Peptide-Imprinted Conductive Polymer and Use Thereof

Abstract

A peptide-imprinted conductive polymer and use thereof is provided, especially a peptide-imprinted conductive polymer including conductive polymer monomer(s), two-dimensional (2D) material(s), and a small peptide fragment of α-synuclein as template. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer has high sensibility, detects α-synuclein at low concentrations, thus allowing early diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Claims

1. A peptide-imprinted conductive polymer comprising: one or more conductive polymer monomers, an α-synuclein identifying template molecule, and one or more two-dimensional (2D) materials.

2. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the one or more conductive polymer monomers is at least one substance selected from the group consisting of aniline (AN), m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN), 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), and hydroxymethyl 3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene (EDOT-OH).

3. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the one or more conductive polymer monomers is 0.001 to 50 wt %.

4. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the α-synuclein identifying template molecule is selected from peptide fragments in SEQ ID NO: 1 fulfilling the following conditions: i. the peptide fragments are 6 to 22 amino acids in length; ii. the peptide fragments contain 1 to 9 hydrophobic amino acids; and iii. the peptide fragments contain 1 to 4 aromatic amino acids.

5. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the α-synuclein identifying template molecule is 0.001 to 50 wt %.

6. The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the one or more 2D materials is at least one substance selected from the group consisting of Cr.sub.2AlC, Mn.sub.2AlC, Mo.sub.2Ga.sub.2C, Mo.sub.3AlC.sub.2, Nb.sub.2AlC, Nb.sub.2C, Nb.sub.4AlC.sub.3, Ta.sub.4AlC.sub.3, Ti.sub.2AlC, Ti.sub.2AlN, Ti.sub.2C, Ti.sub.3AlC.sub.2, Ti.sub.3C.sub.2, Ti.sub.3SiC.sub.2, V.sub.2AlC, V.sub.2C, V.sub.4AlC.sub.3, MoS.sub.2, WS.sub.2, TiS.sub.2, VS.sub.2, CoS.sub.2, NiS.sub.2, ZrS.sub.2, TcS.sub.2, RhS.sub.2, PdS.sub.2, HfS.sub.2, TaS.sub.2, ReS.sub.2, IrS.sub.2, InS.sub.2, SnS.sub.2, S.sub.2PtS.sub.2, MoSe.sub.2, WSe.sub.2, TiSe.sub.2, VSe.sub.2, CoSe.sub.2, NiSe.sub.2, ZrSe.sub.2, TeSe.sub.2, RhSe.sub.2, PdSe.sub.2, HfSe.sub.2, TaSe.sub.2, ReSe.sub.2, IrSe.sub.2, InSe.sub.2, SnSe.sub.2, Se.sub.2, PtSe.sub.2, MoTe.sub.2, WTe.sub.2, TiTe.sub.2, VTe.sub.2, CoTe.sub.2, NiTe.sub.2, ZrTe.sub.2, TcTe.sub.2, RhTe.sub.2, PdTe.sub.2, HfTe.sub.2, TaTe.sub.2, ReTe.sub.2, IrTe.sub.2, InTe.sub.2, SnTe.sub.2, Te.sub.2, and PtTe.sub.2.

7. An electrochemical biosensor comprising the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1.

8. A method of preparing the electrochemical biosensor of claim 7 comprising: preparing an electrode substrate; preparing a monomer solution with conductive polymers with a concentration of 0.001 to 50 wt %, wherein the conductive polymer monomer(s) is at least one substance selected from the group consisting of aniline (AN), m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN), 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), and hydroxymethyl 3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene (EDOT-OH); adding a template molecule with a concentration of 0.001 to 50 wt % to the monomer solution and mix; and adding a 2D material solution, causing the resulting solution to electrochemically polymerize at the electrode substrate.

9. A use of the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, wherein the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer can be applied in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.

10. (canceled)

11. A method of detecting the concentration of α-synuclein in a sample comprising: dropping standard solutions containing different concentrations of α-synuclein on the biosensor of the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of claim 1, and obtain the response current density volume of the cyclic voltammograms of the standard solutions containing different concentrations of α-synuclein with a potentiostat, and repeat measurement at least twice; obtaining the calibration curve of α-synuclein with the response current density value of the cyclic voltammograms of the standard solutions containing different concentrations of α-synuclein; dropping the sample solution on the biosensor and measure its response current density value of the cyclic voltammogram, and repeat measurement at least twice; and comparing the response current density value of the sample with the calibration curve of α-synuclein and obtain the concentration of α-synuclein in the sample.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0033] FIG. 1 shows the flowchart of the manufacturing process for the electrochemical biosensor of the α-synuclein peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of the present disclosure.

[0034] FIG. 2 shows the response current density values of different doping ratios of aniline (AN) and m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN) of the present disclosure.

[0035] FIG. 3 shows the cyclic voltammograms of different doping ratios of aniline (AN) and m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN) of the present disclosure.

[0036] FIG. 4 shows the oxidization peak values of the cyclic voltammograms of different doping ratios of aniline (AN) and m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN) of the present disclosure.

[0037] FIG. 5 shows the cyclic voltammograms of the template molecule of the present disclosure added in different concentrations.

[0038] FIG. 6 shows the response current density values of the template molecule of the present disclosure added in different concentrations.

[0039] FIG. 7 shows the calibration curves of the present disclosure with or without addition of different template molecules.

[0040] FIG. 8 shows the cyclic voltammograms of the effects of the present disclosure with the doping of different-sized transition metal sulfide 2D materials.

[0041] FIG. 9 shows the response current density values of the effects of the present disclosure with the doping of different-sized transition metal sulfide 2D materials.

[0042] FIG. 10 shows the test results of the effectiveness of doping with transition metal sulfide 2D materials.

[0043] FIG. 11 shows the electrochemical impedance measurements of the present disclosure.

[0044] FIG. 12 shows the tests on reusability of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0045] Detailed description of the present disclosure is disclosed herein. It is only given for illustrative purposes and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.

[0046] The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of the present disclosure comprises: conductive polymer monomer(s), an α-synuclein identifying template molecule, and two-dimensional (2D) material(s).

[0047] The conductive polymer monomer(s) of the present disclosure is at least one substance selected from the group consisting of aniline (AN), m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN), 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), and hydroxymethyl 3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene (EDOT-OH).

[0048] The concentration of the conductive polymer monomer(s) of the present disclosure is 0.001 to 50 wt %.

[0049] Exemplarily, aniline (AN)-doped m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN) can be selected as the conductive polymer of the present disclosure, wherein the two are dissolved in DI water respectively, and each has a concentration of 0.001 to 50 wt %, preferably 0.001 to 25 wt %, more preferably 0.001 to 10 wt %.

[0050] Preferably, the mole ratio of AN and MSAN is set between 0.001 to 20, preferably 0.25 to 4, more preferably 0.5 to 2, even more preferably 1.

[0051] The α-synuclein identifying template molecule of the present disclosure uses a small peptide fragment of the α-synuclein molecule as template. Short peptide is relatively stable and inexpensive compared to protein. However, the length of the peptide affects how easily the molecules can enter and leave the cavities. The hydrophobic nature of the amino acid contained in the peptide fragment has a decisive impact on whether the imprinted cavities formed have recognition specificity, and a proper selection of the peptide enhances the reusability of the imprinted cavities. Therefore, the α-synuclein identifying template molecule of the present disclosure is selected from peptide fragments in SEQ ID NO: 1 fulfilling the following conditions:

[0052] i. the peptide fragments are 6 to 22 amino acids in length; preferably, the peptide fragments are 10 to 15 amino acids in length;

[0053] ii. the peptide fragments contain 1 to 9 hydrophobic amino acids, wherein the hydrophobic amino acids are selected from the group consisting of: alanine (Ala), phenylalanine (Phe), isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), methionine (Met), proline (Pro), valine (Val), tryptophan (Trp); and

[0054] iii. the peptide fragments contain 1 to 4 aromatic amino acids, wherein the aromatic amino acids are selected from the group consisting of: phenylalanine (Phe), tryptophan (Trp), tyrosine (Tyr).

[0055] To increase the solubility of the template molecule of the present disclosure in the conductive polymer solution, preferably, the peptide fragments contain no more than 6 hydrophobic amino acids; more preferably, the peptide fragments contain no more than 5 hydrophobic amino acids.

[0056] Exemplarily, the peptide fragment sequences may be SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10, SEQ ID NO: 11, SEQ ID NO: 12, SEQ ID NO: 13 or SEQ ID NO: 14.

[0057] Preferably, the peptide fragment sequences are SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO: 3 or SEQ ID NO: 4; more preferably, the peptide fragment sequences are SEQ ID NO: 3 or SEQ ID NO: 4.

[0058] The concentration of the peptide template molecule is 0.001 to 50 wt %, preferably 0.01 to 25 wt %, more preferably 0.1 to 10 wt %, and even more preferably 0.1 to 0.5 wt %.

[0059] The 2D material(s) of the present disclosure is at least one substance selected from the group having the structural formula M.sub.n+1AX.sub.n or MY.sub.2, wherein the former are transition metal carbides or nitrides (or MXene), and the latter are transition metal dichalcogenides. M denotes a transition metal element, A denotes an element from group IIIA or IVA, X denotes carbon or nitrogen, Y denotes chalcogen element such as S, Se, and Te, and n=1-3. Examples include Cr.sub.2AlC, Mn.sub.2AlC, Mo.sub.2Ga.sub.2C, Mo.sub.3AlC.sub.2, Nb.sub.2AlC, Nb.sub.2C, Nb.sub.4AlC.sub.3, Ta.sub.4AlC.sub.3, Ti.sub.2AlC, Ti.sub.2AlN, Ti.sub.2C, Ti.sub.3AlC.sub.2, Ti.sub.3C.sub.2, Ti.sub.3SiC.sub.2, V.sub.2AlC, V.sub.2C, V.sub.4AlC.sub.3, MoS.sub.2, WS2, TiS.sub.2, VS.sub.2, CoS.sub.2, NiS.sub.2, ZrS.sub.2, TcS.sub.2, RhS.sub.2, PdS.sub.2, HfS.sub.2, TaS.sub.2, ReS.sub.2, IrS.sub.2, InS.sub.2, SnS.sub.2, S.sub.2PtS.sub.2, MoSe.sub.2, WSe.sub.2, TiSe.sub.2, VSe.sub.2, CoSe.sub.2, NiSe.sub.2, ZrSe.sub.2, TcSe.sub.2, RhSe.sub.2, PdSe.sub.2, TaSe.sub.2, ReSe.sub.2, IrSe.sub.2, InSe.sub.2, SnSe.sub.2, Se.sub.2, PtSe.sub.2, MoTe.sub.2, WTe.sub.2, TiTe.sub.2, VTe.sub.2, CoTe.sub.2, NiTe.sub.2, ZrTe.sub.2, TeTe.sub.2, RhTe.sub.2, PdTe.sub.2, HfTe.sub.2, TaTe.sub.2, ReTe.sub.2, IrTe.sub.2, InTe.sub.2, SnTe.sub.2, Te.sub.2, PtTe.sub.2. The conductivity of transition metal disulfide 2D materials is close to semiconductors, while MXene 2D materials have an excellent conductive nature that is close to metal, good thermostability and mechanical properties, and a particle size that can be 20 times larger.

[0060] The concentration of the 2D material(s) is 0.001 to 50 wt %, preferably 0.01 to 25 wt %, more preferably 0.05 to 10 wt %, even more preferably 0.1 to 0.5 wt %, and even further more preferably 0.25 wt %.

[0061] Exemplarily, commercial MXene or MY.sub.2 2D materials are added as dopant to the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer solution of the present disclosure to help increase the roughness and surface area of the conductive polymer thin film surface, which increases the overall conductivity and lowers the use of organic solvents in the manufacturing process.

[0062] Preferably, the size of the 2D material(s) is 0.05 to 3 μm; more preferably, the size of the 2D material(s) is 0.09 to 2.5 μm; even more preferably, the size of the 2D material(s) is 1 to 2 μm.

[0063] The present disclosure provides an electrochemical biosensor made with the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer.

[0064] The electrochemical biosensor of the present disclosure further comprises an electrode substrate, which may be made from any conductive material understood by a person skilled in the art. Examples include screen-printed electrode, indium tin oxide (ITO) substrate, PET flexible conductive glass substrate, AZO conductive substrate, FTO conductive substrate and silicon dioxide conductive substrate. The present disclosure sets no limitation in this regard.

[0065] As shown in FIG. 1, the method of preparing the electrochemical biosensor made with the α-synuclein peptide-imprinted conductive polymer comprises:

[0066] Step 1: prepare an electrode substrate 14;

[0067] Step 2: prepare a monomer solution with conductive polymers 11 with a concentration of 0.001 to 50 wt %, wherein the conductive polymer monomer(s) is at least one substance selected from the group consisting of aniline (AN), m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN), 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), and hydroxymethyl 3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene (EDOT-OH);

[0068] Step 3: add an α-synuclein identifying template molecule with a concentration of 0.001 to 50 wt % to the monomer solution and mix;

[0069] Step 4: add a 2D material 12 solution, add it to an electropolymerization pool and mix with a magnate, add an auxiliary electrode and a reference electrode, connect to the electrode substrate as working electrode, and connect to a commercial potentiostat to start the electropolymerization process;

[0070] Step 5: The finished peptide-imprinted thin film 13 is immersed in 0.05 M ethanol solution and DI water and placed on a shaker at 130 rpm for 5 minutes each. The procedure is used to remove the template molecule bound to the conductive polymer and leaves imprinted cavities with identifying ability.

[0071] The peptide-imprinted conductive polymer of the present disclosure has high sensitivity and a low limit of detection, which can detect α-synuclein in humans at low concentrations, and can be applied in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.

[0072] Examples of the present disclosure are provided below, but are not intended to limit the present disclosure.

Example 1

[0073] Testing different doping proportions of aniline (AN) and m-aminobenzenesulfonic acid (MSAN):

[0074] Dissolve AN and MSAN in DI water to a concentration of 0.057 M each, wherein the mole ratio of AN and MSAN is 1:4, 1:2, 1:1, or 4:1, and add a suitable amount of SEQ ID NO: 3 peptide to prepare a solution of 20 ml in total.

[0075] Add the solution to an electropolymerization pool and mix with a magnate, add platinum as the auxiliary electrode and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, connect to the screen-printed electrode (DropSens-250AT) as the working electrode. Connect it to a commercial potentiostat, and perform 20 cycles scanned from 0.6 V to -0.6 V at 0.1 V/s.

[0076] Immerse the finished peptide-imprinted conductive polymer in 5 wt % ethanol solution and DI water and place it on a shaker at 130 rpm for 5 minutes each. The procedure is used to remove the template molecule bound to the conductive polymer and leaves imprinted cavities with identifying ability.

[0077] Dissolve potassium chloride (KCl), potassium ferricyanide (K.sub.3[Fe(CN).sub.6]), and potassium ferrocyanide (K.sub.4[Fe(CN).sub.6]) in DI water to form a buffer solution. Starting with the buffer solution without the addition of the target molecule α-synuclein, wait for 10 minutes, and then obtain the cyclic voltammogram with a commercial potentiostat. Adsorb the measured solution with a filter paper, add drops of a solution containing 1˜1000 pg/ml target molecule, and wait another 10 minutes before measurement. Combine the two sets of data to obtain the response current density value.

[0078] The results, as shown in FIG. 2, indicate that with SEQ ID NO: 3 peptide-imprinted conductive polymer, the response current density has a maximum value with an AN: MSAN doping proportion of 1:1. As shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, with AN: MSAN being 1:1, the oxidization peak value in the cyclic voltammogram is the lowest out of the five proportions. This shows that when imprinting molecules on the polymer thin film, the lower the current value of the oxidization peak, the more cavities will be produced and the higher the response current density value.

Example 2

[0079] Testing the concentration of the template molecule added:

[0080] Select the peptides SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, and SEQ ID NO: 4, and add each peptide to a conductive polymer solution with an AN: MSAN ratio of 1 respectively to prepare three solutions. The three solutions are 20 ml each, and have a concentration of 0.1 wt %, 0.25 wt %, and 0.5 wt % respectively (i.e., adding 20 μl, 50 μl, and 100 μl of the peptide solution). Next, proceed with the electropolymerization and washing process based on the parameters in Example 1 to form the electrochemical biosensor of the peptide-imprinted conductive polymer.

[0081] As shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, after dripping in 1 pg/ml of the target molecule solution, the results indicate that peptides SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 4 have a higher response current density value at 0.5 wt % compared to other concentrations, and peptide SEQ ID NO: 3 has the highest response current density value at 0.25 wt % compared to other peptides.

[0082] As shown in FIG. 7 and Table 1, 0.5 wt % SEQ ID NO: 2, 0.25wt % SEQ ID NO: 3 and 0.5wt % SEQ ID NO: 4 are imprinted, and target molecule solutions of various concentrations are added (0.001 pg/ml to 1000 pg/ml) for testing. Compared with those imprinted with peptides SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 4, the results show that the conductive polymer with the peptide SEQ ID NO: 3 imprinted has the highest response current density value 971±47 μA/cm.sup.2, and excellent imprinting effectiveness (α) 2.52. Imprinting effectiveness (α)=MIPs current/NIPs current, wherein MIPs denote imprinted thin films, and NIPs denote non-imprinted thin films.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Imprinting effectiveness MIPs NIPs α 0.5 wt % 410 ± 12 μA/cm.sup.2 386 ± 28 μA/cm.sup.2 1.1 SEQ ID NO: 2 0.25 wt % 971 ± 47 μA/cm.sup.2 386 ± 12 μA/cm.sup.2 2.5 SEQ ID NO: 3 0.5 wt % 740 μA/cm.sup.2 370 ± 4 μA/cm.sup.2 2.0 SEQ ID NO: 4

Example 3

[0083] Testing the doping effects of transition metal sulfide 2D materials and sizes:

[0084] Prepare an electrochemical biosensor with non-imprinted polymer (NIP) as the control group, and prepare an electrochemical biosensor with 0.25 wt % SEQ ID NO: 3-imprinted conductive polymer (MIP) as the experimental group. Compare the results of using three kinds of commercially available 2D materials at different concentrations, namely 90 nm WS.sub.2, 2μm WS.sub.2, and 2 μm MoS.sub.2, as dopants. First, dissolve the three materials in DI water to prepare solutions of 0.1 wt %, 0.25 wt %, and 0.5 wt % respectively (i.e., adding 20 μl, 50 μl, and 100 μl of the materials). Add the solutions to the electropolymerization pool to evenly mix with the conductive monomer solution and the template molecule. The electropolymerization, washing process and parameters remain the same as Example 1. Starting with the buffer solution without the addition of α-synuclein, wait for 10 minutes, and then obtain the cyclic voltammogram with a commercial potentiostat. Adsorb the measured solution with a filter paper, add drops of a solution containing 1 pg/ml α-synuclein, and wait another 10 minutes before measurement.

[0085] As shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, the response current density value with the addition of 0.25 wt % transition metal sulfide 2D materials is higher than other concentrations, and the oxidization peak values in the cyclic voltammograms are the lowest among the three concentrations. The addition of 0.25 wt % 2 μm WS.sub.2 results in the highest response current density value and the lowest oxidization peak value compared with the other 2D materials.

Example 4

[0086] Testing the doping effects of transition metal sulfide 2D materials:

[0087] Prepare an electrochemical biosensor with non-imprinted polymer (NIP) as the control group, and prepare an electrochemical biosensor with 0.25 wt % SEQ ID NO: 3-imprinted conductive polymer (MIP) as the experimental group. Use the commercially available 2 μm WS.sub.2 as the doping agent, and compare whether its addition improves the biosensor and the imprinting effectiveness. First, dissolve 0.25 wt % 2 μm WS.sub.2 in DI water, and add it to the electropolymerization pool to evenly mix with the conductive monomer solution and the template molecule. The electropolymerization, washing process and parameters remain the same as Example 1. Starting with the buffer solution without the addition of α-synuclein, wait for 10 minutes, and then obtain the cyclic voltammogram with a commercial potentiostat. Adsorb the measured solution with a filter paper, and take the α-synuclein solutions with low to high concentrations. Add drops of each solution and wait another 10 minutes before measurement. Combine the multiple sets of data to obtain the calibration line for the adsorption of α-synuclein.

[0088] As shown in FIG. 10 and Table 2, with the adsorption of 100 pg/ml α-synuclein, the peptide SEQ ID NO: 3 MIP/WS.sub.2 biosensor has the response current density value of 1309±28 μA/cm.sup.2, which is significantly higher than the response current density value 712±12 μA/cm.sup.2 of that without the WS.sub.2 thin film. The biosensor with WS.sub.2 also exhibits a 1.6 times improvement in imprinting effectiveness. Imprinting effectiveness (α)=MIPs current/NIPs current, wherein MIPs denote imprinted thin films, and NIPs denote non-imprinted thin films.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Imprinting effectiveness MIPs NIPs α 0.25 wt % 1309 ± 28 μA/cm.sup.2 494 ± 106 μA/cm.sup.2 2.7 SEQ ID NO: 3 0.25 wt % 2 μm WS.sub.2 0.25 wt % 712 ± 12 μA/cm.sup.2 422 ± 23 μA/cm.sup.2 1.7 SEQ ID NO: 3

[0089] Electrochemical impedance analysis further confirms that, as shown in FIG. 11, after the addition of the 2 μm WS.sub.2 2D material, the electrochemical biosensor of the peptide SEQ ID NO: 3—imprinted conductive polymer has a decreased Rct value, corresponding to the increase in response current density value after adding the 2 μm WS.sub.2. The non-peptide-imprinted thin film shows no significant difference in Rct value before and after the addition of 2 μm WS.sub.2.

Example 5

[0090] Reusability Test:

[0091] Prepare an electrochemical biosensor with α-synuclein peptide-imprinted conductive polymer with the same steps as Example 1. The molecular ratio of AN: MSAN is 1:1, 0.25 wt % peptide SEQ ID NO: 3 template molecule is imprinted, and 0.25 wt % 2 μm WS.sub.22D material is added. Wash and remove the target molecule (α-synuclein) bound to the cavities with the washing procedure in Example 1. Reuse the same testing solution, and repeat multiple times until the electrode exhibits clear decline in performance in order to test its reusability. As shown in FIG. 12, after 7 consecutive adsorption and desorption, the relative response current density shows an 8% decline in the electrode's performance, which indicates an excellent reusability of the biosensor.