechanism which actuates the removal and reloading (of a new hatch or regenerated batch) of the sacrificial catalytic material for carbon capture. The captured carbon on the sacrificial catalyst material may be recovered partially or completely based on the cost benefit analysis.

[0086] A pretreatment process may be incorporated between the two reactors, which comprises of heating, cyclone separation, and mixing of an additional oxidant (oxygen or steam or both with the gases leaving the CARGEN) for the second combined reformer. In such a process, the catalyst chosen is compatible for combined reforming reaction in the second reactor.

[0087] A pressure swing between the two reactors with a high pressure in first reactor and lower pressure in a second reactor can significantly affect carbon formation and energy requirements in the overall system. A pressure swing between the two reactors with a lower pressure in first reactor and higher pressure in a second reactor significantly reduces net energy demands but decreases overall CO.sub.2% conversion.

[0088] The first reactor can be operated under auto-thermal conditions (by addition of pure oxygen along with CO.sub.2 and methane) at a pressure higher than the second reactor, with no addition of steam to both the reactors. Steam may however be added only to increase hydrogen content of product syngas if needed (for hydrogen production etc.).

[0089] Pressure swings between the reactors may be achieved by using an expander unit which decreases the pressure while deriving high quality shaft work, which may be used elsewhere in the plant. Pressure swings between the reactors also may be achieved by using a turbine generator unit which decreases the pressure while deriving high quality shaft work, which could be used elsewhere in the plant.

[0090] The carbon dioxide capture process may be carried out in a continuous operation by at least one additional train to switch back and forth during cycles of maintenance and operations.

[0091] The regeneration process may be carried out by using any potential volatile organic compound (e.g., ethanol, methanol, glycerol etc.) in place of methane or any such combinations.

[0092] in addition, the configuration of the CARGEN reactor may be utilized to produce a carbonaceous compound alone as carbon dioxide fixation from the CARGEN process. This may pertain to industrial production of black ink for printers and pertain to industrial production of graphite of different grades, which may be used for manufacturing of cast iron/steel or batteries of different grades.

[0093] Furthermore, the energy utilization of the regeneration process can be extremely low (almost 50%) compared to existing technologies. The CARGEN process also has the benefit of high efficiency, as the CARGEN process has the capability to convert more than 65% CO.sub.2 per pass of reactor.

[0094] The disclosed catalyst may comprise transition metals that may be supported or unsupported. The preparation method involves mixing oxide of the transition metal with a suitable support or without a support in a standard ball milling apparatus to produce a fine and homogenous solid mixture of the transition metal oxide and support.

[0095] The disclosed catalyst provides a surface for reaction wherein the reaction gases comprising methane, CO.sub.2, H.sub.2O, and/or O.sub.2 etc can react. The specific utility of this catalyst is for the CARGEN process, which produces high quality carbon materials from greenhouse gases. This process could be industrially useful as it presents an inexpensive and scalable method for mass production of catalyst for the CARGEN process.

[0096] The CARGEN process is a unique technology in the field of CO.sub.2 conversion technology. This catalyst is specifically applicable for the CARGEN process. The catalyst presented in this disclosure targets carbon formation from the reaction gases via the CARGEN process.

[0097] In some embodiments, this catalyst can be prepared as follows:

[0098] 1. Preparation or procurement of transition metal oxide and suitable support;

[0099] 2. Mixing the transition metal oxide and the support in a suitable ratio in which the transition metal oxide will vary from 0% to 100% of the total batch weight;

[0100] 3. Using a standard ball milling process to mix the transition metal oxide and the support for a suitable time optimized as a function of total weight of the batch that is being produced;

[0101] 4. The number of balls used for the ball milling process can be set in such a way that the ratio of the number of balls to weight of the catalyst in grams can be around 10:1, and a variable ratio may also be used in the range of 1:1 to 100:1 as required by the process;

[0102] 5. The final mix of the supported catalyst may be subjected to reduction with suitable reduction gas, such as hydrogen, and used in the CARGEN process for producing high quality carbon material from greenhouse gases.

[0103] These steps are not required to be followed in the exact order and may be interchanged. This process is highly scalable and can be easily implemented on a commercial scale using the standard ball milling process.

[0104] The inventors conducted controlled experiments of preparation of catalyst as well as running the experiment under CARGEN stipulated conditions.

[0105] In a non-limiting example, the inventors prepared a 20 wt % nickel oxide supported by alumina catalyst using the procedure described above. The catalyst was prepared in a ball milling apparatus that used stainless steel balls of 5 mm diameter. A total of 2 g catalyst was produced, for which such balls were used to prepare the mixture. Ball milling was done for 1 hour, and the resulting catalyst was then subjected to material characterization.

[0106] The inventors also performed the following material characterization of the fresh catalyst to determine the features of this catalyst:

[0107] 1. XRD analysis was conducted to determine the crystal structure of the catalyst. It revealed presence of nickel oxide and alumina oxide as indicated by the presence of sharp peaks in XRD profile.

[0108] 2. Brunnauer Emmet and Teller (BET) surface area analysis was conducted to determine the surface area of the catalyst. It revealed that the catalyst had a total surface area of 101 m.sup.2/g available. This shows that this method produces extremely high surface area catalyst.

[0109] 3. BJH Pore Volume of the catalyst was determined, and the results indicated that the pore volume was at least 0.1 cm.sup.3/g of the catalyst.

[0110] 4. Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) profile was conducted to test the reducibility peak of the catalyst material. TPR profile was generated when temperature was ramped up in a standard Chemisorption equipment under the flow of hydrogen gas on the catalyst sample placed in the U tube. The TPR profile generated was a characteristic of nickel material, which also indicated that the active material was reduced easily and corresponded to pure nickel.

[0111] The inventors further performed the following proof of concept experiments that showed that this catalyst works:

[0112] 1. A standard Thermo Gravimetric Analyzer (TGA) equipment was used to conduct the proof of concept analysis. A weight gain profile is analyzed based on the reaction that happens on the crucible pan of the equipment.

[0113] 2. Reaction gases comprising methane, carbon dioxide and oxygen in a ratio stipulated by the CARGEN process was passed through the TGA apparatus at 550° C. temperature and the weight gain was monitored on the crucible pan of the equipment.

[0114] 3. Along with the weight gain, the inventors also monitored the evolved gases and their concentration using a standard Residual Gas Analyzer (RGA) equipment. The RGA data showed that the evolved gases comprise of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, water along with the unreacted gases. This indicated that the reaction happened, and the weight gain was due to carbon formation.

[0115] After this experiment, the inventors conducted the following characterization study of the spent catalyst material:

[0116] 1. SEM was conducted to identify the structure and the type of the material formed during the experiment. Carbon nanotubes were observed of varying diameter from few nanometers to hundreds of nanometers in diameter. Also, the length of the nanotubes was in the range of few nanometers to micrometers, which clearly indicated the formation of carbon nanotubes.

[0117] 2. The energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was conducted to test the material surface and its weight concentration. The EDX profile revealed that the surface only comprised carbon, nickel and alumina particles, which clearly demonstrated the formation of carbon material in the CARGEN process.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Ball Mill CARGEN Catalyst Synthesis

[0118] i) Nickel oxide particles of size in the range of 50 to 500 μm was produced using conventional techniques that may include calcination of nickel nitrate etc.

[0119] ii) Alumina support available from any standard catalyst supplier (SASOL Purolox, Alpha Aesar, Sigma Aldrich, etc.) was mixed with the nickel oxide particles in such a ratio to produce 20% Ni/Al.sub.2O.sub.3.

[0120] If 1 g of catalyst needs to be prepared, 0.253 g of NiO is mixed with 0.8 g of Al.sub.2O.sub.3. The extra 0.053 g of NiO is to account for the presence of oxygen in NiO as our ultimate target is to produce Ni and not NiO.

[0121] iii) The catalyst mixture and the balls were loaded in the ball milling container. For this experiment, a Retsch(R) CRYOMILL apparatus was used. The parameters set for this experiment are the following: Rotation rate: 50 Hz at 250 rpm, sample weight (g): number of balls ratio=1:10, ball mass=0.5 g, milling time: 1 hour.

[0122] iv) After a milling time of 1 hour, the catalyst mixture was calcined at 400° C. temperature for 4 hours to remove moisture and any other volatile compound that may be present in the catalyst mixture. For calcination, the muffle furnace was set at a ramping rate of 5° C./min to reach a target of 400° C. and then allowed to dwell for 240 minutes and then slowly ramped down to room temperature.

[0123] v) After calcination, the sample was sieved at a 300 μm size range. It was observed that all the particles passed through the sieve, indicating that average particle size was below 300 μm size.

Example 2: Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) Experiment

[0124] TGA analysis was conducted for weight gain testing and proof of concept studies of the CARGEN process. For this, the TGA/SDT Q600 equipment by TA® was used.

[0125] i) A 20 mg batch of fresh calcined catalyst was taken and placed in a sample alumina crucible of the TGA equipment. An empty reference alumina crucible of the same weight was kept on the second weighing pan of the crucible to eliminate any weight fluctuation by temperature gain during the experiment.

[0126] ii) Next, the weighing pans were tared to record a zero-weight value. Reduction protocol was initiated, which comprises the following steps:

[0127] a) Drying at 150° C. temperature for 2 hours;

[0128] b) Ramping up the temperature at the rate of 5° C./min to a target temperature of 800° C. temperature and then hold for 2 hours. After reduction is complete, TGA temperature was ramp down to 550° C., which is the desirable CARGEN reaction temperature.

[0129] c) CARGEN reaction gases comprising of O.sub.2, CO.sub.2, and CH.sub.4 in the ratio of 0.1/0.6/1, respectively, were fed to the TGA reactor to initiate the reaction. The weight gain profile from this experiment is shown in FIG. 2.

Example 3: Characterization

[0130] i) Fresh catalyst physisorption: the physisorption data of the fresh catalyst sample was obtained from a standard Tri-star II Micromeritics instrument. Table 1 reports data on the BET surface area and the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore volume, while the adsorption/desorption isotherms linear plot is provided in FIG. 3.

[0131] The fresh catalyst exhibits type-IV type of isotherm with the presence of a type H1 hysteresis loop. BET results suggest that the catalysts particles are mesoporous and are spherical in nature with uniform size and shape.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Physisorption data of the fresh novel CARGEN catalyst Quantity Value Single point surface area at p/p° = 0.30117 101.6899 m.sup.2/g BET surface area 103.9172 m.sup.2/g BJH adsorption cumulative surface area of pores 108.369 m.sup.2/g BJH desorption cumulative surface area of pores 128.757 m.sup.2/g BJH Adsorption cumulative volume of pores 0.513009 cm.sup.3/g between 5.000 Å and 1500.000 Å radius BJH Desorption cumulative volume of pores 0.544415 cm.sup.3/g between 5.000 Å and 1500.000 Å radius BJH Adsorption average pore radius (2V/A) 94.931 Å BJH Desorption average pore radius (2V/A) 84.565 Å

[0132] ii) Fresh catalyst chemisorption: To find the most suitable reduction temperature conditions for the fresh as prepared catalyst, a temperature programmed reduction (TPR) experiment was conducted in the standard Autochem-II Micromeritics chemisorption equipment. The TPR plot in terms of thermal conductivity change signal is presented in FIG. 4. It can be observed that a strong TCD peak at a temperature of 498° C. is formed, indicating that the material is reducible beyond the temperature of 498° C. The reducibility of the catalyst was calculated using the hydrogen consumption in the H.sub.2-TPR experiment. The actual H.sub.2 uptake was found to be 2287 μmoles/g of the catalyst at STP. As per the theoretical calculations, the H.sub.2 uptake of the catalyst was found to be 3412 μmoles/g of the catalyst at STP. Therefore, the degree of reduction of the catalyst is 67%. It is also worth noting that Ni supported on a γ-Al.sub.2O.sub.3 exhibits two distinct reduction temperature between 350-900° C. as reported in many literatures.sup.14,18. This is due to the fact that the strong metal support interaction increases the reduction temperature of bulk Ni.sub.2O.sub.3 and also the formation of a difficultly reducible NiO due to strong interaction with support. In the present catalyst, only one reduction peak of the Ni around 498° C. is observed which indicates the formation of weak support-metal-interaction (SMI) which is intended for CNT tip growth mechanism. The TPR results further indicate that the catalyst thus forms an egg-shell type of structure.sup.14.

[0133] iii) XRD study: the XRD analysis of the fresh and the reduced sample was done using the Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer with Cu (Kα) radiation (40 kV/40 mA). Both the samples were loaded separately, and recording was done in the 20 range of 20-110°, in steps of 0.02° or 2 s intervals. FIG. 5 presents stacked XRD plots of both, fresh and the reduced samples. It can be seen clearly that the all the peaks in the fresh sample are for NiO and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 catalyst, while for the reduced sample, most of them have been converted to Ni as noted by the peak shifts. The crystallite size of the fresh and reduced catalyst samples at Ni (012) and Ni (111) plane were calculated using Scherrer equation. Mild (1.5×) sintering of the Ni.sup.0 particles upon reduction with H.sub.2 were observed as the crystallite size of the reduced sampled increased to 35 nm from 21.4 nm of the fresh sample. The sintering due to coalescence is an established phenomenon by which Ni.sup.0 crystallite migrate at the support surface due to higher temperatures reduction and forms larger size crystallite. Coalescence of Ni.sup.0 is an exothermic reaction which also contributes to the sintering of the crystallites.

[0134] iv) Microscopy assessments: in order to validate the formation of carbon, and in particular MWCNT, the spent catalyst from TGA analysis was analyzed under SEM and TEM. FIGS. 6 and 7 present some of the selected images from SEM and TEM microscopy study respectively. Both SEM and TEM microscopy results demonstrate the formation of MWCNTs with diameters in the range of up to 100 nm, and length in micrometer scale.

[0135] In summary, CARGEN reaction catalyst is presented with its preparation procedure. The following is disclosed in this invention:

[0136] A nickel-based catalyst that will be used in the CARGEN reactor.

[0137] Nickel based catalyst may be supported or un-supported catalyst.

[0138] The support material may comprise of alumina, titania, silica, zeolites, carbon or any other suitable support material that may be useful for CARGEN reaction.

[0139] The Nickel based catalyst will comprise of at least 1 wt % of Nickel to 100 wt % nickel.

[0140] The support material may be activated carbon, carbon nanotube or carbon nanofibers that may be separately produced from CARGEN process itself.

[0141] The carbon support material may be procured commercially but with a purity of at least 90%.

[0142] A ball mill apparatus may be used to mix the catalyst with support.

[0143] The ball mill apparatus also increases the surface area of the catalyst while reducing its particle size.

[0144] The ball mill apparatus may be laboratory size equipment or bench scale or pilot scale or industrial scale. All the scales provide similar quality of the catalyst material.

[0145] The catalyst that is produced from the ball mill apparatus stated above may be produced at lab scale, bench scale and industrial scale.

[0146] All the features mentioned above are also applicable in making other catalysts for CARGEN using group VIII metals like Fe, Ni or Co and their combinations thereof.

[0147] The catalyst materials stated above may be prepared using other supported materials that include but are not limited to SiO.sub.2, TiO.sub.2, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, MgO, ZrO.sub.2, CeO.sub.2, zeolites, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), inorganic clays, carbonates, carbon nanotubes etc.

[0148] The catalyst material for CARGEN as described above may form egg-shell type of structure resembling weak SMI as may be required for MWCNT growth. However, the catalyst material may not be particularly limited to egg-shell type of structure.

[0149] The diameter of MWCNTs from the catalyst material above could be in the range up to 100 nm. However, some of the MWCNTs may also form above 100 nm size.

[0150] As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular form of a word includes the plural, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, the references “a,” “an” and “the” are generally inclusive of the plurals of the respective terms. For example, reference to “an ingredient” or “a method” includes a plurality of such “ingredients” or “methods.” The term “and/or” used in the context of “X and/or Y” should be interpreted as “X,” or “Y,” or “X and Y.”

[0151] Similarly, the words “comprise,” “comprises,” and “comprising” are to be interpreted inclusively rather than exclusively. Likewise, the terms “include,” “including” and “or” should all be construed to be inclusive, unless such a construction is clearly prohibited from the context. However, the embodiments provided by the present disclosure may lack any element that is not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, a disclosure of an embodiment defined using the term “comprising” is also a disclosure of embodiments “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” the disclosed components. Where used herein, the term “example,” particularly when followed by a listing of terms, is merely exemplary and illustrative, and should not be deemed to be exclusive or comprehensive. Any embodiment disclosed herein can be combined with any other embodiment disclosed herein unless explicitly indicated otherwise.

[0152] It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present subject matter and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.

CITED REFERENCE

[0153] 1. Elbashir N O, Challiwala M S, Sengupta D, El-Halwagi M M. System and method for carbon and syngas production. Property WI, Organization, eds. 2018. [0154] 2. Pakhare D, Spivey J. A review of dry (CO.sub.2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chem Soc Rev. 2014; 43(22):7813-7837. doi:10.1039/c3cs60395d [0155] 3. Chatla A, Ghouri M M, Elbashir N O. Highly stable Copper-Nickel alloyed catalyst for CO.sub.2 reforming of Methane: Theory guided experimental validation catalyst design. 2019. [0156] 4. Tavares M T, Alstrup I, Bernardo C A, Rostrup-Nielsen J R. Carbon Formation and CO Methanation on Silica-Supported Nickel and Nickel-Copper Catalysts in CO+H.sub.2 Mixtures. J Catal. 1996; 158(2):402-410. [0157] 5. Snoeck J-W, Froment G F, Fowles M. Kinetic study of the carbon filament formation by methane cracking on a nickel catalyst. J Catal. 1997; 169(1):250-262. [0158] 6. Gili A, Schlicker L, Bekheet M F, et al. Surface carbon as a reactive intermediate in dry reforming of methane to syngas on a 5% Ni/MnO catalyst. ACS Catal. 2018; 8(9):8739-8750. [0159] 7. Challiwala M, Afzal S, Choudhury H A, Sengupta D, El-halwagi M, Elbashir N O. Alternative pathways for CO.sub.2 utilization for enhanced methane dry reforming technology. In: Advances in Carbon Management Technologies.; 2019. [0160] 8. Amelinckx S, Zhang X B, Bernaerts D, Zhang X F, Ivanov V, Nagy J B. A formation mechanism for catalytically grown helix-shaped graphite nanotubes. Science (80-). 1994; 265(5172):635-639. [0161] 9. Dupuis A-C. The catalyst in the CCVD of carbon nanotubes—a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2005; 50(8): 929-961. [0162] 10. Yeoh W-M, Lee K-Y, Chai S-P, Lee K-T, Mohamed A R. Effective synthesis of carbon nanotubes via catalytic decomposition of methane: Influence of calcination temperature on metal-support interaction of Co—Mo/MgO catalyst. J Phys Chem Solids. 2013; 74(11):1553-1559. [0163] 11. Cheung C L, Kurtz A, Park H, Lieber C M. Diameter-controlled synthesis of carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B. 2002; 106(10):2429-2433. [0164] 12. Kumar M, Ando Y. Controlling the diameter distribution of carbon nanotubes grown from camphor on a zeolite support. Carbon N.Y. 2005; 43(3):533-540. [0165] 13. Huh Y, Green M L H, Kim Y H, Lee J Y, Lee C J. Control of carbon nanotube growth using cobalt nanoparticles as catalyst. Appl Surf Sci. 2005; 249(1-4):145-150. [0166] 14. Lu M, Fatah N, Khodakov A Y. Solvent-free synthesis of alumina supported cobalt catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J energy Chem. 2016; 25(6):1001-1007. [0167] 15. Bahruji H, Esquius J R, Bowker M, Hutchings G, Armstrong R D, Jones W. Solvent Free Synthesis of PdZn/TiO 2 Catalysts for the Hydrogenation of CO 2 to Methanol. Top Catal. 2018; 61(3-4):144-153. [0168] 16. Ahmed W, El-Din M R N, Aboul-Enein A A, Awadallah A E. Effect of textural properties of alumina support on the catalytic performance of Ni/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 catalysts for hydrogen production via methane decomposition. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015; 25:359-366. [0169] 17. Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Methane decomposition over Ni—Fe/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 catalysts for production of COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016; 41(3): 1574-1584. [0170] 18. Zhao A, Ying W, Zhang H, Ma H, Fang D. Ni—Al 2O 3 catalysts prepared by solution combustion method for syngas methanation. Catal Commun. 2012; 17:34-38. doi:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.10.010