Method for monitoring a gas sensor
11808732 · 2023-11-07
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01D53/9418
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01N2550/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2900/1402
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/0885
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01D53/9431
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01N11/007
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2570/18
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2610/102
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2610/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2610/1453
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2560/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T10/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F01N3/208
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2900/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/206
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2240/25
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/2006
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02A50/20
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
G01N27/4163
PHYSICS
B01D53/9495
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F01N2900/1616
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2550/03
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T10/12
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F01N2900/1614
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2560/026
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2550/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/0871
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/2066
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2900/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N2560/021
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N11/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F01N11/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F01N3/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A method for monitoring a gas sensor (14) which comprises two electrochemical measuring cells (20, 30) and which is arranged in an exhaust tract (10) of an internal combustion engine (11), wherein the sensor elements (20, 30) exhibit a substantially identical sensitivity towards a first gas component and a different sensitivity towards a second gas component and are insensitive towards further gas components. In an operating state in which an exhaust gas stream at the gas sensor (14) contains less of the second gas component than of the first gas component a concentration of the first gas component is calculated from each of the sensor signals from the sensor elements (20, 30) and a defect in a sensor element (20, 30) is deduced from the concentrations of the first gas component.
Claims
1. A method for monitoring a gas sensor (14) which comprises at least two electrochemical measuring cells (20, 30) and which is arranged in an exhaust tract (10) of an internal combustion engine (11), wherein the measuring cells (20, 30) exhibit a substantially identical sensitivity to a first gas component and a different sensitivity to a second gas component and are insensitive to other gas components, the method comprising: determining, in a first operating state in which an exhaust gas stream at the gas sensor (14) contains less of the second gas component than of the first gas component, a concentration of the first gas component from each of the sensor signals (S) from the measuring cells (20, 30), and determining a defect in a measuring cell (20, 30) from a comparison of the determined concentration of the first gas component for each measuring cell (20, 30).
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gas sensor (14) is arranged downstream of an SCR catalyst (13), the first gas component is ammonia (NH3) and the second gas component is nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein a defect is deduced when a difference in the calculated concentrations of the first gas component exceeds a threshold value.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the exhaust gas contains no second gas component in the operating state.
5. The method according to claim 2, wherein in second operating state in which the exhaust gas contains no nitrogen monoxide (NO) and no nitrogen dioxide (NO2) an ammonia concentration in the gas sensor (14) is determined from a signal from a nitrogen oxide sensor (50) of the gas sensor (14) and a defect is determined when a difference between this ammonia concentration and one of the calculated ammonia concentrations exceeds a threshold value.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the operating state is a coasting operation of the internal combustion engine (10).
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein an efficiency of the SCR catalyst (13) exceeds a threshold value in the operating state.
8. A computer-readable storage medium containing instructions that when executed by a computer cause the computer to monitor a gas sensor (14) which comprises at least two electrochemical measuring cells (20, 30) and which is arranged in an exhaust tract (10) of an internal combustion engine (11), wherein the measuring cells (20, 30) exhibit a substantially identical sensitivity to a first gas component and a different sensitivity to a second gas component and are insensitive to other gas components, by: determining, in a first operating state in which an exhaust gas stream at the gas sensor (14) contains less of the second gas component than of the first gas component, a concentration of the first gas component from each of the sensor signals (S) from the measuring cells (20, 30), and determining a defect in a measuring cell (20, 30) from a comparison of the determined concentration of the first gas component for each measuring cell (20, 30).
9. An electronic control unit (15) adapted for monitoring a gas sensor (14) by means of a method according to claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4) An exhaust tract 10 of an internal combustion engine 11 is shown in
(5)
(6) While the nitrogen oxide sensor 50 has the same sensitivity for ammonia, nitrogen monoxide and nitrogen dioxide and provides an aggregate signal of the concentration of these three gases in the exhaust gas the two measuring cells 20, 30 each have different sensitivities for these gases. Calibration makes it possible to obtain from the raw signals from the measuring cells 20, 30, which are dependent not only on the ammonia concentration but also on the oxygen concentration of the atmosphere, the mixed potentials of a corresponding ammonia concentration and nitrogen dioxide concentration. Such a calibration results, as shown in
(7) The gas sensor 14 may be monitored in different exemplary embodiments of the method according to the invention. A first exemplary embodiment of the method may be employed in an operating state in which the ammonia concentration downstream of the SCR catalyst 13 is markedly higher than the nitrogen dioxide concentration. This is the case for example when due to a high ammonia fill level of the SCR catalyst 13 and on account of a high temperature the efficiency of the SCR reaction is poor and desorption of ammonia, and thus ammonia slip, occur. In this operating state the contribution of the nitrogen dioxide to the two sensor signals S may be neglected to a good approximation and it may be assumed that both measuring cells 20, 30 are showing only the ammonia content of the exhaust gas. If the two sensor signals S differ by more than a threshold value, chosen to account for the fact that the nitrogen dioxide present in small amounts may result in differences between the two sensor signals S, it must be assumed that at least one of the two measuring cells 20, 30 is defective and an error is logged in the electronic control unit 15.
(8) In a second exemplary embodiment of the method according to the invention the exhaust gas contains no nitrogen dioxide downstream of the SCR catalyst 13. This may be achieved for example in an operating state in which an oxygen-poor combustion process at most permits the formation of nitrogen monoxide. In this exemplary embodiment it is also assumed that both sensor signals S each show the ammonia concentration in the exhaust gas downstream of the SCR catalyst 13. If they differ from one another by more than a threshold value then here too a defect of at least one of the two measuring cells 20, 30 is assumed. Since there is no disruptive influence from the presence of nitrogen dioxide this threshold value may be lower than in the first exemplary embodiment of the method.
(9) A third exemplary embodiment of the method may be employed in an operating state in which the exhaust gas contains no nitrogen oxides whatsoever. Such an operating state is present for example in a coasting operation of the internal combustion engine 11. Both the sensor signals S from the two measuring cells 20, 30 and the signal from the amperometric aggregate signal in this operating state correspond to the ammonia concentration downstream of the SCR catalyst 13. If the ammonia concentration determined by means of one of the measuring cells 20, 30 differs from that according to the nitrogen oxide sensor 50 it is assumed that the mixed potential cell having the deviating ammonia concentration is defective. If, by contrast, the ammonia concentrations from both measuring cells 20, 30 differ from that from the nitrogen oxide sensor 50 but are identical to one another, a defect in the nitrogen oxide sensor 50 may be deduced.