BOTTLE FOR STORAGE OF SMALL VOLUMES OF CARBONATED BEVERAGES
20230044870 · 2023-02-09
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B65D1/0246
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C2949/3032
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B32B2250/40
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29K2067/003
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B65D1/0276
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B65D1/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A blow-molded bottle for a carbonated beverage includes a threaded mouth, a cylindrical side wall, a bottom, and a standard fill capacity of 37.5 mL to 105 mL. The bottle is blow-molded from a laminated preform including an outer layer formed from polyethylene terephthalate, an intermediate gas barrier layer formed from a polyamide comprising a dicarboxylic acid component and a diamine component comprising m-xylylenediamine, and an inner layer comprising polyethylene terephthalate. The laminated preform may weigh from about 4 to 16 grams. The polyamide layer provides the bottle with excellent resistance to carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen transmission and prevents the degradation of nutrients and flavors.
Claims
1. A blow-molded bottle for a carbonated beverage, the bottle comprising: a threaded mouth; a cylindrical side wall; a bottom; and a standard fill capacity of 30 mL to 120 mL; wherein the bottle is blow-molded from a laminated preform; wherein the laminated preform comprises: an outer layer formed from polyethylene terephthalate, an intermediate gas barrier layer formed from a polyamide comprising a dicarboxylic acid component and a diamine component comprising m-xylylenediamine; and an inner layer comprising polyethylene terephthalate; wherein the laminated preform weighs from about 4 to 21 grams.
2. The blow-molded bottle of claim 1, wherein the blow-molded bottle has superior resistance to hydrogen, nitrogen, and CO.sub.2 transmission, when compared to a comparative bottle with a standard fill capacity of 30 mL, to 120 mL, wherein the comparative bottle is blow-molded from a comparative preform comprising: a single polyethylene terephthalate layer, and a weight of about 4 to 18 g.
3. The blow-molded bottle of claim 1, wherein the blow-molded bottle has superior resistance to carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen transmission, when compared to a comparative bottle with a standard fill capacity of 37.5 mL to 105 mL, wherein the comparative bottle is blow-molded from a comparative preform comprising: a single polyethylene terephthalate layer, and a weight of about 4 to 17.5 g.
4. The blow-molded bottle of claim 1, wherein the dicarboxylic acid component of the polyamide is an aliphatic dicarboxylic acid having an even number of between 6 and 10 carbon atoms, an isomer of benzenedicarboxylic acid, or a mixture thereof.
5. The blow-molded bottle of claim 3, wherein the dicarboxylic acid component of the polyamide comprises adipic acid, alone or in combination with an isomer of benzenedicarboxylic acid.
6. The blow-molded bottle of claim 3, wherein the dicarboxylic acid component of the polyamide is adipic acid.
7. The blow-molded bottle of claim 1, wherein the bottom has a punt.
8. The blow-molded bottle of claim 2, wherein the wall and base of the blow-molded bottle are 12% to 47% thinner than a wall and a base of the comparative bottle.
9. The blow-molded bottle of claim 2, wherein: the bottle has a volume of 75 to 105 mL; the laminated preform weighs 15 grams; the wall and base of the blow-molded bottle are 20% to 41%, thinner than a wall and a base of the comparative bottle; and the comparative bottle has a volume of 75 to 105 mL, and is blow-molded from the comparative preform, wherein the comparative preform weighs 15 grams.
10. The blow-molded bottle of claim 1, wherein the intermediate gas barrier layer provides 3% to 7% of the total mass of the preform.
11. A method of making a blow-molded bottle for a carbonated beverage, comprising: placing a laminated preform in a mold cavity having a volume of 37.5 mL to 105 mL; and blow molding the laminated preform against an internal surface of the mold cavity to form the blow-molded bottle; wherein the blow-molded bottle has a standard fill capacity of 37.5 mL to 105 mL; wherein the laminated preform comprises: an outer layer formed from polyethylene terephthalate, an intermediate gas barrier layer formed from a polyamide comprising a dicarboxylic acid component and a diamine component comprising m-xylylenediamine; and an inner layer comprising polyethylene terephthalate.
12. The method of claim 10, further comprising a step of producing the laminated preform by: providing a skin material melt stream comprising polyethylene terephthalate and a core material melt stream comprising the polyamide to a co-injection hot runner molding system comprising a nozzle and a mold; passing the skin material melt stream and the core material melt stream through the nozzle, wherein the nozzle defines: an inner melt passage and an outer melt passage for receiving the skin material melt stream, and an intermediate melt passage for receiving the core material melt stream; and combining the skin material melt stream from the inner melt passage, the core material melt stream from the intermediate melt passage, and the skin material melt stream from the outer melt passage to produce a combined melt stream; and injecting the combined melt stream into the mold to form the laminated preform.
13. A blow-molded bottle for a carbonated beverage, the bottle comprising a threaded mouth, a cylindrical side wall, a bottom; and a standard fill capacity of 75 mL to 105 mL; wherein: the bottle is blow-molded from a laminated preform weighing about 4 to 21 grams comprising: an outer layer formed from polyethylene terephthalate, an intermediate gas barrier layer formed from a polyamide comprising a dicarboxylic acid component and a diamine component comprising m-xylylenediamine, wherein the intermediate gas barrier layer provides 3% to 7% of the total mass of the preform; and an inner layer comprising polyethylene terephthalate; wherein the laminated preform weighs from about from 15 to 18 grams.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037] In order to better understand various exemplary embodiments, ence is made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0044] Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like components or steps, there are disclosed broad aspects of various exemplary embodiments.
[0045] Bottles with a polymeric wall made of a polyester monolayer, e.g., a monolayer of polyalkylene terephthalate, such as polyethylene terephthalate, are frequently used to store carbonated beverages. At an initial CO.sub.2 level of 4.2 cc/mL beverage, a 300 mL bottle manufactured from a polyethylene terephthalate preform containing 21 g polymer has a shelf life of 8.6 weeks, as shown in Table 1 below. At the end of this period, the CO.sub.2 level has declined to 3.4 cc/mL, a decline in carbonation level of about 20%. At an initial CO.sub.2 level of 4.2 cc/mL beverage, the carbonation level in a beverage stored in a 300 ml bottle manufactured from a 14.5 g polyethylene terephthalate preform declines by 20% in 5.3 weeks.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Shelf life of carbonated beverages in 300 mL PET bottles at an initial carbonation level of 4.2 cc/mL Time for carbonation Preform Preform Interlayer level to Type Weight Interlayer Content decline 20% Monolayer 21 g — 0% 8.6 weeks Multilayer 16 g 100% 4% 15.9 weeks MXD6 Multilayer 14.5 g 100% 5% 16.3 weeks MXD6 Multilayer 14.5 g 100% 3% 11.8 weeks MXD6 Monolayer 14.5 g — 0% 5.3 weeks
[0046] Shelf life of a bottled carbonated beverage may also be improved by increasing the volume of the bottle, as shown in
[0047] One way of improving the shelf life of a carbonated beverage in a less than 100 mL bottle, or a 1.25-3 oz. bottle, is to reduce the initial carbonation level. For example, a 1.25 oz., 1.5 oz., 2 oz., or 3 oz. bottle made from a polyethylene terephthalate preform weighing 4 g to 21 g may be used to store a beverage with an initial CO.sub.2 level of ca. 2 cc/mL, with a decline in carbonation level of 6% to 12% over a 10-week period. However, such a reduction in carbonation level is undesirable. Alternatively, the shelf life of a carbonated beverage in a 1.25 oz., 1.5 oz., 2 oz., or 3 oz. bottle may be improved by increasing the preform weight, and thus the wall thickness of the final bottle. However, this requires use of increased amounts of plastic as a raw material and is economically and environmentally undesirable.
[0048]
[0049] Bottle 10 includes a tubular sidewall 5 having a diameter D, and a bottom 6. Bottom 6 may include a punt or indentation 7. In some embodiments, diameter D is greater than the diameter of mouth 1, and a shoulder 3 connects mouth 1 and sidewall 5. A standard fill capacity, measured at fill level 4, of bottle 1 may be 30 mL to 120 M, 37.5 mL to 105 M, from 60 mL to 102.5 mL, from 80 mL to 100 mL, or from 87 mL to 90 mL. Fill level 4 may be on shoulder 3, about halfway between mouth 1 and sidewall 5 of bottle 10. The height B of tubular sidewall 5 and the diameter D of sidewall 5 may be selected to provide the desired fill capacity, measured at 20° C. after 72 hours storage.
[0050] While the entire height of tubular sidewall 5 may be a right cylinder of constant diameter if desired, the bottom portion sidewall 5, having a height C, is normally curved inward, as shown in
[0051]
HO.sub.2C—(CH.sub.2).sub.2n—CO.sub.2H II
The dicarboxylic acid component of the polyamide may be adipic acid in combination with terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, or a mixture thereof. The dicarboxylic acid component may be 40% to 100%, 50% to 90%, 60% to 80%, or about 70% adipic acid, and from 0% to 60%, 10% to 50%, 20% to 40%, or about 30% of terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, or a mixture thereof. The dicarboxylic acid component may be 100% adipic acid. The gas barrier layer 12 may be made from 100% MXD6, which is made by polymerizing m-xylylenediamine with adipic acid as the sole acid component. In various embodiments, the intermediate gas barrier layer 12 has a thickness which is 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, or 7% of the total thickness of sidewall 5, or from 3% to 7% of the total thickness of sidewall 5.
[0052] Referring back to Table 1, a laminated 300 ML multilayer bottle with an inner layer of polyethylene terephthalate, an inner layer of polyethylene terephthalate, and an intermediate gas barrier layer of 100% MXD6 has superior resistance to CO.sub.2 gas transmission across the bottle wall. A 300 mL, bottle made from a 21 g polyester monolayer preform has a shelf life of 8.6 weeks before the carbonation level in the bottle has declined by 20% from an initial value of 4.2 cc/mL beverage. A 300 mL multilayer bottle made from a 16 g preform containing an MXD6 interlayer, where the interlayer is 4% of the total mass of the bottle, has a shelf life of 15.9 weeks. Thus, the 16 g multilayer preform uses 24% less plastic than the monolayer preform and increases the shelf life of the carbonated beverage in the bottle by 85%. Similar reductions in the amount of plastic used are expected for smaller volume bottles.
[0053] Table 1 also shows results obtained with 300 mL polyester bottles formed from three different 14.5 g preforms. As noted above, at an initial CO2 level of 4.2 cc/mL beverage, the carbonation level in a beverage stored in a 300 mL bottle manufactured from a 14.5 g polyethylene terephthalate monolayer preform declines by 20% in 5.3 weeks. If an MXD6 interlayer is incorporated into the 14.5 g preform in an amount of 3%, based on the total mass of the preform, the carbonation level in the beverage declines by 20% in 11.8 weeks, more than doubling the shelf life of the beverage in the bottle. If the MXD6 interlayer is used in an amount of 5%, based on the total mass of the preform, the carbonation level in the beverage declines by 20% in 16.3 weeks, essentially tripling the shelf life of the beverage. The 14.5 g multilayer preform uses 31% less plastic than a 21 g monolayer preform and increases the shelf life of the carbonated beverage in the bottle. If the MXD6 interlayer in the 14.5 g preform ranges from 3% to 5% of the preform mass, the shelf life of the carbonated beverage in the resulting bottle increases from 37% to 90%, relative to a beverage stored in a 21 g monolayer preform. Thus, the use of an MXD6 interlayer in a laminated polyester bottle in an amount of 3% to 7%: [0054] allows production of bottles more economically, through the use of less plastic per bottle; [0055] extends the shelf life of a carbonated beverage contained within the bottle; and/or [0056] reduces the impact of polyester bottles on the environment, by reducing the level of plastic waste.
[0057] Polyamides formed from m-xylylenediamine have superior resistance to carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen transmission through the wall of the bottle, and prevent degradation of nutrients and flavors, when compared to other polymers. For example, nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 have excellent oxygen barrier properties but are permeable to carbon dioxide (Tsai et al., Desalination 233 (2008), 183-190). Nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 are commonly used in packaging food products, where it is desirable to prevent oxygen permeation into the package while allowing carbon dioxide formed during storage to escape (“Nylon Films,” Polymer Properties Database, URL: http://polymerdatabase.com/Films/Nylon %20Films.html). Thus, nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 are not suitable for maintaining carbonation levels in a carbonated beverage. Additionally, nylon 6 and nylon 6,6 exhibit unacceptably high oxygen transmission rates, and can allow oxygen to diffuse into the bottle as carbon dioxide diffuses out of the bottle (Soltani et al., Food Packaging, 2017, Pages 1-43; see FIG. 1.2). Entry of oxygen into the bottle may affect flavor, due to oxidation of flavoring agents. More importantly, entry of oxygen into the bottle may oxidize important biologically effective constituents of the beverage, e.g., caffeine and creatine, which would produce undesirable side products.
[0058] Referring back to
[0059] However, increasing the preform mass is not the only way to increase wall thickness. If the preform mass is held constant, and the volume of the bottle produced from the preform decreases from an initial value of 300 mL to a final value of, e.g., 37.5 mL to 105 mL, the sidewalls and bottom of the smaller bottle will have a smaller area than the sidewalls and bottom of the 300 mL bottle but contain the same amount of polymer as the larger bottle. This increases the thickness of the wall of the smaller bottle, relative to the 300 mL bottle, and increases the resistance of the smaller bottle to carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen transmission through the bottle wall.
[0060] If a preform weighing from about 4 grams to 22 grams, 13 grams to 22 grams, from 14.5 to 21 grams, from 14.5 to 18 grams, from 15 to 18 grams, from 15 to 17.5 grams, or from 13 to 16 grams which is suitable for manufacturing a 300 mL bottle is instead used to manufacture a 37.5 mL, to 105 mL bottle, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen transmission from the bottle decreases due to increased wall thickness. If the preform additionally contains from 3% to 7% by mass of an MXD6 polyamide interlayer, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen transmission from the bottle further decreases due to the gas barrier layer.
[0061]
[0062]
[0063] The preform of
[0064]
A barrier 47 separates skin polymer passage 44 and core polymer passage 46, and a barrier 48 separates skin polymer passage 45 and core polymer passage 46.
[0068] As shown in
[0069] The combined polymer stream flows into a preform-shaped cavity 41 in mold 40, from gate 49 through a passage 50. The combined polymer stream contains an inner skin polymer stream of polyethylene terephthalate which form the inner surface of the preform wall, and an outer annular skin polymer stream of polyethylene terephthalate which forms the outer surface of the preform wall. An annular core polymer stream of MXD6 separates the inner and outer skin polymer stream and forms a gas barrier layer in the preform.
[0070] Although the various exemplary embodiments have been described in detail with particular reference to certain exemplary aspects thereof, it should be understood that the invention is capable of other embodiments and its details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects. As is readily apparent to those skilled in the art, variations and modifications can be affected while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing disclosure, description, and figures are for illustrative purposes only and do not in any way limit the invention, which is defined only by the claims.