APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SPECTRALLY SHAPING A LASER BEAM

Abstract

An optical apparatus for spectrally shaping a laser beam within a fiber MOPA laser is disclosed. The apparatus includes a birefringent optic and a linear polarizer. The laser beam is divided between two orthogonal polarization axes of the birefringent optic having polarization mode dispersion. Propagation of the laser beam through the birefringent optic causes a wavelength-dependent phase shift between components of the laser beam in the two polarization axes. A polarizing direction of the polarizer is oriented between the two polarization axes. Propagation of the polarization-dispersed laser beam through the polarizer modulates the power spectral density of a transmitted portion of the laser beam. This spectral modulation can be tuned to shape a Gaussian spectral distribution from the master oscillator into a uniform spectral distribution for amplification by the power amplifier. The uniform spectrally-shaped laser beam can be amplified to higher powers than the original Gaussian laser beam.

Claims

1. An optical apparatus for spectrally shaping a laser beam, comprising: a birefringent optic having orthogonal first and second polarization axes, the birefringent optic arranged to receive and transmit the laser beam, the laser beam received by the birefringent optic being linearly polarized and having an electric-field vector oriented at an oblique angle ϕ to the first polarization axis; and a linear polarizer having a polarizing direction, the polarizer arranged to receive the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optic and to transmit a portion thereof, the polarizing direction oriented at an oblique angle θ to the first polarization axis, the portion of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer having a more-uniform power spectral density than the laser beam received by the birefringent optic; wherein transmission through the birefringent optic induces a wavelength-dependent phase shift between a component of the laser beam parallel to the first polarization axis and a component of the laser beam parallel to the second polarization axis, the wavelength-dependent phase shift producing a wavelength-dependent polarization state of the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optical element, thereby modulating power spectral density in the portion of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer.

2. The optical apparatus of claim 1, wherein angle ϕ differs from angle θ by less than 5°.

3. The optical apparatus of claim 1, wherein the birefringent optic includes a phase modulator for contributing polarization mode dispersion thereto.

4. The optical apparatus of claim 3, further including a source of electric potential for driving the phase modulator, the phase modulator causing a phase delay ωτ+φ between the component of the laser beam parallel to the first polarization axis and the component of the laser beam parallel to the second polarization axis.

5. The optical apparatus of claim 4, wherein angle ϕ differs from angle θ by less than 5°, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ is in a range between 7π/8 and 9π/8 radians.

6. The optical apparatus of claim 5, wherein angles ϕ and θ are between 19° and 30°.

7. The optical apparatus of claim 1, wherein the birefringent optic includes a polarization-maintaining optical fiber for contributing polarization mode dispersion thereto.

8. The optical apparatus of claim 1, wherein the laser beam is provided by a seed laser, the laser beam delivered from the seed laser through a splice to the birefringent optic, angle ϕ being a splice angle of the splice.

9. The optical apparatus of claim 1, wherein the birefringent optic and the polarizer are joined by a splice, angle θ being a splice angle of the splice.

10. A MOPA laser, comprising: a seed laser for providing a linearly-polarized laser beam; a birefringent optic for receiving and transmitting the laser beam, the birefringent optic having orthogonal first and second polarization axes, the laser beam received by the birefringent optic having an electric-field vector oriented at an oblique angle ϕ to the first polarization axis; a linear polarizer having a polarizing direction, the polarizer arranged to receive the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optic and to transmit a portion thereof, the polarizing direction oriented at an oblique angle θ to the first polarization axis, the portion of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer having a more-uniform power spectral density than the laser beam provided by the seed laser; and an amplifier for receiving the portion of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer and generating an amplified laser beam, the amplified laser beam having more power than the laser beam provided by the seed laser; wherein transmission through the birefringent optic induces a wavelength-dependent phase shift between a component of the laser beam parallel to the first polarization axis and a component of the laser beam parallel to the second polarization axis, the wavelength-dependent phase shift producing a wavelength-dependent polarization state of the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optical element, thereby modulating power spectral density in the portion of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer.

11. The MOPA laser of claim 10, wherein the birefringent optic includes a phase modulator for contributing polarization mode dispersion thereto, the phase modulator driven by an electric potential from a source thereof.

12. The MOPA laser of claim 11, further including a splitter for separating a fraction of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer and an analyzer for measuring a deviation of an actual phase delay of the separated fraction of the laser beam from a desired phase delay of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer, the analyzer arranged to send an error signal or a control signal to the source of electric potential, thereby adjusting the electric potential and minimizing the deviation.

13. The MOPA laser of claim 10, wherein the birefringent optic includes a polarization-maintaining optical fiber for contributing polarization mode dispersion thereto.

14. The MOPA laser of claim 10, wherein angle ϕ differs from angle θ by less than 5°.

15. The MOPA laser of claim 14, wherein the birefringent optic causes a phase delay between the component of the laser beam parallel to the first polarization axis and the component of the laser beam parallel to the second polarization axis, the phase delay being in a range between 7π/8 and 9π/8 radians.

16. The MOPA laser of claim 10, wherein the seed laser and the birefringent optic are joined by a splice, angle ϕ being a splice angle of the splice.

17. A method for spectrally shaping a laser beam, comprising the steps of: delivering a linearly-polarized laser beam to a birefringent optic, the linearly-polarized laser beam having an electric-field vector, the birefringent optic having orthogonal first and second polarization axes; dividing the linearly-polarized laser beam received by the birefringent optic into a component parallel to the first polarization axis and another component parallel to the second polarization axis by orienting the electric-field vector between the first and second polarization axes; transmitting the laser beam through the birefringent optic to induce a wavelength-dependent phase shift between the components parallel to the first and second polarization axes, the wavelength-dependent phase shift producing a wavelength-dependent polarization state of the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optic; delivering the laser beam transmitted through the birefringent optic to a linear polarizer, the polarizer having a polarizing direction oriented between the first and second polarization axes; and transmitting a portion of the laser beam received by the polarizer therethrough, the transmitted portion having a modulated power spectral density that is more uniform than the laser beam received by the birefringent optic.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising a step of inducing a phase delay between the component of the laser beam parallel to the first polarization axis and the component of the laser beam parallel to the second polarization axis during transmission of the laser beam through the birefringent optic.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the electric-field vector is oriented at an oblique angle ϕ to the first polarization axis, the polarizing direction is oriented at an oblique angle θ to the first polarization axis, angle ϕ differs from angle θ by less than 5°, and the phase delay is in a range between 7π/8 and 9π/8 radians.

20. The method of claim 18, further comprising the steps of separating a fraction of the laser beam transmitted through the polarizer, analyzing the separated fraction to measure any deviation of an actual phase delay from a desired phase delay, and adjusting the phase delay to maintain the desired phase.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, schematically illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiment given below, serve to explain principles of the present invention.

[0014] FIG. 1 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs.

[0015] wavelength for a Gaussian spectral distribution and a flat-top spectral distribution having the same power and same 1/e.sup.2 linewidth.

[0016] FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically illustrating one preferred embodiment of optical apparatus in accordance with the present invention for spectrally shaping a laser beam provided by a seed laser, including a birefringent optic and a linear polarizer, with the birefringent optic including a phase modulator and a polarization-maintaining optical fiber.

[0017] FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C schematically illustrate power spectral density and polarization at three locations indicated on FIG. 2 on a common frequency scale.

[0018] FIG. 4 is a graph schematically illustrating output power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having a white light input spectrum and splice angles ϕ=θ=45°.

[0019] FIG. 5 is a graph schematically illustrating output power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having a white light input spectrum, an angle θ=45°, and different labeled angles ϕ.

[0020] FIG. 6 is a graph schematically illustrating output power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having a white light input spectrum and different labeled angles ϕ=θ.

[0021] 15

[0022] FIG. 7 is a graph schematically illustrating output power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having a white light input spectrum, angles ϕ=θ=45°, and different labeled phase delays ω.sub.cτ+φ.

[0023] FIG. 8 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having the Gaussian input spectrum depicted with a linewidth of 66.6 GHz, angles ϕ=θ=22.5°, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad.

[0024] FIG. 9 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of the optical apparatus in FIG. 2 having a Gaussian input spectrum with a linewidth of 55.0 GHz, angles ϕ=θ=25.9°, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad.

[0025] FIG. 10 is a block diagram schematically illustrating one preferred embodiment of MOPA laser in accordance with the present invention, including a seed laser, the optical apparatus of FIG. 2, an amplifier, and an active feedback circuit using a signal from an analyzer to adjust a phase φ added to the birefringent optic through the phase modulator.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0026] Referring now to the drawings, wherein like components are designated by like numerals, FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically illustrating one preferred embodiment 10 of optical apparatus in accordance with the present invention for spectrally shaping a laser beam provided by a seed laser 12. Relative orientations of the polarization axes for polarized optical elements are also indicated on the drawing, below the block diagram, with a Z propagation axis directed out of the page. The polarization axes are orthogonal to the Z propagation axis. Curly brackets indicate optical elements that correspond to each set of polarization axes. The laser beam propagates from left to right along the Z propagation axis in the block diagram.

[0027] Seed laser 12 may be a master oscillator or a master oscillator combined with one or more preamplifiers. The laser beam is delivered to optical apparatus 10 through a polarization-maintaining optical fiber 14. The laser beam is linearly polarized within optical fiber 14, with the electric-field vector parallel to either a slow axis or a fast axis of optical fiber 14, which corresponds respectively to a slow-axis polarization P.sub.S or a fast-axis polarization P.sub.F. Propagation in slow-axis polarization P.sub.S is preferred, because it is generally more robust against depolarization by externally applied stress and is used in the examples herein.

[0028] Optical apparatus 10 includes a birefringent optic 16 and a linear polarizer 18. Birefringent optic 16 receives and transmits the laser beam from seed laser 12. Here, birefringent optic 16 includes a relatively-short polarization-maintaining optical fiber 20, a phase modulator 22, and a relatively-long polarization-maintaining optical fiber 24. Phase modulator 22 includes a birefringent electro-optic crystal, such as a lithium niobate (LiNbO.sub.3) crystal, which has orthogonal principal axes. Herein, the principal axes are labeled “X” and “Y”. There are corresponding orthogonal polarization axes “P.sub.X” and “P.sub.Y” for light having an electric-field vector parallel thereto. The refractive indices of the electro-optic crystal and therefore the propagation velocities for light therethrough are different for polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y. This velocity difference is known in the art as “polarization mode dispersion” and it produces a “differential group delay” between light in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y. The linearly-polarized laser beam received by birefringent optic 16 has an electric-field vector oriented at an oblique angle ϕ between polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y. The laser beam propagating through birefringent optic 16 therefore has components in both polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y.

[0029] Phase modulator 22 and optical fiber 24 both contribute polarization mode dispersion. The birefringent axes of polarization-maintaining optical fibers 20 and 24 are aligned with the polarization axes of phase modulator 22. The polarization axis of phase modulator 22 that has the higher refractive index corresponds to longest optical path length therethrough. Similarly, a slow-axis of optical fiber 24 corresponds to the longest optical path length therethrough. Aligning these axes of phase modulator 22 and optical fiber 24 maximizes the overall polarization mode dispersion of birefringent optic 16. That is, aligning these axes produces the maximum difference in optical path length for polarization P.sub.X compared to polarization P.sub.Y.

[0030] Optical fiber 14 of seed laser 12 and optical fiber 20 of birefringent optic 16 are joined by a splice 26 having a splice angle ϕ. Slow axis P.sub.S and fast axis P.sub.F of optical fiber 14 are rotated by an angle ϕ from polarization axes P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of birefringent optic 16. This rotation is fixed when forming splice 26, by deliberately misaligning the birefringent axes of the two fibers, which is accomplished by misaligning stress rods therein. The linearly-polarized laser beam is thereby launched into birefringent optic 16 having a component in polarization P.sub.X and another component in polarization P.sub.Y. Propagation through birefringent optic 16 produces a phase shift between the components in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y due to polarization mode dispersion. This phase shift is wavelength dependent, as discussed below, producing a wavelength-dependent polarization. Herein below, “frequency” will be used instead of “wavelength” for convenience of explanation, however, these quantities are equivalent for analyzing spectra of optical radiation.

[0031] Polarizer 18 receives the laser beam transmitted through birefringent optic 16. In the embodiment depicted, polarizer 18 is in the form of a fiber-coupled component that includes polarization-maintaining optical fibers 28 and 30. The birefringent axes of optical fibers 28 and 30, which correspond to a slow-axis polarization P.sub.S′ and a fast-axis polarization P.sub.F′, are aligned with the optical axes of polarizer 18. The optical axes define a polarizing direction of polarizer 18. One of polarizations P.sub.S′ and P.sub.F′, which is aligned the polarization direction, passes through polarizer 18. The other polarization is blocked. It is preferred to align the more-robust slow-axis polarization P.sub.S′ with the polarizing direction of polarizer 18, as in the examples herein.

[0032] Optical fiber 24 of birefringent optic 16 and optical fiber 28 of polarizer 18 are joined by a splice 32 having a splice angle θ. Slow axis P.sub.S′ and fast axis P.sub.F′ of optical fiber 28 are rotated by an angle θ from polarization axes P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of birefringent optic 16 at a splice 32. The polarizing direction of polarizer 18 is thereby oriented at an oblique angle θ between polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of birefringent optic 16. Optical fiber 30 enables the laser beam propagating out of optical apparatus 10 to be conveniently transported to and coupled into a power amplifier.

[0033] FIGS. 3A-3C schematically illustrate power spectral density and polarization as a function of frequency at three labeled locations in one example of optical apparatus 10 of FIG. 2, having angle ϕ≈45° and angle θ≈45°, selected to demonstrate effects of polarization mode dispersion in birefringent optic 16. In the drawings, polarization axis P.sub.X is horizontal and polarization axis P.sub.Y is vertical. Lines with arrows depict linearly-polarized light. Circles with arrows depict circularly-polarized light. The length of a line or diameter of a circle indicates the power spectral density. The arrows indicate the direction of polarization. In this example, the laser beam provided by seed laser 12 is “white light”, which has a power spectral density that is independent of frequency.

[0034] At location 3A in optical fiber 20, for angle ϕ≈45°, the laser beam launched into birefringent optic 16 has equal power and the same phase in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y. Propagation through birefringent optic 16 introduces a phase shift between the components of the laser beam in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y that is frequency dependent. The power spectral density is unchanged. At location 3B, towards the end of optical fiber 24, the polarization state varies continuously with frequency. For example, over 2π radians (rad) of relative phase shift, the polarization state varies from a linear polarization (0 rad), to a circular polarization (π/2 rad), to the orthogonal linear polarization (π rad), to the opposite-direction circular polarization (3π/2 rad), and back to the original linear polarization (2π rad). For relative phase shifts therebetween, the polarization states will be elliptical. At location 3C, after the polarization-dispersed laser beam has propagated through polarizer 18, the polarization is purely linear and power spectral density varies with sinusoidally with frequency.

[0035] FIG. 4 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for the same example of optical apparatus 10 as FIGS. 3A-3C, having specifically a center frequency of 280 terahertz (THz) and a group delay time between polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of 15 picoseconds (ps). “Frequency offset” on the graph is an offset from the center frequency ω.sub.c. Group delay time τ is a difference in propagation time from splice 26 to splice 32. In this example, the input laser beam delivered from seed laser 12, through splice 26, into birefringent optic 16 is white light having a constant power spectral density. The splice angle ϕ=45° means that power is coupled equally into polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of birefringent optic 16. As expected, the power spectral density of the output laser beam transmitted through polarizer 18 has a sinusoidal dependence on frequency. Optical apparatus 10 is essentially a spectral filter and the “output” plot in FIG. 4 is essentially a transmission spectrum. In the example depicted, there is 100% transmission of the laser beam through optical apparatus 10 at the maxima and 100% extinction of the laser beam at the minima.

[0036] FIG. 5 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of optical apparatus 10, having the same 280 THz center frequency and the same 15 ps group delay time, angle θ=45°, and different labeled angles ϕ. The average transmission when θ≈45° is always 50%. For angle ϕ=0°, transmission is invariant with frequency. For angle ϕ=45°, which is the example depicted in FIG. 4, transmission varies between complete transmission and complete extinction. For other angles ϕ, the transmission spectra are between these two extremes.

[0037] FIG. 6 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for an example of optical apparatus 10, having the same 280 THz center frequency and the same 15 ps group delay time, and different values of angles ϕ and θ that are varied synchronously. Angle ϕ is about equal to angle θ. The input laser beam, not depicted, is again white light having a constant power spectral density. For angles ϕ=θ=0°, there is complete transmission at all frequencies. For angles ϕ=θ=45°, which is again the example depicted in FIG. 4, transmission varies between complete transmission and complete extinction, with an average transmission of 50%. For other angles ϕ=θ, there is less extinction at the minima and the average transmission is higher. Angles ϕ=θ=45° provide the most spectral shaping of a transmitted laser beam, but also produce the highest overall insertion loss of about 3 decibels (dB).

[0038] Phase modulator 22 in FIG. 2 is driven by an electric potential from a source 34 thereof. Applying the electric potential across the birefringent electro-optic crystal in phase modulator 22 will change the refractive index of one of polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y through the electro-optic effect, which causes a phase delay between components of a laser beam in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y propagating through birefringent optic 16. This phase delay adds to or subtracts from the phase shift discussed above. The phase shift is frequency dependent and inherent to birefringent optic 16, whereas source 34 enables an arbitrary phase delay to be applied to birefringent optic 16.

[0039] FIG. 7 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for the same example of optical apparatus 10 as FIG. 4, with angles ϕ=θ=45°, but for different values of a constant phase φ induced by applying a DC electric potential to phase modulator 22. This constant phase φ is assumed to be independent of frequency and adds to a frequency-dependent phase ωτ caused by the differential group delay between polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y. A phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ, evaluated at center frequency ω.sub.c, may be used to characterize the transmission spectrum of optical apparatus 10. The drawing demonstrates that varying phase φ, while keeping center frequency ω.sub.c and group delay time τ fixed, displaces the transmission spectrum in frequency without changing the maximum or minimum transmission. Herein below, phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ refers to a net displacement in phase of the orthogonal polarizations with respect to each other at center frequency ω.sub.c, after considering any portion of the overall phase displacement that is an integer multiple of 2π rad. A phase displacement of 2π rad does not modify the spectral shape of a laser beam traversing optical apparatus 10.

[0040] In a fiber MOPA laser, the master oscillator generally produces a laser beam having a Gaussian or similarly shaped power spectral density. Optical apparatus 10 of FIG. 2 can be configured to reshape the power spectral density of such a laser beam to be closer to an ideal flat-top. FIG. 8 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for another example of optical apparatus 10, with birefringent optic 16 having a group delay time of 15 ps, angles ϕ=θ=22.5°, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad. Seed laser 12 provides a Gaussian-shaped laser beam having a center frequency of 280 THz (equivalent to a wavelength of about 1071 nm) and a 1/e.sup.2 linewidth of 66.6 GHz. The drawing compares this Gaussian input laser beam to the output laser beam that is reshaped by transmission through optical apparatus 10.

[0041] The shaped output laser beam has a relatively flat top that spans about 30 GHz, with a power spectral density about half that at the peak of the Gaussian input laser beam. The shaped output beam is to be amplified in a subsequent power amplifier, so power losses incurred during transmission through optical apparatus 10 can be overcome. More importantly, the spectrally-shaped output laser beam can ultimately be amplified to a higher power due to its more-uniform spectrum, without exceeding a threshold for SBS. This uniformity is illustrated in FIG. 8, by scaling the shaped output to have the same peak power spectral density as the Gaussian input. The area under the power spectral density plot of the scaled shaped output is about 34% greater than the Gaussian input, which means about 34% more power is accessible by subsequent amplification, without generating SBS.

[0042] The scaled shaped output in FIG. 8 also has a greater 1/e.sup.2 linewidth than the Gaussian input. In some applications, such as spectral beam combining, such a large increase in linewidth is undesirable. FIG. 9 is a graph schematically illustrating power spectral density vs. frequency for yet another example of optical apparatus 10, with birefringent optic 16 having a group delay time of 15 ps, angles ϕ=θ=25.9°, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad. The Gaussian input laser beam has a narrower linewidth than the example of FIG. 8, with a 1/e.sup.2 linewidth of 55.0 GHz, and the same center frequency of 280 THz. The input linewidth, angles, and phase were selected to achieve an output laser beam having the same 66.6 GHz 1/e.sup.2 linewidth as the input laser beam provided by seed laser 12 in the example of FIG. 8. In FIG. 9, the area under the power spectral density plot of the scaled shaped output is about 17% greater than a 66.6 GHz Gaussian beam, which means about 17% more power is accessible by subsequent amplification, without exceeding the desired 66.6 GHz linewidth of the laser beam for subsequent amplification.

[0043] The examples of FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate that the transmission spectrum of optical apparatus 10 can be tuned by varying the values of angles ϕ and θ and phase φ. Birefringent optic 16 induces a frequency-dependent phase shift between the components of the laser beam in polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y and produces a frequency-dependent polarization state in the laser beam transmitted therethrough. Polarizer 18, in turn, modulates the power spectral density of a portion of the laser beam transmitted therethrough. By optimizing angles ϕ and θ, and phase φ, the portion of the laser beam transmitted through polarizer 18 has a more-uniform power spectral density than the original laser beam received by birefringent optic 16. In both of these examples, angle ϕ is about equal to angle θ, and phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ is about π rad.

[0044] Angles ϕ=θ between 19° and 30° were found to be favorable for this type of spectral shaping. Angles ϕ=θ between 22° and 27° were found to be even more favorable. Preferably, angle ϕ differs from angle θ by less than 5° (|θ−ϕ|<5°), and most preferably by less than 3° (|θ−ϕ|<3°). Preferably, phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ is in a range between 7π/8 and 9π/8 rad, and most preferably in a range between 15π/16 and 17π/16 rad.

[0045] Returning to FIG. 2, in some embodiments birefringent optic 16 may include only one of phase modulator 22 or optical fiber 24, since both of these elements provide polarization mode dispersion. An embodiment having only optical fiber 24 has an advantage of being less expensive to manufacture. Polarization-maintaining optical fiber typically provides about 1 picosecond per meter (ps/m) of polarization mode dispersion. An advantage of embodiments that include optical fiber 24 is that the group delay time of birefringent optic 16 can be adjusted by simply cutting optical fiber 24 to a corresponding length.

[0046] In embodiments including both phase modulator 22 and optical fiber 24, the order of these elements may be interchanged, with the laser beam propagating first through optical fiber 24 and then through phase modulator 22. The length of optical fiber 24 and the orientation of its birefringent axes with respect to the polarization axes of phase modulator 22 can be selected to add to or subtract from the fixed group delay time of phase modulator 22. The 15 ps group delay time used in the examples above is typical for a commercially available phase modulator. Embodiments that include phase modulator 22 can add or subtract phase φ for tuning the transmission spectrum of optical apparatus 10 by simply applying an electric potential to phase modulator 22, as discussed above.

[0047] Optical fiber 14 may be omitted and optical fiber 20 joined directly to seed laser 12 to fix angle ϕ. Similarly, optical fiber 20 may be omitted and optical fiber 14 joined directly to phase modulator 22 to fix angle ϕ. Typically, a commercial seed laser would include optical fiber 14, and optical fiber 20 would be incorporated into a commercial fiber-coupled phase modulator. Therefore, joining optical fibers 14 and 20 at splice 26 is a convenient way to fix angle ϕ. Optical fiber 28 may be omitted and optical fiber 24 joined directly to polarizer 18. Again, a commercial fiber polarizer typically includes optical fiber 28, so joining optical fibers 24 and 28 at splice 32 is a convenient way to fix angle θ. Commercial fiber polarizers commonly provide linear extinction ratios that exceed 20 dB.

[0048] To better understand the operation of optical apparatus 10, it is useful to express the electric field of the laser beam as a traveling wave and a vector quantity {right arrow over (E)}, having components E.sub.X and E.sub.Y that correspond to the orthogonal polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y of birefringent optic 16. After propagation through birefringent optic 16:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}{E}_X=E\sin \left(\frac{2\pi n_{X}L}{\lambda }-\omega t\right)& \left(1\right)\end{array}$$\begin{array}{cc}{E}_Y=E\sin \left(\frac{2\pi n_{Y}L}{\lambda }-\omega t\right),& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

where n.sub.X and n.sub.Y are the respective refractive indices. Birefringent optic 16 has a fixed group delay time τ, which is the difference in propagation time for the two electric-field components E.sub.X and E.sub.Y traversing the whole length L thereof:

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}\tau =\frac{\Delta nL}{c},& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

where Δn is the difference between refractive indices n.sub.X and n.sub.Y. Therefore, E.sub.Y can be expressed as:

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{E}_Y=E\sin \left(\frac{2\pi \left(n_X+\Delta n\right)L}{\lambda }-\omega t\right)\\ =E\sin \left(\frac{2\pi n_{X}L}{\lambda }+\frac{\mathrm{\omega \Delta }\mathrm{nL}}{c}-\omega t\right)\\ =E\sin \left(\frac{2\pi n_{X}L}{\lambda }+\omega \tau -\omega t\right)\end{array}& \left(4\right)\end{array}$

to show that E.sub.Y has accumulated an additional phase ωτ relative to E.sub.X, which is dependent on frequency ω. It is this additional frequency-dependent phase that produces the different polarization states illustrated in FIG. 3B.

[0049] Polarizer 18 receives the laser beam transmitted through birefringent optic 16 and transmits the portion thereof that is in the polarizing direction. Polarizer 18 thereby transforms the frequency-dependent polarization states into a modulated power spectral density. The polarizing direction of polarizer 18 is defined, here, by a unit vector {circumflex over (p)} and is rotated by angle θ with respect to the E.sub.X component of electric field {right arrow over (E)}. Ignoring the spatial and time dependences of {right arrow over (E)}, the amplitude of the output electric field {right arrow over (E.sub.O )} can be expressed in terms of the components of {right arrow over (E)}, with the output intensity:

[00004]$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}{.Math.\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{E_O}.Math.}^2={.Math.\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{E}.Math.\hat{p}.Math.}^2\\ ={.Math.\left(\begin{array}{c}.Math.E_X.Math.\\ .Math.E_Y.Math.\exp \left(i\mathrm{\omega \tau }\right)\end{array}\right).Math.\left(\begin{array}{c}\cos \left(\theta \right)\\ \sin \left(\theta \right)\end{array}\right).Math.}^2\\ ={.Math..Math.E_X.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)+.Math.E_Y.Math.\exp \left(i\omega \tau \right)\sin \left(\theta \right).Math.}^2\\ ={.Math.E_X.Math.}^2{\cos }^2\left(\theta \right)+{.Math.E_Y.Math.}^2{\sin }^2\left(\theta \right)+2.Math.E_X.Math..Math.E_Y.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)\sin \left(\theta \right)\cos \left(\omega \tau \right)\end{array}.& \left(5\right)\end{array}$

[0050] An extinction ratio ε, which is specifically the ratio between the maximum and minimum values in the power spectral density, can be extracted from Equation (5). In a logarithmic form, the extinction ratio (in decibels) is:

[00005]$\begin{array}{cc}\epsilon =.Math.10\log \left(\frac{{.Math.E_X.Math.}^2{\cos }^2\left(\theta \right)+{.Math.E_Y.Math.}^2{\sin }^2\left(\theta \right)+2.Math.E_X.Math..Math.E_Y.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)\sin \left(\theta \right)}{{.Math.E_X.Math.}^2{\cos }^2\left(\theta \right)+{.Math.E_Y.Math.}^2{\sin }^2\left(\theta \right)-2.Math.E_X.Math..Math.E_Y.Math.\cos \left(\theta \right)\sin \left(\theta \right)}\right).Math..& \left(6\right)\end{array}$

Extinction ratio ε can be expressed in terms of the input electric field {right arrow over (E.sub.1 )} provided by seed laser 12, which is rotated by angle ϕ with respect to the components of electric field {right arrow over (E)}, such that:

[00006]$\begin{array}{cc}\stackrel{.fwdarw.}{E_I}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{E}_I\cos \varphi \\ E_I\sin \varphi \end{array}\right)& \left(7\right)\end{array}$$\mathrm{and}$$\begin{array}{cc}\epsilon =.Math.10\log \left(\frac{{\cos }^2\left(\varphi \right){\cos }^2\left(\theta \right)+{\sin }^2\left(\varphi \right){\sin }^2\left(\theta \right)+2\cos \left(\varphi \right)\sin \left(\varphi \right)\cos \left(\theta \right)\sin \left(\theta \right)}{{\cos }^2\left(\varphi \right){\cos }^2\left(\theta \right)+{\sin }^2\left(\varphi \right){\sin }^2\left(\theta \right)-2\cos \left(\varphi \right)\sin \left(\varphi \right)\cos \left(\theta \right)\sin \left(\theta \right)}\right).Math.& \left(8\right)\end{array}$

Equation 8 is symmetrical with respect to angles ϕ and θ. Extinction ratio s has the same dependence on both angles. Therefore, as a practical matter, changing angle ϕ between the input electric-field {right arrow over (E.sub.1 )} and polarization axis P.sub.X of birefringent optic 16 is equivalent to changing angle θ between the polarization axis P.sub.X and the polarizing direction {circumflex over (p)} of polarizer 18.

[0051] Equation (5) can also be rewritten in terms of the input electric field {right arrow over (E.sub.1)}:

|{right arrow over (E)}.sub.O|.sup.2=E.sub.I.sup.2 cos.sup.2(ϕ)cos.sup.2(θ)+E.sub.I.sup.2 sin.sup.2(ϕ)sin.sup.2(θ)+2E.sub.I.sup.2 cos(ϕ)sin(ϕ)cos(θ)sin(θ)cos(ωτ),   (9)

and used to determine power spectral density vs. frequency for different angles ϕ and θ, such as the plots in FIGS. 5 and 6. Including phase φ provided by phase modulator 22, which is added here to component E.sub.Y, Equation (5) can be rewritten as:

|{right arrow over (E)}.sub.O|.sup.2=E.sub.I.sup.2 cos.sup.2(ϕ)cos.sup.2(θ)+E.sub.I.sup.2 sin.sup.2(ϕ)sin.sup.2(θ)+2E.sub.I.sup.2 cos(ϕ)sin(ϕ)cos(θ)sin(θ)cos(ωτ+φ),   (10)

and used to determine plots for different phases φ, such as those in FIGS. 7-9. Numerical optimization methods can be applied with Equation 10 to determine values for angles ϕ and θ, phase φ, and group delay time τ to reshape a particular input spectrum to be closest to a desired output spectrum. In particular, these parameters can be optimized to maximize the threshold for SBS in any subsequent amplification.

[0052] FIG. 10 is a block diagram schematically illustrating one preferred embodiment 40 of MOPA laser in accordance with the present invention, which includes optical apparatus 10, a seed laser 12, and an amplifier 42. Amplifier 42 is depicted as a fiber amplifier, which may include a plurality of serially-arranged diode-pumped gain fibers. Optical apparatus 10 receives a laser beam from seed laser 12 and a portion of this laser beam is transmitted through and spectrally shaped by optical apparatus 10. Amplifier 42 receives the portion of the laser beam transmitted through optical apparatus 10 and generates an amplified laser beam having more power than the laser beam provided by seed laser 12. The transmitted portion of the laser beam preferably has a more-uniform power spectral density than the laser beam provided by seed laser 12. The amplified laser beam preferably has about the maximum power that can be safely generated by amplifier 42 without generating SBS.

[0053] Any thermal, mechanical, and acoustic stresses on the optical elements of birefringent optic 16 can change the phase delay between polarizations P.sub.X and P.sub.Y thereof. An active feedback circuit may be necessary to compensate for these stresses and maintain a desired phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ. MOPA laser 40 optionally includes a splitter 44 in optical fiber 30 to separate a small fraction the laser beam transmitted through optical apparatus 10. The separated fraction is guided to an optional analyzer 46 to determine any deviation of the actual phase delay from desired phase delay ω.sub.c+φ. After measuring the deviation, analyzer 46 would send a signal 48 to source 34 to adjust the electric potential applied to phase modulator 22 and minimize that deviation. Signal 48 could be an error signal or a control signal, depending on the capabilities of source 34.

[0054] Analyzer 46 may incorporate heterodyne detection to resolve selected frequency components within the separated fraction of the laser beam. For example, heterodyne detection using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. However, in some arrangements, a power measurement by a photodiode in analyzer 46 may be sufficient. Specifically, in arrangements having about equal angles ϕ and θ, and a group delay time τ≈2π/Δω.sub.o. Δω.sub.o is the spectral linewidth of the laser beam provided by seed laser 12. In these arrangements, a minimum power transmitted through optical apparatus 10 corresponds to phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad. Dithering and adjusting phase φ to minimize the power of the separated fraction would find and maintain a desired phase delay ω.sub.cτ+φ=π rad. This method, including a power measurement in analyzer 46, would work in the examples of spectral shaping illustrated in FIGS. 8 and 9. In particular, the method would work to maintain the optimized transmission spectra through optical apparatus 10 to maximize the SBS threshold for amplification in amplifier 42.

[0055] The present invention is described above in terms of a preferred embodiment and other embodiments. The invention is not limited, however, to the embodiments described and depicted herein. Rather, the invention is limited only by the claims appended hereto.