ELECTRON TRANSFER BY NANOCARBON

Abstract

Provided is a means for promoting electron transfer between nanocarbon and other substances. An electron transfer accelerator for nanocarbon comprising a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton.

Claims

1.-4. (canceled)

5. An electrode loaded with nanocarbon, a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and an enzyme on a substrate.

6. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein the nanocarbon is a carbon nanotube.

7. The electrode according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the carbon nanotube is a single-walled carbon nanotube.

8. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein the enzyme is flavin-binding glucose dehydrogenase.

9. The electrode according to claim 5, further comprising a dispersant loaded on the substrate.

10. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein a thin film of carbon or metal is formed on the substrate.

11. A sensor comprising the electrode according to claim 5.

12. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is a compound that does not function as a mediator by itself.

13. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is selected from the group consisting of thymol, phenol, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, tyrosine disodium hydrate, sodium salicylate, toluene, 5-hydroxyindole, aniline, leucoquinizarin, carvacrol, 1,5-naphthalene diol, 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 4-isopropylphenol, 1-naphthol, 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, 2,6-diisopropylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 3-tert-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole, o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol.

14. The electrode according to claim 5, wherein the carbon nanotube is a single-walled carbon nanotube, the enzyme is flavin-binding glucose dehydrogenase, and the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is selected from the group consisting of thymol, phenol, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, tyrosine disodium hydrate, sodium salicylate, toluene, 5-hydroxyindole, aniline, leucoquinizarin, carvacrol, 1,5-naphthalene diol, 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 4-isopropylphenol, 1-naphthol, 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, 2,6-diisopropylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 3-tert-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole, o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol.

15. A sensor comprising the electrode according to claim 14.

16. A method for preparing an electrode loaded with nanocarbon, a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and an enzyme on a substrate, the method comprising attaching or bringing close the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton to nanocarbon on the substrate.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is a compound that does not function as a mediator by itself.

18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is selected from the group consisting of thymol, phenol, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, tyrosine disodium hydrate, sodium salicylate, toluene, 5-hydroxyindole, aniline, leucoquinizarin, carvacrol, 1,5-naphthalene diol, 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 4-isopropylphenol, 1-naphthol, 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, 2,6-diisopropylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 3-tert-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole, o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the nanocarbon is a carbon nanotube.

18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the nanocarbon is a single-walled carbon nanotube.

19. The method according to claim 16, wherein the enzyme is flavin-binding glucose dehydrogenase.

20. The method according to claim 16, wherein the substrate is a substrate on which a thin film of carbon or metal is formed.

21. The method according to claim 16, wherein the carbon nanotube is a single-walled carbon nanotube, the enzyme is flavin-binding glucose dehydrogenase, and the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is selected from the group consisting of thymol, phenol, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, tyrosine disodium hydrate, sodium salicylate, toluene, 5-hydroxyindole, aniline, leucoquinizarin, carvacrol, 1,5-naphthalene diol, 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 4-isopropylphenol, 1-naphthol, 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, 2,6-diisopropylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 3-tert-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole, o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0064] FIG. 1 shows the structure of an electrode produced in Example 1. “1” denotes a PET film, “2” denotes an adhesive sheet, “3” denotes a gold-deposited PET film, and “4” denotes a working electrode section.

[0065] FIG. 2 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading thymol on the working electrode section in Example 1.

[0066] FIG. 3 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading phenol on the working electrode section in Example 1.

[0067] FIG. 4 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading menthol on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 1.

[0068] FIG. 5 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading cyclohexanol on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 1.

[0069] FIG. 6 shows cyclic voltammograms measured without loading a compound on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 1.

[0070] FIG. 7 shows the structure of an electrode produced in Example 3. “5” denotes a PET film, “6” denotes an adhesive sheet, “7” denotes a carbon paste-printed PET film, and “8” denotes a working electrode section.

[0071] FIG. 8 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer in Example 3.

[0072] FIG. 9 shows cyclic voltammograms measured without adding thymol to a buffer in Comparative Example 3.

[0073] FIG. 10 shows cyclic voltammograms measured without adding thymol to a buffer in Example 4.

[0074] FIG. 11 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer to 0.00001% (w/v) in Example 4.

[0075] FIG. 12 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer to 0.0001% (w/v) in Example 4.

[0076] FIG. 13 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer to 0.001% (w/v) in Example 4.

[0077] FIG. 14 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer to 0.01% (w/v) in Example 4.

[0078] FIG. 15 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while adding thymol to a buffer in Example 7.

[0079] FIG. 16 shows cyclic voltammograms measured without adding thymol to a buffer in Comparative Example 5.

[0080] FIG. 17 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading single-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Example 8.

[0081] FIG. 18 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Example 8.

[0082] FIG. 19 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading single-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 6.

[0083] FIG. 20 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 6.

[0084] FIG. 21 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading single-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Example 9.

[0085] FIG. 22 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Example 9.

[0086] FIG. 23 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading single-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 7.

[0087] FIG. 24 shows cyclic voltammograms measured while loading multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section in Comparative Example 7.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

1. Electron Transfer Accelerator for Nanocarbon

[0088] The nanocarbon is not particularly limited as long as it is a substance that has an electron transfer function and that is recognized as nanocarbon. Examples of such substances include carbon materials mainly composed of carbon, including carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, carbon nanotwists, cocoons, carbon nanocoils, graphene, and fullerene. The carbon nanotubes may be single-walled carbon nanotubes, double-walled carbon nanotubes, or multi-walled carbon nanotubes. In one embodiment, the nanocarbon is preferably carbon nanotubes, and more preferably single-walled carbon nanotubes.

[0089] The electron transfer accelerator for nanocarbon preferably comprises a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton. The number of ring-forming atoms in the aromatic ring skeleton is, for example, 5 to 18, preferably 5 to 16, and more preferably 5 to 14. Examples of the aromatic ring skeleton include a skeleton composed of one benzene ring, a skeleton composed of two or more (e.g., 2 to 4) benzene rings (naphthalene skeleton, anthracene skeleton, etc.), a skeleton composed of a condensed ring of a benzene ring and another aromatic ring (e.g., nitrogen-containing aromatic ring, oxygen-containing aromatic ring, or sulfur-containing aromatic ring) (phenanthroline skeleton, benzofuran skeleton, benzimidazole skeleton, carbazole skeleton, etc.), and a skeleton composed of an aromatic ring composed of carbon and another element (e.g., nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur) (triazine skeleton, triazole skeleton, pyridine skeleton, etc.). The compound having an aromatic ring skeleton is preferably a compound that does not function as a mediator by itself. The compound “that does not function as a mediator by itself” means that it does not have the function of transferring electrons by itself between electrodes and enzymes or between electrodes and substrates, unlike benzoquinone and 1-methoxyphenazine methosulfate.

[0090] In one embodiment, the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton preferably has an electron-donating substituent. The electron-donating substituent refers to a hydroxy group, an amino group, a methyl group, or the like. The electron-donating substituent is preferably a hydroxy group. Examples of compounds having an electron-donating substituent and an aromatic ring skeleton include compounds having a benzene ring substituted with a hydroxy group (e.g., thymol, phenol, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, tyrosine disodium hydrate, sodium salicylate, 5-hydroxyindole, leucoquinizarin, carvacrol, 1,5-naphthalene diol, 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 4-isopropylphenol, 1-naphthol, 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, 2,6-diisopropylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol, 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol, bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane, 3-tert-butylphenol, o-cresol, m-cresol, and p-cresol), compounds having a benzene ring substituted with an amino group (e.g., aniline), and compounds having a benzene ring substituted with a methyl group (e.g., toluene and 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole).

[0091] Among the above compounds, thymol, phenol, and carvacrol are preferable.

[0092] When the electron transfer accelerator for nanocarbon is brought close to or attached to nanocarbon, the electron transfer between the nanocarbon and other substances can be promoted. It is preferable that the electron transfer accelerator and nanocarbon are attached or close to each other due to intermolecular interaction. The amount of electron transfer accelerator arranged close to or attached to nanocarbon to promote the electron transfer by nanocarbon is not particularly limited.

2. Nanocarbon to which Electron Transfer Accelerator is Close or Attached

[0093] When the electron transfer accelerator is brought close to or attached to nanocarbon, the electron transfer by the resulting nanocarbon can be promoted. The means for bringing close or attaching the electron transfer accelerator to nanocarbon is not particularly limited. For example, it can be achieved by mixing nanocarbon and the electron transfer accelerator (including mixing them in a solution), or by arranging the electron transfer accelerator on nanocarbon. The electron transfer accelerator arranged close to or attached to nanocarbon may or may not be immobilized. The immobilization is not limited as long as it does not impair the functions of the nanocarbon and the electron transfer accelerator, and can be suitably selected from known means and used.

[0094] The nanocarbon and electron transfer accelerator that can be used in the nanocarbon to which the electron transfer accelerator is close or attached are as described in section 1 above.

3. Electrode

[0095] The electrode preferably has a substrate on which nanocarbon, a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and an enzyme are loaded. The nanocarbon and the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton are as described in section 1 above.

[0096] The amount of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton loaded is not particularly limited. The amount of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton loaded is, for example, 0.001 parts by mass or more, preferably 0.01 parts by mass or more, and more preferably 0.1 parts by mass or more, per 100 parts by mass of the amount of nanocarbon loaded. Further, the amount of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton loaded is, for example, 100000 parts by mass or less, preferably 10000 parts by mass or less, and more preferably 1000 parts by mass or less, per 100 parts by mass of the amount of nanocarbon loaded. The lower limit and the upper limit can be combined in any way. Moreover, the amount of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton loaded is, for example, 0.001 parts by mass or more, preferably 0.01 parts by mass or more, and more preferably 0.1 parts by mass or more, per 100 parts by mass of the amount of the enzyme loaded. Further, the amount of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton loaded is, for example, 1000000 parts by mass or less, preferably 100000 parts by mass or less, and more preferably 10000 parts by mass or less, per 100 parts by mass of the amount of the enzyme loaded. The lower limit and the upper limit can be combined in any way.

[0097] The substrate is not particularly limited as long as it is suitable for the electrode on which the enzyme used in the biosensor is immobilized. For example, the substrate may be an insulating substrate on which a metal film (e.g., a metal thin film) is formed. The insulating substrate may be, for example, a glass substrate or a plastic substrate (e.g., a PET substrate). The type of metal forming the metal film is not particularly limited as long as it can be used for electrodes. For example, gold, platinum, titanium, etc., can be used. Further, the substrate may have a carbon film (e.g., a thin film of carbon paste), in place of a metal film.

[0098] The enzyme is preferably one that releases electrons upon catalytic reaction. Examples of such enzymes include oxidoreductases. Examples of oxidoreductases include glucose dehydrogenase, glucose oxidase, lactate oxidase, cholesterol oxidase, alcohol oxidase, sarcosine oxidase, fructosylamine oxidase, pyruvate oxidase, lactate dehydrogenase, alcohol dehydrogenase, glycerol oxidase, glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase, uricase, choline oxidase, xanthine oxidase, hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and the like.

[0099] In one embodiment, the enzyme is preferably glucose dehydrogenase, more preferably flavin-binding glucose dehydrogenase, and even more preferably glucose dehydrogenase using flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as a coenzyme (also referred to as “FADGDH”). Since FADGDH retains FAD in recesses of the three-dimensional structure formed by polypeptides, a substance called a mediator has been conventionally required to transfer electrons generated therein to electrodes. In contrast, the use of nanocarbon (preferably carbon nanotubes, and more preferably single-walled carbon nanotubes) makes it possible to transfer electrons to electrodes without using a mediator. Further, the use of the electron transfer accelerator described above makes it possible to perform electron transfer via nanocarbon significantly efficiently (or strongly).

[0100] The type of FADGDH is not limited, and any type can be used. Specific examples of FADGDH include those derived from any of the following organisms: Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus foetidus, Aspergillus aureus, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus kawachii, Aspergillus awamori, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Cytophaga marinoflava, Agaricus bisporus, Macrolepiota rhacodes, Burkholderia cepacia, Mucor subtilissimus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor prainii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor circinelloides, Mucor circinelloides f. circinelloides, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor dimorphosporus, Absidia cylindrospora, Absidia hyalospora, Actinomucor elegans, Circinella simplex, Circinella angarensis, Circinella chinensis, Circinella lacrymispora, Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella rigida, Circinella umbellata, Circinella muscae, Metarhizium sp., and Colletotrichum sp.

[0101] In one embodiment, the FADGDH is preferably FADGDH derived from Aspergillus oryzae, FADGDH derived from Mucor hiemalis, FADGDH derived from Mucor subtilissimus, FADGDH derived from Circinella simplex, FADGDH derived from Metarhizium sp., or FADGDH derived from Colletotrichum sp. The FADGDH preferably has 80% or more, more preferably 90% or more, and even more preferably 95% or more, identity to the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID Nos. 1 to 6. FADGDH having glucose dehydrogenation activity can be used. The amino acid sequence identity can be calculated using an analysis tool that is commercially available or available through a telecommunication line (the internet). For example, the amino acid sequence identity can be calculated using the homology algorithm BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) with default (initially set) parameters. SEQ ID No. 1 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Aspergillus oryzae, SEQ ID No. 2 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Mucor hiemalis, SEQ ID No. 3 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Mucor subtilissimus, SEQ ID No. 4 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Circinella simplex, SEQ ID No. 5 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Metarhizium sp., and SEQ ID No. 6 is the amino acid sequence of FADGDH derived from Colletotrichum sp.

[0102] A dispersant may be further loaded on the substrate. The dispersant is not particularly limited as long as it is a substance capable of suppressing the aggregation of nanocarbon on the substrate and dispersing it. Examples of the dispersant include sodium cholate, sodium deoxycholate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, octylphenol ethoxylate, and the like. In one embodiment, the dispersant is preferably sodium cholate or sodium deoxycholate.

[0103] The nanocarbon, the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and the enzyme can be loaded on the substrate by any means. For example, solutions in which these substances are each dispersed or dissolved are prepared, and these solutions are sequentially added dropwise to a predetermined portion on the substrate (when the substrate is an insulating substrate on which a metal thin film is formed, the portion where the metal thin film is formed) and dried; this operation can be repeated to load them. The dispersion medium or solvent is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include water, alcohol solvents (e.g., ethanol), ketone solvents (e.g., acetone), and combinations thereof.

[0104] They may be loaded in any order; however, in one embodiment, the order of loading is preferably nanocarbon.fwdarw.enzyme.fwdarw.compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, or compound having an aromatic ring skeleton.fwdarw.nanocarbon.fwdarw.enzyme.

[0105] The amounts of nanocarbon, compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and enzyme used are not particularly limited.

[0106] In one embodiment, the nanocarbon, the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and the enzyme may be immobilized on the substrate. Immobilization can be performed by suitably selecting a known method. For example, immobilization can be performed in such a manner that a liquid in which substances suitable for immobilization, such as a tetrafluoroethylene/perfluoro[2-(fluorosulfonylethoxy)polyvinyl ether] copolymer (e.g., Nafion (trademark)) and carboxymethyl cellulose, are dissolved is added dropwise to the substrate in a portion in which each of the above substances is loaded, followed by drying. In one embodiment, it is preferable that the nanocarbon, the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton, and the enzyme are loaded on the substrate, followed by treatment with a polymer substance, such as carboxymethyl cellulose, so as to cover these substances.

[0107] In one embodiment, the dispersant is preferably mixed with a dispersion in which nanocarbon is dispersed. The mixing ratio of the dispersant is any ratio, and is preferably 0.2 to 2% (w/v), for example. The mixing ratio of the nanocarbon is also any ratio, and is preferably 0.05 to 0.5% (w/v), for example.

4. Sensor

[0108] The sensor preferably comprises the electrode described in section 3 above. In one embodiment, the sensor preferably comprises the electrode of section 3 as a working electrode. The sensor preferably has a counter electrode, in addition to the working electrode. The sensor may further comprise configurations that are generally found in biosensors, such as a potentiostat and a current-sensing circuit. The counter electrode, potentiostat, current-sensing circuit, etc., may specifically have any configurations as long as the intended measurement can be performed by the sensor, and the specific configurations can be suitably selected from means known in the art and designed.

[0109] In one embodiment, the working electrode included in the sensor may be an electrode obtained by removing the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton from the electrode of section 3. When such a working electrode is used, it is preferable that the solvent (containing a substance to be measured or a substrate) in which each electrode is immersed contains a compound having an aromatic ring skeleton. Typical examples of solvents include buffers, and examples thereof include acetate buffers, citrate buffers, phosphate buffers, borate buffers, and the like.

[0110] The concentration of the substance to be measured or the substrate in the solvent is not particularly limited, and can be set to any concentration necessary for measurement.

[0111] The concentration of the compound having an aromatic ring skeleton in the solvent is not particularly limited. The lower limit of the concentration is, for example, 0.000001% (w/v), preferably 0.000005% (w/v), more preferably 0.00001% (w/v), more preferably 0.00005% (w/v), more preferably 0.0001% (w/v), more preferably 0.0005% (w/v), more preferably 0.001% (w/v), more preferably 0.005% (w/v), and more preferably 0.01% (w/v). The upper limit of the concentration is, for example, 2% (w/v), preferably 1.5% (w/v), and more preferably 1% (w/v). The lower limit and upper limit of the concentration can be combined in any way.

[0112] These sensors can be used to detect and measure targets.

EXAMPLES

[0113] The present invention is described in more detail below with reference to Examples; however, the present invention is not limited thereto.

Example 1

[0114] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate (FIG. 1). In FIG. 1, “1” denotes a PET film, “2” denotes an adhesive sheet, “3” denotes a gold-deposited PET film, and “4” denotes a working electrode section. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SuperPureTubes, Nanolntegris, outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of the following compound (1) or (2) (each 1% (w/v) solution) was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried.

(1) thymol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(2) phenol (dissolved in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer)

[0115] After drying the compound liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FAD-GDH on the working electrode. The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B, produced by ABS Inc.), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These three electrodes were immersed in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed when glucose was not added to this buffer (0 mM), or when glucose was added at 10 mM or 48 mM.

[0116] FIGS. 2 and 3 show the cyclic voltammograms measured at glucose concentrations of 0 mM, 10 mM, and 48 mM. FIG. 2 shows the case of using thymol, and FIG. 3 shows the case of using phenol.

[0117] In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V are as shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b) − (a) (1) Thymol 108 539 431 (2) Phenol 63 373 309

Comparative Example 1

[0118] Cyclic voltammograms were measured in the same manner as in Example 1, except that compound (1) of Example 1 was changed to the following compound (3) or (4).

(3) menthol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(4) cyclohexanol (dissolved in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer)

[0119] The results are shown in FIG. 4 (menthol), FIG. 5 (cyclohexanol), and FIG. 6 (no compound added). In the cyclic voltammograms shown in FIGS. 4 to 6, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) (3) Menthol 47 50 3 (4) Cyclohexanol 42 49 7 Not added 46 51 5

[0120] The results of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 revealed that the current could be measured by adding thymol or phenol even under the conditions in which the current could not be measured only by immobilizing the enzyme and carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section. On the other hand, it was revealed that the current was not measured when menthol or cyclohexanol was used instead of thymol and phenol.

Example 2

[0121] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FADGDH on the working electrode.

[0122] Then, 0.1% (w/v) of any of the following compounds (5) to (10) was added and dissolved in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).

(5) phenol
(6) bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone
(7) tyrosine disodium hydrate
(8) sodium salicylate
(9) toluene
(10) 5-hydroxyindole

[0123] The electrode produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in a sodium phosphate buffer in which any of compounds (5) to (10) above was dissolved. Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed when glucose was not added to this buffer (0 mM), or when glucose was added at 10 mM or 48 mM. In the obtained cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) (5) Phenol 183 552 369 (6) Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone 72 161 89 (7) Tyrosine disodium hydrate 141 231 90 (8) Sodium salicylate 81 125 44 (9) Toluene 68 88 20 (10) 5-Hydroxyindole 675 856 181

[0124] As described above, it was confirmed that the current measured in Example 1 was also observed even when thymol or phenol was changed to compounds (5) to (10) above.

Comparative Example 2

[0125] Cyclic voltammograms were obtained in the same manner as in Example 2, except that any of compounds (5) to (10) was replaced with compound (3) or (4). In the obtained cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 4 below.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) (3) Menthol 43 45 2 (4) Cyclohexanol 40 47 7 Not added 41 48 7

[0126] As described above, it was confirmed that in the configuration of Example 2, the current was not substantially measured when compounds (5) to (10) were not added or were replaced with menthol or cyclohexanol.

[0127] Compounds (1), (2), and (5) to (10) all have an aromatic ring skeleton, whereas compounds (3) and (4) do not have an aromatic ring skeleton. Therefore, it is presumed that due to the aromatic ring skeleton, compounds (1), (2), and (5) to (10) mediate and promote electron transfer between the coenzyme FAD and the carbon nanotubes.

Example 3

[0128] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by printing carbon paste on a PET substrate (FIG. 7). In FIG. 7, “5” denotes a PET film, “6” denotes an adhesive sheet, “7” denotes a carbon paste-printed PET film, and “8” denotes a working electrode section. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of 1% (w/v) carboxymethylcellulose liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FAD-GDH on the working electrode. A 5% (w/v) thymol solution dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol was added and mixed with a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to 0.1% (w/v) thymol.

[0129] The electrode produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in a sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) thymol. Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed when glucose was not added to this buffer (0 mM), or when glucose was added at 10 mM or 48 mM. FIG. 8 shows the obtained cyclic voltammograms. In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 5 below.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Thymol 20 83 63

Comparative Example 3

[0130] Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed in the same manner as in Example 3, except that thymol was not added to a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). FIG. 9 shows the obtained cyclic voltammograms. In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Not added 14 31 17

[0131] As shown in Example 3 and Comparative Example 3, it was confirmed that the current could also be measured by adding thymol to the buffer, instead of immobilizing thymol on the electrode. These results support that the compounds having an aromatic ring skeleton mediate and promote electron transfer between the coenzyme FAD and the carbon nanotubes.

Example 4

[0132] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried.

[0133] After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FADGDH on the working electrode.

[0134] Then, a 10% (w/v) thymol solution dissolved in 100% ethanol was added to a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and thymol-containing buffers with four concentrations (0.00001, 0.0001, 0.001, and 0.01 (w/v)) were prepared.

[0135] The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in the thymol-containing buffer at any of the above concentrations, or in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed. FIGS. 10 to 14 show the cyclic voltammograms measured at glucose concentrations of 0 mM, 10 mM, and 48 mM. The thymol concentration (w/v) is 0% in FIG. 10, 0.00001% in FIG. 11, 0.0001% in FIG. 12, 0.001% in FIG. 13, and 0.01% in FIG. 14.

[0136] In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Current value (pA) Thymol concentration (a) (b) (% (w/v)) 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) 0 (not added) 37 42 5 0.00001 37 86 49 0.0001 41 202 161 0.001 55 287 232 0.01 115 477 362

[0137] As described above, it was revealed that the current could also be measured by adding a very small amount (0.00001% (w/v)) of thymol to the buffer even under the conditions in which the current could not be measured only by immobilizing the enzyme and the carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section. It was also revealed that 60% or more of the maximum current value obtained by adding thymol was measured by adding thymol to the buffer to 0.001% (w/v).

Example 5

[0138] Any of the following compounds (11) to (14) was added and dissolved in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to 0.1% (w/v).

(11) aniline
(12) o-cresol
(13) m-cresol
(14) p-cresol

[0139] An electrode tip produced in the same manner as in Example 1 was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in the sodium phosphate buffer in which any one of (11) to (14) was dissolved, or in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed when glucose was not added to this buffer (0 mM), or when glucose was added at 48 mM. In the obtained cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 8 below.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) (11)Aniline 203 520 317 (12) o-cresol 269 530 261 (13) m-cresol 205 419 214 (14) p-cresol 248 316 68 Not added 26 31 5

[0140] As described above, it was revealed that the current could be measured by adding compounds (11) to (14) even under the conditions in which the current could not be measured only by immobilizing the enzyme and the carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section.

Example 6

[0141] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of each of the following compounds (15) to (33) (each 1% (w/v) liquid) was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried.

(15) leucoquinizarin (dissolved in 80% (v/v) acetone)
(16) carvacrol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(17) 1,5-naphthalene diol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(18) 4-isopropyl-3-methylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(19) 2-isopropylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(20) 4-isopropylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(21) 1-naphthol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(22) 2-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(23) 2,4,6-trimethylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(24) 2,6-diisopropylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(25) 2-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(26) 6-tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(27) 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(28) 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(29) 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(30) 2,4-di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(31) bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(32) 3-tert-butylphenol (dissolved in 50% (v/v) ethanol)
(33) 2-isopropyl-5-methylanisole (dissolved in 80% (v/v) ethanol)

[0142] After drying the liquids of compounds (15) to (33), 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FADGDH on the working electrode.

[0143] The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These three electrodes were immersed in a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed when glucose was not added to this buffer (0 mM), or when glucose was added at 48 mM. In the obtained cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 9 below.

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Current value (μA) (a) (b) 0 mM 48 mM Compound added glucose glucose (b)-(a) (15) Leucoquinizarin 59 397 338 (16) Carvacrol 90 591 501 (17) 1,5-Naphthalene diol 323 436 113 (18) 4-Isopropyl-3-methylphenol 72 497 425 (19) 2-lsopropylphenol 65 473 408 (20) 4-lsopropylphenol 63 335 272 (21) 1-Naphthol 81 539 458 (22) 2-Tert-butyl-5-methylphenol 70 325 255 (23) 2,4,6-Trimethylphenol 71 384 313 (24) 2,6-Diisopropylphenol 48 199 151 (25) 2-Tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol 59 310 251 (26) 6-Tert-butyl-2,4-xylenol 78 239 161 (27) 2-Tert-butyl-4-methylphenol 54 315 261 (28) 2-Tert-butyl-6-methylphenol 48 226 178 (29) 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol 61 257 196 (30) 2,4-Di-tert-butyl-5-methylphenol 50 215 165 (31) Bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)methane 187 83 104 (32) 3-Tert-butylphenol 382 52 330 (33) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylanisole 72 43 29

Comparative Example 4

[0144] Cyclic voltammograms were measured in the same manner as in Example 3, except that compounds (15) to (33) were replaced with the following compound (34).

(34) piperylene (dissolved in 100% acetone)

[0145] In the obtained cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 10 below.

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) (34) Piperylene 21 28 7 Not added 22 30 8

[0146] The results of Example 6 and Comparative Example 4 revealed that the current could be measured by adding compounds (15) to (33) even under the conditions in which the current could not be measured only by immobilizing the enzyme and the carbon nanotubes on the working electrode section. On the other hand, it was revealed that the current was not measured when compound (34) was added.

[0147] Compounds (15) to (33) all have an aromatic ring skeleton, whereas compound (34) has n electrons but no aromatic ring skeleton. Therefore, it is presumed that due to the aromatic ring skeleton, compounds (15) to (33) mediate and promote electron transfer between the coenzyme FAD and the carbon nanotubes.

Example 7

[0148] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 8.2 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.092% (w/v) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (NC7000, Nanocyl, outer diameter: 5 to 15 nm) was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of FADGDH (having the amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID No. 2; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the FADGDH liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and FAD-GDH on the working electrode. A 10% (w/v) thymol solution dissolved in 100% ethanol was added and mixed with a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to 0.01% (w/v).

[0149] The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in a sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) thymol, and cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed. FIG. 15 shows the cyclic voltammograms measured at glucose concentrations of 0 mM, 10 mM, and 48 mM. In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 11 below.

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Thymol 14 42 28

Comparative Example 5

[0150] Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed in the same manner as in Example 4, except that thymol was not added to a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). FIG. 16 shows the obtained cyclic voltammograms. In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 12 below.

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Compound added 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Not added 5 11 6

[0151] As shown in Example 7 and Comparative Example 5, it was confirmed that the current could be measured by adding thymol to the buffer even when multi-walled carbon nanotubes were used.

Example 8

[0152] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm), or 8.2 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.092% (w/v) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 5 to 15 nm), was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of glucose oxidase (20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the glucose oxidase liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and glucose oxidase on the working electrode. A 10% (w/v) thymol solution dissolved in 100% ethanol was added and mixed with a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to 0.01% (w/v).

[0153] The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in a sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) thymol, and cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed. The cyclic voltammograms measured at glucose concentrations of 0 mM, 10 mM, and 48 mM are shown in FIG. 17 (single-walled carbon nanotubes) and FIG. 18 (multi-walled carbon nanotubes). In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 13 below.

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Carbon nanotubes 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Single-walled carbon nanotubes 6 72 66 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 24 52 28

Comparative Example 6

[0154] Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed in the same manner as in Example 8, except that thymol was not added to a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The obtained cyclic voltammograms are shown in FIG. 19 (single-walled carbon nanotubes) and FIG. 20 (multi-walled carbon nanotubes). In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 14 below.

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Carbon nanotubes 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Single-walled carbon nanotubes 4 27 23 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 10 19 9

[0155] As shown in Example 8 and Comparative Example 6, it was confirmed that the addition of thymol to the buffer increased the current values, even when using either single-walled carbon nanotubes or multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Example 9

[0156] An electrode tip having a 9 mm.sup.2 working electrode section was produced using a sheet obtained by depositing gold on a PET substrate, in the same manner as in Example 1. To the working electrode section, 5 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.15% (w/v) single-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 1.1 to 1.7 nm), or 8.2 μL of a water dispersion containing 2% (w/v) sodium cholate and 0.092% (w/v) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (outer diameter: 5 to 15 nm), was added dropwise and dried. After drying the carbon nanotube dispersion, 5 μL of lactate oxidase (having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID No. 7; 20 U/μL) dissolved in ultrapure water was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried. After drying the lactate oxidase liquid, 5 μL of 3% (w/v) Nafion liquid was added dropwise to the working electrode section and dried to immobilize the carbon nanotubes and lactate oxidase on the working electrode. A 10% (w/v) thymol solution dissolved in 100% ethanol was added and mixed with a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to 0.01% (w/v).

[0157] The electrode tip produced above was set as the working electrode of an electrochemical analyzer (ALS/CHI 660B), a silver/silver chloride electrode was set as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire was set as the counter electrode. These electrodes were immersed in a sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.01% (w/v) thymol, and cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed. The cyclic voltammograms measured at lactic acid concentrations of 0 mM, 5 mM, and 12 mM are shown in FIG. 21 (single-walled carbon nanotubes) and FIG. 22 (multi-walled carbon nanotubes). In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 15 below.

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Current value (μA) (a) (b) 0 mM 12 mM Carbon nanotubes lactic acid lactic acid (b)-(a) Single-walled carbon nanotubes 1.3 3.4 2.1 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 11.3 33.2 21.9

Comparative Example 7

[0158] Cyclic voltammetry measurement was performed in the same manner as in Example 8, except that thymol was not added to a 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The obtained cyclic voltammograms are shown in FIG. 23 (single-walled carbon nanotubes) and FIG. 24 (multi-walled carbon nanotubes). In the cyclic voltammograms, the current values at +0.6 V when sweeping from −0.8 V to +0.8 V were as shown in Table 16 below.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Current value (μA) (a) (b) Carbon nanotubes 0 mM glucose 48 mM glucose (b)-(a) Single-walled carbon nanotubes 1.1 1.1 0.0 Multi-walled carbon nanotubes 8.4 9.2 0.8

[0159] As shown in Example 9 and Comparative Example 7, it was confirmed that the addition of thymol to the buffer increased the current values, even when using either single-walled carbon nanotubes or multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Sequence Listing

[0160]