Use of electromagnetic field for tomographic imaging of head
11253164 · 2022-02-22
Assignee
Inventors
- Serguei Y Semenov (Vienna, AT)
- Abouzar Hamidipour (Vienna, AT)
- Markus Hopfer (Schwanberg, AT)
- Ramon Planas Badenas (Vienna, AT)
Cpc classification
A61B2562/222
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G06T11/006
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
An electromagnetic tomographic system for imaging a human head includes a base, an imaging chamber, at least one ring of antennas, a plurality of antenna controllers, and an image processing computer system. The imaging chamber is supported on the base and defines an imaging domain in which the head is received. The antennas are supported by the imaging chamber and encircle the imaging domain. Each controller comprises circuitry carried on a printed circuit board and is dedicated to a respective antenna. Each controller controls operation of a corresponding antenna. In operation, while one antenna is transmitting an electromagnetic signal into the imaging domain, a plurality of the antennas are simultaneously receiving the signal after passing through the imaging domain. The received signals of the plurality of antennas are simultaneously measured. Data representative of the measure electromagnetic signals is output by the controllers and used for image processing.
Claims
1. An electromagnetic tomographic system for imaging a human head, comprising: a base; an imaging chamber, supported on the base, that defines an imaging domain in which a human head is received; at least one ring of antennas, supported by the imaging chamber and encircling the imaging domain; a plurality of antenna controllers, each antenna controller comprising circuitry carried on a printed circuit board, wherein each of the plurality of antenna controllers is dedicated to a respective antenna in the ring of antennas, and wherein the circuitry of each respective antenna controller controls operation of the corresponding antenna and also provides, as output, data representative of measured electromagnetic field signals received by such antenna; and an image processing computer system that receives, from the plurality of antenna controllers, the output data representative of the measured electromagnetic field signals received by the respective antennas and derives image data therefrom.
2. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the circuitry for each respective antenna controller is carried on one or more dedicated printed circuit board that are separate from the respective printed circuit boards for the other antenna controllers.
3. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 2, wherein the circuitry for each antenna controller includes radio frequency (RF) transceiver circuitry that has a transmit side and a receive side that are alternately connected to the antenna using an RF switch.
4. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 2, further comprising a plurality of antenna adapters, wherein each of the plurality of antenna adapters is dedicated to a respective antenna in the ring of antennas, and wherein the antennas and antennas adapters include circuitry that is carried on a dedicated printed circuit board that is separate from the respective printed circuit boards for the other antennas and antenna adapters.
5. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 4, wherein the circuitry for each antenna and antenna adapter and the circuitry for the corresponding antenna controller are carried together on a single respective printed circuit board.
6. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 4, wherein the circuitry for each antenna and antenna adapter is carried on a first printed circuit board in a first module and the circuitry for the antenna controller corresponding to the antenna and antenna adapter is carried on a second printed circuit board in a second module.
7. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 6, wherein each respective first printed circuit board module is connected to its corresponding second printed circuit board module via one or more cable.
8. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 6, wherein the second printed circuit boards for all of the antennas are housed together in a location separate from the antenna rings.
9. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 6, wherein the plurality of second printed circuit boards are arranged in a ring around the first printed circuit boards such that each respective second printed circuit board is disposed adjacent its corresponding first printed circuit board.
10. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 2, wherein the circuitry for each respective antenna controller includes an analog to digital converter (ADC), carried on the one or more dedicated printed circuit board, such that the data representative of measured electromagnetic field signals received by the corresponding antenna may be generated.
11. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 10, wherein the circuitry for each respective antenna controller includes a digital signal processor carried on the one or more dedicated printed circuit boards.
12. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the imaging chamber is cylindrical and includes at least three rings of antennas.
13. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 12, wherein each of the at least three rings of antennas includes a number of antennas that is equal to the number of antennas in each of the other rings.
14. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the imaging chamber is semispherical and includes at least three rings of antennas.
15. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 14, wherein each of the at least three rings of antennas includes a number of antennas that is different from the number of antennas in each of the other rings.
16. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the imaging chamber translates relative to the base.
17. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 16, wherein the imaging chamber translates horizontally relative to the base.
18. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 16, wherein the imaging chamber translates vertically relative to the base.
19. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 16, wherein the imaging chamber rotates upward and downward relative to the base.
20. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the antennas are waveguide antennas.
21. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the antennas are slot antennas.
22. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the image processing computer system is integrated with the electromagnetic tomographic scanner.
23. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the image processing computer system is disposed in the same room as the electromagnetic tomographic scanner.
24. The electromagnetic tomographic system of claim 1, wherein the image processing computer system is disposed in a room that is different from a room in which the electromagnetic tomographic scanner is disposed.
25. An electromagnetic tomographic system for imaging a human head, comprising: a base; an imaging chamber, supported on the base, that defines an imaging domain in which a human head is received; at least one ring of antennas, supported by the imaging chamber and encircling the imaging domain; a plurality of antenna controllers, each antenna controller comprising circuitry, utilizing a superheterodyne technology-based architecture, that is dedicated to a respective antenna in the ring of antennas, and wherein the circuitry of each respective antenna controller controls operation of the corresponding antenna and also provides, as output, data representative of measured electromagnetic field signals received by such antenna; and an image processing computer system that receives, from the plurality of antenna controllers, the output data representative of the measured electromagnetic field signals received by the respective antennas and derives image data therefrom.
26. An electromagnetic tomographic scanner for use in imaging a human head, comprising: a base; an imaging chamber, supported on the base, that defines an imaging domain; at least one ring of antennas, supported by the imaging chamber and encircling the imaging domain; a plurality of antenna controllers, each antenna controller comprising circuitry carried on a printed circuit board, wherein each of the plurality of antenna controllers is dedicated to a respective antenna in the ring of antennas, and wherein the circuitry of each respective antenna controller controls operation of the corresponding antenna and also provides, as output, data representative of measured electromagnetic field signals received by such antenna.
27. An electromagnetic tomographic scanner for use in imaging a human head, comprising: a base; an imaging chamber, supported on the base, that defines an imaging domain; at least one ring of antennas, supported by the imaging chamber and encircling the imaging domain; and a plurality of antenna controllers, each antenna controller comprising circuitry, utilizing a superheterodyne technology-based architecture, that is dedicated to a respective antenna in the ring of antennas; wherein the circuitry of each respective antenna controller controls operation of the corresponding antenna and also provides, as output, data representative of measured electromagnetic field signals received by such antenna.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
(2) Further features, embodiments, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, wherein:
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(34) As a preliminary matter, it will readily be understood by one having ordinary skill in the relevant art (“Ordinary Artisan”) that the present invention has broad utility and application. Furthermore, any embodiment discussed and identified as being “preferred” is considered to be part of a best mode contemplated for carrying out the present invention. Other embodiments also may be discussed for additional illustrative purposes in providing a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. As should be understood, any embodiment may incorporate only one or a plurality of the above-disclosed aspects of the invention and may further incorporate only one or a plurality of the above-disclosed features. Moreover, many embodiments, such as adaptations, variations, modifications, and equivalent arrangements, will be implicitly disclosed by the embodiments described herein and fall within the scope of the present invention.
(35) Accordingly, while the present invention is described herein in detail in relation to one or more embodiments, it is to be understood that this disclosure is illustrative and exemplary of the present invention, and is made merely for the purposes of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. The detailed disclosure herein of one or more embodiments is not intended, nor is to be construed, to limit the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention, which scope is to be defined by the claims and the equivalents thereof. It is not intended that the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention be defined by reading into any claim a limitation found herein that does not explicitly appear in the claim itself.
(36) Thus, for example, any sequence(s) and/or temporal order of steps of various processes or methods that are described herein are illustrative and not restrictive. Accordingly, it should be understood that, although steps of various processes or methods may be shown and described as being in a sequence or temporal order, the steps of any such processes or methods are not limited to being carried out in any particular sequence or order, absent an indication otherwise. Indeed, the steps in such processes or methods generally may be carried out in various different sequences and orders while still falling within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention is to be defined by the appended claims rather than the description set forth herein.
(37) Additionally, it is important to note that each term used herein refers to that which the Ordinary Artisan would understand such term to mean based on the contextual use of such term herein. To the extent that the meaning of a term used herein—as understood by the Ordinary Artisan based on the contextual use of such term—differs in any way from any particular dictionary definition of such term, it is intended that the meaning of the term as understood by the Ordinary Artisan should prevail.
(38) Regarding applicability of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶6, no claim element is intended to be read in accordance with this statutory provision unless the explicit phrase “means for” or “step for” is actually used in such claim element, whereupon this statutory provision is intended to apply in the interpretation of such claim element.
(39) Furthermore, it is important to note that, as used herein, “a” and “an” each generally denotes “at least one,” but does not exclude a plurality unless the contextual use dictates otherwise. Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having an apple” describes “a picnic basket having at least one apple” as well as “a picnic basket having apples.” In contrast, reference to “a picnic basket having a single apple” describes “a picnic basket having only one apple.”
(40) When used herein to join a list of items, “or” denotes “at least one of the items,” but does not exclude a plurality of items of the list. Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having cheese or crackers” describes “a picnic basket having cheese without crackers,” “a picnic basket having crackers without cheese,” and “a picnic basket having both cheese and crackers.” Finally, when used herein to join a list of items, “and” denotes “all of the items of the list.” Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having cheese and crackers” describes “a picnic basket having cheese, wherein the picnic basket further has crackers,” as well as describes “a picnic basket having crackers, wherein the picnic basket further has cheese.”
(41) Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like components throughout the several views, one or more preferred embodiments of the present invention are next described. The following description of one or more preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45) It will be appreciated that in various embodiments, the electromagnetic tomographic scanner may take various forms. In this regard,
(46) In yet further embodiments, a bed may be incorporated into an electromagnetic tomographic scanner. In this regard,
(47) Although the various electromagnetic tomographic scanners described herein 110,410,510,610 take different forms from one another, each scanner provides the ability to position a base, which is generally but not necessarily always supported on wheels, near a patient 108, supported on a bed, and then repositioning a movable portion, including an imaging chamber, relative to the patient's head such that it surrounds the portion of the patient's head 109 to be imaged without the patient 108 being required to move. Furthermore, the movable portion of the scanner includes not only the imaging chamber but the electronics, as described further herein, such that the electronics move with the imaging chamber relative to the base. The movement may be linear (vertical, horizontal, or in some cases at a non-vertical/non-horizontal angle), radial, or both. In some embodiments, movement is preferably effectuated manually, so as to provide more immediate control by an operator, but in at least some embodiments some measure of automated control (such as may be applied via a foot pedal) may be provided. In at least some embodiments, the location and/or orientation of the imaging chamber may be locked into place once positioned as desired. Such scanners may be physically located in hospital environments (e.g., emergency department, intensive care units (ICUs), specialized stroke units, or the like) or, in some embodiments, in other locations (e.g, an ambulance). It will be appreciated that a single hospital or other facility may make use of multiple scanners, and that such scanners may or may not be of different types, but that a plurality of scanners may be supported by a single image processing computer system 128 that is typically located remotely from some or all of the scanners. For the sake of simplicity, however, only a single scanner 110 of the type shown in
(48) As described above, EMT imaging of high dielectric contrast objects, including biological objects, involves the very complicated problem of so-called “diffraction tomography.” A high dielectric contrast between tissues with high water content, such as but not limited to muscle tissue, and low water content, such as but not limited to bone, presents an additional complication when using EM fields for imaging. Specialized hardware in the scanner 110 and image reconstruction methods 3100 are preferably utilized to solve the so-called “diffraction tomography” problem.
(49) As noted previously, the imaging domain 21 of the imaging chamber system 150 is defined by and within the imaging chamber 160. In this regard,
(50)
(51) In alternative embodiments, imaging chambers of other topologies may be utilized. In this regard,
(52) The antennas are preferably designed to produce a particular pattern of radiation in order to improve the image reconstruction process. In this regard,
(53) The antennas 165,765 preferably operate simultaneously, wherein each antenna 165,765 is integrated or connected to its own transceiver and signal analyzer. In this regard,
(54) In some embodiments, it may be possible to use a sequential or “switching” approach such as that described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 9,414,749. Such an approach is shown as an alternative embodiment in
(55) When imaging a human brain, it is generally useful, and often even necessary, to have a fairly large number of antennas (for example, 177 or 192 in the various specific embodiments illustrated herein). Large numbers of antennas likewise require an increase in the size of the switch matrix 850. Unfortunately, these switches are relatively large and have fixed physical dimensions, and their size and weight has a substantial effect on the overall size and weight of the system. In the simultaneous approach, by contrast, the switch matrix 850 is not necessary. Instead, integrating such circuitry with each antenna (thereby avoiding the need for a switch matrix) improves technical specifications of the system (such as reducing data acquisition time from tens of minutes to milliseconds, effectively improving signal-to-noise ratio by avoiding movement artifacts of live biological objects during the resulting short (millisecond) data acquisition time, and allowing for circulation-gated imaging) and reduces the weight and dimensions of the system by at least a factor of two.
(56) Another drawback to the sequential approach is a lack of scalability. If additional antennas are desired (for greater precision or the like), the switch matrix must be redesigned with ever-increasing complexity. In the simultaneous approach, if additional antennas are desired, they are simply added.
(57) It will also be appreciated that the dielectric properties of both the matching media and the human brain itself are highly attenuative. (As further discussed hereinbelow, in at least some preferred embodiments, the matching media is formulated so as to have dielectric properties similar to the “average” dielectric properties of a human brain.) Thus, as the signals are sent and received, there is a decrease in magnitude of the wave properties as they travel due to absorption and scattering of the signals. This, in turn, requires the use of lengthy measurement times (e.g., 10 milliseconds) in order to achieve a good signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. When these measurements are carried out sequentially, a separate measurement must be carried out for each combination of transmitting and receiving antenna. Thus, for example, if all possible measurements are made in a system in which 192 antennas are used, there are a total of 192×191 measurement periods which require a total measurement time of 192×191×10 milliseconds, which totals more than 6 minutes. Operation of the switch matrix to adjust control from one pair of antennas to another requires still further time. Unfortunately, it is difficult if not impossible for the human body to remain completely free of movement for 6 minutes or more, which means that taking measurements over such a long period of time inevitably introduces additional “movement” noise into the results.
(58) In the simultaneous approach, by contrast, the data acquisition times are much shorter because measurements are made at all receiving antennas simultaneously. For example, if all possible measurements are made in a system in which 192 antennas are used, then 191 measurements are made simultaneously (in parallel) while each of the 192 antennas is transmitting. Assuming the measurement time remains the same (e.g., 10 milliseconds), there are a total of only 192 measurement periods which require a total measurement time of 192×10 milliseconds, which totals only about 2 seconds.
(59) Overall, the simultaneous approach thus allows for considerably shorter data acquisition times as compared to a sequential approach, reduces the size and weight of the necessary hardware, provides greater scalability, and is better able to provide more measured components for the complex-valued tensors used in image reconstruction processes described elsewhere herein.
(60) In at least some embodiments, the radio frequency (RF) transceiver circuitry and related hardware may be implemented using a superheterodyne technology-based architecture, wherein radio signals are converted to/from a fixed intermediate frequency (IF) that can be more conveniently processed than the original carrier frequency. In this regard,
(61) The heart of a preferred RF transceiver 272 is a frequency synthesizer that provides a high frequency carrier signal (e.g. 1 GHz) for the analog modulation/demodulation process. Similarly, an IF carrier signal is modulated/demodulated using the back-end digital signal. Filtering, amplification, and other IF functions are likewise carried out in the IF stage 275, and signal/data conversion (DAC/ADC) and digital post processing are conducted in the baseband stage 278.
(62) Notably, quadrature modulation is applied such that the IF signal has both in-phase and quadrature components. These two components allow for vector analysis, or the tracking of changes in both amplitude and phase of the received signal. Furthermore, because the transmitter and receiver share a common clock oscillator 290, amplitude and phase of the received signal can be determined with reference to the transmit signal.
(63) Depending on the design of the antennas 165,765, the RF transceiver circuitry 272, and the control thereof, the interconnection might be realized by semi-rigid coaxial cables or printed strip lines. In a preferred embodiment, this is realized with a two-module PCB-based implementation of antennas and corresponding RF transceiver circuitry. In an example of such an arrangement, the necessary functionality for the antennas 165,765 is implemented on a first module and the necessary RF transceiver circuitry 272 is implemented on a second module, wherein each module includes a PCB that is about 40 sq. cm. in size, and the modules are interconnected via coaxial cables. By removing the switch matrix technology and introducing PCB-based technology, significant weight and size reductions in hardware are obtained.
(64) It will be appreciated that for simultaneous operation, the individual controllers must be synchronized. In this regard,
(65) When dedicated RF transceiver circuitry 272 is utilized for each antenna 165,765, performance variations between each of the transmitting (Tx) or receiving (Rx) channels can be expected due to the imperfections of manufacturing and assembly. Therefore, an equalization technique, referred to as a calibration process, is desirable in order to quantify the received signals relative to each other and thus compensate for such variations. In this regard,
(66) The matching media is a fluid or gel that is used to address electromagnetic body-matching problems and/or other issues. In at least some embodiments, the matching liquid is a mixture of glycerol (Ph. Eur.), water and brine. In at least some preferred embodiments, the matching media is formulated so as to have dielectric permittivity (ϵ=ϵ′+jϵ″) that is similar to an averaged value of all brain tissues, i.e., the average of everything inside a skull. Thus, in those preferred embodiments, ϵ′=about 30 to 60 and ϵ″=about 15 to 25, and in at least some embodiments, ϵ′=about 40 to 45 and ϵ″=about 17 to 21. By using a matching media whose dielectric permittivity is so similar to the collective average of the brain tissue, it is believed that an effect of skull-shielding is minimized.
(67) According to various aspects of the present invention, the imaging chamber 160 may be filled with a matching media in various ways. In some embodiments, technology such as that disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 9,414,749 may be used. In some embodiments, the imaging chamber system 150 may be equipped to rotate at least the imaging chamber 160 upward such that gel may be loaded into the chamber 160. In at least some of these embodiments, the imaging chamber 160 may be rotated to a vertical orientation wherein the main axis thereof is oriented vertically. In this regard,
(68) With the matching media in place, a reference antenna 310 is precisely positioned at the center of a ring R of N antennas. In this regard,
(69)
(70) After the calibration process 1500 has been completed, the process of obtaining “raw” patient data may be carried out. The patient data generation process starts with the imaging chamber 160 completely filled with the matching medium, but no object inside. This empty field measurement is executed which results in a complex-valued tensor of I×J×k components, where I is the number of transmitting antennas, J the number of receiving antennas and k the number of measured frequencies. This tensor is represented by S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,empty, the S-parameters for the measured empty field for each pair of transmitting and receiving antennas i,j for each emitting frequency k. Next, as shown in
(71) The boundary conditions when measuring the empty chamber containing only matching media (S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,empty) are preferably as close as possible to the boundary conditions when measuring the full chamber containing an object such as a human head and the matching media S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,empty. However, as can be seen in (for example)
(72) Thus, in at least some embodiments, use may be made of an apparatus, when measuring the empty chamber, to mimic the boundary conditions that are present when measuring the full chamber. In this regard,
(73) In some embodiments, the hollow boundary model 164 its own closed cavity so as to retain the matching media therein without escaping. In some embodiments, a closed cavity is created entirely by the model; in other embodiments, the closed cavity is formed between the model 164 and a full (solid) lid having no ellipsoidal or other opening therein.
(74) In some embodiments, the imaging chamber 160 is at least partially tilted, or even inverted, so as to cause matching media to flow into or otherwise enter the interior of the hollow boundary model 164. In some such embodiments, the model 164 is sealed to the frame 162 and the lid is removably sealed to the imaging chamber 160 to prevent matching media from escaping from the imaging chamber and/or the interior of the hollow boundary model 164. In other embodiments, sealing may not be necessary; for example, if the matching media is in the form of a gel or otherwise has a consistency that does not flow readily, simple attachment of the lid to the imaging chamber may be sufficient to prevent escape of the matching media from the imaging chamber 160.
(75) In various embodiments, the centrally located hole may take on shapes other than ellipsoidal, such as circular.
(76) This additional feature to the invention better simulates the conditions of the boundary antenna measurements. For example, reference is made to
(77) When 2D image reconstruction is carried out for various rings in based on empty field measurements using the different boundary conditions, the benefit of using the partial frame 162 and hollow boundary model 164 of
(78) On the other hand, when the boundary conditions of the empty field measurement and the full field measurement more closely match, even image reconstruction from the first antenna ring 168 identifies the hemorrhagic stroke model 167. In this regard,
(79) In at least some embodiments, the measured data is validated locally using fast 2D image reconstruction algorithms are executed to obtain a plurality of 2D slices before full 3D image reconstruction is conducted remotely. This two stage process may be recommended due to the technical challenges inherent in conducting on-site image reconstruction (i.e. in the control unit) for the full 3D vector problem due to significant numerical complexity which generally necessitates a computing cluster. Thus, for 3D image reconstruction, the experimental data generally needs to be transferred to a computing system 128 that includes a more powerful data processing unit than is generally available at the site of the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110. On the other hand, 2D image reconstruction requires considerably lower data processing capability and can be carried out locally. Local 2D image reconstruction can thus be utilized for an initial validation of the measured data and a potential re-measurement of the data can be triggered immediately. Furthermore, the 2D slices (described below) can act as an initial condition for the full 3D reconstruction, thus potentially reducing the number of necessary iterations when solving the inverse problem. Still further, the initially reconstructed 2D slices do have considerable diagnostic power and provide valuable immediate information for the decision makers. In this regard, it should be appreciated that although image reconstruction based on the 2D solvers is possible, image reconstruction based on the full 3D solvers improves the images quantitatively, and a reconstruction using full 3D vector is strongly preferred in order to obtain a quantitative image in the whole volume.
(80) In the 2D validation process, the measured data S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,full, S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,empty, after being collected as described above, is stored in the internal memory of a local database connected to the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110, and the scattered data S.sub.i,j,k.sup.meas,scatt is calculated and stored there as well. In some embodiments, the local database is provided in the local computer 129, which communicates directly with the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110, while in some embodiments, data from the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110 is stored in a local database (not shown), such as a database managed by the hospital in which the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110 is located, and the local computer 129 communicates with the local database. The local computer 129 is used to conduct measured data validation. In particular, using image reconstruction procedures described below (and/or, at least some embodiments, in other patent documents), fast 2D image reconstruction algorithms are executed to obtain a plurality of 2D slices, wherein a 2D slice is obtained for each antenna ring. For example, if the chamber 160 includes six antenna rings, six 2D slices—one for the permittivity distribution in the plane of each ring—can be obtained.
(81) After the validation procedure is complete, or in some cases concurrent with such procedure, the data file is encrypted and sent, preferably together with a checksum, to the remote 3D image processing computer system 128 located elsewhere in a hospital or other provider facility, at an IPC, or at another host. Transmission can be done using standard file transfer protocols such as, without limitation, SFTP/SCP, a VPN tunnel, or the like, where the size of the image reconstruction data (typically, a 2×N×N matrix of complex values, corresponding to the empty and full field, where N is the number of antennas) is usually lower than 5 MB. On the remote 3D image processing computer system 128, the data integrity is checked via the checksum and processed with an image reconstruction procedure such as the one detailed hereinbelow. The reconstructed image together with the experimental data is preferably also stored in a redundant database. Then, it is converted into DICOM format, encrypted and sent back to the decision makers.
(82) At least for the purpose of maintaining patient confidentiality, a unique ID number may be generated for each data set and attached to the data file. Notably, in at least some embodiments, it is not necessary to include any patient related information, such as name, gender, or the like. Instead, using the unique ID number, the patient-related information can be added directly to the processed image in DICOM format when later delivered to the decision maker as a reconstructed image.
(83) Along with the hardware of the electromagnetic tomographic scanner 110, one or more specific methods is used to control the performance of the hardware in the scanner 110 during calibration, various measurements, data transfers, and other like procedure. In this regard,
(84) As noted previously, the primary input to the EMTIR method 1800 is three complex-valued tensors 1805 comprising the S-parameters between antenna pairs for each frequency. The number of tensor components is I×J×K, where I is the number of transmitting antennas, S.sub.i=1 to I, J is the number of receiving antennas S.sub.j=1 to J and K is the number of emitting frequencies f.sub.k=1 to K. The three tensors 1805 contain the S-parameters for the full field (when the measured object 109 is inside the chamber 160), the empty field (when the chamber only contains the matching medium), and the scattered field (the field obtained due to the wave scattering phenomena from the measured object).
(85) However, other inputs to the process 1800 are utilized as well. Other inputs (not shown in
(86) At block 1815, the direct problem is solved. Solving the direct problem involves the computation of the EM fields inside the imaging domain 21 with dielectric permittivity ϵ(x, y, z) and the N transmitting antennas 165 acting as electromagnetic sources. The solution of the direct problem in block 1815 results in three additional complex-valued tensors containing the S-parameters for the full, the empty and the scattered fields (S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,full, S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,empty, S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,scatt for each frequency) from the simulation point of view. Notably, the S-parameter tensor for the empty sim field, S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,empty, corresponds to the simulation of the chamber with matching medium but without the measured object 109. Therefore, as illustrated at step 1820, this tensor is only computed at the start of the iterative procedure, and stored in the computer memory, as shown at block 1825. At block 1830 the S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,full, S.sub.i,j,k.sup.sim,scatt are computed each pass through the method.
(87) The solution of the direct problem in block 1815, more specifically, consists of computing the EM fields inside the imaging domain 21 subject to certain boundary conditions and modeling the antennas 165 as the electromagnetic sources. Mathematically, this is performed through the numerical solution of the Maxwell's equations, a set of coupled partial differential equations (PDEs) that give the relationship between the electric and magnetic induction fields and the medium properties. In general, there is no analytical solution to these equations. Therefore, numerical algorithms are used to compute an approximate solution. Several well-known numerical methods exist including but not limited to FEM (Finite Element Methods) or FDTD (Finite-Difference Time-Domain). Numerical approximations of the electric and magnetic induction fields inside the imaging chamber 160 are made for every antenna 165 working as transmitter and receiver by solving Maxwell's equations inside the imaging domain 21 N times, where N is the total number of active antennas, independent of whether the antenna is working as a transmitter and/or receiver.
(88) Next, at step 1835 of the iterative process 1800, the inverse problem is solved. Solving the inverse problem involves modifying the dielectric permittivity ϵ(x, y, z) in order to make the simulated S-parameter tensors converge to the measured ones. Several mathematical algorithms are available for application in this step 1835, including the Gradient method and the Newton-Kantorovich method. Further details of the inverse problem solution process 1835 are described below, and additional or alternative details of direct and/or inverse problem solution processes suitable for use in some embodiments of the present invention may be described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,072,449 to Semenov, issued Jul. 5, 2016 and entitled “WEARABLE/MAN-PORTABLE ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING,” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,239,731 to Semenov et al., issued Jul. 3, 2007 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE FUNCTIONAL IMAGING AND MAPPING OF ELECTRICAL EXCITATION OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES USING ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD TOMOGRAPHY AND SPECTROSCOPY.” The relevant portions thereof are incorporated herein by reference.
(89) As represented at step 1840, the option exists to incorporate pattern recognition and removal techniques into the EMTIR process 1800. For example, the distribution of increments resulting from block 1835, used for updating the dielectric permittivity, may be processed with pattern recognition and removal algorithms in order to remove undesired disturbance effects and improve the quality of the reconstructed images. Suitable pattern recognition and removal techniques include methods of EM Interference Pattern Recognition Tomography (EMIPRT) as disclosed in the aforementioned International Application Serial No. PCT/US16/57254. Such methods may be applied as represented by step 1845.
(90) Once the dielectric permittivity ϵ(x, y, z) is updated as shown at block 1850, the value of the functional is computed at block 1855. The value of functional corresponds to the difference between the actual (measured) values and the simulated values. If at step 1860 the functional value satisfies pre-defined criteria, which may include defining a percentage value of the initial functional value, then convergence is said to have been reached, and the reconstructed image is obtained plotting the final dielectric permittivity distribution in block 1865. Otherwise, appropriate portions of the procedure are repeated iteratively until convergence is reached.
(91) As noted previously, solving the inverse problem at block 1835 involves modifying the dielectric permittivity ϵ(x, y, z) in order to make the simulated S-parameter tensors converge to the measured ones. More specifically, input is generated and used in the reconstruction of the permittivity distribution ϵ({right arrow over (r)})≡ϵ(x, y, z)∈C inside the chamber 160. The inverse problem solution is the permittivity distribution which minimizes the discrepancy between measured data and simulated data, or minimizes a given norm
(92)
The real-valued functional to be minimized is of the form
(93)
where the S.sub.ij(f.sub.k, ϵ({right arrow over (r)}))∈C are the measured and theoretical scattering matrix elements which depend on the 3-dimensional permittivity distribution ϵ({right arrow over (r)})≡ϵ(x, y, z)∈C in the imaging domain 21 and on the given frequency f.sub.k. In the functional (2), N.sub.f is the number of frequencies, N.sub.Tx, is the number of transmitters, N.sub.Rx is the number of receivers, and w.sub.k∈R is an additional factor to weight different frequency contributions in the sum.
(94) The scattering matrix elements are obtained from subtracting the measured S.sub.ij values of the empty chamber 160 from the values obtained when an object is placed within the chamber,
S.sub.ij.sup.sct≡S.sub.ij.sup.full−S.sub.ij.sup.empty (3)
(95) In order to maximize the information about the scatterer in the functional, different normalizations can be used depending on the object under study, including, without limitation:
(96)
(97)
(98) In both cases (i.e., with both types of normalization), the image reconstruction process is in a relatively early iteration. The elliptical shell 961 itself is visible in both cases. However, the inhomogeneity 967 is only visible in
(99) Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the antenna-by-antenna normalization acts as an intrinsic calibration. If the back-interaction from the head 109 or other object to the antennas 165,765 is weak, the calibration coefficients are equal for the scattered and the empty field. In this case, they drop out:
(100)
and no calibration is necessary. However, this assumption is no longer valid if the antennas 165,765 are very close to the object 109.
(101) The complex-valued gradient of the functional (2) is obtained via the functional derivative of J with respect to ϵ({right arrow over (r)}) and is given by
(102)
where {right arrow over (E)}.sub.i,j(f.sub.k, {right arrow over (r)}) are the simulated EM fields transmitted from antenna i and j, respectively, and conj denotes complex conjugation. It is noted that a constant factor (2π/λ.sub.k).sup.2 has been absorbed into w.sub.k.
(103) Finally, the permittivity contribution in the imaging domain 21 is obtained via the iterative process
ϵ({right arrow over (r)}).sup.n+1=ϵ({right arrow over (r)}).sup.n−h.sup.nJ.sub.grad.sup.n({right arrow over (r)}) (7)
where h.sup.n∈R denotes the real-valued step-size at a given iteration n.
(104) The optimization problem to minimize the functional in order to reconstruct the permittivity distribution is an ill-posed problem because the number of measured values is much smaller than the number of unknowns of the inverse problem. Therefore, a regularization procedure is preferably used. One of the possible options is the classical Tikhonov regularization method, which is robust and easy to implement.
(105) The resulting image can be used for any of a variety of purposes, including for assessment, diagnosis, 4D dynamic fused electromagnetic tomography, monitoring viability and functional conditions using such EMT, and others involving any functional or pathological conditions of brain tissue, including but not limited to, ischemia, hypoxia, blood content, acute and chronic stroke and differentiation of stroke type (such as ischemic or hemorrhagic), edema, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), tumors and differentiation of tumor type, and the like.
(106) Based on the foregoing information, it will be readily understood by those persons skilled in the art that the present invention is susceptible of broad utility and application. Many embodiments and adaptations of the present invention other than those specifically described herein, as well as many variations, modifications, and equivalent arrangements, will be apparent from or reasonably suggested by the present invention and the foregoing descriptions thereof, without departing from the substance or scope of the present invention.
(107) Accordingly, while the present invention has been described herein in detail in relation to one or more preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that this disclosure is only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention and is made merely for the purpose of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the invention. The foregoing disclosure is not intended to be construed to limit the present invention or otherwise exclude any such other embodiments, adaptations, variations, modifications or equivalent arrangements; the present invention being limited only by the claims appended hereto and the equivalents thereof