High electron mobility transistor structure including passivation capping layer and method of manufacturing the same
12520511 ยท 2026-01-06
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H10W74/43
ELECTRICITY
H10P74/207
ELECTRICITY
H10P14/6334
ELECTRICITY
H10D30/475
ELECTRICITY
H10P14/69433
ELECTRICITY
H10W74/137
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H10D30/01
ELECTRICITY
H01L21/02
ELECTRICITY
H10D30/47
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A method of manufacturing a high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure is disclosed. By controlling a passivation layer and a barrier layer to uninterruptedly grow in the same growth chamber, defects of the passivation layer generated in the growth process due to a drastic change in temperature, pressure, or atmosphere or degrading a quality of an interface between the passivation layer and the barrier layer could be avoided, thereby providing the passivation layer with a good quality and the interface between the passivation layer and the barrier layer with a good quality, so that the objective of improving the performance of the HEMT structure could be achieved.
Claims
1. A method of manufacturing a high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure, comprising steps of: A: providing a substrate; B: forming a nucleation layer on the substrate; C: forming a buffer layer on the nucleation layer; D: forming a channel layer on the buffer layer; E: depositing a barrier layer on the channel layer; wherein a growth temperature of the barrier layer is a first growth temperature; a two-dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) region is formed in the channel layer along an interface between the channel layer and the barrier layer; step E is performed in a growth chamber; and F: uninterruptedly depositing a passivation layer on the barrier layer in the growth chamber after performing step E, wherein a growth temperature of the passivation layer is controlled to increase from the first growth temperature to a second growth temperature through a heating session.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrier layer and the passivation layer are formed in an identical growth condition of pressure and atmosphere.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step F comprises controlling the growth temperature of the passivation layer to maintain at the second growth temperature in a constant high temperature session.
4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein a growth thickness of the passivation layer in the constant high temperature session is greater than or equal to 50% of a total thickness of the passivation layer.
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein step F comprises controlling the growth temperature of the passivation layer to firstly maintain at the first growth temperature in a constant low temperature session, and then to maintain at the second growth temperature in the constant high temperature session after heating in the heating session; the total thickness of the passivation layer is a sum of a growth thickness of the passivation layer in the constant low temperature session, a growth thickness of the passivation layer in the heating session, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer in the constant high temperature session; the growth thickness of the passivation layer in the constant low temperature session is between 0% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer in the heating session is between 0% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second growth temperature is greater than or equal to 1000 C.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a heating rate of the heating session is between 10 C./min and 30 C./min.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the heating session comprises at least one heating step; the at least one heating step comprises one to fifteen heating steps; a temperature is controlled to increase between 30 C. and 60 C. in each of the at least one heating step, and a heating rate in each of the at least one heating step is controlled to be less than or equal to 60 C./min.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the passivation layer comprises silicon nitride.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a total thickness of the passivation layer is less than or equal to 100 nm.
11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a refractive index of the passivation layer is between 2.05 and 2.28.
12. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the passivation layer is less than or equal to 0.5 nm.
13. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a breakdown voltage withstanding per unit thickness of the passivation layer is between 1 V/nm and 1.15 V/nm.
14. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising measuring a sheet resistance value of the 2-DEG region of the channel layer to obtain a first sheet resistance value and measuring the sheet resistance value of the 2-DEG region of the channel layer after a period of time to obtain a second sheet resistance value, wherein the period of time is greater than or equal to three months; an absolute value of a percentage change of the sheet resistance value is less than or equal to 0.1%; the percentage change of the sheet resistance value is defined as (the second sheet resistance valuethe first sheet resistance value)/the first sheet resistance value*100%.
15. A high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure, comprising in order: a substrate; a nucleation layer; a buffer layer; a channel layer; a barrier layer, wherein a two-dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) region is formed in the channel layer along an interface between the channel layer and the barrier layer; and a passivation layer; wherein a change of a sheet resistance value of the 2-DEG region of the channel layer in a period of time is less than or equal to 1%; the period of time is greater than or equal to three months.
16. The HEMT structure as claimed in claim 15, wherein a total thickness of the passivation layer is less than or equal to 100 nm.
17. The HEMT structure as claimed in claim 15, wherein a refractive index of the passivation layer is between 2.05 and 2.28.
18. The HEMT structure as claimed in claim 15, wherein a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the passivation layer is less than or equal to 0.5 nm.
19. The HEMT structure as claimed in claim 15, wherein a breakdown voltage withstanding per unit thickness of the passivation layer is between 1 V/nm and 1.15 V/nm.
20. The HEMT structure as claimed in claim 15, wherein the passivation layer comprises silicon nitride.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The present invention will be best understood by referring to the following detailed description of some illustrative embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(9) A method of manufacturing a High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT) structure according to an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
(10) In other words, after forming the barrier layer 50 in the growth chamber of a metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) device or the growth chamber of a molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) device, a semi-finished product obtained after step S10 is not removed from the growth chamber, i.e., the barrier layer 50 is not exposed to an atmosphere or an environment outside the growth chamber, and step S12 is directly performed in the growth chamber in a continuous way for forming the passivation layer 60. In other words, both the barrier layer 50 and the passivation layer 60 are formed in an identical growth condition of space, pressure, and atmosphere, and an initial growth temperature of the passivation layer 60 is the same as the growth temperature of the barrier layer 50, wherein the same atmosphere is to use an identical carrier gas, for example, hydrogen or nitrogen.
(11) Therefore, by controlling the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 to uninterruptedly grow in the same growth chamber, defects of the passivation layer 60 generated in the growth process due to a drastic change in temperature, pressure, or atmosphere and degrading a quality of an interface between the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 could be avoided, thereby providing the passivation layer 60 with a good quality and the interface between the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 with a good quality, so that the objective of improving the performance of the HEMT could be achieved.
(12) Step S12 includes controlling the growth temperature of the passivation layer 60 to maintain at the second growth temperature T2 in a constant high temperature session HT. In other words, referring to
(13) Referring to
(14) In still another embodiment, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT is 0% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is between 5% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is between 75% and 95% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60. In practice, a sum of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is less than or equal to 100% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60. In other words, referring to
(15) In still another embodiment, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT is between 0% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is between 5% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is between 50% and 95% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60. In practice, a sum of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is less than or equal to 100% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60.
(16) Preferably, a heating rate of the heating session RT is between 10 C./min and 30 C./min. Referring to
(17) A high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structure 1 manufactured through the aforementioned method of manufacturing the HEMT structure has a better thin film density, a better surface roughness performance, and a better ability of withstanding voltage, wherein a refractive index of the passivation layer 60 satisfies between 2.05 and 2.28, a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the passivation layer 60 is less than or equal to 0.5 nm, and a breakdown voltage withstanding per unit thickness of the passivation layer 60 is between 1 V/nm and 1.15 V/nm; the refractive index is obtained by measuring with an ellipsometer.
(18) Additionally, the method of manufacturing the HEMT structure includes measuring a sheet resistance value of the 2-DEG region of the channel layer 40 to obtain a first sheet resistance value and measuring the sheet resistance value of the 2-DEG region of the channel layer 40 after a period of time to obtain a second sheet resistance value, wherein the period of time is greater than or equal to three months. A percentage change of the sheet resistance value is defined as (the second sheet resistance valuethe first sheet resistance value)/the first sheet resistance value*100%. An absolute value of a percentage change of the sheet resistance value of the HEMT structure 1 manufactured through the aforementioned method is less than or equal to 0.1%. In other words, the HEMT structure 1 manufactured through the aforementioned method has a good sheet resistance value stability.
(19) Referring to Table 1, five comparative examples A to E and two embodiments A and B are illustrated in the below description. A second sheet resistance value of each of the comparative examples A to E and a second sheet resistance value of each of the embodiments A and B are measured to obtain four months after measuring a corresponding first sheet resistance value. The percentage change of the sheet resistance value is defined as above and is not repeated here.
The Comparative Examples A and B
(20) In the comparative examples A and B, a passivation layer 60 is not deposited on a barrier layer 50. The difference between the comparative example A and the comparative example B is that the RCA clean process is performed on a structure of the comparative example A after the first sheet resistance value of the comparative example A is measured, while the RCA clean process is not performed on a structure of the comparative example B after the first sheet resistance value of the comparative example B is measured. Referring to Table 1, a sheet resistance value of the structure of the comparative example A after the RCA clean process is greatly increased from 372.7 ohm/sq to 687 ohm/sq, while a percentage change of a sheet resistance value of the structure of the comparative example B is still as high as 3.57% even through the RCA clean process is not performed.
The Comparative Examples C to E
(21) In the comparative examples C to E, a passivation layer 60 is deposited on a barrier layer 50 in an interrupted way, wherein the interrupted way indicates that after depositing the barrier layer 50 in a growth chamber, the passivation layer 60 is not uninterruptedly grown in the same growth chamber with the same temperature, the same pressure, and the same atmosphere that the barrier layer 50 is deposited. The difference among the comparative example C to the comparative example E is that the RCA clean process is respectively performed on a structure of the comparative example C and a structure of the comparative example D after the corresponding first sheet resistance value is measured, while the RCA clean process is not performed on a structure of the comparative example E after the first sheet resistance value of the structure of the comparative example E is measured.
(22) Referring to Table 1, a sheet resistance value of the structure of the comparative example C and a sheet resistance value of the structure of the comparative example D measured after the RCA clean process do not greatly change and have some improvements compared with the sheet resistance value of the comparative example A, wherein the sheet resistance value of the comparative example A after the RCA clean process is 1.8 times greater than the first sheet resistance value of the comparative example A before the RCA clean process. In other words, by depositing the passivation layer 60 on the barrier layer 50, a sheet resistance value stability could be slightly improved. A percentage change of a sheet resistance value of the comparative example E still reaches 0.87% even through the RCA clean process is not performed.
The Embodiments A and B
(23) In the embodiments A and B, a passivation layer 60 is uninterruptedly deposited on a barrier layer 50 through the aforementioned method of manufacturing the HEMT structure. The difference between the embodiment A and the embodiment B is that the RCA clean process is performed on a structure of the embodiment A after the first sheet resistance value of the embodiment A is measured, while the RCA clean process is not performed on a structure of the embodiment B after the first sheet resistance value of the embodiment B is measured. Referring to Table 1, a sheet resistance value of the structure of the embodiment A after the RCA clean process does not greatly change, and a percentage change of the sheet resistance value of the structure of both the embodiment A and the embodiment B is 0.05%. In other words, the HEMT structure 1 manufactured through the aforementioned method of manufacturing the HEMT structure has a good sheet resistance value stability, and the absolute value of the percentage change of the sheet resistance value could be controlled to be less than 0.1%.
(24) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sheet First resistance Second Percentage sheet value after sheet change of resistance RCA clean resistance the sheet RCA clean value process value resistance Growth condition process (ohm/sq) (ohm/sq) (ohm/sq) value (%) The The passivation Yes 372.7 687 685 83.79 comparative layer is not example A deposited The The passivation No 369.7 382.9 3.57 comparative layer is not example B deposited The The passivation Yes 588.6 591.7 589.3 0.12 comparative layer with 40 nm example C is deposited in an interrupted way The The passivation Yes 537.9 537.6 538.8 0.17 comparative layer with 40 nm example D is deposited in an interrupted way The The passivation No 564.9 560 0.87 comparative layer with 40 nm example E is deposited in an interrupted way The The passivation Yes 386.1 385.5 385.9 0.05 embodiment layer with 40 nm A is uninterruptedly deposited The The passivation No 381.2 381 0.05 embodiment layer with 40 nm B is uninterruptedly deposited
(25) A comparative example 1 and four embodiments 1 to 4 are illustrated in the below description. In the comparative example 1 and the embodiments 1 to 4, after depositing a barrier layer 50, a passivation layer 60 is uninterruptedly grown in a growth chamber that the deposition of the barrier layer 50 takes place in with the same temperature, the same pressure, and the same atmosphere, wherein a first growth temperature T1 is 900 C., and a second growth temperature T2 is 1000 C.; a total thickness of the passivation layer 60 is the same as the aforementioned description, i.e., the sum of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT; the total thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the comparative example 1 is the same as the total thickness of the passivation layer 60 in each of the embodiments 1 to 4; a thickness percentage of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is a percentage of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT over the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, a thickness percentage of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is a percentage of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT over the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, and a thickness percentage of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT is a percentage of the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT over the total thickness of the passivation layer 60.
The Comparative Example 1
(26) Referring to
The Embodiment 1
(27) Referring to
The Embodiments 2 and 3
(28) Referring to
The Embodiment 4
(29) Referring to
(30) Referring to Table 2, as shown in the embodiments 1 to 4, when the passivation layer 60 satisfies that the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT is between 0% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is between 0% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, a thin film refractive index of the embodiments 1 to 4 is between 2.074 and 2.11; compared with a thin film refractive index of 2.014 of the comparative example 1, a structure of each of the embodiments 1 to 4 has a better refractive index performance.
(31) Additionally, as shown in the embodiments 2 and 3, when the passivation layer 60 satisfies that the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant low temperature session LT is 0% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is between 5% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is between 75% and 95% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, a breakdown voltage of the embodiment 2 is 1.05 V/nm and a breakdown voltage of the embodiment 3 is 1.1 V/nm, and both a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the embodiment 2 and a RMS roughness of the embodiment 3 are less than 0.5 nm, while a breakdown voltage of the comparative example 1 is 0.96 V/nm and an RMS roughness of the comparative example 1 is greater than 0.5 nm. In other words, both the structure of the embodiment 2 and the structure of the embodiment 3 have a better ability of withstanding voltage and a better RMS roughness performance than the comparative example 1.
(32) Moreover, as shown in the embodiments 2 to 4, when the passivation layer 60 satisfies that the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the heating session RT is between 5% and 25% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60 and the growth thickness of the passivation layer 60 in the constant high temperature session HT is between 50% and 95% of the total thickness of the passivation layer 60, a percentage change of a sheet resistance value of each of the embodiments 2 to 4 is less than or equal to 0.1%, while a percentage change of a resistance value of the comparative example 1 is larger than 0.5%; in other words, the structure of each of the embodiments 2 to 4 has a better sheet resistance value stability than the comparative example 1; additionally, as shown in the results of the embodiments 2 to 4, the first growth temperature T1 is controlled to increase to the second growth temperature T2 through the heating session RT in a period of time (the embodiments 2 to 4) during the growth process of the passivation layer 60, so that a structure with a better sheet resistance value stability could be obtained when compared with growing the passivation layer 60 completely in the constant low temperature session LT (the comparative example 1) or growing the passivation layer 60 completely in the constant high temperature session HT (the embodiment 1).
(33) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative Embodiment Embodiment Embodiment Embodiment example 1 1 2 3 4 Thickness percentage of the 0 100 75 95 50 passivation layer in the constant high temperature session HT (%) Thickness percentage of the 0 0 25 5 25 passivation layer in the heating session RT (%) Thickness percentage of the 100 0 0 0 25 passivation layer in the constant low temperature session LT (%) Refractive index 2.014 2.1 2.078 2.074 2.11 Breakdown voltage (V/nm) 0.96 1.04 1.05 1.1 0.95 Percentage change of the >0.5 0.5-0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 sheet resistance value (%) RMS roughness (nm) >0.5 >0.5 <0.5 <0.5 >0.5
(34) As shown in
(35) In the current embodiment, the passivation layer 60 includes silicon nitride. A total thickness of the passivation layer 60 is less than or equal to 100 nm, a refractive index of the passivation layer 60 is between 2.05 and 2.28, a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the passivation layer 60 is less than or equal to 0.5 nm, and a breakdown voltage withstanding per unit thickness of the passivation layer 60 is between 1 V/nm and 1.15V/nm. In other words, the HEMT structure 1 provided in the present invention has a better thin film density, a better surface roughness performance, a better ability of withstanding voltage, and a better sheet resistance value stability, thereby achieving the objective of increasing the stability of the HEMT.
(36) With the aforementioned design, by controlling the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 to uninterruptedly grow in the same growth chamber, defects of the passivation layer 60 generated in the growth process due to the drastic change in temperature, pressure, or atmosphere or degrading the quality of the interface between the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 could be avoided, thereby providing the passivation layer 60 with a good quality and the interface between the passivation layer 60 and the barrier layer 50 with a good quality, so that the objective of increasing the performance of the HEMT could be achieved. Additionally, the present invention further provides the HEMT structure 1. By forming the passivation layer 60, the change of the sheet resistance value of the two-dimensional electron gas (2-DEG) region of the channel layer 40 in the period of time is less than or equal to 1%, wherein the period of time is greater than or equal to three months, thereby achieving the objective of increasing the stability of the HEMT.
(37) It must be pointed out that the embodiments described above are only some preferred embodiments of the present invention. All equivalent structures and methods which employ the concepts disclosed in this specification and the appended claims should fall within the scope of the present invention.