Offshore Structure
20170356152 · 2017-12-14
Assignee
Inventors
- David Leonard HALL (Cheadle Hulme, GB)
- Gary DEAN (Chart Sutton, GB)
- Duncan KNIGHT (Aberdeen, GB)
- Anthony CLARK (Great Hatfield, GB)
- Andrew KIRKPATRICK (Darlington, GB)
- Paul OLIVER (Stockton-on-Tees, GB)
- Bruce John MUNRO (Oldmeldrum, GB)
- Lindsay MCKAY (Peterculter, GB)
- Alan RODGER (Aberdeen, GB)
- Eric REID (Aberdeen, GB)
- Donald MACLEOD (Aberdeenshire, GB)
Cpc classification
E02B17/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16C33/74
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E02B2017/0039
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02B17/02
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16C23/045
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
E02B17/02
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02B17/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F16C33/74
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
An offshore structure includes an original structure and an extension structure. The original structure includes a main platform supported via a foundation on a seabed. The extension structure includes a platform extension positioned laterally of the main platform and a platform extension support, depending downwardly from the platform extension, into contact with the foundation, so as to support the extension structure directly on the foundation.
Claims
1. An offshore structure comprising: an original structure comprising a jacket and a main platform supported via a foundation installed in a seabed to bear a load; and an extension structure comprising a platform extension positioned laterally of the main platform and a platform extension support, depending downwardly from the platform extension, into contact with the foundation, so as to support the weight of the extension structure directly on the foundation, and not through the jacket of the original structure.
2. The offshore structure according to claim 1, wherein the foundation comprises pilings driven into the seabed.
3. The offshore structure according to claim 2, wherein the extension structure is directly supported on at least one of the pilings.
4. The offshore structure according to claim 3, wherein the extension structure is directly supported on only one piling.
5. The offshore structure according to claim 3, wherein the at least one of the pilings has a machined upper surface.
6. The offshore structure according to claim 3, wherein the at least one of the pilings has a hollow upper end.
7. The offshore structure according to claim 6, wherein a bottom end of the platform extension support fits into the hollow upper end of the at least one of the pilings.
8. The offshore structure according to claim 7, further comprising a flange positioned above the bottom end of the platform extension support, wherein the flange has an outer width larger than a width of the hollow upper end of the at least one of the pilings.
9. The offshore structure according to claim 1, wherein a bottom end of the platform extension support comprises a substantially conical point.
10. The offshore structure according to claim 1, wherein the extension structure is a monocolumn structure.
11. The offshore structure according to claim 10, wherein the monocolumn structure depends substantially vertically downwardly from the extension platform.
12. The offshore structure according to claim 10, wherein the monocolumn structure tapers in width at a lower end.
13. The offshore structure according to claim 1, further comprising a lateral brace connecting the extension structure to the original structure.
14. The offshore structure according to claim 13, wherein the brace is in the form of truss.
15. The offshore structure according to claim 14, wherein the truss is a two-dimensional truss.
16. The offshore structure according to claim 13, wherein the brace is connected to the extension structure by at least one bearing allowing both rotational and translational motion of the extension structure relative to the brace.
17. The offshore structure according to claim 16, wherein the at least one bearing comprises a bushing attached to the extension structure.
18. The offshore structure according to claim 17, wherein the brace is connected by two bearings, and wherein the bushings of each bearing are substantially parallel to each other.
19. A kit for extending an offshore structure comprising a jacket, the offshore structure being supported via a foundation installed in a seabed to bear a load, the kit comprising: an extension structure comprising a platform extension positionable laterally of a main platform of the offshore structure; and a platform extension support depending downwardly, in use, from the platform extension so as to come into contact with a foundation of the main platform, to support the weight of the platform extension directly on the foundations of the offshore structure and not through the jacket of the offshore structure.
20. A method of extending an offshore structure, the offshore structure comprising a jacket and a main platform supported via a foundation installed in a seabed to bear a load, the method comprising: providing an extension structure, comprising a platform extension and a platform extension support; positioning the platform extension laterally of the main platform; and positioning the platform extension support, depending downwardly from the platform extension, in contact with the foundation so as to support the weight of the platform extension directly on the foundation and not through the jacket of the offshore structure.
Description
DRAWINGS
[0024] Example embodiments are described below, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0032] As discussed above, the present disclosure is concerned with providing a new way of extending existing offshore structures.
[0033]
[0034] The main platform (11) is supported via a foundation (40) on the seabed. In
[0035] The jacket section (12) includes the foundations (40). Foundations (40) typically comprise piles (41) (see
[0036] Pilings (41) are typically steel tubes that are driven into the sea floor. The pilings (41) typically have a reinforced, machined, top end that has a thicker tube wall (for example 100 mm instead of 70 mm) for the purpose of driving the piling down into the sea floor.
[0037] In some cases, pilings (41) are not driven all the way into the sea floor, but are driven to the point at which they can be driven no further or have achieved the required penetration per hammer blows to meet designed capacity. In that case, the unused length of piling (41), not driven into the foundations, are usually cut short above the foundations, so that the free end of the pile does not extend a significant distance away from the foundations. However, if a piling (41) is driven to its full depth, no such cutting of the piling is required, and the machined top end is left intact. In either case, the piling (41) will usually have a hollow upper end.
[0038]
[0039] The extension (20) has an extension supporting section (22) extending downwardly from the extension platform section (21) and towards the foundations (40) of the original structure (10). The supporting section (22) extends into contact with the foundations (40), so that the extension (20) is supported directly on the foundations (40). That is, the foundation (40) bears the weight of the extension (20). Further, the foundation (40) bears the weight of the extension (20) directly, and not through the jacket (12) of the main structure, for example, in contrast to a cantilevered extension from a jacket section.
[0040] As such, although stand-alone monocolumn platforms as such are known, the extension (20) differs from those conventional columns, because it does not have its own supporting base. Further, such conventional structures are typically used in shallow water (e.g. about 50 m) and so providing lateral intermediate stabilisation truss (50) is not normally a major concern. In contrast, in the present disclosure, the monocolumn extension can be used in waters up to 140 m in depth or even more.
[0041] The monocolumn (22) is further connected to the original structure (10) via a truss section (50), which acts as a lateral brace for the monocolumn (22). The truss section (50) is above the sea surface. The truss section (50) provides a stabilising connection to the original structure, to hold the monocolumn (22) in place. The connection of the truss (50) to the monocolumn (22) is discussed in more detail below.
[0042] An upper section of the monocolumn (22) comprises a lattice truss construction around the central monocolumn core. The monocolumn core also reduces in width within this section. This reduces the environmental dynamic loading from the monocolumn (22) onto the main structure (10) via the truss (50) by providing a reduced surface area for waves to impact against. This reduces the force that any waves can apply to the monocolumn (22), whilst ensuring that the extension remains strong (to protect it, for example, against attendant vessel impacts). This arrangement therefore mitigates against fatigue occurring in the connections between the jacket (12) and truss (50) and the truss (50) and monocolumn (22).
[0043]
[0044] In
[0045] The bottom portion of the monocolumn (22) further comprises a steel flange (24) around the tapered section (23). The steel flange can be fully welded around the conical section of the monocolumn. The flange (24) provides a surface that can abut against the top of the pile (41), further assisting in locating the monocolumn into the foundations and helping in the transfer of load from the module (21) and the monocolumn (22) into the foundation piles (41). The flange (24) can have a width (usually a diameter) that is larger than the outer width (usually a diameter) of the pile (41) in which the extension section (22) is located. This ensures that that the extension (20) is located as securely as possible.
[0046] Although
[0047]
[0048] In
[0049]
[0050] Even though the extension (20) and original structure (10) share the same foundations, the monocolumn (22) and the original structure (10) will be subject to differing forces, due to waves or vessel impact for example. As such, the monocolumn (22) may twist and/or bend relative to the original structure (10).
[0051] The bearing joint (60) is shown in more detail in
[0052] The grouting (64) between the bushing (63) and the support column (26) allows for some adjustment when positioning the bushing (63) on the support column (26). This is helpful when there are multiple bearing joints (60), as it allows the cylindrical bushings to be aligned substantially parallel with each other, thus facilitating the same movements occurring in the individual bearings at the same time.
[0053] A spherical bearing, comprising an outer bearing member (61) and an inner bearing (62) are positioned around the bushing (63). The inner surface of the inner bearing member (62) bears against the outer surface of the cylindrical bushing (63). The inner surface of the inner bearing element (62) is preferably of cylindrical shape. The inner bearing element (62) is thus able to move parallel to the cylindrical axis of the bushing (63) (i.e. moving from one end of the bushing (63) to the other) and is also able to rotate around the bushing (63) (i.e. within a plane perpendicular to the cylindrical axis of the bushing (63). The bearing surfaces are lubricated in order to provide very low friction surfaces. The surfaces are the inner surface of the inner bearing element (62) and the outer surface of the bushing (63). Similarly, it is desirable to lubricate the outer surface of the inner bearing element (62) and the inner surface of the outer bearing element (61). Lubrication in the form of oil, grease, PTFE impregnated tape, for example, can be used.
[0054] The outer surface of the inner bearing element (62) is curved. The outer surface of the inner bearing element (62) bears against the outer bearing element (61). The outer bearing element has a bearing surface complimentary in shape to the outer bearing surface of the inner bearing element (62). Preferably, the outer bearing surface of the inner bearing element (62) is convex, and the bearing surface of the outer bearing element (61) is concave. Preferably, the outer bearing surface of the inner bearing element (62) is the surface of a spherical segment. That is, preferably the outer bearing surface of the inner bearing element (62) forms part of the surface of a sphere. This allows the greatest freedom of motion between the inner and outer bearing elements (61) and (62).
[0055] The spherical bearing (61) (62) allows for rotational movement between the truss section and the support column (26). As such, the combination of the spherical bearing and the bearing along the bushing (63) allows both rotational and translational movement between the truss (50) and the monocolumn (22), thus minimizing the transmission of any torsional stresses into the truss (50) due to motion of the monocolumn (22).
[0056] The bearing elements (61) and (62) are housed within a housing comprising elements (65) and (66). Housing elements (65) and (66) are designed to slide together in a wedge formation in order to assist in positioning the bearing joint on the support column (26).
[0057] Due to the harsh environmental conditions experienced on offshore structures, the bearing joint (60) incorporates several measures in order to ensure that the bearing surfaces are kept clean.
[0058] A further lip seal (70) is present at the outer edges of the inner bearing surface of the inner bearing element (62). Once again, this lip seal provides an additional barrier to any dirt or contaminants, thus allowing the bearing surface (62) to move as freely as possible over the bushing (63).
[0059] Similarly, measures are taken to maintain the integrity of the bearing surface between the inner bearing member (62) and the outer bearing member (61). A protective packing (71) is positioned between the housing element (67) and the bearing element (61) and (62). Protective packing (71) is positioned at the outer interface of the bearing surface between the two bearing elements, and forms a physical barrier to prevent any contaminants entering between the two bearing elements. Additionally, an O-ring (72) is positioned towards the edge of the bearing surface of the outer bearing element, to provide an additional barrier to any contaminants.
[0060] In addition to these precautions, taken close to the individual bearing faces, the housing is further sealed by a flexible rubber bellows material (73), thus providing an overall seal between the outermost housing element (60) and the support column (26). The flexible nature of the bellows seal (73) allows for the seal to be maintained even as the extension (20) and the truss (50) move relative to each (i.e. even as the bearing joints (60) move).
[0061] Either or both of the lip seals (68) and (70) may be biased towards the bushing (63) by the use of a ring spring, for example.
[0062] In use, the monocolumn (22) is vertically supported on the foundations (40) of the original structure (10). The monocolumn (22) directly contacts the foundation (40). That is, the monocolumn (22) rests on the foundation (40). The truss (50) provides a means for transferring any lateral loads from the monocolumn (22) (i.e. induced by wave motion) to the jacket (12) of the original structure, thus providing lateral support for the monocolumn (22). Because the truss (50) is rigidly fixed to the jacket (12) (for example by welding) the possibility of stresses being induced in the truss (50) due to vertical forces/displacement at the monocolumn connection is minimized by the use of the bearing joints (60), which effectively form pin connections that are moment released. Monitoring of the bearing performance and the torsional loads in the truss are monitored by means of suitably positioned strain gauges and recording and monitoring system to detect any increased torsional loading into the truss should problems with the bearings occur. This allows preventative maintenance to be undertaken rather than shutting down the platform when fatal problems occur.
[0063] To further ensure that the pinned bearing joints (60) are free to move vertically, it may be desirable to support the weight of the truss (50) using additional hangers from the original structure (10).
[0064] The monocolumn (22) may be installed in place by a heavy lift vessel, for example. Once the extension platform has been positioned laterally of the original structure, vertical support can be provided whilst the extension is lowered and located into the pile (41) of the foundations (40) whilst lateral support can be provided by arms extending from the truss (50). As the monocolumn is installed, the truss can further be utilized to mount equipment to assist in the aligning of the column into the correct vertical alignment with respect to the platform, once the column is supported on the pile. As such, the monocolumn extension can be provided as a kit for extending an existing offshore structure.
[0065] Although the above description has focused on the provision of an extension (20) comprising a monocolumn (22), the concept of utilizing a foundation of an existing offshore structure to directly support an extension is applicable to any form of extension. For example, the extension could have two supporting legs that each supported on a different section of the foundation. Further, the extension support section need not be straight (although this gives benefits in terms of balance) and could incorporate dog-legs for example. Any alteration of the center of gravity could be compensated for by attaching the extension to the original structure at higher points, to absorb the lateral load.
[0066] The above description is provided by way of example only, and is not intended to be limiting upon the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims.